Control: tags -1 + pending
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/scoop_0.7.1-1.html
Much thanks for sponsoring this.
Greetings,
Daniel Stender
--
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com
PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0
C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0
--
To
Hello,
during the build, I have this message
writing output... [ 50%] examples
WARNING: LaTeX command 'latex' cannot be run (needed for math display), check
the pngmath_latex setting
writing output... [ 66%] index
maybe it would be nice to install latex to generate the pngmath pictures.
Thanks for more review.
On 08.09.2014 16:11, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
during the build, I have this message
writing output... [ 50%] examples
WARNING: LaTeX command 'latex' cannot be run (needed for math display), check
the pngmath_latex setting
writing output... [ 66%] index
maybe it
Hello Frederic,
I've set up the DEP-8 tests, please see the latest commit.
My buildlog incl. adt-run results is here:
http://paste.debian.net/119580/
So, it would be o.k. with me to put it on its way. But, further comments
welcome, I will fix this immediately.
Greetings,
Daniel
On
Thanks for more comments.
On 03.09.2014 15:20, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
can you look with the upstream to add copyright headers where it is missing
UNKOWN
and it would be nice to have also the copyright in each header.
it seems thaht there is only the license without the copyright
Hello
what about _static/copybutton.js ?
Can't find anything special on this (among other packages only to be
found in python{2.7,3.2}-doc [1]), so I suggest we just leave it out
(contains no copyright info, whatsoever)
look at here and add the same thing in the copyright file.
Thanks for further stuff, this is going to be a hardened deb/copyright.
Won't do no harm with the FTP people.
On 04.09.2014 20:29, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
what about _static/copybutton.js ?
Can't find anything special on this (among other packages only to be
found in
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi again,
I've advanced with the package, and would like to accept your offer for
sponsoring this.
Please cf
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/scoop.git/
http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/scoop_0.7.1-1_amd64.build
Processing control commands:
tags -1 pending
Bug #760188 [wnpp] ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
Added tag(s) pending.
--
760188: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760188
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Hello, here a quick review of all the patches
* dropped docs package (REJECT-FAQ: split this only if it's big)
I think that this patch should be reverted.
The problem if you add the documentation in python-scoop seems to me
problematic when python3-scoop will come.
It is best to my opinion
Thanks for the review.
On 03.09.2014 14:05, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
Hello, here a quick review of all the patches
* dropped docs package (REJECT-FAQ: split this only if it's big)
I think that this patch should be reverted.
The problem if you add the documentation in python-scoop
scoop-doc would be. But I would be tending to python-scoop-doc anyway.
scoop-doc is better to my opinion
I just looked at sphinx and it seems that this is better to use
source-doc (it is neutral
By-the-way: what's your opinion for the dep of the docs package on the
main package, Suggests or
On 03.09.2014 14:05, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
* finalized
ok, do not hesitate to use cme to fix your control file.
The Vcs-Browser wasn't up-to-date. Fixed this.
* running testsuite
nice to have a test suite. You can look at the debci and autopkgtest
infrastructure to implement
copyright review
I used licensecheck as a starting point
can you look with the upstream to add copyright headers where it is missing
UNKOWN
and it would be nice to have also the copyright in each header.
it seems thaht there is only the license without the copyright statement.
this is not a
You removed the local-options (are you using gbp-buildpackage to build
scoop ?)
Yes. What's this for, useful to keep?
In fact I like when the master branch does not touch the upstream sources.
This is why I use the unapply patches option
this way I have the original sources in the master
On 02.09.2014 06:46, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
sorry, here the right adress
git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/scoop.git
Ah, that's already in Git, too. Thanks, Frederic.
Greetings,
Daniel
--
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com
PGP key:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com
* Package name: scoop
Version : 0.7.1
Upstream Author : SCOOP Development Team scoop-us...@googlegroups.com
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/scoop/
* License : LPGL-3.0
Hello, I already started to package it, but I did not intend to maintain it.
I can sponsorize the upload if you need a sponsor.
Did you considede maintaining it under the debian-science umbrella.
I know that it is related to deap, so it is science related :).
Here the debian-science git
Hi Frederic,
thanks for the offer to sponsor the package. Yes I would be interested
to put into under Debian Science (I've did that already for Python-nltk).
Thanks also for the pointer to your previous work on Scoop, I'll take a
look into it and come back with the package, soon.
That's a pointer to another Debian Science package, but anyhow
interesting (exemplarily) :-)
Greetings,
Daniel
On 01.09.2014 22:47, Daniel Stender wrote:
Hi Frederic,
thanks for the offer to sponsor the package. Yes I would be interested
to put into under Debian Science (I've did that
sorry, here the right adress
git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/scoop.git
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
21 matches
Mail list logo
