Bug#1050806: O: debianutils -- Essential utilities specific to Debian

Ileana Dumitrescu: Hi Niels, @Ileana: Would you be fine with co-maintaining it with me? We can use the existing git repo (https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debianutils) as packaging repo and coordinate our changes via that. That sounds good! I have submitted a new version of debianutils to

Bug#1050806: O: debianutils -- Essential utilities specific to Debian

Control: owner -1 Control: retitle -1 ITA: debianutils -- Essential utilities On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 13:35:05 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote: Package: wnpp After I have made a dog's breakfast of debianutils' postinst and fixed it, I do not feel inclined to maintain that essential package any

Bug#1029645: ITP: debputy -- Manifest style debian package builder

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Niels Thykier X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, ni...@thykier.net * Package name: debputy Version : 0.1.1 Upstream Contact: Niels Thykier * URL : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debputy/ * License : GPL-2

Bug#1024450: ITP: setuptools-gettext -- Compile .po files into .mo files

Jelmer Vernooij: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jelmer Vernooij X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org * Package name: setuptools-gettext Version : 0.0.1 Upstream Author : Breezy Team * URL : https://github.com/jelmer/setuptools-gettext * License

Bug#923034: FreeRADIUS status

Alan DeKok: > We've been looking for a new Debian maintainer for a while. > > What, exactly, is in "bad shape" about this package? If there are issues, > we can work towards fixing them. > > The software is widely used by many tens of thousands of sites. I hope > it's not going to be

Bug#889307: O: popt -- lib for parsing cmdline parameters

On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 15:24:41 +0100 Tobias Frost wrote: > Package: wnpp > > The current maintainer of popt, Paul Martin , > is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. > > Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this > package if you will

Bug#891890: ITP: zfs-linux-git -- zfsonlinux packaging tracking git master

Antonio Russo: > On 6/22/18 4:17 AM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: >> >> as promised, and unfortunately delayed a bit longer than I wanted. >> thanks for the initial push - some of the points are more for a >> discussion with upstream regarding their inclusion of some variant of >> this, some are for

Bug#659069: RFP: retroshare -- Friend-to-friend network client for secure messaging and file exchange

Cyril Soler: > The retroshare software already ships debian packages for Debian 8+9, as can > be seen here: > https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/network:retroshare >   Ok, so there is an initial packaging. That is a good start. > [...] > > What's missing is the distribution part. So

Bug#659069: Info received (Bug#659069: Info received (Bug#659069: why hasn't this been packaged yet? figured Debian folks would be all over it))

Cyril Soler: > Could anyone from Debian consider this request please? It's been 6 years now, > and I believe that a decent number of users are > actually expecting Debian to package Retroshare. Thx! > Hi Cyril, Unfortunately, packaging in Debian relies on a volunteer who is willing to donate

Bug#886643: ed help request

Lev Lamberov: > Hi Martin, > > I'd like to help with maintaining ed. My personal workflow is around > gbp, so I've did some changes and setup a repository on Salsa [0] just > to show you what I did. Please, take a look and if my workflow fits I'll > set up a repository in Debian group and proceed

Bug#870145: RFA: localepurge -- reclaim disk space by removing unneeded localizations

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request an adopter for the localepurge package. The package description is: This package provides a script to recover disk space wasted for unneeded locales, GNOME/KDE localizations and localized man pages. Depending on the installation, it is possible to save

Bug#854615: ITP: apt-seek -- search for files within Debian packages

Dmitry Bogatov: > > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Dmitry Bogatov > > * Package name : apt-seek > Version : 0.1 > Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov > * Url : >

Bug#826771: ITP: dh-runit -- debhelper add-on to handle runit runscripts

Dmitry Bogatov: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Dmitry Bogatov > > * Package Name : dh-runit > Version : 0.1 > Upstream Author : None > Url : > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-runit.git > License :

Bug#820561: ITP: dh-elpa-test -- Debian helper tool for running ELPA package testsuites

Sean Whitton: > So dh-elpa-test needs its own sequencer script in > /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Sequence, and so it also needs its own > corresponding /usr/bin/dh_elpa_test. But then for ease of maintenance > it should be its own source package. Hi, I am not aware of any reason why a

