Bug#698101: duplicate of ca-certificates
Hi On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 07:23:17AM +, Luca Filipozzi wrote: Please consider one of the two approaches: (1) modify the tests of libfinance-quote-perl to not require Mozilla::CA (2) package libmozilla-ca-perl but have it depend on and use ca-certificates. Please don't create a package with yet another set of root certificates. On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:42:21PM +0900, TANIGUCHI Takaki wrote: I tried to build libfinance-quote-perl package with importing from git HEAD repository locally. It did not required Mozilla::CA to build, but some tests were failed without Mozilla::CA. See also #619059[1] for a previous ITP for libmozilla-ca-perl. [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/619059 Regards, Salvatore -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130114075900.GA2192@elende
Bug#698101: ITP: libmozilla-ca-perl -- Mozilla's CA cert bundle in PEM format
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:46:47 +0900, TANIGUCHI Takaki wrote: * Package name: libmozilla-ca-perl Version : 20120823 Upstream Author : Gisle Aas gi...@activestate.com * URL or Web page : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mozilla-CA/ * License : MPL1.1 | GPL2+ | LGPL2.1+ Description : Mozilla's CA cert bundle in PEM format Mozilla::CA provides a copy of Mozilla's bundle of Certificate Authority certificates in a form that can be consumed by modules and libraries based on OpenSSL. Shouldn't be needed, we have ca-certificates. So far patching (or simply using the patched debian packages like liblwp-protocol-https-perl) was enough: http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/liblwp-protocol-https-perl/6.03-1/cert.patch If you tell us why you think you need this package we might be able to help with finding a solution. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- BOFH excuse #324: Your packets were eaten by the terminator -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130114080635.gd6...@colleen.colgarra.priv.at
Bug#698111: ITP: zimlib -- Standard library implementation of ZIM specifications
Hi, On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote: * Package name: zimlib Version : 0.93.20121015-1 * URL : http://www.openzim.org/index.php/Zimlib . ZIM is a file format created with focus on extracting and encoding data from Mediawiki for offline use. Even though project currently focuses on Mediawiki its original mission is to make web content available offline. Project intends to support other wiki engines and content management systems in future. When I saw this, it got me clearly confused because at first I thought that it was related to http://zim-wiki.org/. It's a bit unfortunate that Zim is used to refer to two projects reladed to wikis. I don't know who was first but maybe you could point out the nameclash to upstream ? FWIW the zim debian package refers to http://zim-wiki.org/ which I'm maintaining for Debian. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook: → http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130114090018.ga3...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com
Bug#698111: ITP: zimlib -- Standard library implementation of ZIM specifications
Git repository for zimlib shows rename was done in 2009, zim was already a few years old at that time. Afraid little I can do to resolve the clash other than renaming my application, which needless to say, I don't want to because I like the name. Regards, Jaap On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote: Hi, On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote: * Package name: zimlib Version : 0.93.20121015-1 * URL : http://www.openzim.org/index.php/Zimlib . ZIM is a file format created with focus on extracting and encoding data from Mediawiki for offline use. Even though project currently focuses on Mediawiki its original mission is to make web content available offline. Project intends to support other wiki engines and content management systems in future. When I saw this, it got me clearly confused because at first I thought that it was related to http://zim-wiki.org/. It's a bit unfortunate that Zim is used to refer to two projects reladed to wikis. I don't know who was first but maybe you could point out the nameclash to upstream ? FWIW the zim debian package refers to http://zim-wiki.org/ which I'm maintaining for Debian. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook: → http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CA+TmwMFtG_uhwX1dqPA9T0C=jxw0bb8cgboqu5vvc3x1qtx...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#698132: ITP: libnet-gmail-imap-label-perl -- IMAP proxy for Google's Gmail that retrieves message labels.
