Hi,
after reading some of the rebuttals, I have some questions for
all the candidates (some questions make more sense for the candidates
who are also in the DPL board that I suggested, but others are free to
respond as if they were part of the board). When I look at those questions,
I have the
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 00:34:44 -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
I feel the real concerns for kfreebsd porters are in getting patches
accepted, and having some additional resources. For now this may be
accomplished outside the Debian resources, but official recognition might
make things more
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007, Kari Pahula wrote:
I would like to hear what the candidates think about the non-free
section. Is having it hosted on Debian's infrastructure still worth
it?
It was never worth it. It has brought disagreement with the FSF
(nothing new, I know) which as a result did not
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:55:06AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
after reading some of the rebuttals, I have some questions for
all the candidates (some questions make more sense for the candidates
who are also in the DPL board that I suggested, but others are free to
respond as if they
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
1/ Why do you think that alone you'll be able to take consensual decisions
if
you fear that you're not able to convince a small set of open-minded
Debian developers?
It's not about being able to take consensual decisions; it's about the
fact
Hi,
I have question to Sam Hocevar.
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 07:08:50PM +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
I am a little curious at a disjuncture I see between your platform and
some of your actions, and I am hoping you can explain. In your platform,
you
On Thu, Mar 8, 2007 at 00:53:33 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
I took this as the approval of the fact that you (Sam Hocevar) created
this site.
It looks like you didn't read Sam's answers in this thread. See for
example [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007, Osamu Aoki wrote:
I took this as the approval of the fact that you (Sam Hocevar) created
this site.
I DID NOT CREATE THIS WEBSITE AND I AM NOT A MEMBER OF THIS ORGANISATION.
KINDEST REGARDS,
--
SAM.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:58:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Try please, blow me away.
In your opinion, is it ever appropriate for any of the
following parties to insist on being blown away in exchange
for removing an obstacle to other developers' work? If so, when?
1) DPL
2) ftpmaster
3)
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:02:36PM +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007, Osamu Aoki wrote:
I took this as the approval of the fact that you (Sam Hocevar) created
this site.
I DID NOT CREATE THIS WEBSITE AND I AM NOT A MEMBER OF THIS ORGANISATION.
Good to know this :-)
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:16:13PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
1/ Why do you think that alone you'll be able to take consensual
decisions if
you fear that you're not able to convince a small set of open-minded
Debian developers?
It's
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:03:54AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:58:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Try please, blow me away.
In your opinion, is it ever appropriate for any of the
following parties to insist on being blown away in exchange
for removing an obstacle
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:43:41PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by this question, or what the point is.
I will clarify. AJ obviously feels that it is his prerogative (under
which hat or set of hats, I do not know) to decide which set of
architectures in the archive
Clint Adams wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:43:41PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by this question, or what the point is.
I will clarify. AJ obviously feels that it is his prerogative (under
which hat or set of hats, I do not know) to decide which set of
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:14:05PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:43:41PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by this question, or what the point is.
I will clarify. AJ obviously feels that it is his prerogative (under
which hat or set of hats, I
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007, Clint Adams wrote:
Now it is unclear which hat AJ is wearing when he implies that he is
authorized to decide which architectures are important, by criteria he
decides unilaterally. I am curious as to what the other candidates
think: is it appropriate for him to do this,
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:02:36PM +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007, Osamu Aoki wrote:
I took this as the approval of the fact that you (Sam Hocevar) created
this site.
I DID NOT CREATE THIS WEBSITE AND I AM NOT A MEMBER OF THIS ORGANISATION.
KINDEST REGARDS,
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 05:47:45AM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
The idea itself is not a bad one, however during the entire course of
the experiment it was never questioned by the proponents that we should
go through with it. Declaring it an experiment did not have the desired
effect of
Hi,
How much time do you generally have to read Debian-related e-mail?
How much for the Debian mailing lists?
How many lists do you follow, and which ones do you pay real attention to?
Have you stopped following a Debian mailing list in the past, and if so,
what was the most important/common
19 matches
Mail list logo
