Bug#888985: ITP: irtt -- Isochronous Round-Trip Tester

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pete Heist <p...@eventide.io> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org * Package name: irtt Version : 0.9+git20180131.0.7d52098-1 Upstream Author : Pete Heist * URL :

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

> On Feb 7, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Thanks for contributing this package. > > The resulting binary package irtt_0.9-1_amd64.deb contains both a binary and > Go source code. This is a bit unusual: in Debian, we only package Go source > code to

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

> On Feb 7, 2018, at 10:36 PM, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Ok, I’m getting there, bear with me. :) In my case, would I not want to > produce both a binary package and eventually a source package? > > Be careful not to confuse the Debian concept of source packages

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

> On Feb 9, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:09 AM, Pete Heist <p...@eventide.io > <mailto:p...@eventide.io>> wrote: > > From the original warnings you sent I know I’ve fixed all except "

Bug#888985: IRTT source pushed

Hi, my apologies for my inexperience building debian packages. I pushed the IRTT source following the instructions for dh-make-golang. The flent package in pkg-netmeasure is looking forward to using this as a dependency. Is there anything else needed from me? Thanks! Pete

Bug#888985: IRTT source pushed

> On Feb 6, 2018, at 7:41 PM, nodens wrote: > > You should probably send an explicit request for sponsor (RFS), on the > pkg-go-maintainer list, while leaving the bug in CC and with a specific > subject like "RFS: IRTT (#888985)" to allow your request to stand out a > bit in

Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "irtt" Package name: irtt Version : 0.9-1 Upstream Author : Pete Heist <p...@eventide.io <mailto:p...@eventide.io>> URL : https://git

Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "irtt" Package name: irtt Version : 0.9-1 Upstream Author : Pete Heist <p...@eventide.io <mailto:p...@eventide.io>> URL : https://git

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

> On Feb 12, 2018, at 10:22 PM, Michael Stapelberg > wrote: > > Would you like me to sponsor the upload of irtt now? Yes, if you would. Thanks! Pete

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

> On Feb 11, 2018, at 12:37 AM, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> > wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Pete Heist <p...@eventide.io > <mailto:p...@eventide.io>> wrote: > > - I tried getting signatures working but punted because GitH

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

> On Feb 12, 2018, at 11:05 PM, Pete Heist <p...@eventide.io> wrote: > >> On Feb 12, 2018, at 10:22 PM, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org >> <mailto:stapelb...@debian.org>> wrote: >> >> Would you like me to sponsor the upload of irtt n

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

> On Feb 14, 2018, at 3:05 PM, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > There’s nothing you need to do. I built it on amd64, as is currently still > required when uploading to the NEW queue (I would have preferred to upload > source-only). Once it’s accepted, the buildds will

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

> On Feb 9, 2018, at 11:43 AM, Pete Heist <p...@eventide.io> wrote: > >> On Feb 9, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org >> <mailto:stapelb...@debian.org>> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:09 AM, Pete Heist <p.

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

> On Feb 7, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Thanks for contributing this package. Not at all, thank you kindly for patience with my complete newness to this! > The resulting binary package irtt_0.9-1_amd64.deb contains both a binary and > Go source

Bug#888985: [pkg-go] RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

> On Feb 7, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Clément Hermann <nod...@nodens.org> wrote: > > On 07/02/2018 11:39, Pete Heist wrote: >> >> Ah, ok. IRTT has an API, but it's not published yet. I think a >> binary-only package may be better at this point, and a separate source &