Bug#1068151: marked as done (Pre-installed vendors list contains broken links)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 31 Mar 2024 20:47:56 + (UTC)
with message-id <9489a182-e124-46da-bf5c-b209aae47...@me.com>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068151,
regarding Pre-installed vendors list contains broken links
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1068151: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068151
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Dear www team, The list of computer 
vendors that pre-install Debian found at /distrib/pre-installed [1] contains 
broken links and outdated entries of companies that do not exist anymore. 
Specifically, here is a list of entries I suggest be *removed*, grouped by 
region as they appear on the page (note that all of these links are broken in 
some way): - Canada: JCCSS (Jeremy Carter's Computer Service and Sales) Reason: 
website is down - Costa Rica: Luis-Alberto Montero Reason: domain was sold to 
another party - Germany: Sanux.de Reason: website seems to have been lost - 
Germany: Xtops.DE Reason: website is not functional - Italy: Binario Etico 
Reason: website down - Mexico: GOLIARDOS TECHNOLOGY S.A. de C.V. Reason: 
website down - Poland: Scrascom Komputery Poleasingowe Reason: website down - 
Switzerland: FOX Elektronix - Fux Reason: website down - United States: 
Psychsoftpc Reason: website down Additionally, here is a list of entries I 
suggest be *modified*, along with their modification and justification: - 
India: NaveenGanesan.com Change: Update link to 
https://naveenganesan.com/naveenlinux Reason: Old link leads to a 404; website 
owner updated the location of their Debian page from /computing to /naveenlinux 
- Netherlands: SnaakSystems Changes: 1) Update link to https://novacustom.com 
2) Update email to i...@novacustom.com 3) Update 1st line of address to 
NovaCustom (the rest of the address is still valid) Reason: rebranding (domain 
was updated from laptopzelfsamenstellen.nl to novacustom.com ) [1] 
https://www.debian.org/distrib/pre-installed Cheers, Justin--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

There was a mistake in formatting the bug; please ignore it.--- End Message ---

Processed: issue with Debian-style html theme for sphinx-based documents

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign 1064593 www.debian.org
Bug #1064593 [debian-policy] debian-policy: missing static resources for 
www.debian.org policy page
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-policy' to 'www.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions debian-policy/4.6.2.1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1064593 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
1064593: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064593
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: affects 1064593

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> affects 1064593 debian-policy
Bug #1064593 [www.debian.org] debian-policy: missing static resources for 
www.debian.org policy page
Added indication that 1064593 affects debian-policy
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1064593: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064593
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1068152: marked as done (Pre-installed vendors list contains broken links)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 03 Apr 2024 09:50:28 +
with message-id <660d26641f709_1408bb94c-...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#1068152 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068152,
regarding Pre-installed vendors list contains broken links
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1068152: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068152
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear www team,

The list of computer vendors that pre-install Debian found at
/distrib/pre-installed [1] contains broken links and outdated entries
of companies that do not exist anymore. Specifically, here is a list
of entries I suggest be *removed*, grouped by region as they appear on
the page (note that all of these links are broken in some way):

- Canada: JCCSS (Jeremy Carter's Computer Service and Sales)
Reason: website is down
- Costa Rica: Luis-Alberto Montero
Reason: domain was sold to another party
- Germany: Sanux.de
Reason: website seems to have been lost
- Germany: Xtops.DE
Reason: website is not functional
- Italy: Binario Etico
Reason: website down
- Mexico: GOLIARDOS TECHNOLOGY S.A. de C.V.
Reason: website down
- Poland: Scrascom Komputery Poleasingowe
Reason: website down
- Switzerland: FOX Elektronix - Fux
Reason: website down
- United States: Psychsoftpc
Reason: website down


Additionally, here is a list of entries I suggest be *modified*, along
with their modification and justification:

- India: NaveenGanesan.com
Change: Update link to https://naveenganesan.com/naveenlinux
Reason: Old link leads to a 404; website owner updated the
location of their Debian page from /computing to /naveenlinux
- Netherlands: SnaakSystems
Changes:
1) Update link to https://novacustom.com
2) Update email to i...@novacustom.com
3) Update 1st line of address to NovaCustom (the rest of the
address is still valid)
Reason: rebranding (domain was updated from
laptopzelfsamenstellen.nl to novacustom.com)

[1] https://www.debian.org/distrib/pre-installed

Cheers,

Justin
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,

Bug #1068152 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git 
repository.
You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/commit/8ccf3ed2c06d878349dd52dcecd4b726d603d383


fix links, Closes: #1068152


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1068152--- End Message ---

Bug#1064593: marked as done (debian-policy: missing static resources for www.debian.org policy page)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 04 Apr 2024 19:51:23 +
with message-id <660f04bbdfb33_1408bb94c-...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#1064593 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064593,
regarding debian-policy: missing static resources for www.debian.org policy page
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1064593: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064593
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.6.2.1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: spwhit...@spwhitton.name, hwans...@mailbox.org, 
debian-www@lists.debian.org

(this may relate closely to #915583)

Some of the web resources referenced by the online[1] copy of the Debian policy
manual seem to return HTTP 404 responses at the moment, meaning that the
intended Sphinx CSS theming fails to apply.

[1] - https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,

Bug #1064593 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git 
repository.
You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/-/commit/397fb61dee41a4bb09c4ec6c7bbc40f0087aab33


Allow documents to use new html theme (based on readthedocs.org theme). Closes: 
#1064593.


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1064593--- End Message ---

Bug#1053549: marked as done (Create a Debian theme for documentation based in Sphinx (reStructuredText))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 7 Apr 2024 13:00:43 +0200
with message-id <20240407130043.894c57d79acee013d4dda...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1053549: Create a Debian theme for documentation based 
in Sphinx (reStructuredText)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053549,
regarding Create a Debian theme for documentation based in Sphinx 
(reStructuredText)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1053549: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053549
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-www@lists.debian.org
Usertags: design
X-Debbugs-CC: 
debian-...@lists.debian.org,design-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net.


Dear website, documentation and design teams,

Several documentation manuals are being generated now using 
ReStructuredText and Sphinx, and it would be nice that a Debian theme in 
Sphinx is created and used to match our docs appearance with the Debian 
website colours etc.


Currently in the website we publish, at least:

* Debian Policy: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
* Debian Developers Reference: 
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/index.en.html
* Testing Release notes: currently in 
https://www.debian.org/releases/testing/release-notes/ but that may change


The upstream documentation about theming is here:
 http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/stable/theming.html

Please take into account that currently the machine www-master where the 
website is built runs bullseye (sphinx version: 3.4.3-2, but at some 
time it will be upgraded to bookworm (sphinx version: 5.3.0-4).


Kind regards
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

Laura Arjona Reina  wrote (Fri, 6 Oct 2023 09:35:09 +0200):
> Several documentation manuals are being generated now using 
> ReStructuredText and Sphinx, and it would be nice that a Debian theme in 
> Sphinx is created and used to match our docs appearance with the Debian 
> website colours etc.

Thanks to Stéphane Blondon, we have a nice Debian theme for Sphinx now, and
I managed to get it to the website in the end so far, currently visible at
debian-policy:
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/index.html

I had to deal with some missing javascript files as well, to make the 
sidebar appear/disappear on small screens like smartphones, but that works
now.

The only thing which is not working currently, is the search functionality,
but since that's not theme-specific I guess (please correct me, if I'm 
wrong), I close this bug.

Javascript leaves some open issues, but for those I will follow-up on some 
existing javascript bugs, we already have for the website/manuals.


Holger


-- 
Holger Wansing 
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508  3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076--- End Message ---

Processed: merging 997077 1039982

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> merge 997077 1039982
Bug #997077 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: can't download archives due 
to Mixed Content
Bug #1039982 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: Cannot download package 
source files due to mixed content URL
Merged 997077 1039982
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1039982: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039982
997077: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997077
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#987943: marked as done (www.debian.org: Developers Reference: Sphinx search non-functional: searchindex.js missing)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 9 Apr 2024 23:22:29 +0200
with message-id <20240409232229.0d4df7c0cf2decfaf861b...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#987943: www.debian.org: Developers Reference: Sphinx 
search non-functional: searchindex.js missing
has caused the Debian Bug report #987943,
regarding www.debian.org: Developers Reference: Sphinx search non-functional: 
searchindex.js missing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
987943: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987943
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Sphinx search is broken on the developers reference:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/searchindex.js
is 404.

SR
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

Holger Wansing  wrote (Mon, 8 Apr 2024 00:35:46 +0200):
> Everything works fine there as far a I see (with a desktop firefox and brave
> browser, as well as with the mobile versions of those browsers on my 
> smartphone).
> Feel free to test with more browsers/platforms/whatever.
> 
> I guess I will need to trim the 7doc script once again - h ...

This is done now.
debian-policy on debian.org/doc is fine as it is now.

See commits 3462a061, a2262ec9 and ae8aa074 on
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/-/commits/master/parts/7doc?ref_type=heads

So, we know now what is needed, to get it this far (aka: get the search
function working and make the html theme work on big (desktop pcs) and
small (smartphone) screens:

We need javascript functionality from the packages libjs-sphinxdoc and 
libjs-jquery. Without these, the above funtions will not work.
I brought it this far, to make sure of this fact.

I will close this bug now.

Whether javascript will stay active on debian.org website will need to be
decided. I will follow up regarding this topic on 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872944


Holger



-- 
Holger Wansing 
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508  3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076--- End Message ---

Bug#877337: marked as done (www.debian.org: Switch back to single page version of Policy Manual)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 09:21:37 +0200
with message-id <26135.36737.787967.779...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #877337,
regarding www.debian.org: Switch back to single page version of Policy Manual
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
877337: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877337
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hello www-team,

One of the improvements for which we switched Debian Policy to build
with Sphinx was the ability to output the Policy Manual as a single HTML
page.  Previously, it was only possible to output the Policy Manual as a
number of interlinked HTML pages.

We (the active Policy Team members) think that the single page version
is more suitable for Debian's web mirrors.  This is because it is more
useful for newcomers: with the single page version, it is possible to
use your browser's search function to search across the entire document.
More experienced users, who want the multi-page version, probably have
the debian-policy package installed locally.

When we uploaded Policy 4.1.0.0, this had the effect of switching the
version of the Policy Manual published on the web mirrors from
multi-page to single page.  But this was because we screwed up the
installed paths (see #872895).  With Policy 4.1.1.0, we've fixed the
paths, and so the version of the Policy Manual published on the web
mirrors has reverted to the multi-page version.

Please revert this, so the single page version is published on our web
mirrors.  Here is a patch (against [1]; unfortunately, I'm not in a
position to test it).  I'd appreciate it if this change could be made
quickly, to avoid URLs to the multi page version ending up in too many
mailing list posts/other documents.

@@ -392,7 +392,8 @@ echo -n "Installing documents:"
 # Debian Policy Manual
 unpack debian-policy
 mvdocs debian-policy usr/share/doc/debian-policy NO en / policy
-mvhtml_sphinx debian-policy usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html NO en /
+mvhtml_sphinx debian-policy usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy-1.html NO 
en /
+mv -f $webdocdir/debian-policy/policy-1.html 
$webdocdir/debian-policy/index.html
 
 mvdocs fhs usr/share/doc/debian-policy/fhs NO en packaging-manuals/ fhs-2.3
 mvhtml fhs usr/share/doc/debian-policy/fhs NO en packaging-manuals/ fhs-2.3

[1]  https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/parts/7doc

-- 
Sean Whitton
From dcb0c69aa246e8076f79d6838cd7eec34d57b815 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Whitton 
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:33:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Publish single page version of Debian Policy Manual

---
 parts/7doc | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/parts/7doc b/parts/7doc
index 4917094..8905599 100755
--- a/parts/7doc
+++ b/parts/7doc
@@ -392,7 +392,8 @@ echo -n "Installing documents:"
 # Debian Policy Manual
 unpack debian-policy
 mvdocs debian-policy usr/share/doc/debian-policy NO en / policy
-mvhtml_sphinx debian-policy usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html NO en /
+mvhtml_sphinx debian-policy usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy-1.html NO en /
+mv -f $webdocdir/debian-policy/policy-1.html $webdocdir/debian-policy/index.html
 
 mvdocs fhs usr/share/doc/debian-policy/fhs NO en packaging-manuals/ fhs-2.3
 mvhtml fhs usr/share/doc/debian-policy/fhs NO en packaging-manuals/ fhs-2.3
-- 
2.14.1



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We now have a multi page html version including search functionality on
our web page.

I like to terminate this old (7 years) discussion if single or multi
page is more suitable for our users. Let's use what available and
focus on more important topics.

We also have single page txt and a PDF version.

-- 
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Processed (with 1 error): Reassign to package release-notes

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 release-notes
Bug #1069417 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: upgrade procedure instructs users 
to run “apt update” but neglects upgrading
Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to 'release-notes'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1069417 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1069417 to the same values 
previously set
> thanks
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.


-- 
1069417: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069417
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#863579: marked as done (www.debian.org: include wiki team in /intro/organization)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:18:58 +0200
with message-id <26153.5330.271446.253...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #863579,
regarding www.debian.org: include wiki team in /intro/organization
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
863579: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863579
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

It would be nice to include the wiki team members in /intro/organization, as
well as the mail contact.

Nor https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/Contact nor
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianWiki list people names, so people in the
wiki team should say if they want to appear there and provide the list of
names, positions, and mail addresses to list.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.8
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
IMO it's not needed and the discussion also shows that the LDAP
information is not up to date. So having a list of people which
are not receiving the emails makes no sense. And my experiences
clearly shows that updating such a list is not done.

This is similar to experiences with lists in /intro/organisation

Therefore closing.
-- 
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Processed: reassign 1069758 to release-notes

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # www.debian.org/.../release-notes/...
> reassign 1069758 release-notes
Bug #1069758 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: upgrade procedure instructs users 
to run “apt update” but neglects upgrading
Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to 'release-notes'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1069758 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1069758 to the same values 
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1069758: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069758
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#872944: marked as done (www.debian.org: Remove JavaScript from Policy Manual published on web mirrors)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 24 Apr 2024 21:52:17 +0200
with message-id <26153.25329.121588.795...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #872944,
regarding www.debian.org: Remove JavaScript from Policy Manual published on web 
mirrors
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
872944: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872944
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important

Hello webmasters,

The Debian Policy Manual just changed its HTML output and while the
HTML has published, the CSS and included images have not.

Looking at [1], the CSS and included images should have been published
because they're still installed to
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html/.  So I think this is a problem
on your end rather than ours.  Please do reassign this bug if I'm wrong
about that, and thanks in advance for your help.

[1]  https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/parts/7doc

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.12.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

-- 
Sean Whitton


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This bug is about removing JS from the policy manual.
This is not needed, therefore closing.

If you like to discuss if a single page version is needed, please
reopen #877337.
-- 
viele Grüße Thomas--- End Message ---

Bug#612274: marked as done (www.debian.org: RSS feed for News contains same timestamp for multiple entries posted on the same day)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 24 Apr 2024 21:56:00 +0200
with message-id <26153.25552.726089.531...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #612274,
regarding www.debian.org: RSS feed for News contains same timestamp for 
multiple entries posted on the same day
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
612274: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612274
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

The RSS feed at http://www.debian.org/News/news contains the same
timestamp for 2 news posted the same day.

This is somewhat annoying for tools like feed2omb which rely on the
timestamp of the last article they forwarded to decide whether something
needs to be forwarded or not. They will forward the first one and then
consider the second one to not be newer (this is because I don't allow
feed2omb to post 2 articles in the same run).

It would thus be nice to use different timestamps. Just increment the
timestamp arbitrarily in this situation.

Cheers,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers oldstable
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (150, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This bug has no activity since many years.
It seems that it's not a problem for anyone these days.

-- 
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Bug#905422: marked as done (Avoid hard-coding the version numbers of FHS)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:05:51 +0200
with message-id <26153.26143.765941.208...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #905422,
regarding Avoid hard-coding the version numbers of FHS
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
905422: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905422
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear debian website developers,

New Debian Policy has updated Debian's FHS version from v2.3 to v3.0. The
corresponding FHS version under www.debian.org needs to be updated too.

https://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals#policy

--
Regards,
Boyuan Yang



-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 
'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.17.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=zh_CN:zh (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
The current FHS version is only used once in this document. I see no
problem in not using a variable for that.
-- 
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Bug#583781: marked as done (Please provide only one item by DPN issue for News/weekly RSS)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:16:54 +0200
with message-id <26153.26806.525741.717...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #583781,
regarding Please provide only one item by DPN issue for News/weekly RSS
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
583781: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583781
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Heya, it would be great to have a RSS and/or Atom feed for the news section of
the Debian homepage (and possibly a different one for the advisories listed
there too). I know it's stuff one can already follow via mailing list(s), but a
lot of people these days uses feeds directly, I think we can offer a service to
more users offering both.

Now, I've written before helpers that generate RSS, and I'm willing to
contribute one for this specific case. Nevertheless the README files under
News/ are a bit scary in stating that only press/webmasters should fiddle with
them, so I'm looking for advice. Where can a script that generates RSS/Atom
(and commits it?) can be hooked at in the process of maintaining the HTML
listing of news on the website homepage?

