Re: Proposed GR: Repeal the 2005 vote for declassification of the debian-private mailing list

[Kurt Roeckx]

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 06:53:01PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Then there is a proposal from Iain Lane :
> 
> 
> Title: debian-private shall remain private
> 
>   1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of
>  debian-private list archives" is repealed.
>   2. There shall be no declassification of any portion of the
>  debian-private archives, except when the authors of all material
>  being declassified have explicitly consented.
>   3. Participants are reminded to use -private only when necessary.
> 
> 

Just to clarify, it wasn't proposed as a real option yet.


Kurt

Re: GR proposal: give up on declassifying debian-private (Re: General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private results)

[Kurt Roeckx]

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 09:37:05AM +0200, Ond??ej Surý wrote:
> Just found out about Gunnar's proposal in the debian-vote archive, so I
> am seconding Gunnar's proposal from 20160902041505.gd3...@gwolf.org
> (https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2016/09/msg4.html)

This is not signed.  Please sign your message.


Kurt

Re: Proposed GR: Repeal the 2005 vote for declassification of the debian-private mailing list

[Kurt Roeckx]

On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:15:05PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> === BEGIN GR TEXT ===
> 
> Title: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private.
> 
> 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private
>lisa archives" is repealed.
> 2. In keeping with paragraph 3 of the Debian Social Contract, Debian
>Developers are strongly encouraged to use the debian-private mailing
>list only for discussions that should not be disclosed.
> 
> === END GR TEXT ===

So to clarify the situation, I can find (signed) seconds from:
- Thibaut Paumard 
- Bart Martens 
- Didier 'OdyX' Raboud 
- Holger Levsen 

There is also an unsigned second from:
- Ondrej Sury 

Then there is a proposal from Iain Lane :


Title: debian-private shall remain private

  1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of
 debian-private list archives" is repealed.
  2. There shall be no declassification of any portion of the
 debian-private archives, except when the authors of all material
 being declassified have explicitly consented.
  3. Participants are reminded to use -private only when necessary.



Which is prefered by Steve M. Robbins , and I'm
not sure I should count that as a second.

Then there is Ian Jackson's proposal with 2 seconds:
- Micha Lenk 
- Gunnar Wolf 


Did I miss something?


Kurt

Re: GR proposal: give up on declassifying debian-private (Re: General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private results)

[Ondřej Surý]

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 06:52:44PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 09:37:05AM +0200, Ond??ej Surý wrote:
> > Just found out about Gunnar's proposal in the debian-vote archive, so I
> > am seconding Gunnar's proposal from 20160902041505.gd3...@gwolf.org
> > (https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2016/09/msg4.html)
> 
> This is not signed.  Please sign your message.

Ack, hope signing the reply will suffice to express that I second the Gunnar's 
proposal.

Ondrej


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: GR proposal: give up on declassifying debian-private (Re: General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private results)

[Kurt Roeckx]

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 09:46:19PM +0200, Ond??ej Surý wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 06:52:44PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 09:37:05AM +0200, Ond??ej Surý wrote:
> > > Just found out about Gunnar's proposal in the debian-vote archive, so I
> > > am seconding Gunnar's proposal from 20160902041505.gd3...@gwolf.org
> > > (https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2016/09/msg4.html)
> > 
> > This is not signed.  Please sign your message.
> 
> Ack, hope signing the reply will suffice to express that I second the 
> Gunnar's proposal.

Yes,

So that proposal has 5 seconds now, and so is accepted.


Kurt