El día 02 feb 2003, Branden Robinson escribía:
[Reply-To is set. This message is written with the intention of
soliciting private replies; however, if you want to reply to debian-vote
as well, go ahead.]
Hi folks,
Won't you publish the results of the survey?
Won't you run for DPL this
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:11:27AM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
Won't you publish the results of the survey?
Yes; please see:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200302/msg6.html
Won't you run for DPL this year? (Deadline is today 00:00 UTC)
Yes, please see:
El día 02 feb 2003, Branden Robinson escribía:
[Reply-To is set. This message is written with the intention of
soliciting private replies; however, if you want to reply to debian-vote
as well, go ahead.]
Hi folks,
Won't you publish the results of the survey?
Won't you run for DPL this
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:31:49AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:44:37PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Originally I planned to incorporate whatever feedback I received
into my Platform, but now I'm less sure that's the right way to go.
It is a bad idea. If you
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:31:49AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:44:37PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Originally I planned to incorporate whatever feedback I received
into my Platform, but now I'm less sure that's the right way to go.
It is a bad idea. If you
overall, i'd probably vote for you if it wasn't for the fact that you're
against having non-free in the debian ftp archives. in fact, i'd be
tempted to vote for even knowing that you're against non-free, because
the majority of developers would probably vote down any attempt to
remove it. you
* Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-02-05 21:20]:
one day an inactive developer will become active again, and they
shouldn't have to go through the whole New Maintainer process
They generally don't have to go through NM again, just to submit their
GPG keys.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL
Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IMO, the fact that you're confrontational and opinionated is a good
thing. the DPL should take a far more active and front-line role,
and set the agenda (for action and for debate).
Agree completely. Bonus points for not leaving in a huff when things
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:20:13PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
you also did a good job at the thankless task of Treasurer. it's a crap
job, but somebody has to do it, and you did it well with regular reports
and updates and generally showed good organisational skills.
I appreciate the
overall, i'd probably vote for you if it wasn't for the fact that you're
against having non-free in the debian ftp archives. in fact, i'd be
tempted to vote for even knowing that you're against non-free, because
the majority of developers would probably vote down any attempt to
remove it. you
* Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-02-05 21:20]:
one day an inactive developer will become active again, and they
shouldn't have to go through the whole New Maintainer process
They generally don't have to go through NM again, just to submit their
GPG keys.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL
Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IMO, the fact that you're confrontational and opinionated is a good
thing. the DPL should take a far more active and front-line role,
and set the agenda (for action and for debate).
Agree completely. Bonus points for not leaving in a huff when things
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:20:13PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
you also did a good job at the thankless task of Treasurer. it's a crap
job, but somebody has to do it, and you did it well with regular reports
and updates and generally showed good organisational skills.
I appreciate the
* Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-02-02 17:58]:
To that end, I am soliciting specific feedback by means of the
questionnaire below. If you have perspectives and opinions you
would like to communicate to me on the subjects addressed below,
please reply to me privately and GPG-sign
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 05:58:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
1. Rank the following possible functions of Debian Project Leader in
[snip - ranking system]
[ 2 ] attending trade shows and conferences
[ 1 ] resolving disputes internal to the Project
[ 2 ] representing Debian
[Reposted to -vote, so interesting parties, such as other
maybe-DPL-candidates can benefit from my answers, or have a good laugh
at my ignorance, etc, etc, appropriate thing should be underlined.
By the way, I would be interested in what other people answered, so
please Cc the list too!]
1.
Martin == Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin * Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-02-02
Martin 17:58]:
To that end, I am soliciting specific feedback by means of the
questionnaire below. If you have perspectives and opinions you
would like to
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:44:37PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I hope you can post a summary. I found many questions very
interesting since you touch the question of the role of the DPL.
I think it would be interesting for other candidates (and for the
community as a whole) to hear what
* Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030203 17:05a:
I find your questions relevant to the overall understanding of
the debian project and the position of the DPL. I wish we would
see discussion on this and i propose to discuss this at debconf
in some form or an other in great(er) depth.
1.
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
19. Should decisions about DFSG-compliance be made on the
debian-legal list, or should we have a more formalized body for
making such decisions?
debian legal has the experts, they should know and feel responsible
and decide
Since when are they
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:05:37AM -0800, David N. Welton wrote:
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
19. Should decisions about DFSG-compliance be made on the
debian-legal list, or should we have a more formalized body for
making such decisions?
debian legal has the experts,
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:05:37AM -0800, David N. Welton wrote:
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
debian legal has the experts, they should know and feel responsible
and decide
Since when are they 'experts'? Frankly, I want to see some law
degrees, or the equivalent work
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:05:37AM -0800, David N. Welton wrote:
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
19. Should decisions about DFSG-compliance be made on the
debian-legal list, or should we have a more formalized body for
making
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
---CUT HERE-
1. Rank the following possible functions of Debian Project Leader in
order from most important to least important by placing a digit
between the brackets to the left of the
* Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-02-02 17:58]:
To that end, I am soliciting specific feedback by means of the
questionnaire below. If you have perspectives and opinions you
would like to communicate to me on the subjects addressed below,
please reply to me privately and GPG-sign
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 05:58:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
1. Rank the following possible functions of Debian Project Leader in
[snip - ranking system]
[ 2 ] attending trade shows and conferences
[ 1 ] resolving disputes internal to the Project
[ 2 ] representing Debian
[Reposted to -vote, so interesting parties, such as other
maybe-DPL-candidates can benefit from my answers, or have a good laugh
at my ignorance, etc, etc, appropriate thing should be underlined.
By the way, I would be interested in what other people answered, so
please Cc the list too!]
1.
Martin == Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin * Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-02-02
Martin 17:58]:
To that end, I am soliciting specific feedback by means of the
questionnaire below. If you have perspectives and opinions you
would like to
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:44:37PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I hope you can post a summary. I found many questions very
interesting since you touch the question of the role of the DPL.
I think it would be interesting for other candidates (and for the
community as a whole) to hear what
* Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030203 17:05a:
I find your questions relevant to the overall understanding of
the debian project and the position of the DPL. I wish we would
see discussion on this and i propose to discuss this at debconf
in some form or an other in great(er) depth.
1.
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
19. Should decisions about DFSG-compliance be made on the
debian-legal list, or should we have a more formalized body for
making such decisions?
debian legal has the experts, they should know and feel responsible
and decide
Since when are they
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:05:37AM -0800, David N. Welton wrote:
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
19. Should decisions about DFSG-compliance be made on the
debian-legal list, or should we have a more formalized body for
making such decisions?
debian legal has the experts,
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:05:37AM -0800, David N. Welton wrote:
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
debian legal has the experts, they should know and feel responsible
and decide
Since when are they 'experts'? Frankly, I want to see some law
degrees, or the equivalent work
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:05:37AM -0800, David N. Welton wrote:
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
19. Should decisions about DFSG-compliance be made on the
debian-legal list, or should we have a more formalized body for
making
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
---CUT HERE-
1. Rank the following possible functions of Debian Project Leader in
order from most important to least important by placing a digit
between the brackets to the left of the
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 06:32:45PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
* Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030203 17:05a:
I find your questions relevant to the overall understanding of
the debian project and the position of the DPL.
Ugh. We have a three week campaigning period. Can we leave
36 matches
Mail list logo