An alternative less invasive solution would be to have a separate script
elsewhere checking out periodically from CVS the News/ directory, generate the
RSS feed, and have it referenced from the homepage. That would work, wouldn't
be that much at stake with feed technology (which does pull anyhow), but
somehow doesn't feel "right".

Any hint?
Thanks for maintaining www.d.o!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Just closing this very old wishlist. We only had discussion about it,
but noone worked on this.

-- 
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Bug#821096: marked as done (filenames of generated by parse-advisory.pl and parse-dls.pl files should include the revision number)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:18:06 +0200
with message-id <26153.26878.499420.858...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #821096,
regarding filenames of generated by parse-advisory.pl and parse-dls.pl files 
should include the revision number
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
821096: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821096
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

Security Team issues revisions of DSAs, e. g. DSA-3485-1 and DSA-3485-2, but
currently parse-advisory cannot handle revisions file-wise. That is, it creates
dsa-3485.wml for the original DSA, but it is not so easy to create a revision
when the latter is issued, because file dsa-3485.wml already exists. So,
someone needs to, say, rename dsa-3485.wml, use parse-advisory to create a
source page for the revision, then rename both wml files: the original DSA
and its revision. To avoid that parse-advisory should add the revision number
to filename of generated wml file. Sometimes (like in dsa-3485-1 and dsa-3485-2
case) it is not so easy to change the text of dsa-3485 in such a way that it
would include both the original DSA and its revision, so it's better to store
them in separate files.

Cheers!
Lev Lamberov



-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
These scripts are not used any more.
-- 
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Bug#863647: marked as done (use LDAP to generate www.debian.org/intro/organization page (or at least, part of it))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:26:59 +0200
with message-id <26153.27411.53763.690...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #863647,
regarding use LDAP to generate www.debian.org/intro/organization page (or at 
least, part of it)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
863647: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863647
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

We have some info stored in the Debian LDAP, about people belonging to
groups, that could be used to generate (and keep updated
automatically) the /intro/organization page.

Adapting a script written by Paul Wise (thanks!), and running it from
a debian.org machine (e.g. people.debian.org), I can obtain the list
of, for example, Publicity Team delegates (see attached script
ldap_dump.py)..

We would need to know the gid or supplementaryGid of each of the teams
that we want to generate.

Then we would need to compare the list of groups/people that we can
obtain from LDAP, with the current list that we have in
/intro/organization. To take into account: some teams have no
corresponding LDAP group, e.g. Technical Committee.

Then, adapt the current organization.data file to insert the
corresponding scripting parts for the data that we obtain via LDAP
(not sure if we can insert Python scripts in the wml files, but
probably we can write similar code in Perl).

Leaving this here for now, I may return to advance this later in the
year, if nobody beats me to it.

Cheers
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
#!/usr/bin/python

# Author: Paul Wise 
# Author: Laura Arjona Reina 
# License: MIT/Expat

import os
import sys
import ldap

aliases = []

l = ldap.initialize('ldaps://db.debian.org')
r = l.search_s('dc=debian,dc=org',ldap.SCOPE_SUBTREE,'(supplementaryGid=publicity)',['gecos'])
aliases.append('Publicity Team')
for dn,e in r:
aliases.append(' Member: %s' % e['gecos'][0])
del l, r

with open(os.path.expanduser('./debian-teams'), 'w') as f:
f.write('\n'.join(aliases))
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Obtaining the data from LDAP does not help, because also the LDAP data
is not up to date. We often have inactive members belonging to some
team/LDAP group for years after they went inactive.

Paul mentioned in another bug that some team members (I think it was
the wiki team) were not added to the wiki contact mail alias. So
having them in a list makes no sense.

--
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Bug#1017109: marked as done (issue building the /*/devel/website/stats/*.wml files with Debian 11's wml version)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:44:15 +0200
with message-id <26154.24111.36693.800...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #1017109,
regarding issue building the /*/devel/website/stats/*.wml files with Debian 
11's wml version
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1017109: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1017109
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: www.debian.org
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertag: scripts
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org

Hello all
After upgrading www-master from Debian 10 buster (wml 2.12.2) to Debian 
11 bullseye (wml 2.32.0), we're experiencing an issue when building the 
stats files for the website:


make[4]: Entering directory 
'/srv/www.debian.org/webwml/english/devel/website/stats'
wml -q -D CUR_YEAR=2022 -o UNDEFuEN:ar.en.html@g+w   -D CUR_LANG=English 
-D CUR_ISO_LANG=en -D CUR_LOCALE=en_US.UTF-8 -D CHARSET=utf-8 \

../../../../english/devel/website/stats/ar.wml
ePerl:Error: Perl runtime error (interpreter rc=2)

 Contents of STDERR channel: -
couldn't open ./../../../../index.wml or 
/srv/www.debian.org/webwml/english/devel/website/stats/../../../../index.wml: 
No such file or directory

Died at /tmp/kZRxwsy3aN/wml.tmp1 line 747.
--
** WML:Break: Error in Pass 3 (rc=1).
Died at /usr/share/wml/TheWML/Frontends/Wml/Runner.pm line 402.
 
TheWML::Frontends::Wml::Runner::_run_pass(TheWML::Frontends::Wml::Runner=HASH(0x55c872bf8850),
 3, SCALAR(0x55c8731471c8), REF(0x55c873147198), REF(0x55c8731471b0)) called at 
/usr/share/wml/TheWML/Frontends/Wml/Runner.pm line 440
 
TheWML::Frontends::Wml::Runner::_passes_loop(TheWML::Frontends::Wml::Runner=HASH(0x55c872bf8850))
 called at /usr/share/wml/TheWML/Frontends/Wml/Runner.pm line 727
 
TheWML::Frontends::Wml::Runner::_output_and_cleanup(TheWML::Frontends::Wml::Runner=HASH(0x55c872bf8850))
 called at /usr/share/wml/TheWML/Frontends/Wml/Runner.pm line 932
 
TheWML::Frontends::Wml::Runner::run_with_ARGV(TheWML::Frontends::Wml::Runner=HASH(0x55c872bf8850),
 HASH(0x55c872df9390)) called at /usr/bin/wml line 47
make[4]: *** [Makefile:33: ar.en.html] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory 
'/srv/www.debian.org/webwml/english/devel/website/stats'

make[3]: [../../../Makefile.common:84: stats-install] Error 2 (ignored)
make[3]: Leaving directory 
'/srv/www.debian.org/webwml/english/devel/website'


The error happens with all the files in the "stats" folder, in all the 
languages.
I have checked that the source wml files (created with the script 
stattrans.pl) are similar with buster and bullseye. It seems the problem 
is in how the file is referenced when passed to wml: if I try to build 
the file like this:


wml -q -D CUR_YEAR=2022 -o UNDEFuEN:ar.en.html@g+w   -D CUR_LANG=English 
-D CUR_ISO_LANG=en -D CUR_LOCALE=en_US.UTF-8 -D CHARSET=utf-8 ar.wml


then it builds fine. If I try

wml -q -D CUR_YEAR=2022 -o UNDEFuEN:ar.en.html@g+w   -D CUR_LANG=English 
-D CUR_ISO_LANG=en -D CUR_LOCALE=en_US.UTF-8 -D CHARSET=utf-8 
../stats/ar.wml


 again it builds fine, the same with 
../../../devel/website/stats/ar.wml but it fails when the file is 
referenced as "../../../../english/devel/website/stats/ar.wml"


I am not sure if this happens because with that path are two .wmlrc 
files involved, or because the new wml version is buggy about how it 
handles long relative paths.


For now, I suggest to workaround the issue changing the corresponding 
line in the english/devel/website/stats/Makefile:


-%.$(LANGUAGE).html: $(ENGLISHDIR)/$(CUR_DIR)/%.wml 
$(LOCALEDIR)/stats.mo | $(VCSREVCACHE)

+%.$(LANGUAGE).html: %.wml $(LOCALEDIR)/stats.mo | $(VCSREVCACHE)

then the English folders builds fine, but we would need to create 
symbolic links in the other languages /devel/website/stats, in a similar 
way as it was done with the sitemap.wml in bug #924172, so they can be 
built too. I don't know how to do this, though, I've added this code to  
/english/devel/website/stats/Makefile:


ifneq "$(LANGUAGE)" "en"

%.wml:
    $(shell ln -s $(ENGLISHDIR)/$(CUR_DIR)/*.wml .)
endif

prior to the %.$(LANGUAGE).html recipe, and it seems it works for all 
languages except Chinese (variants):


wml -q -D CUR_YEAR=2022 -O1 -o 
UNDEFuZH@uCNuCNHKuCNTW:ar.zh-cn.html.tmp@g+w -o 
UNDEFuZH@uHKuCNHKuHKTWuTWHK:ar.zh-hk.html.tmp@g+w -o 
UNDEFuZH@uTWuCNTWuHKTWuTWHK:ar.zh-t
w.html.tmp@g+w --prolo

Bug#1069884: marked as done (Document acronym "ITA" on https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:20:33 +
with message-id <662ee7d1b2f53_213419960-...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#1069884 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069884,
regarding Document acronym "ITA" on https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1069884: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069884
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: deb...@rocketjump.eu

Hi,

it would be nice to document "ITA" on https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ along
with the other acronyms like O/RFA/RFH/ITP/RFP. I'm guessing it means "intent to
adopt"? It's mentioned in the removing tables entries, but that's not helpful to
see which tags are available.

Greets,
Lee
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,

Bug #1069884 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git 
repository.
You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/commit/9d50d212081566bba3064fb1532996d817aeeac9


devel/wnpp/: Document acronym "ITA". (Closes: #1069884)


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1069884--- End Message ---

Bug#1007805: marked as done (wiki.debian.org: Wiki treats a Mastodon address like an email address)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 3 May 2024 15:06:08 +0200
with message-id 
and subject line not reproducible, likely fixed upstream
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007805,
regarding wiki.debian.org: Wiki treats a Mastodon address like an email address
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1007805: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007805
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wiki.debian.org
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream

https://wiki.debian.org/Russell%20Coker

I just added my Mastodon address to my page and it is interpreted as an email
address.  I think that a pattern like @[a-z0-9]@[a-z0-9] should be exempt from
the rules about automatically making a mailto.

Also it would probably be good for the template for a user home page to
suggest addresses for Mastodon and Diaspora.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
hi,

looking at https://wiki.debian.org/Russell Coker, your mastodon address
is now rendered correctly as a link. I guess that the issue has been
fixed upstream--- End Message ---

Bug#1070391: marked as done (wiki.debian.org: spelling error: This command backup all height key-slots)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 05 May 2024 14:50:52 -0400
with message-id <408132f4a3fafa8f40ee32c7943057bebc12f532.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1070391: wiki.debian.org: spelling error: This command 
backup all height key-slots
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070391,
regarding wiki.debian.org: spelling error: This command backup all height 
key-slots
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1070391: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070391
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: wiki.debian.org
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainer,

on page https://wiki.debian.org/LVM it says "This command backup all height 
key-slots"


I'd like to suggest that the text is changed to: "This command backs up all 
eight key-slots"
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On Sat, 2024-05-04 at 17:59 +, Yngve Spjeld-Landro wrote:
> Package: wiki.debian.org
> Severity: minor
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> on page https://wiki.debian.org/LVM it says "This command backup all
> height 
> key-slots"
> 
> I'd like to suggest that the text is changed to: "This command backs up
> all 
> eight key-slots"

The typo has been fixed.

Just a reminder, anyone can edit the Debian Wiki contents. Next time if
you find an issue on the Wiki, please register a Debian Wiki account and
directly do the modification.

Thanks,
Boyuan Yang


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---

Bug#998672: marked as done (packages.debian.org: all arch:all packages have empty filelist)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 7 May 2024 21:08:08 -0400
with message-id 

and subject line Re: Bug#998672: packages.debian.org: all arch:all packages 
have empty filelist
has caused the Debian Bug report #998672,
regarding packages.debian.org: all arch:all packages have empty filelist
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998672: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998672
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: mo...@debian.org

Hello,
i think this problem has been going on for quite a while (months): all arch:all
packages have empty filelist, f.e.

https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/python3-poetry-core/filelist


please have a look as that piece of data is really useful.

Thanks,
Sandro
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Looks like the filelist is fine now, closing this bug.

Thanks,
Boyuan Yang--- End Message ---

Bug#825044: marked as done (www.d.o: please copy the new autopkgtext.txt from debian-policy into the website)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 11 May 2024 23:10:39 +0200
with message-id <26175.57039.61.12...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #825044,
regarding www.d.o: please copy the new autopkgtext.txt from debian-policy into 
the website
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
825044: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825044
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package: www.debian.org

So, since debian-policy 3.9.7 there is a document describing
autopkgtest.  I'd like having this reachable through www.d.o as all the
other policy documents already are.

Julien Cristau pointed me to
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/parts/7doc#n314 So
I'm going to guess that's all needed is some addition to that script.

I don't have a particular opinion on where this/these file(s) should be.

Thanks in advance.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I've added the autopkgtest.txt to the web pages and a link on www.d.o/devel
This will be available in a few hours after the next build of this web page.

-- 
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Bug#905440: marked as done (www.debian.org: remove "last modified" from footer)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 12 May 2024 23:14:32 +0200
with message-id <26177.12600.110594.747...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #905440,
regarding www.debian.org: remove "last modified" from footer
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
905440: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905440
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: www.debian.org

In the footer of every page we list the date the page was last
modified. Currently this information is completly useless, because it
does not show a correct date. e.g.

https://www.debian.org/women/
Last Modified: Fri, Jun 1 18:42:17 UTC 2018 

Let's look into the git log:

The last commit on index.wml was in 2014, which only changed http to
https, so no real content change. In fact, the content didn't changed
since 2012 and may be out of date.

Please just remove this useless information from every page.

-- 
regards Thomas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

the mtime of all wml files are now fixed and therefore the
last modified time in the footer is correct.

I did this on www-master:
$ cd /srv/www.debian.org/webwml/
$ git restore-mtime --skip-missing --no-directories  -v  |& tee > 
../cron/log/git-restore-mtime.log

-- 
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Processed: severity of 924139 is important

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 924139 important
Bug #924139 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: migrate from python to python3
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
924139: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924139
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#1071157: www.debian.org: securing debian manual: broken links

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 harden-doc
Bug #1071157 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: securing debian manual: broken 
links
Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to 'harden-doc'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1071157 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1071157 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
1071157: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071157
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#772822: marked as done ("please also mention SUAs and d-s-a@l.d.o on wwww.debian.org")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 18:59:45 +0200
with message-id <26187.33153.260827.455...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #772822,
regarding "please also mention SUAs and d-s-a@l.d.o on .debian.org"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
772822: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772822
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: security-tracker
Severity: wishlist

DLAs include a "Source" field that simply says "Debian LTS Team". It
would be nice if, like DSAs, the "Source" field linked to a source of
further information, like the mailing list archive or the Debian website
or to the security tracker SVN/git repository.

https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DLA-55-1
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-3020-1

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
The DLA list now link to the original annoouncement mail and the
security tracker. 

-- 
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Bug#932252: marked as done (cleanup of /intro/organization)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 18:58:03 +0200
with message-id <26187.33051.262637.879...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #932252,
regarding cleanup of /intro/organization
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
932252: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932252
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: www.debian.org


I like to clean up /intro/organization, esp. remove some content.
We have to much content on this page, much old and outdated
content. We could move some content to other pages.

My suggestion is:

- remove item Development Projects
- remove item  Individual Packages — @packages.debian.org ,
  since the page it links to will be removed
- remove the whole Ports — GNU/Linux section. These are only links to
  mailing list.
- maybe move the mailing list under User support to /support
- Debian women lists some members that left the Debian project years
  ago. ping someone to update the members list.
- remove item Consultants Page
- remove item CD Vendors Page
- remove item LDAP Developer Directory Administrator
- remove item Package Tracking System
- remove move section Debian Pure Blends. IMO blends are like
  ports. It's not a suborganization of Debian, and there's no need to
  list people involved in it.

-- 
regards Thomas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I've cleaned the most important things. Therefore closing.

-- 
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Bug#608400: marked as done (re-organize how to contribute documentation "per-profile")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 19:02:39 +0200
with message-id <26187.33327.681454.731...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #608400,
regarding re-organize how to contribute documentation "per-profile"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
608400: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608400
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Out of curiosity in response to various DPL inquiries about "how can I help
Debian?", I've reviewed a bit the various pieces of documentation on the
subject and compared it with what other distros do.  A remarkable difference
seems to be a "per-profile" organization of the available material,
i.e. organizing the "how to contribute" page with a top-level distinction
among, say: developers, translators, bug triager, artists, donors, etc.

I believe there is some value in such a distinction, simply because the users
interested into helping out usually knows pretty well what they are able and
willing to do.  I hence suggest to reorganize the content of
http://www.debian.org/intro/help according to the various profiles.

