Bug#1020616: RFP: gnome-browser-connector -- GNOME Shell extensions integration for web browsers

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: gnome-browser-connector Version : 42.1 Upstream Author : Yuri Konotopov * URL : https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeShellIntegrationForChrome * License : GPLv3 Programming Lang: Python Description :

Bug#768073: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#768073: ITP: lxd - The Linux Container Daemon

Hi, On 08/01/2021 05:07, peylight wrote: > Hi Dear Debian Developers, > Can you check the 331th message of LXD packaging please: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768073#311 > Thanks for your interest in LXD packaging - and sorry for the late reply. The issue with said

Bug#768073: ITP: lxd - The Linux Container Daemon

Hi, On 27/09/2020 20:23, Kurt Kremitzki wrote: > Hello, > > With the release of LXD 4.6 [1], it should now be a lot easier for it to be > brought to Debian: > > "Dqlite changes > > Shortly after LXD 4.5 was released, a major change was made to upstream > dqlite. > > Rather than relying on

Bug#905068: ITP: libdqlite - High-availability SQLite with Raft consensus (Was: Re: ITP: golang-github-canonicalltd-dqlite -- Distributed SQLite for Go applications)

retitle -1 ITP: libdqlite - High-availability SQLite with Raft consensus thanks On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:24:36 +0800 (CST) "Clement Hermann" wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Clement Hermann > > * Package name: golang-github-canonicalltd-dqlite > Version :

Bug#949575: RFP: bandwhich -- Terminal bandwidth utilization tool

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: bandwhich Version : 0.10.0 Upstream Author : Aram Drevekenin * URL : https://github.com/imsnif/bandwhich * License : MIT Programming Lang: Rust Description : Terminal bandwidth utilization tool

Bug#842921: RFP: libextutils-hascompiler-perl -- check for the presence of a compiler

Hi, closing this, since it was packaged after all (#932485). Sorry, while packaging it I failed to check if there was already an RFP. Cheers, nodens.

Bug#932495: ITP: libextutils-makemaker-dist-zilla-develop-perl -- Perl module creating bare-bones Makefile.PL files for use with dzil

Package: wnpp Owner: Clément Hermann Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libextutils-makemaker-dist-zilla-develop-perl Version : 0.03 Upstream Author : Jesse Luehrs * URL : https

Bug#932494: ITP: libextutils-hascompiler-perl -- Perl Module checking the presence of a compiler

Package: wnpp Owner: Clément Hermann Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libextutils-hascompiler-perl Version : 0.021 Upstream Author : Leon Timmermans * URL : https://metacpan.org/release

Bug#932485: ITP: libextutils-hascompiler-perl -- Perl Module checking the presence of a compiler

Package: wnpp Owner: Clément Hermann Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libextutils-hascompiler-perl Version : 0.021 Upstream Author : Leon Timmermans * URL : https://metacpan.org/release

Bug#768073: ITP: lxd -- The Linux Container Daemon

Hi, First, sorry for the late reply. A mail filter caught this message before I had the chance to read it. On 14/12/2018 12:15, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > how good are chances to get LXD into Buster? As much as it pains me to say so, not very good at the moment, with the soft freeze

Bug#905065: ITP: golang-github-canonicalltd-raft-membership -- Extension of the Hashicorp raft package to easily join and leave a cluster

Hi! On 26/10/2018 15:41, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > Le mardi 31 juillet 2018 à 11:24:36+0800, Clement Hermann a écrit : >> Package: wnpp >> Severity: wishlist >> Owner: Clement Hermann >> >> * Package name: golang-github-canonicalltd-raft-membership >> Version :

Bug#905068: ITP: golang-github-canonicalltd-dqlite -- Distributed SQLite for Go applications

Hey, thanks for the quick response! On 9/14/18 2:24 PM, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Hey there, > > I do have the intention to submit the patches upstream, but since 1) the > work is not fully complete 2) SQLite authors are *extremely* > conservative when it comes to contributions, that won't happen

Bug#905068: ITP: golang-github-canonicalltd-dqlite -- Distributed SQLite for Go applications

Hi! On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 14:00:12 -0400 =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane_Graber?= wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:10 AM Free Ekanayaka wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > I would think that Stéphane will want to backport these changes to the > > 3.0.x series, as they improve performance considereably. It