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Angel Abad an...@debian.org * Package name: libnet-gmail-imap-label-perl Version : 0.6 Upstream Author : Zakariyya Mughal zmug...@cpan.org * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-Gmail-IMAP-Label * License : Artistic-2.0 Programming Lang: Perl Description : IMAP proxy for Google's Gmail that retrieves message labels Net::Gmail::IMAP::Label provides a proxy that sits between an IMAP client and Gmail's IMAPS server and adds GMail labels to the X-Label header. This proxy uses the Gmail IMAP extensions. . To use this proxy, your e-mail client will need to connect to the proxy using the IMAP protocol (without SSL). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130114094933.27153.43557.reportbug@bangalore
Bug#698111: ITP: zimlib -- Standard library implementation of ZIM specifications
Hi Raphaël,
On 10:00 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
snip
When I saw this, it got me clearly confused because at first I thought
that it was related to http://zim-wiki.org/. It's a bit unfortunate that
Zim is used to refer to two projects reladed to wikis.
zim in zimlib is actually ZIM which stands for Zeno IMproved file format
which was derived from Zeno file format.
[1]
I don't know who was first but maybe you could point out the nameclash
to upstream ?
I will ask upstream but a couple of project depends on this library and
this name one being kiwix which I maintain but it duplicates this source
which is the reason why I ITPed it.
But as I said name is actually abbreviation and renaming it doesn't make
sense. What do you think?
FWIW the zim debian package refers to http://zim-wiki.org/ which I'm
maintaining for Debian.
Yeah first when I saw about zim in one of your blog post I got confused
and thought zimlib is already packaged :-)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZIM_%28file_format%29
Warm Regards
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#698111: ITP: zimlib -- Standard library implementation of ZIM specifications
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote: I will ask upstream Thanks. But as I said name is actually abbreviation and renaming it doesn't make sense. What do you think? I don't agree with this statement. Coming up with a name is always a creative endeavour and you can always come up with something different if really needed. The question is more whether upstream is amenable to changing the name given that zim from zim-wiki.org seems to predate openzim.org. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook: → http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130114101420.ga9...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com
Bug#698111: ITP: zimlib -- Standard library implementation of ZIM specifications
Engelheart kel...@kiwix.org
Bcc:
Subject: Re: Bug#698111: ITP: zimlib -- Standard library implementation of
ZIM specifications
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: 20130114101420.ga9...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com
On 11:14 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
I will ask upstream
Thanks.
Emmanuel, the new upstream maintainer said as of now he has no opinion
but he agreed zim-wiki was first to use name zim.
But as I said name is actually abbreviation and renaming it doesn't make
sense. What do you think?
I don't agree with this statement. Coming up with a name is always a
creative endeavour and you can always come up with something different
if really needed.
That's true. Given that this is a library a name change can lead to
problem for all projects which is depending on it (I'm not sure how many
project depends on this lib though) any way that's my thinking but I
will leave it to upstream to decide (Emmanuel is CC'd)
snip
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#698111: ITP: zimlib -- Standard library implementation of ZIM specifications
On 11:14 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
I will ask upstream
Thanks.