Just for reference, here a few links to what others (random sampling, not
necessarily representative) have been doing in that respect:

- Fedora: http://fedoraproject.org/en/join-fedora (scrolling a bit down)
- Ubuntu: http://www.ubuntu.com/community
- OpenSUSE: http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:How_to_participate

Thanks a lot for maintaining www.d.o,
Cheers.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

This was never implemented, so closing.
Since we restructred this page a lot the proposed change is obsolete.
-- 
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Bug#742266: marked as done (www.debian.org: "Help Debian" webpage is not very helpful)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 19:02:39 +0200
with message-id <26187.33327.681454.731...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #608400,
regarding www.debian.org: "Help Debian" webpage is not very helpful
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
608400: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608400
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Last week, during the MiniConf in Barcelona, the issue of newcomers being lost
arised a few times. There are numerous efforts underway to attract new
contributors, but it seems we're falling short at retaining some of them when
they first approach the project.

The "Help Debian" webpage is a place where many potential contributors will try
to find a way to help, but it has many issues.

First of all, it is badly organised and not very attractive to read.

I think it should be structured in a different way. I think a good idea would
be to spli the tasks in different levels of difficulty, separating technical
and non-technical, etc.

Also, point no 7 is ridiculous: are we actually suggesting a newbie to
bootstrap a port?? That definitely needs to be removed :)

Thanks.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

This was never implemented, so closing.
Since we restructred this page a lot the proposed change is obsolete.
-- 
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Bug#911896: marked as done (Review, update and document the mail setup of www.debian.org-related addresses)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 19:07:20 +0200
with message-id <26187.33608.813613.154...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #911896,
regarding Review, update and document the mail setup of www.debian.org-related 
addresses
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
911896: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911896
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear all

In bug #911605 it was suggested that maybe our setup should be public
and versioned.

I think it's a good idea. Not sure if I can put time on this in the
short term, so for now I'm filing the bug. Maybe other people can
comment and/or act on it. I have no clear proposal in my mind, I'm all
ears :-)

Some of the places to look at:

https://salsa.debian.org/dsa-team/mirror/email-virtualdomains/blob/master/debian.org/aliases

www-master.debian.org:/srv/www.debian.org/mail/aliases
www-master.debian.org:/srv/www.debian.org/mail/.mailfilter

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cgi/tree/master/cgi-bin
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/

and of course the places in webwml repo where those addresses are mentioned.

Kind regards
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
The mail setup is not public, only DD may access it.
Therefore closing.
-- 
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Bug#317140: marked as done (Display the license for Debian books)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 19:15:43 +0200
with message-id <26187.34111.815771.952...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #317140,
regarding Display the license for Debian books
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
317140: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=317140
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org

On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 08:08:29PM +0200, Mauro Darida wrote:
> I would suggest to indicate, for each book, the license under which is sent 
> to 
> publication. This would save time about getting information on proprietary 
> books (i.e the one from Martin F. Kraft)

Thanks for the suggestion.  I've sent this message to the bug tracking
system so that it doesn't get lost.

-- 
Matt


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Sorry, that we did not replied to your contribution. But we have
change a lot on the web pages since then and noone managed to add this
info.

-- 
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Bug#805451: marked as done (Bugs/Reporting: please document for each pseudo-header in which addr...@bugs.debian.org it can be used)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 19:33:19 +0200
with message-id <26187.35167.456859.239...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #805451,
regarding Bugs/Reporting: please document for each pseudo-header in which 
addr...@bugs.debian.org it can be used
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
805451: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=805451
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

whenever I want to use pseudoheaders in bug interaction I find myself
missing a reference documentation of them, stating what they do, their
exact syntax, and which are accepted by which part of the BTS.

For example, can I use Version when I mail to -d...@bugs.debian.org?
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing says that I can, but
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#pseudoheader does not mention it.

Can I use Control: when I mail n...@bugs.debian.org?
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#control it documents in which
address it can be used, and I find it very useful.

Can I use Tags: when I mail n...@bugs.debian.org? I cannot find a
mention of it, and I do not know where to look.

Most times I want to interact with the BTS and Do Things Right The First
Time, I end up asking such questions to #debian-devel and feeling
frustrated for the need of asking such apparent trivialities.

I wish there was a coincise reference to them: it would help me greatly.


Thank you,

Enrico


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Closing since noone worked on thisfor years and it will likely not happen.

-- 
 Thomas--- End Message ---

Bug#754601: marked as done ([www] tidy reports errors on release pages)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 23:13:42 +0200
with message-id <26187.48390.554539.576...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #754601,
regarding [www] tidy reports errors on release pages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
754601: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754601
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch 

what it reports are nested strong elements and undefined
 small-non-free-cd-images element.
on the squeeze page, entire  block is useless

-- 
victory
Index: squeeze/debian-installer/index.wml
===
--- squeeze/debian-installer/index.wml  (revision 103)
+++ squeeze/debian-installer/index.wml  (working copy)
@@ -78,14 +78,7 @@
 and general information about loading firmware during an installation can
 be found in the Installation Guide (see Documentation below).
 
-
-
-netinst (generally 175-240 MB) non-free
-CD images with firmware
-
 
-
-
 
 
 
Index: wheezy/debian-installer/index.wml
===
--- wheezy/debian-installer/index.wml   (revision 103)
+++ wheezy/debian-installer/index.wml   (working copy)
@@ -89,8 +89,8 @@
 
 
 
-netinst (generally 240-290 MB) non-free
-CD images with firmware
+netinst (generally 240-290 MB) non-free
+CD images with firmware>
 
 
 
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This does not seem to be a problem any more.
-- 
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Bug#861781: marked as done (www.debian.org: updating Debian memberships in other organisations information)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 23:19:46 +0200
with message-id <26187.48754.244035.733...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #861781,
regarding www.debian.org: updating Debian memberships in other organisations 
information
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
861781: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861781
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

The list of Debian memberships on our website is outdated.

https://www.debian.org/misc/memberships

We might want to:

Replace the representatives that are retired* from Debian:

GNOME Foundation (representative: Matthew Garrett*)
Linux Standards Base (representative: Wichert Akkerman*)
SchoolForge (representatives: Ben Armstrong*, Raphaël Hertzog)
OASIS: Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards 
(representative: Mark Johnson*)

Reconfirm the involvement of these representatives:

Linux International (representative: Ean R. Schuessler)
Linux Professional Institute (representative: Christoph Lameter)
SchoolForge (representatives: Ben Armstrong*, Raphaël Hertzog)
OVAL: Open Vulnerability Assessment Language (representative: Javier 
Fernández-Sanguino) 

Find out who our representatives are for these organisations:

Linux Magazine advisory council

Discuss membership possibilities with:

Linux Foundation (the Free Standards Group got merged into LF)

Add other organisations that Debian has representatives in.

Look at which other organisations Debian may want membership in.

Remove these organisations that no longer exist:

Desktop Linux Consortium (representative: Colin Walters*)

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We included the changes o nthe web page. For further changes please
open a new bug report.

-- 
regards Thomas--- End Message ---

Bug#1071739: marked as done (packages.debian.org: Removal of spam domain from download mirror page)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 24 May 2024 17:31:01 +
with message-id <6650ced53bb43_28480f94c54...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#1071739 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071739,
regarding packages.debian.org: Removal of spam domain from download mirror page
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1071739: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071739
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: packages
X-Debbugs-Cc: sa...@debian.org

Below content is verbatim from 
<https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2024/05/msg00039.html>

Hello,

While downloading binary file for a package, on download page [1], under South 
America mirror, there exists http[:]//debian.torredehanoi.org domain. Said 
domain redirected to https[:]//iyfbodn.com which is getting blocked in uBlock 
Origin (due to inclusion in Easylist and Peter Lowe;s Ad and tracking server 
list). URL seems like spam and would request it's removal.

[1]: https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/asn/download--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,

Bug #1071739 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git 
repository.
You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/commit/68dd648d0b460c33c396e743732268c0bcd10f8a


remove spam domain, Closes: #1071739


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1071739--- End Message ---

Bug#900990: marked as done ([www.debian.org] update broken links to alioth.debian.org (and aliases))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 25 May 2024 00:41:32 +0200
with message-id <26193.6044.973160.915...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #900990,
regarding [www.debian.org] update broken links to alioth.debian.org (and 
aliases)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
900990: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=900990
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-www@lists.debian.org
Usertags: content
Tags: newcomer

Hello all

A lot of links have been updated already (thanks!) but we still have in
the website links pointing to alioth.debian.org or its aliases.

I'm attaching several lists of links that we should update at some time.

Notes:
* Most of them are in news items from the past.

* For source code repositories, some of them are migrated to salsa but
the format of the URLs is different (so you need to find in salsa the
item we're linking to, and then update the whole URL with the URL of the
new link).

*  The repos that were not migrated to salsa are now in
https://alioth-archive.debian.org/ but in .tar.xz format, so similar
situation.

* Some web pages that were in the sites with URL type
http[s]://some-project.alioth.debian.org/ are now in Salsa pages (under
pages.debian.net) but we cannot tell exactly where. Hints: look at the
source code repo of the corresponding team, or ask the corresponding team

* For very old stuff that was not migrated and is definitely gone
(because in alioth-archive there are only repositories), we can choose
between linking to archive.org (if exists archive of those pages) or
delete the link (and maybe add a note about dead link? a note will need
translations, though).

* The attached lists are from the /english folder. If something is
changed there, translations should be updated as well. The script
smartchange.pl may help on that, but note that its behavior is now
different than what we had with CVS (call it with -h to see the help
message).
* I suggest to start with the obvious updates, and leave the ones that
is not clear how to update them to the end, posting here in this bug
report the suggestions.

Interested people willing to help even more with broken links can also
have a look at:

https://www-master.debian.org/build-logs/urlcheck/

Cheers
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
News/2000/20001115.wml:10:<http://cvs.debian.org/";>cvs.debian.org>, and is
News/2000/20001115.wml:20:BrainFood for hosting www.debian.org and 
cvs.debian.org respectively
News/weekly/2003/49/index.wml:124:that the CVS repository on cvs.debian.org is 
back, but all pserver accounts
News/weekly/2003/08/index.wml:28:href="http://cvs.debian.org/webwml/english/users/index.wml?cvsroot=webwml";>\
News/weekly/2003/45/index.wml:109:href="http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/doc/TODO?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup";>\
News/weekly/2003/03/index.wml:39:href="http://cvs.debian.org/ddp/?cvsroot=debian-doc";>Debian
 Documentation
News/weekly/2003/21/index.wml:192:href="https://cvs.debian.org/?cvsroot=debbugs";>CVS
 repository.
News/weekly/2003/06/index.wml:146:href="http://cvs.debian.org/apt/po/?cvsroot=APT+%28%2Fcvs%2Fdeity%29";>CVS,
News/weekly/2003/37/index.wml:132:href="http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/doc/INSTALLATION-HOWTO?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup";>\
News/weekly/2003/23/index.wml:38:href="http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/doc/TODO?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup";>\
News/weekly/2004/37/index.wml:103:href="http://cvs.debian.org/ddp/manuals.sgml/release-notes/?cvsroot=debian-doc";>\
News/weekly/2004/51/index.wml:83:href="http://cvs.debian.org/mia/?cvsroot=qa";>MIA
 database management in
News/weekly/2004/51/index.wml:98:href="http://cvs.debian.org/ddp/manuals.sgml/release-notes/?cvsroot=debian-doc";>\
News/weekly/2001/27/index.wml:22:href="http://cvs.debian.org/boot-floppies/documentation/";>current
 version
News/weekly/2005/21/index.wml:71:in the archive http://cvs.debian.org/dak/?cvsroot=dak";>suite.
News/weekly/2005/26/index.wml:58:href="http://cvs.debian.org/srcdep/Packages-arch-specific?rev=HEAD&cvsroot=dak&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup";>\
News/weekly/2002/28/index.wml:97:href="http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/doc/ui.txt";>design.
  Work an

Bug#915972: marked as done (Broken policy documentation links in p.d.o)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 25 May 2024 10:55:39 +0200
with message-id <0adf89c5-4e50-4874-bd18-c74e36bc6...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: #915972Broken policy documentation links in p.d.o
has caused the Debian Bug report #915972,
regarding Broken policy documentation links in p.d.o
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
915972: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915972
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: newcomer
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: packages
X-Debbugs-CC: alf...@agrell.info

Hello all

As reported in the mail message below (thanks Alfred!, you may want to
subscribe to the bug number or even submit a patch), some links in
packages.debian.org need to be updated to point to the current Debian
Policy URLs.

I have searched for debian-policy links in the packages repo
(https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages) and tried the URLs
found. These ones need to be updated:

lib/Parse/DebianChangelog.pm:1258:L<https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#debian-changelog-debian-changelog>.

templates/config/archive_layout.tmpl:22:main =>
'https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#the-main-archive-area',

templates/config/archive_layout.tmpl:23:contrib =>
'https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#the-contrib-archive-area',

templates/config/archive_layout.tmpl:24:'non-free' =>
'https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#the-non-free-archive-area',

templates/html/show.tmpl:61:[%- PROCESS marker text=g('essential')
title=g('package manager will refuse to remove this package by default')
url='https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#essential-packages' IF
page.get_newest('essential') == 'yes' %]

Kind regards,

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

El 13/11/18 a las 23:48, Alfred Agrell escribió:
> Hello,
> 
> bug report: the [contrib] links on packages.debian.org currently lead to
> <https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#the-contrib-archive-area>,
> which is just an index page. The intended target has an extra
> ch-archive.html,
> <https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#the-contrib-archive-area>.
> 
> 
> This shows up on, for example,
> <https://packages.debian.org/stretch-backports/virtualbox> and
> <https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=virtualbox>. The same issue
> exists on [non-free] packages too.
> 
> - Alfred Agrell
> 

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This has been dealed with in the meantime; closing this bug.


-- 
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3--- End Message ---

Bug#1016694: marked as done (packages.debian.org uses favicon with white shadow)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 25 May 2024 16:48:35 +
with message-id <66521663982fc_28480f94c55...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#1016694 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016694,
regarding packages.debian.org uses favicon with white shadow
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1016694: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016694
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation?
I switched my browser to use dark theme and access packages.debian.org with it.

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
I switched my browser to use dark theme and access packages.debian.org with it.

   * What was the outcome of this action?
I saw that it uses a favicon with a white grop shadown looking really ugly.

   * What outcome did you expect instead?
To see a just red favicon just like the one of www.debian.org or wiki.debian.org


See the attached screenshot of my open tabs showing from left to right
packages.debian.org (with an ugly favicon), www.debian.org and wiki.debian.org.


Best regards,
  Alexander


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.12
  APT prefers oldstable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-18-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,

Bug #1016694 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git 
repository.
You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/commit/9168b2d3acf138dd19779c544164eac1091ea7b3


Use favicon from debian.org, as also changed in master branch. Closes: #1016694


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1016694--- End Message ---

Bug#1073204: marked as done (www.debian.org: untranslated string in translations of https://www.debian.org/intro/organization.html)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:04:37 +
with message-id <666de5c52b4fc_32c48596058...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#1073204 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #1073204,
regarding www.debian.org: untranslated string in translations of 
https://www.debian.org/intro/organization.html
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1073204: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n

Dear Maintainer,

The translations of https://www.debian.org/intro/organization.html have the
following untranslated sentence:

"Debian is a member of the following organizations, either directly or through
SPI."

This is due to the fact that that sentence is part of the file
english/intro/organization.data instead of english/intro/organization.wml.

This problem could be solved by moving that specific sentence to
english/intro/organization.wml and by splitting up
english/intro/organization.data in two parts. A part 1 that gets included by a
line
#include "$(ENGLISHDIR)/intro/organization-part1.data"
that comes in english/intro/organization.wmljust before the line
"Debian is a member of the following organizations, either directly or through
SPI."
and a part 2 that gets included by a line
#include "$(ENGLISHDIR)/intro/organization-part2.data"
that has to be placed just after the forementioned line.

Kindly,
Frans Spiesschaert



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.13
  APT prefers oldoldstable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'oldoldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldoldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-26-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=nl_BE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,

Bug #1073204 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git 
repository.
You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/commit/6cadb1162628a7fdf8b8fe5124c707136d7ae90a


Reorder organization.data and move one paragraph from organization.data to 
organization.wml. (Closes: #1073204)


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1073204--- End Message ---

Processed: reassign 1074176 to www.debian.org, user www.debian....@release.debian.org, usertagging 1074176

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # How is this a "general" bug?
> reassign 1074176 www.debian.org
Bug #1074176 [general] packages.debian.org: allow seeing files
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'www.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1074176 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1074176 to the same values 
previously set
> user www.debian@release.debian.org
Setting user to www.debian@release.debian.org (was 
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> usertags 1074176 + packages
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: packages.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1074176: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074176
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1074497: marked as done (wiki.debian.org: NVIDIA Optimus: Still necessary to avoid the intel Xorg driver?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 6 Jul 2024 08:17:50 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <3fcdfc14-1269-e5fd-2d4c-270212acc...@sourcepole.ch>
and subject line a ticket is not the place to discuss wiki articles
has caused the Debian Bug report #1074497,
regarding wiki.debian.org: NVIDIA Optimus: Still necessary to avoid the intel 
Xorg driver?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1074497: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074497
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wiki.debian.org
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: larri...@inbox.lv

Dear Maintainer,

'.. Also make sure that the outdated xserver-xorg-video-intel package is not 
installed. The "modesetting" xorg driver has superseded it and will be used in 
this configuration.'

