On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:50:19PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:07:18PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
C. Reaffirms its continued support of users whose hardware (or
software) requires works which are not freely
== BEGIN PROPOSAL =
The Free Software movement is about enabling users to modify the works
that they use on their computer; about giving users the same
information that copyright holders and upstream developers have. As
such, a critical part of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I second the below proposal.
== BEGIN PROPOSAL =
The Free Software movement is about enabling users to modify the works
that they use on their computer; about giving users the same
information that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I second this proposal.
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because there appears to be some residual confusion[1][2][3] about
what I actually proposed and its content, here is the proposal as it
currently stands. The proposal is only the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Armstrong schrieb am Montag, den 18. September 2006:
I also second this clarified proposal.
== BEGIN PROPOSAL =
The Free Software movement is about enabling users to modify the works
that they
I second this proposal.
== BEGIN PROPOSAL =
The Free Software movement is about enabling users to modify the works
that they use on their computer; about giving users the same
information that copyright holders and upstream developers have. As
Hi,
I second this proposal:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
== BEGIN PROPOSAL =
The Free Software movement is about enabling users to modify the works
that they use on their computer; about giving users the same
information that copyright
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:07:18PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
Because there appears to be some residual confusion[1][2][3] about
what I actually proposed and its content, here is the proposal as it
currently stands. The proposal is only the content between BEGIN
PROPOSAL and END PROPOSAL.
I
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:07:18PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
D. Requests that vendors of hardware, even those whose firmware is
not loaded by the operating system, provide the prefered form for
modification so that purchasers of their hardware can
exercise their freedom to
Seconded.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:07:18PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
== BEGIN PROPOSAL =
The Free Software movement is about enabling users to modify the works
that they use on their computer; about giving users the same
information that
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:07:18PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
C. Reaffirms its continued support of users whose hardware (or
software) requires works which are not freely licensed or whose
source is not available by making such works
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:07:18PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
== BEGIN PROPOSAL =
The Free Software movement is about enabling users to modify the works
that they use on their computer; about giving users the same
information that copyright
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Enrico Zini wrote:
In this view, I see two problems with your GR:
1. It needs a separate vote to affirm we happen to need it.
Yes, that's by design. IMO such a exception to the SC/DFSG should be
addressed explicitely by a GR doing exactly that and specifically
setting
I'd like to propose the following option to the current GR process.
As I will (starting late sunday PDT) be away for a week and a few days
at Burning Man,[i] I will be unable to appropriately respond to
corrections and suggested amendments during that time. However, I will
do so immediately at my
Le ven 25 août 2006 08:51, Don Armstrong a écrit :
I second that proposition
=
The Free Software movement is about enabling users to modify the
works that they use on their computer; about giving users the same
information
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Don Armstrong wrote:
D. Requests that vendors of hardware, even those whose firmware is
not loaded by the operating system, provide the prefered form for
modification so that purchasers of their hardware are can
This should read 'hardware can exercise'; I had
Don Armstrong schrieb am Donnerstag, den 24. August 2006:
I'd like to propose the following option to the current GR process.
I second this proposal.
As I will (starting late sunday PDT) be away for a week and a few days
at Burning Man,[i] I will be unable to appropriately respond to
Hello,
I second this proposal independently of the presence of the D clause,
although I prefer it being not removed.
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to propose the following option to the current GR process.
As I will (starting late sunday PDT) be away for a week and a few
René van Bevern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I second this proposal independently of the presence of the D clause,
although I prefer it being not removed.
Same for me; with or without are
Regards, Frank
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to propose the following option
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:51:51PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
4. Finally, if in the context of the release of etch, we need to
compromise our ideals and accept programmatic works without source,
we should do so by specifically exempting them from DFSG 2 for the
purpose of releasing
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 01:20:19PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:51:51PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
4. Finally, if in the context of the release of etch, we need to
compromise our ideals and accept programmatic works without source,
we should do so by
I second this proposal.
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:51:51PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
I'd like to propose the following option to the current GR process.
As I will (starting late sunday PDT) be away for a week and a few days
at Burning Man,[i] I will be unable to appropriately respond to
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:51:51PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
I'd like to propose the following option to the current GR process.
I like your proposal too. As for D, maybe we could word it a bit differently,
as it will be a arduous task, with little success chances in the general case.
Maybe
Alexander Wirt schrieb am Freitag, den 25. August 2006:
Don Armstrong schrieb am Donnerstag, den 24. August 2006:
I'd like to propose the following option to the current GR process.
I second this proposal.
I have to say a few mores word to it. It would be fully ok for me if we
release etch
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
René van Bevern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I second this proposal independently of the presence of the D clause,
although I prefer it being not removed.
Same for me
Ah, yes, and to make things clear: While I second this proposal, I
still think
25 matches
Mail list logo
