Hi.
I'd support a proposal that focused on reaffirming the decisions that
have already been taken, and it sort of sounds like you're doing that.
However, I think your proposal goes significantly further than I'd like.
So, I'd rank your proposal significantly below Lucas's proposal.
however, if
Dears,
I'd like to draft an alternative proposal to the GR.
Would anybody consider it a nice addition to the proposals we
currently have, and eventually second it if I asked for it?
Of course, improvements to the text are much more than welcome!
** Begin Alternative Proposal **
Proposal:
Luca Falavigna dktrkranz at debian.org writes:
2. Freedom of upstream discrection
Upstream Developers considering a specific Free Software (including,
but not limited to, a particular init system executed as PID 1)
fundamental to deliver the best Software releases, are fully entitled
Hi Luca,
On Freitag, 17. Oktober 2014, Luca Falavigna wrote:
I'd like to draft an alternative proposal to the GR.
Would anybody consider it a nice addition to the proposals we
currently have, and eventually second it if I asked for it?
yes, I would. This proposal looks great! Many thanks!
Hi,
On Freitag, 17. Oktober 2014, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Note that this paragraph *directly* goes against the *definition* of
a software distribution (take upstream software and integrate it with
the whole, occasionally going against upstream’s will) and towards a
unified userland.exe…
wait,
2014-10-17 11:17 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.org:
Note that this paragraph *directly* goes against the *definition* of
a software distribution (take upstream software and integrate it with
the whole, occasionally going against upstream’s will) and towards a
unified userland.exe…
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:14:22AM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
I'd like to draft an alternative proposal to the GR.
Would anybody consider it a nice addition to the proposals we
currently have, and eventually second it if I asked for it?
I'd second this.
Thanks!
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
On 17 October 2014 10:14, Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org wrote:
Dears,
I'd like to draft an alternative proposal to the GR.
Would anybody consider it a nice addition to the proposals we
currently have, and eventually second it if I asked for it?
Of course, improvements to the text are
Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org writes:
I'd like to draft an alternative proposal to the GR.
Would anybody consider it a nice addition to the proposals we
currently have, and eventually second it if I asked for it?
I'd second this proposal.
--
|8]
pgpd8kf_TBaYa.pgp
Description: PGP
Hi,
Upstream Developers considering a specific Free Software (including,
but not limited to, a particular init system executed as PID 1)
fundamental to deliver the best Software releases, are fully entitled
to require, link, or depend on that Software, or portions of it.
Note that
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:30:46PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
Upstream Developers considering a specific Free Software (including,
but not limited to, a particular init system executed as PID 1)
fundamental to deliver the best Software releases, are fully entitled
to require,
the problem with this proposal is that if your strip out all the
feelgood propaganda fluff misusing the word freedom, what it's
actually saying is that package maintainers don't have to even attempt
to maintain compatibility with non-systemd init systems, and making
it acceptable to perform
12 matches
Mail list logo