Bug#811411: O: adduser -- add and remove users and groups

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I am orphaning the adduser package on behalf Stephan Gran, who was the last active/reachable member of the Adduser maintenance team. The package description is: This package includes the 'adduser' and 'deluser' commands for creating and removing users. . -

Re: Including new packages in Debian

Joseph Bell: > Howdy, > > I'm looking to understand how one gets a given software package considered > for inclusion in Debian. I have 3 software components, one of which is > https://github.com/Zewo/libvenice , and I'm curious as to where do I even > start for getting into the next release of

Bug#712938: sni-qt -- Indicator support for Qt

On 2015-07-27 07:20, 1...@o2o2.tk wrote: On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 02:00:02 +0430 Tsu Jan tsujan2...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 20:59:22 + 1...@o2o2.tk wrote: Yes, nvidia drivers installed via nvidia's installer. But what should I do to fix this issue? You should

Bug#712938: sni-qt -- Indicator support for Qt

On 2015-07-26 23:57, Tsu Jan wrote: [...] Hi, All in all, it's weird that in spite of Dave's and my early warnings, this problem still arose. I have not been following this from the beginning, so I do not know what said warning is. Isn't Debian a community-based distro? Personally, I

Bug#765322: RFA: t1utils -- Collection of simple Type 1 font manipulation programs

On 2015-07-21 07:59, Paulo wrote: [...] Hi Niels, can I help you? I'm working in this package so in fill days I will upload to mentors a NMU with new upstream release version 1.39. regards, kretcheu Hi Paulo, I would be delighted to have you adopt or co-maintain t1utils. :)

Bug#787898: Request access to git.debian.org

On 2015-06-06 08:56, willer450 wrote: Hi. I am a guest and I need access to git.debian.org. My alioth account name is willy-er-guest and I am going to work on project fonts-pt. Thanks. Hi, Thanks for your interest in Debian. I cannot help you with your inquiry directly, I merely

Bug#752018: Wildfly package

On 2015-04-03 10:06, Konstantin Manna wrote: Hi Julian, Hi, Just a drive-by remark. For extended help, please consider reaching out to debian-j...@lists.debian.org if you haven't already done so. :) thanks for the update. Lintian does not yet like your package :-) lintian --pedantic

Bug#768507: [debhelper-devel] #768507: Co-maintainers for debhelper

On 2014-11-17 10:02, Josselin Mouette wrote: Hi Niels, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: Valéry, Josselin and Modestas: Are you all still interested in working on debhelper - if so, in general or do you have specific area/tool of interest that you

Bug#768507: [debhelper-devel] #768507: Co-maintainers for debhelper

On 2014-11-17 18:01, Tianon Gravi wrote: On 16 November 2014 09:32, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: I have taken the liberty of CC'ing in case you were (no longer?) subscribed to debhelper-devel@l.a.d.o. Thanks for the reminder that I needed to subscribe! All: If you are (still

Bug#768507: #768507: Co-maintainers for debhelper

* Niels Thykier Valéry, Josselin and Modestas have had their membership for quite a while (The youngest membership appearing to be Modestas from Nov. 2013). Bernhard, Tianon and myself have been added on the 8th of Nov. this year by Joey, presumably in responds to our intend to adopt the package

Bug#768507: #768507 - debhelper

On 2014-11-08 00:18, Bernhard R. Link wrote: Hi Niels, If you want a team for maintaining debhelper, I'm more than willing to join. Bernhard R. Link Hi Bernhard, I would definitely looking for co-maintainers and you are of course welcome. :) ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#768507: [debhelper-devel] Bug#768507: ITA: debhelper -- helper programs for debian/rules

On 2014-11-08 18:15, Damyan Ivanov wrote: -=| Niels Thykier, 07.11.2014 23:11:01 +0100 |=- According to the changelog, debhelper has been orphaned and needs maintainer. I intend to take over maintence assuming this is true and there is no active team behind Debhelper Maintainers list (CC'ed

Bug#768507: ITA: debhelper -- helper programs for debian/rules

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, According to the changelog, debhelper has been orphaned and needs maintainer. I intend to take over maintence assuming this is true and there is no active team behind Debhelper Maintainers list (CC'ed). ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#765322: RFA: t1utils -- Collection of simple Type 1 font manipulation programs

On 2014-10-14 09:36, Ricardo Mones wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: normal The current maintainer of t1utils, C.M. Connelly c...@debian.org, is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this