I have Debian 12.5 (i.e. current as of June 2024) but I have the intel driver 
installed.  When I try to use apt to install the modesetting driver, I get a 
redirect to xserver-xorg-core and the result that everything is already 
up-to-date.

Has the modesetting driver been withdrawn and superseded by the original 
drivers?  Does the wiki need an update?

Regards,
Scott.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Hello Scott,

Scott MacKenzie wrote on 2024-06-29:


Dear Maintainer,

'.. Also make sure that the outdated xserver-xorg-video-intel package is 
not installed. The "modesetting" xorg driver has superseded it and will 
be used in this configuration.'


I have Debian 12.5 (i.e. current as of June 2024) but I have the intel 
driver installed.  When I try to use apt to install the modesetting 
driver, I get a redirect to xserver-xorg-core and the result that 
everything is already up-to-date.


Has the modesetting driver been withdrawn and superseded by the original 
drivers?  Does the wiki need an update?


Debian tickets are not the right means to discuss wiki articles. Therefore 
I am closing this ticket.


Instead you can use f.ex. Debian's IRC [1] channel to do that or you can 
use one of the Debian Users mailing lists [2].


If you want to fix an article or discuss variants of ways of how to do 
things, then you can make yourself a wiki account and discuss the issue 
directly in the article. Even better, you can check the history of the 
article and you can try to ask the people that wrote the passages that you 
want to discuss directly.


Also note that people can watch articles and if they do then they will 
get notified of your edits and if the watchers think there's a problem 
with the edits they still can correct them.


Greetings and thanks for contributing!
*t

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/IRC
[2] https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/--- End Message ---

Processed: reassign 1076697 to www.debian.org

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 1076697 www.debian.org
Bug #1076697 [debian-www] Translation of "Galician" is missing from trixie 
release notes table
Warning: Unknown package 'debian-www'
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-www' to 'www.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1076697 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1076697 to the same values 
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1076697: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076697
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#302862: marked as done (DSA-177 links to wrong advisory)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:57:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302862: DSA-177 links to wrong advisory
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 13:11:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 06:11:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DI4sr-0004W6-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:11:21 -0700
Received: from hexagon.inweb.co.uk [213.210.47.3] 
by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DI4sq-0007If-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 07:11:20 -0600
Received: from kippax (theoldbakery.cupis.co.uk [213.210.14.210])
by hexagon.inweb.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D9AE3140FB;
Sun,  3 Apr 2005 14:10:45 +0100 (BST)
Received: by kippax (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun,  3 Apr 2005 14:10:45 +0100
From: "Paul Cupis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DSA-177 links to wrong advisory
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:10:45 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor

The page http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-177 links to the
original advisory for this security problem (pam -- serious security
violation). The link, however, actually links to the advisory for
DSA178.

The page should link to

http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-announce-2002/msg00101.html

not

http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-announce-2002/msg00100.html

Regards,
Paul Cupis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (910, 'unstable'), (900, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

---
Received: (at 302862-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 18:57:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 11:57:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from plasma.jpberlin.de [213.203.238.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DIAHc-6z-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:57:16 -0700
Received: from plasma.jpberlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (plasma [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 17169-10 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Sun,  3 Apr 2005 20:57:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from homer (d106021.adsl.hansenet.de [80.171.106.21])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by plasma.jpberlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD617F9FE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,  3 Apr 2005 20:57:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: Tobias Toedter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#302862: DSA-177 links to wrong advisory
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:57:02 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1236783.4e58tsRZ8x";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at plasma.jpberlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

--nextPart1236783.4e58tsRZ8x
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 03 April 2005 15:10, Paul Cupis wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: minor
>
> The page http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-177 links to the
> original advisory for th

Bug#302739: marked as done (www.debian.org: doc/reference § 2.1.3 says sarge=stable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:18:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302739: =?iso-8859-1?Q?www=2Edebia?= 
=?iso-8859-1?Q?n=2Eorg=3A_doc=2Freference_=A7?= 2.1.3 says sarge=stable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 18:05:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 10:05:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHmzm-0005WU-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 10:05:18 -0800
Received: from 213-84-114-29.adsl.xs4all.nl (tofu.mamane.lu) [213.84.114.29] 
by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHmzk-0005sk-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 11:05:17 -0700
Received: from master by tofu.mamane.lu with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DHmwg-0005ti-Ad
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 20:02:06 +0200
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 20:02:06 +0200
From: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: =?iso-8859-15?Q?doc=2Frefe?=
=?iso-8859-15?Q?rence_=A7?= 2.1.3 says sarge=stable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux
X-Request-PGP: http://www.mamane.lu/openpgp/dh4096.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-system.en.html, section
2.1.3 says that sarge is the current stable, which is rather confusing
for people not up to date with Debian news.

-- 
Lionel

---
Received: (at 302739-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 19:18:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 12:18:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DIAcI-0001vt-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:18:38 -0700
Received: from [217.2.130.32] (helo=localhost)
by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(WEB.DE 4.104 #268)
id 1DIAbn-0001j0-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:18:07 +0200
Received: from jens by localhost with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DIAbz-0001rN-RG; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:18:19 +0200
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:18:19 +0200
From: Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#302739: =?iso-8859-1?Q?www=2Edebia?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?n=2Eorg=3A_doc=2Freference_=A7?= 2.1.3 says sarge=stable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 08:02:06PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-system.en.html, section
> 2.1.3 says that sarge is the current stable, which is rather confusing
> for people not up to date with Debian news.

Thanks for this report.

I changed the DDP version to use Woody for stable, but please note that
this will be overridden with the next synchronisation from SourceForce
CVS (project name: qref). This is because we prepare a new version
and deb packages for Sarge and we need of course to mention Sarge as the
stable release so that it can migrate to Sarge.

Jens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304620: marked as done (www.debian.org: ring.shizuoka.ac.jp is unavailable any more)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:40:28 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line www.debian.org: ring.shizuoka.ac.jp is unavailable any more
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2005 11:18:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 14 04:18:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from serio.al.rim.or.jp [202.247.191.123] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DM2MD-0006rr-00; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 04:18:01 -0700
Received: from mail3
by serio.al.rim.or.jp (3.7W/HMX-13) id UAA14631
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:17:59 +0900 (JST)
Received: from exploit (www.jp.debian.org [210.157.158.35]) by mail3 
(8.9.3/3.7W)
id UAA20674 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:22:10 +0900 
(JST)
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:17:09 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: ring.shizuoka.ac.jp is unavailable any more
From: Nobuhiro IMAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.50 on Emacs 22.0.50 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg=pgp-sha1;
 boundary="--Security_Multipart(Thu_Apr_14_20_17_09_2005_442)--"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Security_Multipart(Thu_Apr_14_20_17_09_2005_442)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor

One of the official mirror site of Debian archive,
ring.shizuoka.ac.jp, is unavailable any more due to transfer of its
administrator. We should remove the site from Mirrors.masterlist.

I'm tring to do this by myself.

Regards,
--
Nobuhiro IMAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key fingerprint = F39E D552 545D 7C64 D690  F644 5A15 746C BD8E 7106

Security_Multipart(Thu_Apr_14_20_17_09_2005_442)--
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCXlFTWhV0bL2OcQYRAvnKAJ9mk7BQQPBennNRYWxfQMqVKUdnCQCgsGxf
bVC6VGI1wqb4NS7dn5aVxqQ=
=oKcg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Security_Multipart(Thu_Apr_14_20_17_09_2005_442)

---
Received: (at 304620-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2005 11:42:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 14 04:42:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from serio.al.rim.or.jp [202.247.191.123] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DM2jV-0001j0-00; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 04:42:05 -0700
Received: from mail5
by serio.al.rim.or.jp (3.7W/HMX-13) id UAA16380
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:42:02 +0900 (JST)
Received: from exploit (www.jp.debian.org [210.157.158.35]) by mail5 
(8.9.3/3.7W)
id UAA08614 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:44:23 +0900 
(JST)
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:40:28 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: www.debian.org: ring.shizuoka.ac.jp is unavailable any more
From: Nobuhiro IMAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.50 on Emacs 22.0.50 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg=pgp-sha1;
 boundary="--Security_Multipart(Thu_Apr_14_20_40_28_2005_776)--"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Security_Multipart(Thu_Apr_14_20_40_28_2005_776)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello,

From: Nobuhiro IMAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: ring.shizuoka.ac.jp is unavailable any more
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:17:09 +09

Processed: changed my e-mail address from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

o Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)

> submitter #275376 !
Bug#275376: gnotime: keyboard shortcuts don't work if mouse is inside project 
tree
Changed Bug submitter from Miernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)

> submitter #223678 !
Bug#223678: gnotime: start/stop timer changes the toolbar from "Text Only" to 
"Text Below Icons" mode
Changed Bug submitter from Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miernik 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)

> submitter #218721 !
Bug number 218721 not found.

> submitter #260788 !
Bug number 260788 not found.

> submitter #257487 !
Bug number 257487 not found.

> submitter #187882 !
Bug number 187882 not found.

> submitter #198239 !
Bug number 198239 not found.

> submitter #203850 !
Bug number 203850 not found.

> submitter #218212 !
Bug number 218212 not found.

> submitter #253170 !
Bug number 253170 not found.

> submitter #262472 !
Bug number 262472 not found.

> submitter #176558 !
Bug number 176558 not found.

> submitter #176794 !
Bug number 176794 not found.

> submitter #177704 !
Bug number 177704 not found.

> submitter #177737 !
Bug number 177737 not found.

> submitter #177927 !
Bug number 177927 not found.

> submitter #178230 !
Bug number 178230 not found.

> submitter #186694 !
Bug number 186694 not found.

> submitter #192217 !
Bug number 192217 not found.

> submitter #193943 !
Bug number 193943 not found.

> submitter #193964 !
Bug number 193964 not found.

> submitter #194255 !
Bug number 194255 not found.

> submitter #196645 !
Bug number 196645 not found.

> submitter #197311 !
Bug number 197311 not found.

> submitter #198188 !
Bug number 198188 not found.

> submitter #198300 !
Bug number 198300 not found.

> submitter #201203 !
Bug number 201203 not found.

> submitter #201402 !
Bug number 201402 not found.

> submitter #203512 !
Bug number 203512 not found.

> submitter #203540 !
Bug number 203540 not found.

> submitter #204368 !
Bug number 204368 not found.

> submitter #204722 !
Bug number 204722 not found.

> submitter #204723 !
Bug number 204723 not found.

> submitter #204864 !
Bug number 204864 not found.

> submitter #204896 !
Bug number 204896 not found.

> submitter #205517 !
Bug number 205517 not found.

> submitter #216216 !
Bug number 216216 not found.

> submitter #218722 !
Bug number 218722 not found.

> submitter #220936 !
Bug number 220936 not found.

> submitter #222461 !
Bug number 222461 not found.

> submitter #222957 !
Bug number 222957 not found.

> submitter #223646 !
Bug number 223646 not found.

> submitter #224643 !
Bug number 224643 not found.

> submitter #224644 !
Bug number 224644 not found.

> submitter #229520 !
Bug number 229520 not found.

> submitter #238455 !
Bug number 238455 not found.

> submitter #257272 !
Bug number 257272 not found.

> submitter #261002 !
Bug number 261002 not found.

> submitter #266937 !
Bug number 266937 not found.

> submitter #269887 !
Bug number 269887 not found.

> submitter #282825 !
Bug number 282825 not found.

> submitter #173882 !
Bug number 173882 not found.

> submitter #174400 !
Bug number 174400 not found.

> submitter #176949 !
Bug number 176949 not found.

> submitter #194258 !
Bug number 194258 not found.

> submitter #196649 !
Bug number 196649 not found.

> submitter #196664 !
Bug number 196664 not found.

> submitter #196796 !
Bug number 196796 not found.

> submitter #203848 !
Bug number 203848 not found.

> submitter #204000 !
Bug number 204000 not found.

> submitter #204721 !
Bug number 204721 not found.

> submitter #250726 !
Bug number 250726 not found.

> submitter #191563 !
Bug number 191563 not found.

> submitter #196631 !
Bug number 196631 not found.

> submitter #196735 !
Bug number 196735 not found.

> submitter #198500 !
Bug number 198500 not found.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304992: marked as done (www.debian.org: www.debian.org/News has same date (1 Jan 2005) for woody r4 and r5 point releases)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:25:05 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304992: www.debian.org: www.debian.org/News has same date 
(1 Jan 2005) for woody r4 and r5 point releases
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 02:16:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 19:16:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe-65-26-182-85.indy.res.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net) 
[65.26.182.85] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMzL2-0001zI-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 19:16:44 -0700
Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 10C5968C026; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 21:16:43 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: www.debian.org/News has same date (1 Jan 2005) for 
woody r4
 and r5 point releases
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 21:16:42 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Something looks wrong here:

[01 Jan 2005] Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 updated (r5)
[18 Feb 2005] Debian project at several conferences and expos
[01 Jan 2005] Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 updated (r4)

According to my debian-announce folder[1], the r5 point release was done on
16 April 2005, not 1 January.

[1] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/debian-announce-2005/msg1.html

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-powerpc-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 304992-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 13:25:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 17 06:25:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DN9m0-0002EK-00; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 06:25:16 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 8678E64D42; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:25:16 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DD5484EC71; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:25:05 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:25:05 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#304992: www.debian.org: www.debian.org/News has same date (1 
Jan 2005) for woody r4 and r5 point releases
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-16 21:16]:
> Something looks wrong here:
> 
> [01 Jan 2005] Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 updated (r5)
> [18 Feb 2005] Debian project at several conferences and expos
> [01 Jan 2005] Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 updated (r4)
> 
> According to my debian-announce folder[1], the r5 point release was done on
> 16 April 2005, not 1 January.

Joey has fixed this already.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#305089: marked as done (www.debian.org: please update http://www.debian.org/intro/organization re: Debian Project Leader)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:09:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#305089: www.debian.org: please update 
http://www.debian.org/intro/organization re: Debian Project Leader
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 21:36:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 17 14:36:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe-65-26-182-85.indy.res.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net) 
[65.26.182.85] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DNHQx-0006ot-00; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:36:04 -0700
Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 98A5C68C003; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:36:02 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: please update http://www.debian.org/intro/organization 
re:
 Debian Project Leader
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:36:02 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi guys,

http://www.debian.org/intro/organization

has recently become inaccurate with respect to the post of Debian Project
Leader.

Please update this page to reflect the current identity of the DPL.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-powerpc-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 305089-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 22:09:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 17 15:09:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp06.web.de [217.72.192.224] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DNHxa-fy-00; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 15:09:47 -0700
Received: from [217.2.148.245] (helo=localhost)
by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(WEB.DE 4.104 #268)
id 1DNHx2-00070M-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:09:13 +0200
Received: from jens by localhost with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DNHxE-bU-5L
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:09:24 +0200
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:09:23 +0200
From: Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#305089: www.debian.org: please update 
http://www.debian.org/intro/organization re: Debian Project Leader
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 04:36:02PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> http://www.debian.org/intro/organization
> 
> has recently become inaccurate with respect to the post of Debian Project
> Leader.
> 
> Please update this page to reflect the current identity of the DPL.

This is already fixed since more than 9 hours :-)

Jens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#307570: marked as done (please provide releasenotes (Re: Release update: editorial changes to the testing propagation scripts))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 4 May 2005 12:54:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307570: please provide releasenotes (Re: Release update: 
editorial changes to the testing propagation scripts)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2005 23:24:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 03 16:24:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bone.digitalis.org [212.12.48.27] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DT6ku-x3-00; Tue, 03 May 2005 16:24:44 -0700
Received: from localhost (bone [127.0.0.1])
by bone.digitalis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FC7329946;
Wed,  4 May 2005 01:24:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bone.digitalis.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bone [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 28116-08; Wed, 4 May 2005 01:24:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from matrix.athome (d010017.adsl.hansenet.de [80.171.10.17])
(using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by bone.digitalis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE19C329944;
Wed,  4 May 2005 01:24:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: please provide releasenotes (Re: Release update: editorial changes to 
the testing propagation scripts)
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 01:23:25 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1377472.aBZrzoapJE";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at digitalis.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

--nextPart1377472.aBZrzoapJE
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: www.debian.org

Hi,

On Tuesday 03 May 2005 21:46, Steve Langasek posted a fine mail about a fin=
e=20
change (thanks for both to whom it may apply).

Whohoo! :-)

Regarding testing upgrades from woody, I would like to propose mentioning=20
more visible that the suggested upgrade tool is aptitude, not apt-get - few=
er=20
people than you might think read the fine releasenotes :-)=20

This might be related to the fact the they're somewhat hidden, at least=20
to ./google "sarge releasenotes" -=20
http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes isn't helpful atm eithe=
r.

regards & keep on rockin' ;-)
Holger

> As before, being able to hold to this schedule depends heavily on a
> steadily dropping RC bug count, so if that isn't happening, the timeline
> will have to be tweaked accordingly.

> Note once again that you can stage NEW uploads in experimental to avoid
> disruption in unstable.

--nextPart1377472.aBZrzoapJE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCeAgVUHLQNqxYNSARArWEAKCxHgLg5HqWtDzORypyTXbTuBQIrwCcDRaj
wAk27jjbm2/TXU7R4b4IkL8=
=8UZo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--nextPart1377472.aBZrzoapJE--

---
Received: (at 307570-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2005 10:54:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 04 03:54:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bone.digitalis.org [212.12.48.27] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTHWd-eS-00; Wed, 04 May 2005 03:54:43 -0700
Received: from localhost (bone [127.0.0.1])
by bone.digitalis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA40329946
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed,  4 May 2005 12:54:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bone.digitalis.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bone [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 31516-06 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 4 May 2005 12:54:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from matrix.athome (d010017.adsl.han

Bug#291555: marked as done (omitting slash causes strange mish-mash)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 7 May 2005 09:33:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2005 13:39:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 21 05:39:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tomts25.bellnexxia.net (tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net) 
[209.226.175.188] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Crz0s-00060T-00; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 05:39:46 -0800
Received: from myrealbox.com ([70.48.36.64]) by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net
  (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP
  id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:39:44 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:42:28 -0500
From: Jason Spiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: omitting slash causes strange mish-mash
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org

http://packages.debian.org/stable/ (note: there's a slash at the end of 
that URL) takes me to the list of packages in stable.

http://packages.debian.org/stable (without a slash) takes me to a Can't 
find package "stable" page.

The same thing happens when I replace the word 'stable' with the word 
'testing', 'unstable', or 'experimental'.

Note that I have not found any links to 
http://packages.debian.org/stable without the slash. I have, however, 
just printed out 20 pages of installfest handouts with the slash 
missing. If I do not correct them, 20 newbies will get unexpected 
results and perhaps give up on apt-get.

Regards,
Jason


---
Received: (at 291555-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2005 16:33:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 07 09:33:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DUSFO-0005IL-00; Sat, 07 May 2005 09:33:46 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j47GXiTV065848
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 7 May 2005 09:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DUSF9-0001Y3-Hn
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 07 May 2005 09:33:31 -0700
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 09:33:31 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.82, clamav-milter version 0.82 on 
zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Howdy,

I just tried

 http://packages.debian.org/stable
 http://packages.debian.org/testing
 http://packages.debian.org/unstable
 http://packages.debian.org/experimental

and they all redirect to the correct page.

--=20
Matt

--SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signat

Bug#308537: marked as done (www.debian.org: please update link to Debian Flyer on events/material)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2005 20:12:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308537: www.debian.org: please update link to Debian Flyer 
on events/material
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 20:50:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 13:50:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gelfand.mdcc.cx (stegun.mdcc.cx) [80.126.189.155] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVbgL-0001TG-00; Tue, 10 May 2005 13:50:21 -0700
Received: from nagy.mdcc.cx (nagy.mdcc.cx 
[IPv6:2001:888:1a9b:0:204:e2ff:fe33:5ea5])
by stegun.mdcc.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47ACA99EB;
Tue, 10 May 2005 22:50:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by nagy.mdcc.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7FD572AC48D; Tue, 10 May 2005 22:50:18 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 22:50:18 +0200
From: Joost van Baal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org: please update link to Debian Flyer on events/material
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.11
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 8FC6 A40E 31B8 7E0E 2270  D7A9 0606 9CF2 9694 57F0
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x969457F0
X-PGP-Key: http://mdcc.cx/~joostvb/joostvb_key.asc
X-Accept-Language: nl, en
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hi,

The Debian Flyer has a new homepage.  This patch for
cvs.debian.org/webwml/webwml/english/events/material.wml fixes the now
obsolete reference:

--

--- material.wml2004-09-24 14:10:04.192505186 +0200
+++ material.wml.new2005-05-10 22:41:18.206401880 +0200
@@ -63,14 +63,9 @@
 regarding to Debian, can entice people to contribute and for it's
 paper they can take notes on it! All in all, they are pretty useful.

-You can retrieve the
-full source used for building multilingual flyers, and you can  also
-browse the files. Currently, flyers are
-available in English, German, Swedish, Italian, French, Dutch and
-Spanish. Translating the general flyer to a new language is
-as easy as translating the english.tex file and following the building
-instructions in the \
-readme.txt  file.
+Sources for a multilingual flyer, as well as instructions for printing are
+available from the http://debian-flyers.alioth.debian.org";>Debian
+Flyers webpage.

 For pamphlets, there are AbiWord files
 available for both English and Spanish that can be easily translated into


--

all content below materials/flyers/general can probably get removed: I
don't think it'll be updated any longer.

The Debian Flyers project publishes typesetted stuff on it's own page.

Thanks, Bye,

Joost



--IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCgR6KBgac8paUV/ARAu3vAJ9gb+EsrJGA3ZvAX2PmXRJQtPJFpwCfc41y
uPbWB7qHIYcSdteOaG81Jxo=
=BWu4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6--

---
Received: (at 308537-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 18:12:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 11:12:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from plasma.jpberlin.de [213.203.238.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWIAj-0002qv-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 11:12:33 -0700
Received: from plasma.jpberlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (plasma [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 01735-08; Thu, 12 May 2005 20:12:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from homer (c227068.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.227.68])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))

Processed: cloning 308880, reassign -1 to debian-policy, severity of -1 is minor ..., closing 308880

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> clone 308880 -1
Bug#308880: www.debian.org: Debian policy is not available in pdf and ps format
Bug 308880 cloned as bug 308886.

> reassign -1 debian-policy
Bug#308886: www.debian.org: Debian policy is not available in pdf and ps format
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `debian-policy'.

> severity -1 minor
Bug#308886: www.debian.org: Debian policy is not available in pdf and ps format
Severity set to `minor'.

> retitle -1 please make names of alternate versions links
Bug#308886: www.debian.org: Debian policy is not available in pdf and ps format
Changed Bug title.

> close 308880
Bug#308880: www.debian.org: Debian policy is not available in pdf and ps format
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Robert Cheramy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308988: marked as done (bad usage of anchor tags leads to ugly css hover effects)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2005 21:51:28 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308988: bad usage of anchor tags leads to ugly css hover 
effects
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 May 2005 16:05:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 13 09:05:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWcfZ-0003zO-00; Fri, 13 May 2005 09:05:45 -0700
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 34so771686nzf
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 13 May 2005 09:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;

h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;

b=eubGEFSh9j7UYcQwKtrRVQK2sYGd69tOnD6PGyiOx14uJ1E+L8lQRazRHXmp3sxaWL021pSakLZsagYrPgBwKTAWBOG/m/+wso4of+mzPLLhh9WvYYJ6M3BFfHwV4FRb1lKZzqkl0O2p03FUicSpZAWue4lU9ubkbG8Jf2rMBG0=
Received: by 10.36.146.12 with SMTP id t12mr1125628nzd;
Fri, 13 May 2005 09:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.17.12 with HTTP; Fri, 13 May 2005 09:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 18:05:14 +0200
From: Andreas Wuest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Andreas Wuest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bad usage of anchor tags leads to ugly css hover effects
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,
HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org

Pages which have a table of contents like
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ or http://www.debian.org/support
use the anchor tag like e.g. in Introduction, i.e. the  element's content is
the title itself.

But since debian.css defines the following rules for  tags:

a:visited { color: #800080; }
a:link { color: #FF; }
a:active { color: #FF; }
a:hover {   color: #F000FF; }

this leads to the effect, that, whenever one hovers over the title, it
will change its color. This is not only ugly but also misleading,
since the color change should indicate a hyperlink, but it's a plain
title which does not link to anywhere, but is instead being linked TO.

This could be solved by either using the anchor tag as follows:

Introduction

or by changing the css rules for  to:

a[href]:visited { color: #800080; }
a[href]:link { color: #FF; }
a[href]:active { color: #FF; }
a[href]:hover {   color: #F000FF; }

If this effect was intentional however, forget this report.

--=20
Best wishes,
Andi

---
Received: (at 308988-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 May 2005 20:52:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 13 13:52:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail45.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.45] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWh8j-0007oq-00; Fri, 13 May 2005 13:52:09 -0700
Received: from softwolves.dyndns.org (062016249163.customer.alfanett.no 
[62.16.249.163])
by mail45.nsc.no (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4DKpVo6028781;
Fri, 13 May 2005 22:51:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from perkele (perkele [10.1.1.1])
by softwolves.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7AF1E15B; Fri, 13 May 2005 22:51:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by perkele (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 70A7D3C2B; Fri, 13 May 2005 22:51:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by perkele (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4A32D9E;
Fri, 13 May 2005 21:51:28 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 21:51:28 +0100 (CET)
From: Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andreas Wuest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#308988: bad usage of anchor tags leads to ugly css hover
 effects
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Warning: Junk / bulk email will be reported
X-Rating: This message is not to be eaten by humans
Organization: /

Bug#296872: marked as done (Wrong Links to qmail copyright within packages.debian.org)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2005 02:12:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296872: Wrong Links to qmail copyright within 
packages.debian.org
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2005 11:02:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 25 03:02:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from imap.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4dEr-0007qu-00; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 03:02:29 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2005 11:01:57 -
Received: from pD9EB82D3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.122.254]) 
(217.235.130.211)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 12:01:57 +0100
X-Authenticated: #2184277
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:01:42 +
From: Christian Mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050210
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Wrong Links to qmail copyright within packages.debian.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi


I just found in page:
http://packages.debian.org/stable/source/qmail
this wrong Link:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/q/qmail/qmail_1.03-24/qmail.copyright
which should be:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/q/qmail/qmail_1.03-24/qmail-src.copyright

Also I found in
http://packages.debian.org/testing/source/qmail
and in
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/qmail
this wrong Link:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/q/qmail/qmail_1.03-36/qmail.copyright
which should be:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/q/qmail/qmail_1.03-36/qmail-src.copyright

I assume this occures, because the source package "qmail" produces the binary
package "qmail-src".
On the binary pages all Links to the various copyright files are correct.

(sorry no diff's as I'm currently on a Windows machine :-(

Bye
Christian

---
Received: (at 296872-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2005 00:12:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 13 17:12:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWkGM-00082N-00; Fri, 13 May 2005 17:12:14 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DWkGK-Y0-50
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 May 2005 02:12:12 +0200
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 02:12:12 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#296872: Wrong Links to qmail copyright within 
packages.debian.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 11:01:42AM +, Christian Mack wrote:
> I just found in page:
> http://packages.debian.org/stable/source/qmail
> this wrong Link:
> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/q/qmail/qmail_1.03-24/qmail.copyright
> which should be:
> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/q/qmail/qmail_1.03-24/qmail-src.copyright

Hmm, no, actually it should be
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/q/qmail/qmail_1.03-24/copyright

Anyway, fix commited, should be fixed tomorrow.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#297040: marked as done (www.debian.org: No php4 copyright file via packages.debian.org)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2005 02:15:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297040: www.debian.org: No php4 copyright file via 
packages.debian.org
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2005 17:48:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 26 09:48:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp3.libero.it [193.70.192.127] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D5631-0005J2-00; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 09:48:11 -0800
Received: from localhost (172.16.1.79) by smtp3.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01)
id 420786690047EF6D; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 18:47:40 +0100
Received: from neverland (62.98.131.192) by smtp20.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01)
id 41D02BD3037FC753; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 18:47:40 +0100
Received: from frx by neverland with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1D562N-Fw-00; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 18:47:31 +0100
From: Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: No php4 copyright file via packages.debian.org
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 18:47:26 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at libero.it serv1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2005-02-26
Severity: normal

I cannot retrieve php4 copyright file via web.
Directing my browser to
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/php4/php4_4.3.10-8/php4.copyright
  
takes me to a warning that
"There was no copyright file found in this binary package. [...]"
and suggests me to file a bug if I cannot find the file in other
binary packages built[1] from the same source package.
I tried with some of such packages but failed.
So here I am to file a bug...


[1] Actually it says "build": it's a typo, I would say...


---
Received: (at 297040-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2005 00:15:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 13 17:15:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWkJk-Ti-00; Fri, 13 May 2005 17:15:45 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DWkJi-ZT-D8
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 May 2005 02:15:42 +0200
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 02:15:42 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#297040: www.debian.org: No php4 copyright file via 
packages.debian.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 11:51:02PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 06:47:26PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I cannot retrieve php4 copyright file via web.
> > Directing my browser to
> > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/php4/php4_4.3.10-8/php4.copyright
> >   
> > takes me to a warning that
> > "There was no copyright file found in this binary package. [...]"
> > and suggests me to file a bug if I cannot find the file in other
> > binary packages built[1] from the same source package.
> > I tried with some of such packages but failed.
> > So here I am to file a bug...

Seems like I fixed that a while ago and forgot to close the bug
report...

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reassign 309162 to debian-policy

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 309162 debian-policy
Bug#309162: www.debian.org: Misspelling in Policy Manual
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `debian-policy'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309493: marked as done (Bugs in www.debian.org/releases/sarge)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2005 18:12:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309493: Bugs in www.debian.org/releases/sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2005 15:47:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 08:47:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DY4Hw-0001mx-00; Tue, 17 May 2005 08:47:20 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 67so860804wri
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 May 2005 08:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;

h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type;

b=N4QU5dhnbzZCdIoob7BpmUFpsep1ZPhnSZY/jNN/KcbCKXymOrrUnjYwGadbjOEg2gh3ttXsUiFyWLrkh3RlWaKUMl0XSRHCkZXjCh31rSGgbpQ46kcfWdrAiBPLc+yUNr1eGaNkgU2ejjbj/M6Qbx+MwRCq4gGdS0caxZO/LPo=
Received: by 10.54.133.2 with SMTP id g2mr4420497wrd;
Tue, 17 May 2005 08:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mind ([84.222.69.239])
by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id g3sm773146wra.2005.05.17.08.40.38;
Tue, 17 May 2005 08:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 17:40:33 +0200
From: Francesco Pedrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bugs in www.debian.org/releases/sarge
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.6cvs1 (GTK+ 2.6.4; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
 boundary=Signature_Tue__17_May_2005_17_40_33_+0200_6KDXB7_sEI2e6j1V;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

--Signature_Tue__17_May_2005_17_40_33_+0200_6KDXB7_sEI2e6j1V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: www.debian.org

In the italian version of www.debian.org/releases/sarge the link for
the announce of the freezing of sarge points to
http://bugs.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/05/msg1.html.
the link should points to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/05/msg1.html

--=20
:wq

--Signature_Tue__17_May_2005_17_40_33_+0200_6KDXB7_sEI2e6j1V
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCihB0effTtTSGAaMRAoXfAKCi/ZrtVh2lZaCLfjK3KawBcNiF6QCfSeFt
7m9ZosJ3U54x7EyvSX2/FMc=
=HSYx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--Signature_Tue__17_May_2005_17_40_33_+0200_6KDXB7_sEI2e6j1V--

---
Received: (at 309493-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2005 16:12:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 09:12:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from europa.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.60] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DY4fw-00020B-00; Tue, 17 May 2005 09:12:08 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 1213E198092
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 May 2005 18:12:07 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from [213.224.16.86] (dD5E01056.access.telenet.be [213.224.16.86])
by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5108198032
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 May 2005 18:12:06 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 18:12:02 +0200
From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#309493: Bugs in www.debian.org/releases/sarge
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:

Processed: Link to women.alioth.debian.org added

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package www.debian.org
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: www.debian.org

> retitle 298755 Integrating [EMAIL PROTECTED] in www.debian.org?
Bug#298755: www.debian.org: Unable to find [EMAIL PROTECTED] project
Changed Bug title.

> thanks mate
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#290187: marked as done (www.debian.org: packages.debian.org recently got uglier in non-CSS browsers)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 19 May 2005 17:57:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Addressed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2005 23:35:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 12 15:35:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from silicon.club.cc.cmu.edu [128.2.4.170] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cos17-0001sX-00; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:35:09 -0800
Received: (qmail 14465 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2005 23:35:07 -
Received: from tellurium.club.cc.cmu.edu (HELO laptop) (128.2.4.134)
  by silicon.club.cc.cmu.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2005 23:35:07 -
Received: by laptop (Postfix, from userid 0)
id 69F331ADCD; Sun,  2 Jan 2005 01:42:29 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brian Sammon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: packages.debian.org recently got uglier in non-CSS 
browsers
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.60
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 01:42:28 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

This change has happened in the past week or two, as far as I can tell; I
look at packages.debian.org at least once or twice a week.
When I look at a package info page with my non-CSS browser, where it used to
display a graphical bullet color-coded to the type of dependency, now it
just displays [dep] or [sug] or [rec].  This makes it take me longer to scan
the page to determine which dependencies I am interested in.

You can see this if you use the "dillo" browser.
Has a decision been made to only support CSS browsers?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

---
Received: (at 290187-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2005 15:57:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 19 08:57:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYnP1-sF-00; Thu, 19 May 2005 08:57:39 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DYnOz-DH-E0
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 May 2005 17:57:37 +0200
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 17:57:37 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Addressed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

I think this bug is sufficiently addressed by now.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#294823: marked as done (www.debian.org: CSS changes for www.debian.org and packages.d.o)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 19 May 2005 17:55:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Outdated
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Feb 2005 19:54:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 11 11:54:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (timmy.gws-online.de) [80.146.170.26] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CzgsQ-0005yO-00; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:54:54 -0800
Received: from p5089ec45.dip.t-dialin.net
([80.137.236.69] helo=firewall.bofh.ms ident=Debian-exim)
by timmy.gws-online.de with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CzgsO-dQ-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 20:54:52 +0100
Received: from hexe.bofh.ms ([10.0.0.66] ident=mail)
by firewall.bofh.ms with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1CzgsK-0001QT-El; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 20:54:49 +0100
Received: from jw by hexe.bofh.ms with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CzgyH-X4-00; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:00:57 +0100
From: Jutta Wrage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: CSS changes for www.debian.org and packages.d.o
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:00:57 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Jutta Wrage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2005-02-11
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

For next changes in packages.d.o and www.d.o there are new css entries.
Please remind, that the changes will make it possible to increase
accessibility.

I added some things for the download table and a hidden "skip menu"
(accessibility) and replaced the spaces by tabs.

wget http://www.witch.westfalen.de/debian.css (the whole file)
wget http://www.witch.westfalen.de/debian/diff/dwww-css-20041215.diff
(the diff)

Can someone apply them, please?

thanks

Jutta

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux hexe 2.4.23-pre9-epia1 #2 Mon May 17 22:41:34 CEST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE


---
Received: (at 294823-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2005 15:55:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 19 08:55:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYnMi-0005vn-00; Thu, 19 May 2005 08:55:16 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DYnMf-Cl-3I
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 May 2005 17:55:13 +0200
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 17:55:13 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Outdated
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

The patch in the bug is outdated and should be applied by now
(splitted on several commits)

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309882: marked as done (packages.debian.org: dsc/orig/diff/changelog/copyright links broken for non-free packages)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 20 May 2005 11:14:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309882: packages.debian.org: 
dsc/orig/diff/changelog/copyright links broken for non-free packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 May 2005 08:37:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 20 01:37:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from warp.os9.nl [145.99.250.222] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZ30u-SK-00; Fri, 20 May 2005 01:37:48 -0700
Received: by warp.os9.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 39600E6AAB; Fri, 20 May 2005 10:35:28 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: packages.debian.org: dsc/orig/diff/changelog/copyright links broken for
 non-free packages
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 10:35:28 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

On the package page of any package in non-free, the links under
"More Information on " are broken or missing.

Normally, it sais something like this:
> Source Package: aap, Download: [dsc] [aap_1.0.orig.tar.gz] [aap_1.0-1.diff.gz]
> View the Debian changelog
> View the copyright file

For non-free packages, this shows only:
> Source Package: aap, Download:

So most links are missing, and the link to the source package yields
a 404 error. For contrib packages, everything seems to work just fine.

Thanks for the otherwise very useful package pages btw!


Regards,

Thijs Kinkhorst

---
Received: (at 309882-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 May 2005 09:14:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 20 02:14:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZ3Zz-0005Ab-00; Fri, 20 May 2005 02:14:04 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 1706344A70
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 20 May 2005 11:14:03 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from [213.224.178.48] (dD5E0B230.access.telenet.be [213.224.178.48])
by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF87B44A99
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 20 May 2005 11:14:02 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 11:14:00 +0200
From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#309882: packages.debian.org: dsc/orig/diff/changelog/copyright
 links broken for non-free packages
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi

Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> 
> On the package page of any package in non-free, the links under
> "More Information on " are broken or missing.

Please, try again, as I cannot reproduce this. I'm closing this bug.

> Normally, it sais something like this:
> 
>>Source Package: aap, Download: [dsc] [aap_1.0.orig.tar.gz] [aap_1.0-1.diff.gz]
>>View the Debian changelog
>>View the copyright file

It does show everything ok here.

> For non-free packages, this shows only:
> 
>>Source Package: aap, Download:
> 
> 
> So most links are missing, and the link to the source

Processed: Re: Bug#309882 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#309882: packages.debian.org: dsc/orig/diff/changelog/copyright links broken for non-free packages)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 309882
Bug#309882: packages.debian.org: dsc/orig/diff/changelog/copyright links broken 
for non-free packages
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Reassign 291018 qa.debian.org

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # went wrong due to typo in djpig's message
> reassign 291018 qa.debian.org
Bug#291018: PTS: shows blank page for removed package
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `qa.debian.org'.

> # there, a bug about the same problem already exists, merge
> merge 291018 304070
Bug#291018: PTS: shows blank page for removed package
Bug#304070: packages.qa.debian.org: shows empty page for nonexistent package
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `severity' don't match:
 #291018 has `minor';
 #304070 has `normal'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309882: marked as done (packages.debian.org: dsc/orig/diff/changelog/copyright links broken for non-free packages)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 02:18:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 May 2005 08:37:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 20 01:37:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from warp.os9.nl [145.99.250.222] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZ30u-SK-00; Fri, 20 May 2005 01:37:48 -0700
Received: by warp.os9.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 39600E6AAB; Fri, 20 May 2005 10:35:28 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: packages.debian.org: dsc/orig/diff/changelog/copyright links broken for
 non-free packages
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 10:35:28 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

On the package page of any package in non-free, the links under
"More Information on " are broken or missing.

Normally, it sais something like this:
> Source Package: aap, Download: [dsc] [aap_1.0.orig.tar.gz] [aap_1.0-1.diff.gz]
> View the Debian changelog
> View the copyright file

For non-free packages, this shows only:
> Source Package: aap, Download:

So most links are missing, and the link to the source package yields
a 404 error. For contrib packages, everything seems to work just fine.

Thanks for the otherwise very useful package pages btw!


Regards,

Thijs Kinkhorst

---
Received: (at 309882-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2005 00:18:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 21 17:18:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZeAy-0006UZ-00; Sat, 21 May 2005 17:18:40 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DZeAv-0003vx-EF
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 22 May 2005 02:18:37 +0200
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 02:18:37 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This issue is fixed.
(Due to a configuration error the non-free Sources lists got overwritten
with an empty file)

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310617: marked as done (www.debian.org: security/2005/dsa-667.ja.html does not build)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 20:43:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310617: www.debian.org: security/2005/dsa-667.ja.html does 
not build
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 18:03:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 11:03:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from simon.bofh.ms [213.133.111.3] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dadkc-0004lq-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 11:03:34 -0700
Received: from p508f4fae.dip.t-dialin.net
([80.143.79.174] helo=firewall.bofh.ms ident=Debian-exim)
by simon.bofh.ms with asmtp (Exim 4.20 #1 (Debian))
id 1DadpH-hw-Js
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:08:23 +0200
Received: from hexe.bofh.ms ([10.0.0.66] ident=mail)
by firewall.bofh.ms with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1DadkA-s8-4Y; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:03:12 +0200
Received: from jw by hexe.bofh.ms with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Dadst-00010d-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:12:07 +0200
From: Jutta Wrage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: security/2005/dsa-667.ja.html does not build
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 20:12:07 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Jutta Wrage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2005-05-24
Severity: normal

The build page is empty. I am not sure about it, but seems these two
missing lines cause the problem:

# do not modify the following line
#include "$(ENGLISHDIR)/security/2005/dsa-667.data"

greetings

Jutta

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux hexe 2.4.23-pre9-epia1 #2 Mon May 17 22:41:34 CEST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE


---
Received: (at 310617-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 18:43:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 11:43:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DaeNB-O6-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 11:43:25 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CA9922410C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:43:24 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from [213.118.110.48] (dD5766E30.access.telenet.be [213.118.110.48])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CC92240C5
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:43:24 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 20:43:21 +0200
From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#310617: www.debian.org: security/2005/dsa-667.ja.html does
 not build
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jutta Wrage wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Version: N/A; reported 2005-05-24
> Severity: normal
> 
> The build page is empty. I am not sure about it, but seems these two
> missing lines cause the problem:

Yes, I have added the lines and the build seems fine AFAICT.

> # do not modify the following line
> #include "$(ENGLISHDIR)/security/2005/dsa-667.data"

Updated in CVS.

Cheers

Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCk3XJ5UTeB5t8Mo0RAn09AKDDud3HHiux35dgfxBdpzB0fcQs7wCgz0+H
+j8K+OiDKvGchGfoCPhXsPI=
=L/eR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> submitter 241412 !
Bug#241412: [INTL:nl] new Dutch po-debconf translation
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 241414 !
Bug#241414: [INTL:nl] new Dutch po-debconf translation
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 251397 !
Bug#251397: [INTL:nl] new Dutch po-debconf translation
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 253328 !
Bug#253328: splitting xlibs
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 253336 !
Bug#253336: splitting xlibs
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 263587 !
Bug#263587: [INTL:nl] New Dutch po-debconf translation
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 263714 !
Bug#263714: [INTL:nl] New Dutch po-debconf translation
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 274899 !
Bug#274899: [INTL:nl] new dutch po-debconf translation
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 276630 !
Bug#276630: Fwd: Mention Debian Reference in description user lists?
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 295665 !
Bug#295665: [INTL:nl] new Dutch po-debconf translation
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 296285 !
Bug#296285: reporting/html_reports: Don't show removed packages on the webpages
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 298625 !
Bug#298625: apt-cache --help should mention all possible options
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 280588 !
Bug#280588: Please make encrypted text configurable
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 240038 !
Bug#240038: [INTL:nl] new Dutch po-debconf translation
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 241421 !
Bug#241421: [INTL:nl] new Dutch po-debconf translation
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 241428 !
Bug#241428: [INTL:nl] new Dutch po-debconf translation
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 249865 !
Bug#249865: [INTL:nl] new Dutch po-debconf translation
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> submitter 276625 !
Bug#276625: debian-faq: Please mention the Debian Reference
Changed Bug submitter from Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Luk Claes <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)

> thanks mate
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#264660: marked as done (wrong links on http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/pot)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:30:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#264660: status of 264660
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2004 20:06:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 09 13:06:32 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from imap.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BuGPg-00018i-00; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 13:06:32 -0700
Received: (qmail 24826 invoked by uid 65534); 9 Aug 2004 20:06:00 -
Received: from A52d9.a.pppool.de (EHLO a52d9.a.pppool.de) (213.6.82.217)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 09 Aug 2004 22:06:00 +0200
X-Authenticated: #16353863
From: Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wrong links on http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/pot
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 22:04:14 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi!

Some links to debconf templates.pot (in brackets) on 
http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/pot
are broken, e.g.:
pango1.0 [templates.pot]
nautilus-media [templates.pot]
localepurge [templates.pot]
libpam-ldap [templates.pot]

I'm not able to test all links, so perhaps there are more broken.


Regards,

Erik


-- 
 www.ErikSchanze.de *
 Bitte keine HTML-Mails! No HTML mails, please! Maillimit: 1 MB *
  * Linux-Info-Tag in Dresden, am 30. Oktober 2004  *
 Info: http://www.linux-info-tag.de *

---
Received: (at 264660-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2005 01:05:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 18:05:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhzrT-00068b-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:05:03 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j5E152e7010049
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DhvZj-00054w-Oc; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:30:28 -0700
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:30:25 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#264660: status of 264660
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on 
zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 10:55:48PM +0200, Pierre Machard wrote:
> (Sorry for the delay I was laking of time this last month)

No problem.

> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 03:17:52AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >=20
> > Pierre, are you planning to implement further improvements to the
> > handling of missing templates.pot files, or should 264660 be closed?
>=20
> I am not working o

Processed: Re: Bug#313488: www.debian.org: install manual incorrectly states HFS+ can't be read under debian

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 313488 debian-installer-manual
Bug#313488: www.debian.org: install manual incorrectly states HFS+ can't be 
read under debian
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `debian-installer-manual'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 309768, severity of 313420 is wishlist

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 309768 pending
Bug#309768: packages.debian.org: changelog: standards-version parsed as telnet: 
link
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> severity 313420 wishlist
Bug#313420: packages.debian.org: changelog to html - UTF8 & '+' bullets
Severity set to `wishlist'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#314861: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-apt-get.en.html 3.8 /etc/apt/apt.conf doesn't exist

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 314861 apt-howto
Bug#314861: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-apt-get.en.html 3.8 
/etc/apt/apt.conf doesn't exist
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `apt-howto'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#315583: explanation of Conflicts/Replaces/Provides

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package www.debian.org
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: www.debian.org

> reassign 315583 developers-reference
Bug#315583: explanation of Conflicts/Replaces/Provides
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `developers-reference'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#44811: marked as done (search_packages.pl creates bogus links)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 11 Sep 1999 23:05:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#44811: search_packages.pl creates bogus links
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 1999 19:14:32 +
Received: (qmail 24448 invoked from network); 10 Sep 1999 19:04:50 -
Received: from pop3-3.enteract.com (207.229.143.32)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 1999 19:04:50 -
Received: (qmail 81857 invoked from network); 10 Sep 1999 19:04:29 -
Received: from shell-3.enteract.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by pop3-3.enteract.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 1999 19:04:29 -
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 14:04:29 -0500 (CDT)
From: Klaus Weide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Klaus Weide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: search_packages.pl creates bogus links
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A

Apparently the script invoked by (for example)

  

uses the Referer HTTP header, if it is being sent, to construct
the links in the returned page.  I assume this is meant to point
the reader back at the right Web page mirror, like www.us.debian.org,
www.de.debian.org, etc.  But Referer-based navigation is fundamentally
unreliable.

For demonstration, I created a local file ~/lynx_bookmarks-copy.html,
(I) with a link to the above URL.  Following this link using lynx [*]
results in what looks at first like the usual Search Results page, but
with all the links wrong.  For example, what should have been a link to

  

is instead a link to

  .

(II) By using a link to  instead,
which redirects to the long URL above, I get the same result as above.

(III) In some situations lynx can send a completely unreleted Referer,
when returning with Left Arrow to a document that has dropped out of
its cache of rendered documents.


Relying on Referer for correct links is a Bad Idea in general.
You should at least check the header value for plausibility.
It probably should match "http://*.debian.org/* or something like
that.  If the string doesn't look right, do the same thing you do
when Referer is absent.

Or you could somehow pass through the hostname as part of
the URL query string, at least in some situations.


[*] III can be argued to be misbehavior on lynx's part.  I believe it
is acting correctly for I and II.
Note I had to put the links into a file not recognized as a bookmark
file, and make sure the -nofilereferer option (or its lynx.cfg
equivalent) is not set, for lynx to send Referer.  This is not material
to the point, no such steps would be necessary to demonstrate the
problem if I chose to access the file via an http (or ftp,...) URL.

   Klaus

Bug#45966: marked as done (X-Debian-CC replaced with X-Debbugs-CC)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 25 Sep 1999 07:12:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#45966: X-Debian-CC replaced with X-Debbugs-CC
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 1999 11:21:55 +
Received: (qmail 27861 invoked from network); 25 Sep 1999 11:21:50 -
Received: from snoopy.apana.org.au ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Sep 1999 11:21:50 -
Received: by snoopy.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1003)
id 77990175D; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 21:22:57 +1000 (EST)
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: X-Debian-CC replaced with X-Debbugs-CC
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 21:22:57 +1000 (EST)

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A

In http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting, it continues to
state X-Debian-CC, but this has been replaced (from what I have
read in debian-devel and debian-hurd) by X-Debbugs-CC.

