Bug#768073: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hi, Time for a new status update, I guess. On 04/12/2017 21:40, Clément Hermann wrote: > So, I did some work on golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2 > > (#839748), since I had no answer. > It should be fit for release but I

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hi ! Time for a status update on this one, hopefully ! On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:36:47 +0200 Clément Hermann wrote: > > I see there are only a couple dependancies left on the wiki page. Do you > need help ? > I'm not a Go expert, but I would really like to see LXD in

Bug#768073: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Ooops. Sent using my work address, please use this one instead (but I'm subscribed on both list so don't CC me if you reply on-list). Sorry for the noise! On 13/10/2017 13:36, Clément Hermann wrote: > Hi ! > > On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:00:33 +0100 Evgeni Golov wrote: >> Hi, >>

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hi ! On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:00:33 +0100 Evgeni Golov wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 04:08:18PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > We packaged the following specifically as LXD dependencies which did go in: > > > > *

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hi, On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 04:08:18PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > We packaged the following specifically as LXD dependencies which did go in: > > * https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3 > * https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-petname > (possibly others, hit-list

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hi folks, We didn't manage to get LXD into the archive in time for the freeze. We packaged the following specifically as LXD dependencies which did go in: * https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3 * https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-petname (possibly others, hit-list

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hi all, I was pinged about this today which reminded me to post an update to the bug. I'm unlikely to have enough time to finish packaging the rest of the dependencies before the freeze deadline. But the good news is we're very close anyway! Zhenech has golang-…-lxc.v2 imported to pkg-lxc

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Le 14 octobre 2016 13:33:53 GMT+02:00, "Clément Hermann" a écrit : >Le 14/10/2016 à 12:34, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:11:13PM +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote: >>> A few of these dependencies are already in the archive, not all have >the >>> standard

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Le 14/10/2016 à 12:34, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:11:13PM +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote: >> A few of these dependencies are already in the archive, not all have the >> standard naming yet, but I think about half of those are already packaged. > > Thanks! I've just gone

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:11:13PM +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote: > A few of these dependencies are already in the archive, not all have the > standard naming yet, but I think about half of those are already packaged. Thanks! I've just gone through to re-check them, renamed a few to the canonical

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hello, I have been using LXD for many months now, so I am patiently waiting for the day when I will be able to use it on Debian! Thanks for all the work y'all. I was wondering what the plan is regarding the apparmor compatibility? I think that LXD needs apparmor and as far as I know, apparmor is

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hi Jon, On 13/10/16 11:59, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > Just a quick mail to say hello, I recently joined because I am interested Welcomed! :) > in packaging (at least) build dependencies for LXD, which is Canonical's > container hypervisor platform. > > The specific go dependencies that we need

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hi Team, Just a quick mail to say hello, I recently joined because I am interested in packaging (at least) build dependencies for LXD, which is Canonical's container hypervisor platform. The specific go dependencies that we need to package are: * golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3-dev *

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Awesome! Looking forward to any updates you may have in regards to golang-deps. On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 08:17:09PM +0200, Adnan Hodzic wrote: > > Jonathan and everybody else, > > > > Since I couldn't find my original

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 08:17:09PM +0200, Adnan Hodzic wrote: > Jonathan and everybody else, > > Since I couldn't find my original LXD package source, I started from > scratch. > > I created new Git repo (pkg-lxc/lxd.git) and pushed initial Debian package > of LXD 2.4.1 (Yakkety release). Git

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Jonathan and everybody else, Since I couldn't find my original LXD package source, I started from scratch. I created new Git repo (pkg-lxc/lxd.git) and pushed initial Debian package of LXD 2.4.1 (Yakkety release). Git repo is available on Alioth: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-lxc/lxd.git

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Jonathan, >> Awhile back I started packaging process. I basically re-packaged the LXD >> Ubuntu package. As Evgeni mentioned it "is what we did with the other LXC >> components and that worked out pretty well so far." > >Do you have that lying around, and if so is it worth us pushing it to a git

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:35:24AM +0200, Adnan Hodzic wrote: > Awhile back I started packaging process. I basically re-packaged the LXD > Ubuntu package. As Evgeni mentioned it "is what we did with the other LXC > components and that worked out pretty well so far." Do you have that lying around,

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hi folks, thanks for the useful replies! I've sent requests to join pkg-lxc and pkg-go, and set up a scratch/todo page on wiki.d.o at https://wiki.debian.org/LXD that we could use to coordinate work needed. Now to take a look at those Go packages... signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hey Jonathan (and everybody else), Sorry about delayed reply. > Adnan, how's it going? Awhile back I started packaging process. I basically re-packaged the LXD Ubuntu package. As Evgeni mentioned it "is what we did with the other LXC components and that worked out pretty well so far." However,

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Jonathan, By all means, please take over the ITP. We've been waiting for too long, and it would be a big plus if we could have LXD for Stretch. If it was there, I could working out a python-nova-lxd and nova-compute-lxd package, which would be nice to see in Debian Stertch as well. We've been

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hi, I think that an ITP that has been inactive this long could be taken over by another interested party without it being a hijack, all things considered. (I think some QA script might move it to RFP soon anyway). Adnan, how's it going? There's a pkg-lxc team already. Since this package is/will