Bug#753512: ITP: libemail-reply-perl -- module to reply to an email message

On 2014-07-02 19:12, gregor herrmann wrote: Package: wnpp Owner: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libemail-reply-perl Version : 1.203 Upstream Author : Ricardo

Bug#741065: ITP: etcd-- A highly-available key value store for shared configuration and service discovery

On 2014-03-08 02:47, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: * Fast: benchmarked 1000s of writes/s per instance I think there is a typo here; 1000s of writes/s per instance. I suspect (but I am not quite sure) that the intended was something like: 1000 writes _ second * instance If

Bug#736648: RFP: icu4j-49 -- a library for Unicode support and internationalization

On 2014-01-26 01:15, Hilko Bengen wrote: * Emmanuel Bourg: Would it be possible to upgrade the existing icu4j package instead? japi-compliance-checked reports a compatibility of 80%. Here are the issues found by clirr: ERROR: 8001: com.ibm.icu.impl.ByteBuffer: Class

Bug#729207: O: qpid-python

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, python-qpid has defacto been orphaned for a while, but AFAICT there was no wnpp bug for it (until now). Some information about the package: Package: python-qpid New: yes State: not installed Version: 0.22-1 Priority: extra Section:

Bug#707649: RFA: sentinella -- System monitor that can react to user chosen conditions

On 2013-05-19 20:15, Eriberto wrote: Hi Niels, I am very interested in SO, network, security and forensics areas. I can maintain this package. Great. :) Are you also interested in libsysactivity ? I can maintain it alone or with you (being co-maintainer or maintainer, as you prefer).

Bug#707649: RFA: sentinella -- System monitor that can react to user chosen conditions

On 2013-05-19 20:48, Eriberto wrote: 2013/5/19 Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net: Are you also interested in libsysactivity ? I can try to maintain it too! I have low experience with libraries but I already maintain one (packaged by me) and isn't very hard. I accept. The most important

Bug#707649: RFA: sentinella -- System monitor that can react to user chosen conditions

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I am not using sentinella on a regular basis and I think it (and its upstream) would be better served with a more dedicated maintainer. You need not be a DD or a DM; I am willing to sponsor updates. Alternatively, I am more than willing to co-maintain with you.

Bug#704450: ITA mytop -- top like query monitor for MySQL

Control: owner -1 wer...@aloah-from-hell.de On 2013-05-05 18:13, Werner Detter wrote: owner 704450 wer...@aloah-from-hell.de Hi, You are missing a (B)CC to cont...@bugs.debian.org for that to work. Alternatively you can use the Control pseudo header (as I did above) without needing the

Bug#679663: fixed in editorconfig-core 0.11.0-1

On 2013-04-20 09:43, Hong Xu wrote: Hi Jonas, About two days have passed but I can still not find it in debian packages: Hi, The package is available (now at least, see [1]). http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=editorconfig+searchon=namessuite=allsection=all I think (but I don't

Bug#703366: RFH: apt-file -- search for files within Debian packages (command-line interface)

On 2013-03-26 01:20, Nick Black wrote: Stefan Fritsch left as an exercise for the reader: Well, the contents files are much larger than the package files and are usually used less frequently. So some users may prefer to download the contents files only when necessary. Apart from that, I

Bug#703366: RFH: apt-file -- search for files within Debian packages (command-line interface)

On 2013-03-20 18:30, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Wednesday 20 March 2013, Niels Thykier wrote: [...] I (and I guess many other users) would be pleased if we could reach a point in which apt-get update (or its countless alternative ways) would update indeed all data I requested to be downloaded

Bug#703366: RFH: apt-file -- search for files within Debian packages (command-line interface)

(Dropping CC for d-devel) On 2013-03-20 11:40, David Kalnischkies wrote: On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote: The largest task as I see it would be to better integrate some or all of the transport mechanisms, so that apt-file can behave properly for

Bug#569668: davmail ITP status update (Re: ITP: davmail)

On 2012-09-05 12:11, Alexandre Rossi wrote: Hi, Hi, I see that libjackrabbit-java is now in Debian. How are you getting on with libhtmlcleaner-java and, more pertinently davmail packaging? I have a working package using Debian libraries instead of embedded ones : -