Just an update Emmanuel started a discussion on whether to get the
project renamed and possible names here [1]
He has asked me for some time before he can revert back on this bug
report with his opinion
[1] http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/offline-l/2013-January/001102.html
Cheers
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#698138: ITP: ebook2cw -- Convert ebooks to Morse MP3s/OGGs
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Christoph Feenders deb...@echti.de * Package name: ebook2cw Version : 0.8.2 Upstream Author : Fabian Kurz fab...@fkurz.net * URL : http://fkurz.net/ham/ebook2cw.html * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : Convert ebooks to Morse MP3s/OGGs ebook2cw is a command line program which converts a plain text (ISO 8859-1 or UTF-8) file (ebook) to Morse code MP3 or OGG audio files. It automatically splits and numbers the output files by chapters. For a detailed description, please refer to the man-page or the project website. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130114110500.19028.26703.reportbug@xena
Processed: Re: Bug#698101: duplicate of ca-certificates
Processing control commands: close 698101 Bug #698101 [wnpp] ITP: libmozilla-ca-perl -- Mozilla's CA cert bundle in PEM format Marked Bug as done -- 698101: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698101 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b698101.13581657447554.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#698101: duplicate of ca-certificates
Control: close 698101 On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 07:23:17 + lfili...@debian.org(Luca Filipozzi) said: Please consider one of the two approaches: (1) modify the tests of libfinance-quote-perl to not require Mozilla::CA I choose this option. This working is not required now. When new libfinance-quote-perl is release, I will do that. (2) package libmozilla-ca-perl but have it depend on and use ca-certificates. Please don't create a package with yet another set of root certificates. On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:42:21PM +0900, TANIGUCHI Takaki wrote: I tried to build libfinance-quote-perl package with importing from git HEAD repository locally. It did not required Mozilla::CA to build, but some tests were failed without Mozilla::CA. -- Luca Filipozzi Member, Debian System Administration Team -- 谷口 貴紀 (TANIGUCHI Takaki)tak...@asis.media-as.org http://takaki-web.media-as.org/ tak...@debian.org http://facebook.com/taniguchi.takaki http://twitter.com/takaki_t -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871udoarkp.wl%tak...@asis.media-as.org
Bug#698146: ITP: cardpeek -- tool to read the contents of smartcards
Package: wnpp Owner: Richard Ulrich ri...@paraeasy.ch Severity: wishlist * Package name: cardpeek Version : 0.7.1 Upstream Author : l...@gmx.com * URL : http://code.google.com/p/cardpeek/ * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: C / LUA Description : tool to read the contents of smartcards The goal of cardpeek is to allow smartcard owners to be better informed about what type of personnal information is stored in these devices. The tool currently reads the contents of : * EMV cards, including NFC ones. * Navigo public transport cards (partially supports MOBIB as well) * The French health card Vitale 2 * Electronic/Biometric passports in BAC security mode. It can also read the following cards with limited interpretation of data: * Some Mifare cards (such as the Thalys card); * Moneo, the French electronic purse; * GSM SIM cards. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#698152: ITP: poti -- library to create trace files in the Paje file format
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vincent Danjean vdanj...@debian.org * Package name: poti Version : 4.2 Upstream Author : Lucas Schnorr schn...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/schnorr/poti * License : LGPL-3.0+ Programming Lang: C Description : library to create trace files in the Paje file format Poti is a library to create trace files in the Paje file format. This format can represent lots of different kind of traces and it can be read by several trace readers (vite, etc.) You should not use it directly during the tracing of your application (nothing will stop you from doing this if you want). It is recommended to use it after traces are collected in your preferred file format (probably binary with memory buffers to avoid at a maximum the tracing intrusion). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130114141815.5534.79159.report...@eyak.imag.fr
Bug#698152: ITP: poti -- library to create trace files in the Paje file format
Vincent Danjean, le Mon 14 Jan 2013 15:18:15 +0100, a écrit : Owner: Vincent Danjean vdanj...@debian.org * Package name: poti Heh, this is welcome for the future starpu 1.1 version which will be able to make use of it :) Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130114144427.gv28...@type.bordeaux.inria.fr
Bug#609278: Unity
