Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 01:47:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#258164: fixed in imagemagick 5:6.0.3.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
According to Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 11:07:42AM +0300, Heikki Kantola wrote:
I just noticed that the more recent XFree86 version seem to somehow
interfere the VT text consoles on my Radeon 9200 dualhead setup: VTs
are now unusable as text is oddly striped
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 258164
Bug#258164: xdm: crashed when clicking things in mozilla
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Package: libx11-6
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: wishlist
After some quarrels about fixing et_EE locale to ISO-8859-15 (the
correct Estonian charset), a new locale was added with the right charset:
et_EE.ISO-8859-15. This locale is in Debian now too and works fine but
X11 libs don't support
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unmerge 256706
Bug#256706: Win-Tab switching broken in dfsg.1-5
Bug#254923: xserver-xfree86: [keyboard] alt key not working when starting from
display manager
Bug#254973: metacity: Alt-Tab doesn't works
Bug#255063: capplets: Problem with keyboard
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 258231 + fixed-upstream patch pending sid upstream
Bug#258231: Window switching keys don't seem to actually switch windows
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream, patch, pending, sid, upstream
severity 258231 serious
Bug#258231: Window
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 258231 xlibs
Bug#258231: Window switching keys don't seem to actually switch windows
Bug#254923: xserver-xfree86: [keyboard] alt key not working when starting from
display manager
Bug#254973: metacity: Alt-Tab doesn't works
Bug#255063:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 254288 + moreinfo
Bug#254288: xserver-xfree86: [ati/atimisc] blue bit dropped at depth 24 on
264VT [Mach64 VT] rev 64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
tag 254288 + moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 03:10:29PM +1000, Peter Dey wrote:
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
ATi driver seems to drop the blue bit at 24-bit colour. Red and yellow
colours showing fine.
There's more than one bit of blue at depth 24; there are 8
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 254563 + moreinfo upstream
Bug#254563: xsm: does not see any clients
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, upstream
retitle 254563 xbase-clients: [xsm] does not see any session-aware clients
Bug#254563: xsm: does not see any clients
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
# not sid-specific; I wish people would cut this crap out
tags 254601 - sid
Bug#254601: XFree refusees to start with sis video card, complains about
unresolved symbols
Tags were:
tag 254563 + moreinfo upstream
retitle 254563 xbase-clients: [xsm] does not see any session-aware clients
thanks
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 03:35:07PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1
Severity: important
Since quite some time now, xsm does not see any of
retitle 254618 xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] crash while switching workspaces
on Radeon Mobility M7 LW [Radeon Mobility 7500] rev 0
tag 254618 + moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 04:09:45PM -0400, Patricio Rojo wrote:
I used a backed-up XF86Config-4 file. Other than the packages that
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 06:22:16PM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
I just enhanced/fixed this in the driver available on my website
(06/17). It now loads the glx module if that hasn't been loaded before.
Hence, it does not matter if Load dri and/or Load glx are in the
Module section.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
retitle 254632 xterm: recent versions' incompatibility with NetBSD termcap
results in worse thread view in mutt running inside a GNU screen
Bug#254632: xterm update results in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 254650 xterm: document utf8Fonts resource in NEWS.Debian or FAQ
Bug#254650: Please add a note about the change in specifying fonts for UTF-8
XTerms
Changed Bug title.
tag 254650 + moreinfo
Bug#254650: xterm: document utf8Fonts resource in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 254674 xterm,xfree86
Bug#254674: xterm crashes on paste event
Bug reassigned from package `xterm' to `xterm,xfree86'.
retitle 254674 xterm: crashes on paste event
Bug#254674: xterm crashes on paste event
Changed Bug title.
merge 250655
retitle 254650 xterm: document utf8Fonts resource in NEWS.Debian or FAQ
tag 254650 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Thomas,
Can you supply me with some text to provide here? I'm not completely sure
I understand the problem, and until I do I don't know whether this is more
of a FAQ issue and/or a
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 09:00:11PM +0300, Denis wrote:
Hi! I'm trying to upgade my old motherboard Soltek 75KAV to Soltek based
on NForce2 chipset Soltek SL-75FRN3. And I've got weird problem with my
Geforce2 mx 400 card which is only run on drivers which come with the
kernel, but when I
Author: branden
Date: 2004-07-08 14:01:45 -0500 (Thu, 08 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 1598
Modified:
trunk/debian/TODO
Log:
Add item.
Fabio, if you disagree with this for -7, please step it down.
