On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 11:44:16AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Marc Haber writes:
>
> > The one we just had was tl;dr to me. The people pushing it gave me zero
> > motivation to read it, I spent my spare time on my packages.
While I can't speak for Russ, I did try to summarize in "normal"
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 04:59:35PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Personally, I think it's totally fine for decisions to be made by those
> of us that feel like we have an opinion, and for those that don't feel
> the need to vote to trust that the outcome from that will be reasonable.
>
> I don't
Russ Allbery dijo [Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 11:44:16AM -0800]:
> As the person proposing this GR, I think that's a perfectly reasonable
> stance to take, and to be quite honest one of my goals was to *not* give
> people a (negative) motivation to feel like they have to be involved. My
> explicit goal
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 12:40:46AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > It's understandable that there is no motivation to choose between two very
> > long and complicated (and similar but maybe not?) changes.
> >
>
> True, also (like in my case) I forced myself to find the time to read trough
> it
Bernd Zeimetz writes:
> So in general if there are such big and non-obvious changes to
> documents, I think the best option would be to have (require?) a side by
> side diff as PDF or in some other readable format available.
Wouter and I attempted to provide that via Salsa diffs, although the
On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 19:42 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> It's understandable that there is no motivation to choose between two very
> long and complicated (and similar but maybe not?) changes.
>
True, also (like in my case) I forced myself to find the time to read trough
it and
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:31:54AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 11:41:51PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 11:23:35PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > As of this writing, the tally sheet is still the dummy tally sheet, and
> > > it has not been
Marc Haber writes:
> The one we just had was tl;dr to me. The people pushing it gave me zero
> motivation to read it, I spent my spare time on my packages.
As the person proposing this GR, I think that's a perfectly reasonable
stance to take, and to be quite honest one of my goals was to *not*
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 03:31:12PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> I think its a bit sad that even in Debian the motivation to vote seems to be
> pretty low. I'm wondering if there is anything we can do to motivate more
> people to vote.
Generally, I tend to vote when I see a technical benefit or
Wouter Verhelst schrieb:
> In that case, the problem is that the links to the tally sheet still
> point to the dummy sheet; if you go to the vote's page, then click on
> the "statistics" link, and next on the "tally sheet" one, you get the
> dummy tally sheet.
I don't (neither yesterday nor
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 8:00 AM Philip Hands wrote:
>
> I don't see how encouraging people to vote who lack either an opinion on
> the subject in hand, or the motivation to vote, is supposed to improve
> the outcome.
Yeah, I think it's based on mathematics.
On average, higher turnout
Hi all
El 31/1/22 a las 16:59, Philip Hands escribió:
Felix Lechner writes:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 6:37 AM Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
I'm wondering if there is anything we can do to motivate more
people to vote.
>From Wikipedia's page on 'Get Out the Vote': [1]
"GOTV is often most
Felix Lechner writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 6:37 AM Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>>
>> I'm wondering if there is anything we can do to motivate more
>> people to vote.
>
>>From Wikipedia's page on 'Get Out the Vote': [1]
>
> "GOTV is often most effective when potential voters are told
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 6:37 AM Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>
> I'm wondering if there is anything we can do to motivate more
> people to vote.
>From Wikipedia's page on 'Get Out the Vote': [1]
"GOTV is often most effective when potential voters are told to do
so "because others will
On 1/31/22 15:42, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 03:31:12PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
The details of the results are available at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003
I think its a bit sad that even in Debian the motivation to vote seems to be
pretty low. I'm
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 03:31:12PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > The details of the results are available at:
> > https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003
>
> I think its a bit sad that even in Debian the motivation to vote seems to be
> pretty low. I'm wondering if there is anything we can do
Hi,
> The details of the results are available at:
> https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003
I think its a bit sad that even in Debian the motivation to vote seems to be
pretty low. I'm wondering if there is anything we can do to motivate more
people to vote.
Bernd
--
Bernd Zeimetz
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 11:41:51PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 11:23:35PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > As of this writing, the tally sheet is still the dummy tally sheet, and it
> > has not been replaced with the real one.
>
> I don't see a problem. This looks like
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 11:23:35PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> As of this writing, the tally sheet is still the dummy tally sheet, and it
> has not been replaced with the real one.
I don't see a problem. This looks like the real tally sheet:
As of this writing, the tally sheet is still the dummy tally sheet, and it has
not been replaced with the real one.
What's happening?
--
Verstuurd vanaf mijn Android apparaat met K-9 Mail. Excuseer mijn beknoptheid.
Hi,
The winner of the General Resolution is:
Choice 1: "Amend resolution process, set maximum discussion period"
The details of the results are available at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
21 matches
Mail list logo