Hello Folks still following this ITP. I spent some time trying to see if I could get the Unity shell packaged for Debian. I started with taking the latest build from precise-updates and see what needs change and what is missing Here's what I have: rrs@champaran:~/Community/Packaging/Unity$ ls bamf/ frame/ grail/ Lenses/ libunity-webapps/ unity/ x11proto-fixes/ compiz/geis/humanity-icon-theme/ libunity/ libxfixes/ unity-asset-pool/ dbus-test-runner/ glib2.0-2.32.3/ indicator-messages/ libunity-misc/ nux/ unity-greeter/ Many of it is already in Debian in sid and experimental. Where as some others (icons etc) can always be addons. Building the entire thing was a real PITA. The main reason being that getting Unity for Debian would mean close co-ordination in between dependent package teams and accommodating changes. For example, the unity patch for chromium. And this definitely cannot be done by a single person. So are people interested and willing to take it further ??? I haven't done much than just try to get it build inside a sid/experimental pbuilder instance, so all the big task of co-ordination with other dependency teams is still pending... Oh!! And yes, it also runs on my box. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#363014: opengl man pages from SGI in subversion
See https://cvs.khronos.org/svn/repos/ogl/trunk/ecosystem/public/sdk/docs/man3/glActiveTexture.xml and related files. The copyright is at the bottom of each of them, and it does seem to be a free software license. It would be great to have these man pages packages. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vcazpyf6@pobox.com
Bug#466699: ITP: libzdb -- Zild Database Library
Note: libzdb is also used by seafile, http://seafile.com i'm currently in discussion with upstream of seafile to ITP it. Jérémy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50f42799.2020...@melix.org
Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Monday 21 January 07:03:13 UTC 2013 # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html # # Source package in NEW: poti tags 698152 + pending Bug #698152 [wnpp] ITP: poti -- library to create trace files in the Paje file format Added tag(s) pending. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 698152: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698152 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135818053910549.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed (with 1 errors): wnpp-inconsistencies
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # ITP missing for package pytaglib at mentors retitle 696455 ITP: pytaglib -- Python 2.x/3.x bindings for the Taglib Bug #696455 [wnpp] ITP: python-pytaglib -- Python 2.x/3.x bindings for the Taglib audio, metadata library Changed Bug title to 'ITP: pytaglib -- Python 2.x/3.x bindings for the Taglib' from 'ITP: python-pytaglib -- Python 2.x/3.x bindings for the Taglib audio, metadata library' audio, metadata library Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 696455: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696455 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135818176120431.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#698159: ITP: python-hp3parclient -- HP 3PAR HTTP REST Client - Python bindings
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: James Page james.p...@ubuntu.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 * Package name: python-hp3parclient Version : 1.0.0 * URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/hp3parclient * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Python Description : HP 3PAR HTTP REST Client - Python bindings This is a client library that can talk to a HP 3PAR Storage array. . The 3PAR storage array has a REST web service interface as of 3.1.2 of the firmware. . This client library implements a simple interface for communicating with this REST interface using the Python httplib2 library. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQ9DdoAAoJEL/srsug59jDcC0P/iNjow++sGQKhE5Ax9jiOON2 K+MoXpFp2/4+YWpLdpTpMH2IwTpbCrgmOvelj4eBIeZNabkG4BYe4ke389FjmZ00 fIi1pIjGft4iuErXH+up3VFC9f2dLzKqc7jZ2zbQV5b/fAX+pPlu0MCR1Udj0UDf hnAdzeBPD4LjYbFLf7Yizl6nPOx/zLJFDJeDTBpT5ymz8ueTSu+Z6Cb2h3H/FXkK sR8HyXUo4goKZSPcMK+egfUXIiVKNWmYT92rfVoAP6kVvBLT/GWfFDx69YUQhv6+ bqZW+I8/SjuCTfYLLhkaWtFSeAUvt6of0isozhVLoyPVCBi/c+IPCr78zLKJR0sH uYjTQS5p9/6UTD7YFfHc8aH+RudiFzICY81zdgZBaPFlJ40jnEQH5fGuPrgGNBVe S1mE9AAG/Y68/7qKyTl4OZ5sc0UAlfh7PjNcR7dKcVmfCBCFLK3gIrVXqv6Yq26l hoMY0ucfJ8T9KmloPwFONVBzL4cCsHQyuiVTIrqSKyNxdwANK2l2VuKL+/BOhgbn s5B2SK0GZCkWy7jZMd+m48lCx2qrRo6LsHn3FemiI26iEmf0xT5s3AvzOswPkir4 jqsnVEintuY60n345gmjDF2k0gbSSfIM4x3b03NZlyCG+2nL7mWJFsXhfCeQnHXy KqO0RrjB82SYkimj91Nl =bapS -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130114165052.30993.76365.reportbug@hendrix.shouse.local
Processed: wnpp inconsistencies
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # ITP missing for package pytaglib at mentors retitle 696455 ITP: pytaglib -- Python 2.x/3.x bindings for the Taglib audio, metadata library Bug #696455 [wnpp] ITP: pytaglib -- Python 2.x/3.x bindings for the Taglib Changed Bug title to 'ITP: pytaglib -- Python 2.x/3.x bindings for the Taglib audio, metadata library' from 'ITP: pytaglib -- Python 2.x/3.x bindings for the Taglib' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 696455: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696455 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135818286028491.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#698111: ITP: zimlib -- Standard library implementation of ZIM specifications
Hi Raphaël,
On 11:14 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
I will ask upstream
Thanks.
But as I said name is actually abbreviation and renaming it doesn't make
sense. What do you think?
I don't agree with this statement. Coming up with a name is always a
creative endeavour and you can always come up with something different
if really needed.
The question is more whether upstream is amenable to changing the name
given that zim from zim-wiki.org seems to predate openzim.org.
I did some more investigation and I don't see any file name clash
betweek zim from zim-wiki and zimlib. Even though both packages have zim
in the package name there is description field which clarifies any
confusion between both packages for end user.
So I guess renaming from upstream is not required. Please share your
thoughts.
Warm Regards,
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#698111: ITP: zimlib -- Standard library implementation of ZIM specifications
Hi, On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote: I did some more investigation and I don't see any file name clash betweek zim from zim-wiki and zimlib. Even though both packages have zim in the package name there is description field which clarifies any confusion between both packages for end user. So I guess renaming from upstream is not required. Please share your thoughts. My thoughts are I have been confused and thus I believe that other users will be confused in the future. This is why I believe it's best to rename. Furthermore, there are no file clashes yet, but the day where someone will write a python wrapper for zimlib (and this is on the roadmap apparently), it might become a real issue. That said, I'm not here to impose anything to anyone. I just wanted to inform you so that both upstream are aware of the potential conflict and so that they can handle it properly. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook: → http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130114210030.ga15...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com
Bug#592967: marked as done (RFP: jnr-posix -- basic POSIX-like functions for Java)
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:00:56 -0300 with message-id caea1cyrih9ifdby4x-jdgcfc0q56tan_p0kc4iofdkbxj3p...@mail.gmail.com and subject line jnr-posix: It's already available in the archive has caused the Debian Bug report #592967, regarding RFP: jnr-posix -- basic POSIX-like functions for Java to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 592967: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592967 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org * Package name: jnr-posix Version : 1.1.4 Upstream Author : Thomas E Enebo * URL : http://github.com/wmeissner/jnr-posix * License : CPL/GPL/LGPL Programming Lang: Java Description : basic POSIX-like functions for Java This package is a Java library providing access to various POSIX functions like chmod(2), link(2) or getuid(2) through dynamic loading of native libraries with JNA. jnr-posix is the successor of the existing package libjna-posix-java and is needed by JRuby Torsten ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- This package was uploaded and accepted in the archive on May 2011. http://packages.qa.debian.org/libj/libjnr-posix-java/news/20110530T211755Z.html -- Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://keyserver.pgp.com/ Faith means not wanting to know what is true. -- Nietzsche---End Message---
Bug#686485: [license-reconcile] some more license mappings (#1)
Phil, Thanks for the interest. It's actually now under the Debian Perl Group's reposiitory. I guess I should have updated the ITP so sorry. It's also been uploaded and is sitting in the new queue. I have to say after working on this for six months I was just desparate to get at least 0.1 out of the door. On 14/01/13 08:54, Philip Hands wrote: Hi, I've added a few more license mappings, such as: 'GPL (v3 or later)' = 'GPL-3+' prompted by trying to get the copyright file for freeswitch to be somewhere near complete. That also required some patches to licensecheck from devscripts, but mostly getting it to shut up about false positives, so this patch should be fine even with an unpatched licensecheck. Cheers, Phil. You can merge this Pull Request by running git pull https://github.com/phil-hands/license-reconcile master Or view, comment on, or merge it at: https://github.com/periapt/license-reconcile/pull/1 Commit Summary * add additional string mappings File Changes * *M* lib/Debian/LicenseReconcile/LicenseCheck.pm (7) Patch Links: * https://github.com/periapt/license-reconcile/pull/1.patch * https://github.com/periapt/license-reconcile/pull/1.diff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50f47a02.6060...@periapt.co.uk