Bug#768073: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#768073: LXD packaging (and lxc-go plus a little bit of salsa)

On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:51:35 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Hermann?= wrote: > On 10/07/2018 12:40, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > I was pleased to see the last LXD dependency that we were tracking has > > finally made it into Debian, so the path is likely clear for LXD itself > > now

Bug#905068: ITP: golang-github-canonicalltd-dqlite -- Distributed SQLite for Go applications

Hi, On 31/07/2018 17:28, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Hello Clement, > > dqlite upstream and LXD team member here. > > Please note that dqlite is going through a bit of change, which I > started to merge yesterday. So a few of the ITPs you have filed will no > longer make sense. Thanks a lot for

Bug#768073: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#768073: LXD packaging (and lxc-go plus a little bit of salsa)

Hi ! On 10/07/2018 12:40, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > Hey folks, > I was pleased to see the last LXD dependency that we were tracking has > finally made it into Debian, so the path is likely clear for LXD itself > now (unless we need to catch up on some newer dependencies since the > analysis was

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

On 07/02/2018 11:39, Pete Heist wrote: > > Ah, ok. IRTT has an API, but it's not published yet. I think a > binary-only package may be better at this point, and a separate source > package later when that’s ready? If you agree, could you suggest a > simple, current binary package hosted on github

Bug#768073: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#768073: LXD packaging (and lxc-go plus a little bit of salsa)

On 03/02/2018 16:52, Clément Hermann wrote: > Hi, > Is there anything regarding lxc-team packaging style/workflow I should > be aware of? From what I saw, the workflow seems to be using gbp with > pristine star branch, UNRELEASED target distribution until the package > is ready to

Bug#768073: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#768073: LXD packaging (and lxc-go plus a little bit of salsa)

Hi, I've resumed active work on LXD, the last dependency (golang-gopkg-lxc-go-lxc.v2 - #883488) is almost done (pending review and upload). Regarding lxc-go, I suggest we archive the previous attemps, since it will live in pkg-go repository (using gitlab Archive feature on Salsa). Same for the

Bug#883488: RFS: golang-gopkg-lxc-go-lxc.v2

Hi! The last missing dependency for LXD should be ready to upload, hopefully. If a DD could have a look at it and upload it that would be awesome. Martín, maybe preferably you since you already had a first look at it ? Cheers! -- nodens

Bug#837500: fixed in golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3 3.0-1

Control: close 839748 On 28/12/2017 17:13, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 16:00:17 +0000, Clément Hermann wrote: > >> Format: 1.8 >> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 19:33:18 +0100 >> Source: golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3 >> Binary: golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.

Bug#768073: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#768073: Bug#768073: LXD packaging

On 21/12/2017 10:31, Evgeni Golov wrote: I also started working on golang-gopkg-lxc-go-lxc.v2-dev (ITP: #883488). That's the last dependancy for LXD. >>> >>> And it's waiting for review and upload as well, in the pkg-go repository. >>> >> >> I'm almost done, hopefully will have

Bug#768073: [pkg-lxc-devel] LXD packaging

On 17/12/2017 21:39, Clément Hermann wrote: > On 04/12/2017 21:40, Clément Hermann wrote: >> So, I did some work on golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2 >> <https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/packages/golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.git/> >> (#839748), since I had no answer. >

Bug#768073: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hi, Time for a new status update, I guess. On 04/12/2017 21:40, Clément Hermann wrote: > So, I did some work on golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2 > <https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/packages/golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.git/> > (#839748), since I had no answer. > It should be fit

Bug#839748: [pkg-go] Bug#839748: ITP: golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3 -- Django-syntax like template-engine for Go

On 17/12/2017 16:40, Clément Hermann wrote: > Hi ! > > On 03/12/2017 23:39, Clément Hermann wrote: > >> I just uploaded my fixes and pushed the missing branches/tags. >> >> All it needs now is rewiewing, signed tag and upload, hopefully. >> > > I

Bug#839748: ITP: golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3 -- Django-syntax like template-engine for Go