Bug#681346: ITP: libdigest-sha1-perl -- Perl interface to the SHA-1 algorithm

On 2012-07-12 16:04, Gergely Nagy wrote: Dmitry E. Oboukhov un...@debian.org writes: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dmitry E. Oboukhov un...@debian.org Package name: libdigest-sha1-perl Version : 2.13 Upstream Author : Gisle Aas gi...@activestate.com URL

Bug#680224: O: jwordsplitter -- Java library for splitting words into atoms

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I hereby orphan jwordsplitter on behalf of its current maintainer Rail Aliev, who is apparently not active anymore. Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it. If you

Bug#678274: O: libjdic-java

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I hereby orphan libjdic-java on behalf of the Java Team as we do not have the necessary time and skills to maintain it. (see the RC bugs #631039 and #654264). I have CC'ed the Maintainer of paros, which is (to my knowledge) the only reverse dependency of

Bug#675006: ITP: storymaps - Story planning and writing application for children

On 2012-05-29 11:27, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: Package: wnpp Priority: wishlist [...] + FreMarker, http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/ [...] Regards Javier There is a libfreemarker-java in Debian already, which is probably the library you are looking for. :)

Bug#615595: O: sim -- Sim-IM Instant Messenger data files

On 2011-11-08 07:29, Nikolay Shaplov wrote: Hi, I am considering to request a removal of sim because it is unmaintained and RC-buggy. The main bug with nonfree icons were already solved in upstream. Also it does not crash anymore. Hi, That is good to know. .) But I saw a version of

Bug#475377: Considering to RM afnix

Hi, I am considering to remove afnix, since it is unmaintained and has a very low popcon. However, there has been QA uploads to bump upstream releases twice this year (both uploaders CC'ed). If you have any interest in this package, please consider adopting it. Otherwise I will push for its

Bug#615595: O: sim -- Sim-IM Instant Messenger data files

Hi, I am considering to request a removal of sim because it is unmaintained and RC-buggy. But I saw a version of sim on mentors.d.n, despite this bug not being an ITA. So Alexander or Nikolay, are any of you interested in maintaining this in Debian? If not, I will file a removal request very

Bug#600171: eclipse-jgit uploaded to mentors.debian.net

On 2011-09-28 00:11, Jakub Adam wrote: I put JGit package to mentors.debian.net, please review and consider sponsoring an upload http://mentors.debian.net/package/eclipse-jgit BR, Jakub Hey, Have you considered putting this under the Debian Java Team? Most (all?) existing

Bug#591354: RFP: eclipse-shelled -- Shell script editor for Eclipse.

On 2011-09-17 07:25, Fernando C. Estrada wrote: Hi Roman, I'm interested to see ShellEd in Debian, is there any progress on packaging?, need some help? Thanks in advance for your efforts to package ShellEd for Debian ;-) Regards, P.S. If you are no longer interested I could take care

Bug#636698: O: eclipse-pydev

Package: wnpp Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi I am hereby orphaning eclipse-pydev on behalf of the Java Team. The package has not seen an upload for over 3 years and has been RC buggy a bit longer than that. Should you wish to adopt the package, feel free

Bug#633774: RFP: osgi-core -- Core OSGi

On 2011-07-13 16:43, Sebastian Reichel wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: osgi-core Version : 4.2.1 Upstream Author : OSGi Alliance * URL : http://www.osgi.org * License : Apache 2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description :

Bug#613293: RFS: svgsalamander (updated, take 3)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-03-27 14:24, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: Hi, I have contacted upstream with my questions about svgsalamander. He answered quickly but I took some time to get back to work. That happens :) Personally I am still waiting for 25 hour

Bug#473213: Grails' roadmap to sid

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-03-27 00:28, Miguel Landaeta wrote: block 473213 by 453471 thanks On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:02:32PM -0430, Miguel Landaeta wrote: So, in the next weeks (months??) I'm going to prepare a package for grails 1.3.x. Before that can be

Bug#619631: RFP: eclipse-plugin-avr -- tools for developing C programs for the ATMEL AVR series of embedded processors

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-03-26 10:06, Chris wrote: On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 21:39 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-03-25 19:04, Christopher Baines wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name

Bug#619631: RFP: eclipse-plugin-avr -- tools for developing C programs for the ATMEL AVR series of embedded processors

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-03-25 19:04, Christopher Baines wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: eclipse-plugin-avr Version : 2.3.4 Upstream Author : URL :