Bug#695130: License of debian/* stuff
Hi Paul I have no objections. On 13 January 2013 11:13, Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org wrote: Hi Graham, Motif is licensed under LGPL-2+. Could you consider licensing our packaging effort under the same license terms? That would make e.g. the uploading of patches to upstream a lot easier. Paul
Bug#435702: marked as done (O: x2x -- Link two X displays together, simulating a multiheaded display)
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:33:02 + with message-id e1tutwy-0004hz...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#435702: fixed in x2x 1.30-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #435702, regarding O: x2x -- Link two X displays together, simulating a multiheaded display to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 435702: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=435702 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: normal After getting rid of some old hardware, I longer use x2x so I'm looking for someone to adopt it. Upstream is alive and well (and in NM), but he's also looking to pass development to someone else. The package description is: x2x joins a pair of X displays together, as if they were a single multiheaded display. The pointer can be warped between displays, or, depending on how you start x2x, can slide from one display to the other when it runs off the edge of the screen. Keyboard focus also moves between displays in the way you'd expect, and the X selection propagates around. At least one of the displays involved (specifically, the one being controlled remotely) must support the XTEST extension. (The servers shipped by Debian support this.) . x2x is useful when you have two displays on the same desk, as you can use a single keyboard and mouse to control both. If you want to propagate your selections between displays which are not sharing a desk, you might be more interested in the package propsel. Propsel does not link the displays' keyboard and mouse, which would be confusing in some cases, and can propagate between up to 8 displays, whereas x2x can handle only two at a time. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: x2x Source-Version: 1.30-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of x2x, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 435...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Barak A. Pearlmutter b...@debian.org (supplier of updated x2x package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:30:20 +0100 Source: x2x Binary: x2x Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.30-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Barak A. Pearlmutter b...@debian.org Changed-By: Barak A. Pearlmutter b...@debian.org Description: x2x- Link two X displays together, simulating a multiheaded display Closes: 421279 435702 438943 500147 695167 Changes: x2x (1.30-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Adopt package (closes: #435702) * New upstream release (closes: #438943) - Contains dpms patch (closes: #421279) * Update packaging: - remove mention of propsel from description (closes: #500147, #695167) - new upstream home page and repository - upstream has autoconf/automake, switch to use it - dh9, harden - bump standards version Checksums-Sha1: 792cb54e8c20bf48d854e15bc1d83ef23335babd 1187 x2x_1.30-1.dsc 6620019019265c4bfe0575af1cb445ae2979b440 44838 x2x_1.30.orig.tar.gz f64b94d3a02062b7edbff7e8946f9a87465d3d5d 4818 x2x_1.30-1.debian.tar.gz 2386053150edd94a77323ac5b54c1fb67cf15e36 31268 x2x_1.30-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 346bd851e137b25ffeb4c7e56257567f6836187f0cc0e673944bc56d5ed28ff8 1187 x2x_1.30-1.dsc 21758dfe5835982ab243720654a265cd4462e937bcd72f690c740dad7c06d6d3 44838 x2x_1.30.orig.tar.gz 31ba23242545f18e4d0b5742c1f013ee53c468424fd103da9545d74a3fc8c60b 4818 x2x_1.30-1.debian.tar.gz b7d03ca5a12fccc1264c5d4b8288b315dd280a53eca44af0221b37f6c3dc836c 31268 x2x_1.30-1_amd64.deb Files: b926c16ef9a708ea3f04d38e2e7e7078 1187 x11 optional x2x_1.30-1.dsc d19d2254de8bdfc25fe94ce62babb878 44838 x11 optional x2x_1.30.orig.tar.gz 2e0c9f43e9958793da1803498af7c7ba 4818 x11 optional x2x_1.30-1.debian.tar.gz 94bd12325c3b575288ceb09227f74ce4 31268 x11 optional x2x_1.30-1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlD0krEACgkQLz4Gnv7CP7KH+wCfYtFKlHhOU/Ev0kOy3DxWZVZE kvAAoMHfWdueVtEWBy4w9t/WB8g4ooSh =2MpW -END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---
Bug#673920: (no subject)
retitle 673920 RFP: python-rsa -- pure Python RSA implementation noowner 673920 thanks Since python-oauthlib is not using anymore python-rsa I'm no more interested in packaging it. Cheers, -- Daniele Tricoli 'Eriol' http://mornie.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 673920 RFP: python-rsa -- pure Python RSA implementation Bug #673920 [wnpp] ITP: python-rsa -- pure Python RSA implementation Changed Bug title to 'RFP: python-rsa -- pure Python RSA implementation' from 'ITP: python-rsa -- pure Python RSA implementation' noowner 673920 Bug #673920 [wnpp] RFP: python-rsa -- pure Python RSA implementation Removed annotation that Bug was owned by Daniele Tricoli er...@mornie.org. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 673920: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673920 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135821003322582.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Monday 21 January 19:03:11 UTC 2013 # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html # # Source package in NEW: a href=http://packages.qa.debian.org/jquery-goodies;jquery-goodies/a tags 697234 + pending Bug #697234 [wnpp] ITP: libjs-jquery-slides -- Simple slideshow plugin for jQuery Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: a href=http://packages.qa.debian.org/libguestfs;libguestfs/a tags 698151 + pending Bug #698151 [src:libguestfs] libguestfs: FTBFS in unstable due to dropped fuse-utils (Build-Depends) Added tag(s) pending. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 697234: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697234 698151: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698151 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13582237448956.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#696719: ITP: mock -- build rpm packages inside a chroot
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: Mock was previously packaged in Debian, but unmaintained and eventually removed: http://bugs.debian.org/616383 I believe it can be handy for us and would like to re-introduce it. Good to see this, I've been using mock locally for some time now myself, extremely useful to me. Let me know if you need help testing or whatever. I am working on packaging yum-utils (#547171) which looks like it should be in Depends for mock. Thanks, looking forward to testing what you have so far. -- mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cad6ldl+eimrhq8d5sh6wfb1wypmdxg0hov4tqflnd8xaqou...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#544982: ITP: telldus-core -- Utilities and driver to control NEXA and other RF
[Stefan Alfredsson 2011-06-18] I missed the reply from Micke (wasnt subscribed to the bug :S), so I've had the ITP on hold... I'll do this soon. Meanwhile, the software is easily installed from their own repository, so it would be important to keep these in sync to avoid confusion. Any progress with this? The sources are here: http://download.telldus.se/debian/pool/stable/ For example http://download.telldus.se/debian/pool/stable/telldus-core_2.0.4.orig.tar.gz Or here: http://download.telldus.se/debian/pool/unstable/telldus-gui_2.0.104.orig.tar.gz Did you use some other repository? I used this repository, but do not find any .dsc files, nor do the telldus-core_2.1.1.orig.tar.gz file contain any debian/ directory with build rules. -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2flhamj9cse@diskless.uio.no