Hi ! On 03/12/2017 23:39, Clément Hermann wrote: > I just uploaded my fixes and pushed the missing branches/tags. > > All it needs now is rewiewing, signed tag and upload, hopefully. > I first did that, but discussion with Tincho and Jonathan on IRC made me reset the repo complet

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hi ! Time for a status update on this one, hopefully ! On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:36:47 +0200 Clément Hermann <clement.herm...@virtua.ch> wrote: > > I see there are only a couple dependancies left on the wiki page. Do you > need help ? > I'm not a Go expert, but I would real

Bug#883488: ITP: golang-gopkg-lxc-go-lxc.v2 -- Go bindings for liblxc

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: =?utf-8?q?Cl=C3=A9ment_Hermann?= * Package name: golang-gopkg-lxc-go-lxc.v2 Version : 0.0~git20171109.99ba61b-1 Upstream Author : LXC - Linux Containers * URL : https://github.com/lxc/go-lxc * License

Bug#839748: ITP: golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3 -- Django-syntax like template-engine for Go

On 03/12/2017 17:37, Clément Hermann wrote: > On 21/11/2017 12:48, Clément Hermann wrote: >> When I wanted to build the package, I realized it's not using >> git-buildpackage, as the other Go packages do. >> >> Is it intentional, or do you plan to use graft or someth

Bug#839748: ITP: golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3 -- Django-syntax like template-engine for Go

On 21/11/2017 12:48, Clément Hermann wrote: > On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 18:45:21 +0100 <clement.herm...@virtua.ch> wrote: >> Hi ! >> >> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 15:30:00 +0100 Jonathan Dowland <j...@debian.org> > wrote: > >>> This is a dependency for LXD and i

Bug#839748: ITP: golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3 -- Django-syntax like template-engine for Go

Hi, just realized I sent this using my work address. Here is the correct one (but I'm subscribed to the bug anyway). On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 18:45:21 +0100 wrote: > Hi ! > > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 15:30:00 +0100 Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > This is a

Bug#839748: ITP: golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3 -- Django-syntax like template-engine for Go

ssor of pongo. > > This is a dependency for LXD and is being packaged via the pkg-go team. It's actually the last one beside golang-gopkg-lxc-go-lxc.v2-dev. Any ETA ? I saw the repository under pkg-go, is there any way I can help ? Cheers, -- Clément Hermann Senior Network System Engi

Bug#849727: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#849727: Adopting seahorse-nautilus?

Control: retitle -1 ITA: seahorse-nautilus -- Nautilus extension for Seahorse integration Fixing title. Thunderbird wrapped it. Cheers, -- nodens

Bug#849727: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#849727: Adopting seahorse-nautilus?

Control: retitle -1 ITA: seahorse-nautilus -- Nautilus extension for Seahorse integration Control: owner -1 pkg-privacy-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Since there is no news for a while and seahorse-nautilus has been removed from testing, I'll resume work on this under the pkg-privacy

Bug#768073: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Ooops. Sent using my work address, please use this one instead (but I'm subscribed on both list so don't CC me if you reply on-list). Sorry for the noise! On 13/10/2017 13:36, Clément Hermann wrote: > Hi ! > > On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:00:33 +0100 Evgeni Golov <evg...@debian.org&g

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

ed help ? I'm not a Go expert, but I would really like to see LXD in Debian. (also, not a DM/DD - Yet! ) I started looking at golang-gopkg-inconshreveable-log15.v2, the packaging should be straightforward enough apparently. I'm willing to do it if it helps. Cheers, -- Clément Hermann Senior

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Le 14 octobre 2016 13:33:53 GMT+02:00, "Clément Hermann" <nod...@nodens.org> a écrit : >Le 14/10/2016 à 12:34, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:11:13PM +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote: >>> A few of these dependencies are already in the archi

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Le 14/10/2016 à 12:34, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:11:13PM +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote: >> A few of these dependencies are already in the archive, not all have the >> standard naming yet, but I think about half of those are already packaged. > > Thanks! I've just gone

Bug#804258: ITP: igb -- dkms source for the igb network driver

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Clément Hermann" <nod...@nodens.org> * Package name: igb Version : 5.3.3.2 Upstream Author : Intel Corporation * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/ * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: