Re: Question for Charles Plessy (was: No answer for insulting and accusatory emails.)

2010-03-24 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 08:12:17PM +, Neil McGovern a écrit : > > The position of DPL attracts rather a lot of press attention. This at > times will be accusatory, inflamatory and downright rude. Welcome to the > world of journalism. > > Do you intend to ignore these, or just ones from develo

Re: Question for Charles Plessy (was: No answer for insulting and accusatory emails.)

2010-03-24 Thread Neil McGovern
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:36:05AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Lastly, for the meaning of ‘accusatory’, perhaps I could have found a > better word? But I am not a native speaker. What I mean is that if in > one message, somebody writes ‘you want this [bad thing]’ or ‘you did > not do that [good

Re: Question for Charles Plessy (was: No answer for insulting and accusatory emails.)

2010-03-24 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:46:22AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a écrit : > > That opens up for an interesting question: What ways to settle a > conflict with fellow Debian Developers seem proper to you? Do we have > to expect further unspecified ignores from your side should you be > el

Question for Charles Plessy (was: No answer for insulting and accusatory emails.)

2010-03-24 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi Charles, Charles Plessy schrieb: just for the record, I will not answer to insulting or accusatory emails. Some of them may contain interesting questions or comments, though. Please feel free to repeat them in a separate message if you also found them interesting. That opens up for an inte