I am not really sure if I should bug www.debian.org or
bugs.debian.org, so please reassign as required.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.1
Kernel Version: Linux snoopy 2.2.12 #1 Thu Sep 2 10:09:15 EST 1999 i486 unknown

---
Received: (at 45966-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 1999 14:12:04 +
Received: (qmail 17334 invoked from network); 25 Sep 1999 14:12:03 -
Received: from dhcp008.53.lvcm.com (HELO tali.benham.net) (@24.234.53.8)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Sep 1999 14:12:03 -
Received: from gecko by tali.benham.net with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 11UsYs-0007nB-00; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 07:12:26 -0700
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 07:12:25 -0700
From: Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#45966: X-Debian-CC replaced with X-Debbugs-CC
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nLMor0SRtNCuLS/8"
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre1i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--nLMor0SRtNCuLS/8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It will be fixed in the next update

On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 09:22:57PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Version: N/A
>=20
> In http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting, it continues to
> state X-Debian-CC, but this has been replaced (from what I have
> read in debian-devel and debian-hurd) by X-Debbugs-CC.
>=20
> I am not really sure if I should bug www.debian.org or
> bugs.debian.org, so please reassign as required.
>=20
> -- System Information
> Debian Release: 2.1
> Kernel Version: Linux snoopy 2.2.12 #1 Thu Sep 2 10:09:15 EST 1999 i486 u=
nknown
>=20
>=20
> -- =20
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.org
>=20
>=20

--nLMor0SRtNCuLS/8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v0.9.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE37NhJbbwt//gBAIoRAeA+AJ44LmJjYbKfil5AB1VTWY9I4111PwCeLzxn
n4QhpxkbtjLQ5Oy+QaF7rdA=
=2Pri
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--nLMor0SRtNCuLS/8--

Processed: Re: Bug#46723: db.debian.org: unwanted (?) http: link from

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 46723 wishlist
Bug#46723: db.debian.org: unwanted (?) http: link from https: pages
Severity set to `wishlist'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#41679: marked as done (www.debian.org: running-kernel-2.2 page points to unstable versions that depend on libc6(>=2.1))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated 06 Oct 1999 14:20:54 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line www.debian.org: running-kernel-2.2 page points to unstable 
versions that depend on libc6(>=2.1)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 1999 19:25:13 +
Received: (qmail 16869 invoked from network); 20 Jul 1999 19:25:11 -
Received: from scribe.cc.purdue.edu (128.210.11.6)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 1999 19:25:11 -
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppp-x9-36.ecn.purdue.edu by scribe.cc.purdue.edu with ESMTP; 
Tue, 20 Jul 1999 14:25:03 -0500
Received: from servis by ppp-x9-36.ecn.purdue.edu with local (Exim 2.05 #1 
(Debian))
id 116fVf-0006Ls-00; Tue, 20 Jul 1999 14:25:03 -0500
From: Brian Servis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: running-kernel-2.2 page points to unstable versions 
that depend on libc6(>=2.1)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 14:25:03 -0500

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A

The page "Errata: Running Linux 2.2.x in slink" located at
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/running-kernel-2.2 points
directly to unstable packages that are slowly being converted to
libc6(>=2.1).  Thus a user can not simply drop them in as replacments
for their current versions. Perhaps it would be better if a small
repository of these required packages could be built against a stock
slink system so a user would not have to try and build them for
themselves.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.1
Kernel Version: Linux brian 2.2.10 #2 Mon Jul 19 16:14:58 EST 1999 i686 unknown

---
Received: (at 41679-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 1999 18:20:41 +
Received: (qmail 5908 invoked from network); 6 Oct 1999 18:20:40 -
Received: from arcts2p185.port.net (HELO arroz.fake) (@207.237.111.185)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 1999 18:20:40 -
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 421)
id E72B57058; Wed,  6 Oct 1999 14:20:54 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org: running-kernel-2.2 page points to unstable versions 
that depend on libc6(>=2.1)
From: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 06 Oct 1999 14:20:54 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 24
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


> The page "Errata: Running Linux 2.2.x in slink" located at
> http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/running-kernel-2.2 points
> directly to unstable packages that are slowly being converted to
> libc6(>=2.1).  Thus a user can not simply drop them in as
> replacments for their current versions. Perhaps it would be better
> if a small repository of these required packages could be built
> against a stock slink system so a user would not have to try and
> build them for themselves.

That would indeed be "nice", but the fact is, there is no such
repository available.

The documentation team merely provides the best documentation
available.  We cannot change the world.  If there *were* such a
repository, then a bug should be filed that we should point to it.
Since there is not, I am closing this bug.

However, I have added a paragraph to the top of the web page in
question which talks about this issue a bit.  (May take a few days for
this change to appear).

--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>

Bug#42386: marked as done (www.debian.org: www.de.debian.org/releases/slink/running-kernel-2.2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated 06 Oct 1999 14:23:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line www.debian.org: 
www.de.debian.org/releases/slink/running-kernel-2.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 1999 12:06:21 +
Received: (qmail 26669 invoked from network); 3 Aug 1999 12:06:20 -
Received: from dialup-289.germany.ecore.net (HELO connector.intern.lin4net.de) 
(@212.223.17.35)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 3 Aug 1999 12:06:20 -
Received: from alpha.intern.lin4net.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.3.42] (may 
be forged))
by connector.intern.lin4net.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA04920;
Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:05:55 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by alpha.intern.lin4net.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) id OAA15223;
Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:05:47 +0200
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:05:47 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: www.de.debian.org/releases/slink/running-kernel-2.2
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.2

Package: www.debian.org
Version: 19990803
Severity: normal

The page states that xosview will loop endless with 2.2.2+ on a slink system. 
This is true for the slink version, but the unstable version has it fixed.

May the Source be with you.
Goswin

-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux alpha 2.2.5 #6 Fri Nov 3 00:26:07 CET 2000 alpha unknown

---
Received: (at 42386-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 1999 18:23:05 +
Received: (qmail 6315 invoked from network); 6 Oct 1999 18:23:04 -
Received: from arcts2p185.port.net (HELO arroz.fake) (@207.237.111.185)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 1999 18:23:04 -
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 421)
id 0EC817058; Wed,  6 Oct 1999 14:23:19 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org: www.de.debian.org/releases/slink/running-kernel-2.2
From: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 06 Oct 1999 14:23:19 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


> The page states that xosview will loop endless with 2.2.2+ on a
> slink system. This is true for the slink version, but the unstable
> version has it fixed.

Done.

--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>

Processed: bug maint www/ boot-floppies

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 40775 boot-floppies
Bug#40775: unclear wording in Sparc docs
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `boot-floppies'.

> reassign 42334 boot-floppies
Bug#42334: out of date information on www.debian.org
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `boot-floppies'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#42564: marked as done (www.debian.org: Slink Gnome area points to old gnome-staging (apt entry is dead now))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated 06 Oct 1999 14:39:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnome on slink
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 1999 14:05:10 +
Received: (qmail 31754 invoked from network); 6 Aug 1999 14:05:09 -
Received: from ch208d-rt.cae.tntech.edu (HELO ch208d.cae.tntech.edu) ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 1999 14:05:09 -
Received: from mwr by ch208d.cae.tntech.edu with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 11CkcE-0001xk-00; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 09:04:58 -0500
From: Mike Renfro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: Slink Gnome area points to old gnome-staging (apt 
entry is dead now)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 09:04:58 -0500

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A

On the www.debian.org/releases/slink/ page, there's a link to updated
gnome packages, but they point to Jim's old gnome-staging area, not the
ones at www.gnome.org

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.1
Kernel Version: Linux ch208d 2.0.37 #1 Mon Jun 28 09:08:00 CDT 1999 i686 unknown

---
Received: (at 42564-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 1999 18:39:21 +
Received: (qmail 10520 invoked from network); 6 Oct 1999 18:39:18 -
Received: from arcts2p185.port.net (HELO arroz.fake) (@207.237.111.185)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 1999 18:39:18 -
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 421)
id 6E2317058; Wed,  6 Oct 1999 14:39:30 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: gnome on slink
From: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 06 Oct 1999 14:39:29 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Since Gnome now maintains their own pages about running an updated
gnome on slink, I've just pointed to them from the releases/slink/
page.  These bugs can be closed and the Gnome group (not independant
debian developers) take responsibility for this.

Woo woo! Delegation!

--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>

Bug#42607: marked as done (www.debian.org: http://www.dk.debian.org/releases/slink/gnome not updated)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated 06 Oct 1999 14:39:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnome on slink
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 1999 10:00:34 +
Received: (qmail 9406 invoked from network); 7 Aug 1999 10:00:33 -
Received: from kirstine.fys.ku.dk ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 1999 10:00:33 -
Received: from scharff.fys.ku.dk (really [130.225.102.66]) by fys.ku.dk
via smail with esmtp (ident root using rfc1413)
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.101)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 12:00:24 +0200 (CEST) 
Received: by fys.ku.dk
via sendmail from stdin
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.102)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 12:00:21 +0200 (CEST) 
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1999 12:00:21 +0200 (CEST)
From:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: http://www.dk.debian.org/releases/slink/gnome not 
updated
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bcc:
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A

Hello

http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/gnome seems not to be up to date:

It refers to

deb http://www.debian.org/~jim/debian-gtk-gnome/gnome-stage-slink
slink main

which no longer exists.

http://www.gnome.org/start/getting_debian.shtml contains almost equal
information, but contains correct sources.list definitions.

Yours

Per Marker Mortensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
System Administrator, Ørsted Laboratory 
Niels Bohr Institute for Astrophysics, Physics and Geophysics, Copenhagen

Office (HCØ): D301
Officephone : 35320501
Mobilephone : 20413070
Homephone   : 32876254


-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.1
Kernel Version: Linux scharff.fys.ku.dk 2.0.36 #1 Wed Jan 27 23:28:30 CET 1999 
i686 unknown

---
Received: (at 42607-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 1999 18:39:21 +
Received: (qmail 10520 invoked from network); 6 Oct 1999 18:39:18 -
Received: from arcts2p185.port.net (HELO arroz.fake) (@207.237.111.185)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 1999 18:39:18 -
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 421)
id 6E2317058; Wed,  6 Oct 1999 14:39:30 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: gnome on slink
From: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 06 Oct 1999 14:39:29 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Since Gnome now maintains their own pages about running an updated
gnome on slink, I've just pointed to them from the releases/slink/
page.  These bugs can be closed and the Gnome group (not independant
debian developers) take responsibility for this.

Woo woo! Delegation!

--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>

Bug#44875: marked as done (broken link in slink install instructions)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated 06 Oct 1999 14:41:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line broken link in slink install instructions
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 1999 20:21:24 +
Received: (qmail 17618 invoked from network); 11 Sep 1999 20:21:18 -
Received: from caraptoruu.geoworks.com (208.232.87.36)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 11 Sep 1999 20:21:18 -
Received: from maelstrom.geoworks.com by CAraptorUU.geoworks.com
  via smtpd (for master.debian.org [209.41.108.5]) with SMTP; 11 Sep 
1999 20:21:17 UT
Received: from quark.geoworks.com (quark.geoworks.com [198.211.201.100])
by maelstrom.geoworks.com (8.8.6/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA16273
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 11 Sep 1999 13:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sarcastro.geoworks.com ([198.211.201.161])
by quark.geoworks.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA27947
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 11 Sep 1999 13:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miket by sarcastro.geoworks.com with local (Exim 3.03 #1 
(Debian))
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 11PtgQ-0003k5-00; Sat, 11 Sep 1999 13:23:38 -0700
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 13:23:37 -0700
From: Mike Touloumtzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: broken link in slink install instructions
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre1i

Package: www.debian.org

Hi,

This page:

http://www.debian.org/releases/slink/

contains this text:

"An updated version of the potato apt is available
compiled for Slink as well. Download the Debian package
at http://netgod.net/x/apt_0.3.7slink0_i386.deb.";

which isn't true any more (I looked all over netgod and
couldn't find this package).

Mail on this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has gone unanswered
for a couple of months now.  Since slink the the current
release and this problem is in the main release notes,
it doesn't make Debian look too good.

thanks,
miket

---
Received: (at 44875-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 1999 18:41:19 +
Received: (qmail 11065 invoked from network); 6 Oct 1999 18:41:18 -
Received: from arcts2p185.port.net (HELO arroz.fake) (@207.237.111.185)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 1999 18:41:18 -
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 421)
id 388137058; Wed,  6 Oct 1999 14:41:34 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Anthony Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: broken link in slink install instructions
From: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 06 Oct 1999 14:41:33 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


> Maybe we should remove this subsection, as we now have apt 0.3.10 in
> the latest slink?

Done.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>

Bug#47149: marked as done (packages.debian.org/foo-bar should link to bugs.debian.org/foo-bar)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 1999 10:51:51 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Already done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 1999 13:02:18 +
Received: (qmail 5890 invoked from network); 11 Oct 1999 13:02:11 -
Received: from hooloovoo.mathi.uni-heidelberg.de (129.206.26.16)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 11 Oct 1999 13:02:11 -
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by hooloovoo.mathi.uni-heidelberg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) id 
PAA11164
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 15:01:36 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 15:01:36 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.debian.org/foo-bar should link to bugs.debian.org/foo-bar
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Subject says it all: I think it would be nice if packages.debian.org/foo-bar
would provide a link to the BTS page for that package. However you would
implement this.

Gregor

---
Received: (at 47149-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 1999 18:23:46 +
Received: (qmail 23144 invoked from network); 11 Oct 1999 18:23:45 -
Received: from styx.captech.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 11 Oct 1999 18:23:45 -
Received: by styx.captech.com; id LAA26140; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 11:30:42 -0700 
(PDT)
Received: from unknown(192.168.10.61) by styx.captech.com via smap (V5.0)
id xma026056; Mon, 11 Oct 99 11:30:02 -0700
Received: from gecko by gecko.benham.net with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 11ajc0-fh-00; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 10:51:52 -0700
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 10:51:51 -0700
From: Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Already done
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre2i
Sender: Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

As it was pointed out

Bug#47407: marked as done (www.debian.org: The list of Incoming Mirrors is not current)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 14 Oct 1999 13:26:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#47407: www.debian.org: The list of Incoming...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 1999 14:44:05 +
Received: (qmail 6856 invoked from network); 14 Oct 1999 14:44:00 -
Received: from nms.rz.uni-kiel.de (134.245.1.2)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 1999 14:44:00 -
Received: from linuxserv.pclab.ifg.uni-kiel.de by nms.rz.uni-kiel.de with 
Local-SMTP (PP); Thu, 14 Oct 1999 16:43:36 +0200
Received: from geopcl4.pclab.ifg.uni-kiel.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[134.245.134.23]) by linuxserv.pclab.ifg.uni-kiel.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP 
  id QAA12014; Thu, 14 Oct 1999 16:43:35 +0200
Received: from torsten by geopcl4.pclab.ifg.uni-kiel.de with local (Exim 3.03 
#1 (Debian)) id 11cDlg-EU-00; Fri, 15 Oct 1999 22:16:00 +0200
From: Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: The list of Incoming Mirrors is not current
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 22:16:00 +0200

Package: www.debian.org
Version: 19991015
Severity: normal

ftp.de.debian.org seems not to mirror Incoming any longer. Please consider
updating http://www.debian.org/devel/incoming_mirrors.

Thanks
Torsten

-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux geopcl4 2.0.37 #2 Wed Jun 23 16:25:39 CEST 1999 i686 
unknown

---
Received: (at 47407-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 1999 17:25:11 +
Received: (qmail 9088 invoked from network); 14 Oct 1999 17:25:11 -
Received: from ppp09.math.uwaterloo.ca (HELO landru.math.uwaterloo.ca) ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 1999 17:25:11 -
Received: from treacy by landru.math.uwaterloo.ca with local (Exim 3.03 #1 
(Debian))
id 11boe3-0001AU-00; Thu, 14 Oct 1999 13:26:27 -0400
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 13:26:27 -0400
From: "James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#47407: www.debian.org: The list of Incoming...
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre3i

Closing. Already fixed in CVS

Bug#44812: marked as done (Perl scripts are mis-identified as Polish)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Oct 1999 23:49:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Perl scripts are mis-identified as Polish
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 1999 19:34:05 +
Received: (qmail 23035 invoked from network); 10 Sep 1999 19:34:04 -
Received: from pop3-3.enteract.com (207.229.143.32)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 1999 19:34:04 -
Received: (qmail 2867 invoked from network); 10 Sep 1999 19:34:02 -
Received: from shell-3.enteract.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by pop3-3.enteract.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 1999 19:34:02 -
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 14:34:02 -0500 (CDT)
From: Klaus Weide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Perl scripts are mis-identified as Polish
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A

For example, after requesting
  :

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 19:29:46 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.3 (Unix) Debian/GNU
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Language: pl

The .pl suffix should not be interpreted as a specifying a language here.

   Klaus

---
Received: (at 44812-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 1999 03:47:54 +
Received: (qmail 16245 invoked from network); 16 Oct 1999 03:47:53 -
Received: from ppp09.math.uwaterloo.ca (HELO landru.math.uwaterloo.ca) ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 1999 03:47:53 -
Received: from treacy by landru.math.uwaterloo.ca with local (Exim 3.03 #1 
(Debian))
id 11cKqu-0005ea-00; Fri, 15 Oct 1999 23:49:52 -0400
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 23:49:52 -0400
From: "James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Perl scripts are mis-identified as Polish
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre3i

Fixed.

Bug#37123: marked as done (www.debian.org: http://www.debian.org/ gives "403 forbidden" if using proxy server)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Oct 1999 00:00:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line http://www.debian.org/ gives "403 forbidden" if using proxy 
server
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 1999 22:54:33 +
Received: (qmail 10105 invoked from network); 3 May 1999 22:54:32 -
Received: from nz40.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (HELO mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de) 
(129.13.197.4)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 3 May 1999 22:54:32 -
Received: from torres.gf1.internal ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [129.13.216.193])
by mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3)
id 10eRb4-0001lq-00; Tue, 4 May 1999 00:54:05 +0200
Received: from mh by torres.gf1.internal with local (Exim 2.10 #1)
id 10eRYB-00087b-00; Tue, 4 May 1999 00:50:59 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org: http://www.debian.org/ gives "403 forbidden" if using 
proxy server
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 00:50:59 +0200

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A

When i try to use http://www.debian.org/ with proxy enabled (squid
running on www-cache.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de), 403 is returned. DIsabling
proxies works fine, so does using a mirror site.