Bug#612358: ITP: lpg-generator-java -- Java Runtime support for the LPG parser

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 * Package name: lpg-generator-java Version : 2.0.20 Upstream Author : Philippe Charles pgchar...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http

Bug#600171: ITP: eclipse-jgit -- pure Java implementation of the GIT VCS

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 * Package name: eclipse-jgit Version : 0.9.3 Upstream Author : Eclipse Development Team * URL : http://eclipse.org/jgit/ * License : BSD

Bug#593285: additional info

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hey Sorry for the late reply - I completely forgot this one. Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 21:49 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: That would still require someone to actually write said support ;) ;) patches welcome

Bug#551861: [eclim-user] Fwd: Re: RFP: eclim -- Integration between the eclipse IDE and the VIM text editor

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-10-14 06:00, Eric Van Dewoestine wrote: [...] Which implies that if a EPL'ed plugin, which is not produced by the Eclipse Foundation, is loaded side by side with the eclim plugin then your license will be violated. As an example the

Bug#551861: RFP: eclim -- Integration between the eclipse IDE and the VIM text editor

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi The license of eclipse (EPL) and eclim (GPLv3) are not compatible so if eclim links against eclipse, then there is an issue. I have not checked whether this is this case with eclim, but it is likely. This incompatibility is acknowledged both by

Bug#587553: ITP: bluej

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-10-12 18:03, Ryan Kavanagh wrote: Hi Niels, On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 08:27:41PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: Any news on this ITP? On the 2nd of August you reported that it was stalled until the next upstream release (due to license

Bug#599787: ITP: jodreports -- Merge OpenDocument text with data - Library

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-10-11 10:17, Sascha Girrulat wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sascha Girrulat sas...@girrulat.de * Package name: jodreports Version : 2.2.1 Upstream Author : Mirko Nasato mi...@artofsolving.com

Bug#587553: ITP: bluej

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hey Any news on this ITP? On the 2nd of August you reported that it was stalled until the next upstream release (due to license issues). According to [1] upstream released a new version on August 25th, though it does not list any license changes.

Bug#593292: RFP: eclipse-cmakebuilder -- CMakeBuilder for Eclipse (Relicensed under EPL)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Upstream just informed me that they have now relicensed CMakeBuilder under EPL 1.0 and their site have been updated to reflect this as well[1]. This should solve the license issue; if time permits I may package this later, but for now I am

Bug#593290: RFP: eclipse-cmake-editor -- CMake Editor for Eclipse

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi I had a look at the project and it looks like a lot of the files have an All rights reserved with no explicit license allowing us to redistribute it. I noted that their eclipse feature says it is under CPL, but I am not sure if that is enough

Bug#593292: RFP: eclipse-cmakebuilder -- CMakeBuilder for Eclipse

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Unfortunately GPL and EPL (which eclipse is licensed under) are incompatible and we therefore cannot package this plugin. I have contacted upstream about this in private and hope they will reconsider their license. ~Niels -BEGIN PGP

Bug#593285: additional info

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-08-17 00:53, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: IIRC, it's even planned to add support for deb-packages ;) That would still require someone to actually write said support ;) It would probably make sense to have one (binary) package per

Bug#587553: RFP: bluej -- educational environment for java development

On 2010-06-29 21:08, RalfGesellensetter wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: bluej Version : 3.0.0 Upstream Author : Michael Kölling and many others * URL : http://bluej.org/download/files/bluej-300.deb * License : GNU GPL 2.0

Bug#581767: RFP: rome -- Java library to handle Atom feed

Hi The OSGi metadata looks fine except for Import-Package: ...org.jdom.adapters;version=3D1.0.0... which I suspect should have been a 1.1.1 like the others. Also, javahelper has picked up the dependency on libjdom1-java so you can use the ${java:Depends} variable in the Depends line for

Bug#581767: RFP: rome -- Java library to handle Atom feed

Niels Thykier wrote: ~Niels Fedora Packaging: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rome/devel/ gah, looks like my mail got trashed. As I recall I need rome for one of the eclipse packages I got ITP/ITA'ed, particularly I need it argumented with some OSGi metadata. Fedora created

Bug#581767: RFP: rome -- Java library to handle Atom feed

~Niels Fedora Packaging: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rome/devel/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#581422: ITP: eclipse-mylyn -- Task support for Eclipse

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net Owner: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net * Package name: eclipse-mylyn Version : 3.2.1 * URL : http://www.eclipse.org/mylyn * License : EPL v1.0 Programming Lang: Java Description

Bug#492325: ITP: phpmyid -- standalone, single user, OpenID identity provider

Hi Andreas The last message on this ITP is from 2008; you seem to have the package ready, but it does not appear in the archive. Have you lost interest in this package? ~Niels signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#575783: RFP: eclipse-git-plugin -- EGit is an Eclipse Team provider for the Git version control system

Patrick Datko wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: eclipse-git-plugin Version : 0.7.1 Upstream Author : Shawn O. Pearce spea...@spearce.org * URL : http://www.eclipse.org/egit/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: Java

Bug#555663: (no subject)

Thomas Girard wrote: Hello Niels, On 11/11/2009 11:51, Niels Thykier wrote: Hi Thomas Considering that I have already added most of the dependencies for eclipse-cdt to my list of ITA/ITPs I might as well go all the way. Any news on this? Thanks, Thomas Hi, We are still working

Bug#526489: I am out of my damn mind. - ITA: eclipse

Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 11/08/09 at 22:25 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: retitle 526489 ITA: eclipse -- Extensible Tool platform and java IDE owner 526489 ! thanks Hi As the title says, I intend to take over eclipse. Tim Sally, I noticed that you expressed an interest in taking

Bug#506988: ITP: libbnd-java/bnd -- create and diagnose OSGi R4 bundles

Hi How is it going with this package? Do you need a hand? ~Niels signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#555663: (no subject)

retitle 555663 ITA: eclipse-cdt -- Plugin for C/C++ development owner 555663 ! thanks Hi Thomas Considering that I have already added most of the dependencies for eclipse-cdt to my list of ITA/ITPs I might as well go all the way. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#551965: ITP: eclipse-rse -- Eclipse Remote System Explorer (RSE)

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net * Package name: eclipse-rse Version : 3.1 Upstream Author : DSDP TM Development Team dsdp-tm-...@eclipse.org * URL : http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm/ * License : Eclipse Public License

Bug#551855: Added to my TODO

Hi I will get on this after I am done with eclipse, eclipse-cdt and and we are done with the Ubuntu freeze etc. It appears to depend on the following unpacked stuff: * eclipse-emf (= 2.5.0) * eclipse-mylyn (= 3.2) * eclipse-rse And is obviously waiting for eclipse 3.5.1 to hit the

Bug#526489: I am out of my damn mind. - ITA: eclipse

retitle 526489 ITA: eclipse -- Extensible Tool platform and java IDE owner 526489 ! thanks Hi As the title says, I intend to take over eclipse. Tim Sally, I noticed that you expressed an interest in taking this, but you never got around to take ownership of this bug. I have assumed you lost

Bug#535691: RFH: munin packaging help

Holger Levsen wrote: package: wnpp x-debbugs-cc: munin-deb-ma...@linpro.no, munin-us...@lists.sourceforge.net Hi, the munin package could need some more love: - currently there are 35 open bugs, some with patches, some need to go upstream, etc. - and there is a constant flow of new

Bug#510596: RFP: libfreehep-java -- encourage the sharing and reuse of Java code , in High Energy Physics

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dominik Since you have decided to work on it, you should probably retitle this bug to an ITP and assume ownership of the bug. Right now it is still listed as an RFP. ~NT You can send the following to cont...@bugs.debian.org to claim ownership.

Bug#407652: ITA: html2ps -- HTML to PostScript converter

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jeremiah and Steaphan It appears, I was not paying attention with my last reply (I did not notice it was Steaphan, who wrote and not Jeramiah .). Sorry for the mail confusion. Nevertheless, I am glad that you are going to adopt this package

Bug#407652: Do you still intend to adopt html2ps?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steaphan Greene wrote: For the record, I am still interested in taking this package over, if no current DD wants to do it. However, I am still NOT a DD, so I would still need a sponsor. I do not think that any other DD are dying to take it (they

Bug#407652: Do you still intend to adopt html2ps?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey Jeremiah I checked this bug report recently and noticed that you expressed interest in adopting html2ps - though it is now about 6 months ago. If you still want to adopt the package, please assume ownership over the bug (and retitle it to ITA).