Bug#888985: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

2018-02-12 Thread Michael Stapelberg
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Pete Heist wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2018, at 12:37 AM, Michael Stapelberg > wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Pete Heist wrote: > >> >> - I tried getting signatures working but punted because

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

2018-02-11 Thread Pete Heist
> On Feb 11, 2018, at 12:37 AM, Michael Stapelberg > wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Pete Heist > wrote: > > - I tried getting signatures working but punted because GitHub creates a > .tar.gz, which I signed

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

2018-02-10 Thread Michael Stapelberg
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Pete Heist wrote: > > On Feb 9, 2018, at 11:43 AM, Pete Heist wrote: > > On Feb 9, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Michael Stapelberg > wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:09 AM, Pete Heist wrote:

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

2018-02-10 Thread Pete Heist
> On Feb 9, 2018, at 11:43 AM, Pete Heist wrote: > >> On Feb 9, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Michael Stapelberg > > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:09 AM, Pete Heist > > wrote: >>

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

2018-02-09 Thread Pete Heist
> On Feb 9, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:09 AM, Pete Heist > wrote: > > From the original warnings you sent I know I’ve fixed all except "I: irtt > source:

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

2018-02-08 Thread Michael Stapelberg
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:09 AM, Pete Heist wrote: > > On Feb 7, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Michael Stapelberg > wrote: > > Thanks for contributing this package. > > The resulting binary package irtt_0.9-1_amd64.deb contains both a binary > and Go source code.

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

2018-02-08 Thread Pete Heist
> On Feb 7, 2018, at 10:36 PM, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Ok, I’m getting there, bear with me. :) In my case, would I not want to > produce both a binary package and eventually a source package? > > Be careful not to confuse the Debian concept of source packages

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

2018-02-07 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Sorry, only saw this email after my other reply. Somehow the threading broke, it seems. On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Pete Heist wrote: > > > On Feb 7, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Clément Hermann wrote: > > > > On 07/02/2018 11:39, Pete Heist wrote: > >> > >> Ah,