On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:25:56PM +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 28/06/07 at 05:49 +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Yes, please sent it, I'll publish it somewhere.
If you are not too ashamed of your scripts, I'd like to see them as
well, if you don't mind.
Hi,
Thanks to Felipe, the
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On 28/06/07 at 05:49 +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Yes, please sent it, I'll publish it somewhere.
If you are not too ashamed of your scripts, I'd like to see them as
well, if you don't mind.
Hi,
Thanks to Felipe, the lists of possible candidates are now
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 04:30:46PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On 28/06/07 at 05:49 +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Thanks to Felipe, the lists of possible candidates are now public. See:
* list of non-DD Maintainers or Uploaders, sorted by the number of
packages:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:16:47PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:25:56PM +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 28/06/07 at 05:49 +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Yes, please sent it, I'll publish it somewhere.
If you are not too ashamed of your scripts, I'd like to see
On sam, 2007-06-30 at 16:30 +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
It would probably be helpful to clean the listing from those in NM.
I guess I know a way to clean them :)
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On 28/06/07 at 05:49 +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Yes, please sent it, I'll publish it somewhere.
If you are not too ashamed of your scripts, I'd like to see them as
well, if you don't mind.
Hi,
Thanks to Felipe, the lists of possible candidates are now public. See:
* list of non-DD
On 27/06/07 at 21:42 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 26/06/07 at 16:57 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:35:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Someone with access to the real keyrings would be
able to tell you the
On 26/06/07 at 16:57 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:35:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Someone with access to the real keyrings would be
able to tell you the right number.
TTBOMK, the real keyring can be obtained by ssh by DDs, at
Hi Anthony,
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 21:29, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:18:57AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
However, like Pierre, I'm not convinced that the numbers of actually
interested people is large.
FWIW, I'm happy to put the work into this even if not many people
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 10:58:13PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Notes: package should generally be co-maintained by sponsor and non-DD
maintainer, with the non-DD maintainer doing most of the work
If you restrict this use case to that specific case, then you won't
have a lot of
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 11:17:44AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 21:29, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:18:57AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
However, like Pierre, I'm not convinced that the numbers of actually
interested people is large.
FWIW, I'm
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 11:17:44AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 21:29, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:18:57AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
However, like Pierre, I'm not convinced that the numbers of
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:03:36PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 10:58:13PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Notes: package should generally be co-maintained by sponsor and non-DD
maintainer, with the non-DD maintainer doing most of the work
If you restrict this use
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
== Upstream Maintainers ==
[...]
Authorised by: Existing maintainer
Notes: package should be co-maintained by maintainer and upstream, upstream
generally to be expected to be uploading code changes rather than
packaging changes
I'm not sure I
On Monday 25 June 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
== Sponsored Maintainers =
For packages that're maintained by non-DDs on an ongoing basis via
sponsored uploads, DM status provides the sponsor with the opportunity
to change the upload priveleges from default-deny to default-allow
once they
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
== N-M Delays
This one suck, because NM delays are mostly fixeable, and DM will just
make them not painful at all for DD, depriving the system to be fixed.
This is exactly the use case I fear.
That's why I'd like some
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 10:13:31AM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
Do we have any numbers on how many non-DD maintainers we have? I'm part of
that group, but how large a group is this?
There are about 2100 unique email address in the Maintainer: and
Uploaders: field in the unstable
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 02:50:59PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
So here's a proposal for the Debian Maintainers idea that's been floating
around for some time now [...]
I've used terms like initial policy quite a bit -- [...]
Shortly before leaving
Hi!
* Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070626 13:51]:
There are about 2100 unique email address in the Maintainer: and
Uploaders: field in the unstable Sources files. That counts mailing
lists and potentially multiple alternate addresses for DDs as well as
non-DD maintainers of course.
I
cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
Do we have any numbers on how many non-DD maintainers we have? I'm part of
that group, but how large a group is this?
A very long one-liner[1] gets me 992 in the main unstable archive. Of course
the number is different since the debian-keyring in the unstable
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:35:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Someone with access to the real keyrings would be
able to tell you the right number.
TTBOMK, the real keyring can be obtained by ssh by DDs, at
merkel:/srv/keyring.debian.org/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg
and via anonymous
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:18:57AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
However, like Pierre, I'm not convinced that the numbers of actually
interested people is large.
FWIW, I'm happy to put the work into this even if not many people end
up using it.
Cheers,
aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:35:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Someone with access to the real keyrings would be
able to tell you the right number.
TTBOMK, the real keyring can be obtained by ssh by DDs, at
merkel:/srv/keyring.debian.org/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:18:57AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
However, like Pierre, I'm not convinced that the numbers of actually
interested people is large.
I suspect one reason that this thread hasn't resulted in many people
expressing an interest is that non-DDs tend not to read
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du mercredi 27 juin 2007, vers 01:06, Paul
Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
I'm a fairly active (non-DD) member of the Java Packaging team, and I
also maintain a couple of non-Java packages. Although I'm starting to
become reasonably skilled at Java packaging, I'm
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 02:50:59PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
So here's a proposal for the Debian Maintainers idea that's been floating
around for some time now [...]
I've used terms like initial policy quite a bit -- [...]
Shortly before leaving DebConf someone (whose name I've forgotten,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
Shortly before leaving DebConf someone (whose name I've forgotten,
sadly) suggested that some sample use cases for the DM process might be
useful. Here's some that come to my mind:
Another use case that I'd like to mention is the Ubuntu maintainer
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 07:45:20PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
== N-M queue =
Authorised by: AM
This one makes sense. I'd also add the sponsor in the people giving
the ACK.
== Sponsored Maintainers =
Authorised by: Sponsor
Notes: package should generally be
28 matches
Mail list logo