Greetings
Marc


-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.1
Kernel Version: Linux torres 2.0.36 #5 Sun Apr 4 15:47:37 CEST 1999 i586 unknown

---
Received: (at 37123-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 1999 03:58:11 +
Received: (qmail 17839 invoked from network); 16 Oct 1999 03:58:10 -
Received: from ppp09.math.uwaterloo.ca (HELO landru.math.uwaterloo.ca) ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 1999 03:58:10 -
Received: from treacy by landru.math.uwaterloo.ca with local (Exim 3.03 #1 
(Debian))
id 11cL0t-0006YH-00; Sat, 16 Oct 1999 00:00:11 -0400
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 00:00:10 -0400
From: "James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: http://www.debian.org/ gives "403 forbidden" if using proxy server
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre3i

closing

Bug#37870: marked as done (www.debian.org: Content negotiation for Danish fubar'ed)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Oct 1999 00:00:45 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Content negotiation for Danish fubar'ed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 1999 18:46:10 +
Received: (qmail 16466 invoked from network); 17 May 1999 18:46:09 -
Received: from gamma.dou.dk (@130.225.130.6)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 17 May 1999 18:46:09 -
Received: from kaa.hco.kollegie.dk ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (may be forged))
  by gamma.dou.dk (8.8.6/8.8.4) with ESMTP
  id UAA29815; Mon, 17 May 1999 20:45:56 +0200 (METDST)
Received: from n1125aa.hco.kollegie.dk ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [172.16.9.94])
by kaa.hco.kollegie.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA13071;
Mon, 17 May 1999 20:45:56 +0200
Received: from renehl by n1125aa.hco.kollegie.dk with local (Exim 2.05 #1 
(Debian))
id 10jSOi-YA-00; Mon, 17 May 1999 20:45:56 +0200
From: Rene Hojbjerg Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: Content negotiation for Danish fubar'ed
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Rene Hojbjerg Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 20:45:56 +0200

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A

If you set your browser to prefer Danish language web sites and go to
http://www.debian.org/ (or any mirror), instead of the nice page in Danish
you get appr. 34K of binary garbage.  It turns out that this is actually a
gzipped version of the German front page.

The has been verified using both Lynx and Netscape. 

Please fix this problem.

HTH.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.1
Kernel Version: Linux carsten 2.2.7 #1 ons apr 28 23:16:09 CEST 1999 i686 
unknown

---
Received: (at 37870-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 1999 03:58:44 +
Received: (qmail 17870 invoked from network); 16 Oct 1999 03:58:43 -
Received: from ppp09.math.uwaterloo.ca (HELO landru.math.uwaterloo.ca) ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 1999 03:58:43 -
Received: from treacy by landru.math.uwaterloo.ca with local (Exim 3.03 #1 
(Debian))
id 11cL1R-0006YT-00; Sat, 16 Oct 1999 00:00:45 -0400
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 00:00:45 -0400
From: "James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Content negotiation for Danish fubar'ed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre3i

closing

Processed: reassign

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 45802 lists.debian.org
Bug#45802: www.debian.org: mailing list debian-russian is not present
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `lists.debian.org'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#32420: marked as done (www.uk.debian.org: pages in Spanish?!)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Oct 1999 00:46:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line www.uk.debian.org: pages in Spanish?!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 1999 12:34:42 +
Received: (qmail 10434 invoked from network); 26 Jan 1999 12:34:41 -
Received: from mserv1a.u-net.net (195.102.240.34)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 1999 12:34:41 -
Received: from (polya) [195.102.196.96] 
by mserv1a.u-net.net with esmtp (Exim 1.82 #2)
id 1057hg-Jr-00; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 12:34:48 +
Received: by maths.qmw.ac.uk
via sendmail from stdin
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.102)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 12:29:32 + (GMT) 
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julian Gilbey)
Subject: www.uk.debian.org: pages in Spanish?!
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Debian bug reports)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 12:29:32 + (GMT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL48 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 545   

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A

I just downloaded http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/subscribe and
it was in Spanish!!  I'm sure most UK Debian users don't speak fluent
Spanish

   Julian

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Julian Gilbey Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Dept of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary & Westfield College,
  Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, ENGLAND
  -*- Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my PGP public key. -*-
---
Received: (at 32420-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 1999 04:44:02 +
Received: (qmail 22770 invoked from network); 16 Oct 1999 04:44:01 -
Received: from ppp09.math.uwaterloo.ca (HELO landru.math.uwaterloo.ca) ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 1999 04:44:01 -
Received: from treacy by landru.math.uwaterloo.ca with local (Exim 3.03 #1 
(Debian))
id 11cLjH-0007ny-00; Sat, 16 Oct 1999 00:46:03 -0400
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 00:46:03 -0400
From: "James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: www.uk.debian.org: pages in Spanish?!
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre3i

closing

Processed: Re: Bug#47925: www.debian.org: debian-bugs-dist missing from list archives page

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 47925 lists.debian.org
Bug#47925: www.debian.org: debian-bugs-dist missing from list archives page
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `lists.debian.org'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed:

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 48601 listarchives
Bug#48601: www.debian.org: Signed messages not displayed in list archive
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `listarchives'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#50290: marked as done (www.debian.org: The main page isn't fully HTML 4 compliant)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 15 Nov 1999 23:49:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#50290: www.debian.org: The main page isn't fully HTML 4 
compliant
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 1999 01:32:28 +
Received: (qmail 3177 invoked from network); 16 Nov 1999 01:32:28 -
Received: from languor.mit.edu (HELO lethargy.mit.edu) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 1999 01:32:28 -
Received: from jknight by lethargy.mit.edu with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 11nXX7-0004lT-00; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 20:35:45 -0500
From: James Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: The main page isn't fully HTML 4 compliant
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.6.1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 20:35:45 -0500

Package: www.debian.org
Version: 19991116
Severity: normal


Error (36/2): In the tag  white space is missing as separator after the 
attribute "VALIGN". 
Error (132/91): The character '&' must be written as '&'. 
---
Received: (at 50290-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 1999 04:42:25 +
Received: (qmail 12927 invoked from network); 16 Nov 1999 04:42:24 -
Received: from ppp05.math.uwaterloo.ca (HELO landru.math.uwaterloo.ca) ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 1999 04:42:24 -
Received: from treacy by landru.math.uwaterloo.ca with local (Exim 3.03 #1 
(Debian))
id 11naYN-0002Wc-00; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 23:49:15 -0500
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 23:49:15 -0500
From: "James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: James Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#50290: www.debian.org: The main page isn't fully HTML 4 
compliant
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, Nov 15, 1999 
at 08:35:45PM -0500

On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 08:35:45PM -0500, James Knight wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Version: 19991116
> Severity: normal
> 
> 
> Error (36/2): In the tag  white space is missing as separator after the 
> attribute "VALIGN". 
> Error (132/91): The character '&' must be written as '&'. 
> 
I just committed the changes to CVS. The updates will appear at the next mirror
run which will be around 2330 UTC Tuesday. It is interesting that
http://validator.w3.org/ does not report any problems on the page.

Closing the bug.

-- 
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#51340: marked as done (bad link on /releases/slink/index.en.html)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated 08 Dec 1999 15:40:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#51340: bad link on /releases/slink/index.en.html
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 1999 18:38:11 +
Received: (qmail 17129 invoked from network); 26 Nov 1999 18:38:11 -
Received: from s4.smtp.oleane.net (195.25.12.14)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Nov 1999 18:38:10 -
Received: from vince.ldsol.com (unknown [62.161.210.241])
by s4.smtp.oleane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEBE20BBC
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 19:38:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from v2.ldsol.com [192.168.1.100] (mail)
by vince.ldsol.com with esmtp 
id 11rQXJ-0004qU-00 (Linux Rulez); Fri, 26 Nov 1999 19:56:01 +0100
Received: from vincent by v2.ldsol.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 11rQFI-0002YH-00; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 19:37:24 +0100
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 18:37:24 + (GMT)
From: Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bad link on /releases/slink/index.en.html
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Package: www.debian.org
Version: current

the page /releases/slink/index.en.html contains a dandling link to 
http://www.gnome.org/start/getting_debian.shtml.
the correct GNOME URL is: http://www.gnome.org/start/debian-readme.html

Cordialement,

---
Received: (at 51340-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 1999 20:20:56 +
Received: (qmail 26252 invoked from network); 8 Dec 1999 20:20:55 -
Received: from 209-122-223-230.s230.tnt3.nyw.ny.dialup.rcn.com (HELO 
arroz.fake) (@209.122.223.230)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 1999 20:20:55 -
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 421)
id 11B92938AA; Wed,  8 Dec 1999 15:40:07 -0500 (EST)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#51340: bad link on /releases/slink/index.en.html
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 08 Dec 1999 15:40:06 -0500
In-Reply-To: Vincent Renardias's message of "Fri, 26 Nov 1999 18:37:24 + 
(GMT)"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 10
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070099 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.99) Emacs/20.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> the page /releases/slink/index.en.html contains a dandling link to 
> http://www.gnome.org/start/getting_debian.shtml.
> the correct GNOME URL is: http://www.gnome.org/start/debian-readme.html

Fixed in CVS.

-- 
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>

Processed: reduce severity

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 53109 wishlist
Bug#53109: www.debian.org: Package descriptions need link to package home page.
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#52985: marked as done (slink release information has out of date point release)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated 20 Dec 1999 01:23:22 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#52985: slink release information has out of date point 
release
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 1999 23:50:16 +
Received: (qmail 6252 invoked from network); 17 Dec 1999 23:50:16 -
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 17 Dec 1999 23:50:16 -
Received: from jacobn by chiark.greenend.org.uk with local (Exim 2.05 #1)
id 11z78Y-8X-00 (Debian); Fri, 17 Dec 1999 23:50:14 +
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 23:50:14 +
From: Jacob Nevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: slink release information has out of date point release
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i
Sender: Jacob Nevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Package: www.debian.org

The page http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/>, under the
'Errata' heading, says "The current point release is Debian 2.1r2",
despite there having been 2.1r3 and 2.1r4 since then.
---
Received: (at 52985-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 1999 05:54:06 +
Received: (qmail 20536 invoked from network); 20 Dec 1999 05:54:04 -
Received: from 209-122-225-197.s197.tnt1.nyw.ny.dialup.rcn.com (HELO 
arroz.fake) (@209.122.225.197)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 20 Dec 1999 05:54:04 -
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 421)
id 7E43D93805; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 01:23:22 -0500 (EST)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jacob Nevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#52985: slink release information has out of date point release
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 20 Dec 1999 01:23:22 -0500
In-Reply-To: Jacob Nevins's message of "Fri, 17 Dec 1999 23:50:14 +"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 10
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070099 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.99) Emacs/20.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Jacob Nevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The page http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/>, under the
> 'Errata' heading, says "The current point release is Debian 2.1r2",
> despite there having been 2.1r3 and 2.1r4 since then.

Thanks.  Updated in CVS.  Closing this bug.

-- 
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>

Processed: reassign 54095 trn

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 54095 trn
Bug#54095: www.debian.org: trn wrongly listed as non-free
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `trn'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#48933: marked as done (Searching the curl package produces outdated results)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:11:50 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Searching the curl package produces outdated results
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 1999 21:22:09 +
Received: (qmail 22360 invoked from network); 1 Nov 1999 21:22:08 -
Received: from nizan.internatif.org (HELO mailhost.internatif.org) ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 1999 21:22:08 -
Received: from ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by mailhost.internatif.org (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.1) with UUCP id WAA15774
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 22:22:06 +0100
Received: from ludwigV.sources.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by ludwigV.sources.org (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id WAA13161
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 22:21:33 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) 
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Debian-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Subject: Searching the curl package produces outdated results
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 22:21:33 +0100
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important

If I search "curl", for instance by looking at http://packages.debian.org/curl,
 I find:

http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/non-us/curl.html
...
Package: curl 5.9-2 [non-us] 

curl's current version in potato is 6.0 and it is no longer in non-us, since 
there are now two versions, curl-ssl in non-us/main and curl in main.


---
Received: (at 48933-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2000 16:10:33 +
Received: (qmail 13510 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2000 16:10:32 -
Received: from ppp11.math.uwaterloo.ca (HELO landru) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2000 16:10:32 -
Received: from treacy by landru with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 128mql-00067L-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:11:51 -0500
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:11:50 -0500
From: "James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Searching the curl package produces outdated results
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i

Old file removed. Closing the bug.

-- 
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#52129: marked as done (Broken copyright and changelogs)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:25:59 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Broken copyright and changelogs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 1999 14:30:05 +
Received: (qmail 18981 invoked from network); 7 Dec 1999 14:30:04 -
Received: from mailext02.compaq.com (207.18.199.33)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 1999 14:30:04 -
Received: by mailext02.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345)
id C2DF49A8C7; Tue,  7 Dec 1999 08:30:03 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mailint12.im.hou.compaq.com (mailint12.compaq.com 
[207.18.199.190])
by mailext02.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD49F90D83
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  7 Dec 1999 08:30:03 -0600 (CST)
Received: by mailint12.im.hou.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345)
id ECC6E4FB03; Tue,  7 Dec 1999 08:29:56 -0600 (CST)
Received: from exctay-gh01.tay.cpqcorp.net (exctay-gh01.tay.cpqcorp.net 
[16.103.129.42])
by mailint12.im.hou.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C345E4C907
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  7 Dec 1999 08:29:56 -0600 (CST)
Received: by exctay-gh01.tay.cpqcorp.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2559.0)
id ; Tue, 7 Dec 1999 09:30:03 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Larrick, Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Broken copyright and changelogs
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 09:29:34 -0500 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2559.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"

Package: www.debian.org

The copyright file and Debian changelog links at the bottom of the page in
many (all?) package description pages are broken.  

See for example
; click on
Debian chagelog at the bottom (which is
) and it comes
back with a page saying simply "No such changelog gimp1.1"

I am using Netscape Communicator 4.7 on various platforms (Debian GNU/Linux
Alpha, MacOS 8.6, Windows NT 4.0), though I can't see that it matters.

-Doug Larrick
---
Received: (at 52129-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2000 16:24:36 +
Received: (qmail 20038 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2000 16:24:35 -
Received: from ppp11.math.uwaterloo.ca (HELO landru) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2000 16:24:35 -
Received: from treacy by landru with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 128n4R-0006rR-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:25:59 -0500
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:25:59 -0500
From: "James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Broken copyright and changelogs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i

The changelogs and copyright files are accessable again (have been for a while).
Closing the bug.

-- 
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#50249: marked as done (Wrong logo images)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 15 Jan 2000 12:40:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Wrong logo images
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 1999 15:13:05 +
Received: (qmail 29538 invoked from network); 15 Nov 1999 15:12:48 -
Received: from ts1-210.grnet.com (HELO sisko.dusknet.dhis.org) ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 15 Nov 1999 15:12:48 -
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=dusknet.dhis.net ident=deek)
by sisko.dusknet.dhis.org with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 11nNoF-0001FW-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 10:12:47 -0500
Sender: deek
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 10:12:45 -0500
From: Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Dusk To Dawn Computing
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.13 i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Wrong logo images
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="D553019BC1521F37A58C0C33"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--D553019BC1521F37A58C0C33
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

The Debian logo images have been incorrectly converted from the original
EPS files...see attached .xcf.gz file for a conversion from pristine EPS
source for the open logo, with text. Official logo conversion available
on request.

-- 
| Jeff Teunissen -- President, Dusk To Dawn Computing -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Disclaimer: I am my employer, so anything I say goes for me too. :)
| dusknet.dhis.net is a black hole for email.Use my Reply-To address.
| Specializing in Debian GNU/Linux http://dusknet.dhis.net/~deek/
--D553019BC1521F37A58C0C33
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
 name="openlogo.xcf.gz"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="openlogo.xcf.gz"
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Bug#52354: marked as done (No changelog & copyright info available in software packages page)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 15 Jan 2000 12:42:28 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line No changelog & copyright info available...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 1999 21:53:51 +
Received: (qmail 25606 invoked from network); 8 Dec 1999 21:53:47 -
Received: from reha.trenet.ee (193.40.208.4)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 1999 21:53:47 -
Received: from pingviin.trenet.ee ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by reha.trenet.ee (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id XAA05381
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 8 Dec 1999 23:53:31 +0200
Received: from trenet.ee ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by pingviin.trenet.ee (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id XAA02968
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 8 Dec 1999 23:53:33 +0200
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 23:53:31 +0200
From: Ivar Smolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.13 i686)
X-Accept-Language: et, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: No changelog & copyright info available in software packages page
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Package: www.debian.org

No changelog & copyright info in software packages page. Server
responses "No such changelog ..." or "No such copyright file"

-- 
ökul
---
Received: (at 52354-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2000 17:40:01 +
Received: (qmail 23645 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2000 17:40:01 -
Received: from ppp18.math.uwaterloo.ca (HELO landru) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 15 Jan 2000 17:40:01 -
Received: from treacy by landru with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 129XDY-0004BQ-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 12:42:28 -0500
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 12:42:28 -0500
From: "James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: No changelog & copyright info available...
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i

The copyright and changelog files are back on line now. Closing the bug.

-- 
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]