Modified: trunk/debian/TODO
===
---
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 254565 = upstream help
Bug#254565: xserver-xfree86: [savage] two cursors display when using an ARGB
cursor theme on VT8636A TwisterK
Tags were: upstream moreinfo
Tags set to: upstream, help
retitle xserver-xfree86: [savage] two cursors display
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
# RAAAHHR!! WHAT **IDIOT** TAGGED THIS EXPERIMENTAL? THERE ARE NO XFREE86
PACKAGES IN EXPERIMENTAL, MORON!
tags 254923 - experimental
Bug#254923: xserver-xfree86: [keyboard]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
submitter 256297 Thomas Winischhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#256297: xserver-xfree86: various RandR extension problems
Changed Bug submitter from Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
tag 254565 = upstream help
retitle xserver-xfree86: [savage] two cursors display when using an ARGB cursor
theme on LCD with VT8636A TwisterK
thanks
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 03:57:36PM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
I can confirm this bug. I have a SuperSavage IX/C SDR chip on my Thinkpad
T23.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:20:35AM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
I fixed my workstation today by following advice found in The Debian
Reference ยง9.4.13
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-tune.en.html#s-xfs-tt
Specifically, moving Type1 down to the bottom of the list did the trick.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 255197 xterm: [uxterm] don't always just strip off the '@euro' locale
modifier
Bug#255197:
=?iso-8859-15?q?uxterm_doesn=27t_consider_utf-8=40euro=0D=0AThe_uxterm_scrip?=
retitle 255197 xterm: [uxterm] don't always just strip off the '@euro' locale
modifier
tag 255197 + upstream moreinfo
thanks
Thomas, do you know what needs to be done for this bug?
--
G. Branden Robinson| Software engineering: that part of
Debian GNU/Linux
Author: branden
Date: 2004-07-08 14:28:10 -0500 (Thu, 08 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 1599
Modified:
trunk/debian/TODO
trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml
Log:
Add item.
Fabio, if you disagree with this for -7, please ratchet it down.
Modified: trunk/debian/TODO
Author: branden
Date: 2004-07-08 14:30:53 -0500 (Thu, 08 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 1600
Modified:
trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml
Log:
Revert inadvertent, unrelated change made in r1599.
Modified: trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml
===
---
tag 255224 + upstream moreinfo
retitle 255224 xlibs-data: GBK - COMPOUND_TEXT encoding broken
thanks
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:20:37AM +0800, Su Yong wrote:
It has been fixed in official XFree86, see
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1362
for more detail.
Thanks! I have reviewed the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 255282 + moreinfo
Bug#255282: xserver-xfree86: [libGLcore.a] Skipping -- No symbols found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 255371 xlibs: typos in /etc/X11/xkb/README.config
Bug#255371: xlibs: typo in /etc/X11/xkb/README.config
Changed Bug title.
tag 255371 + upstream
Bug#255371: xlibs: typos in /etc/X11/xkb/README.config
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 255381 wishlist
Bug#255381: xlibs: [xkb] powerbook italian layout
Severity set to `wishlist'.
tag 255381 + moreinfo upstream
Bug#255381: xlibs: [xkb] powerbook italian layout
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, upstream
thanks
retitle 255371 xlibs: typos in /etc/X11/xkb/README.config
tag 255371 + upstream
thanks
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 03:39:26PM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: minor
In most of the examples included in /etc/X11/xkb/README.config
the command setxkbmap
tag 255282 + moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 07:42:11PM -0500, Mike Mestnik) (The Archmage Forever
wrote:
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal
I'm working on Mesa, specificaly getting DRI to work on this mach64. I have
an i386 box with a simular chip
severity 255381 wishlist
tag 255381 + moreinfo upstream
thanks
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 04:40:47PM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: whishlist
This is a file for xmodmap that will fix some problems with
the italian keyboard for powerbook.
major
Sebastien,
Thanks for starting a thread on this. X Strike Force, let's see what we
can do about it. :)
Mr. Pascal,
I recently backported your change from XFree86 CVS last year:
172. Add workaround for problems that arise when in multi-layout map
different modifier keysyms share the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
retitle 257794 soubled suse and no fedora
Bug#257794: Package: installation-reports
Changed Bug title.
reassign 257794 grub-installer
Bug#257794: soubled suse and no fedora
Bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:14:19 +0200
Source: xfree86
Binary: libx11-6-dbg libxtst6-dbg xserver-common xlibs-static-dev libxp6-dbg
xbase-clients xlibmesa3-dbg libxtrap6-dbg xfonts-75dpi libxt6 libice6-dbg xmh
libxaw6-dbg x-dev libxv1
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-6.diff.gz
xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-6.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:23:11, the
Author: fabbione
Date: 2004-07-08 15:16:59 -0500 (Thu, 08 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 1601
Added:
tags/4.3.0.dfsg.1-6/
Log:
Tag 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 release.
Copied: tags/4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 (from rev 1600, branches/4.3.0/sid)
Author: fabbione
Date: 2004-07-08 15:19:42 -0500 (Thu, 08 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 1602
Modified:
NEWS.xhtml
Log:
Announce 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 release.
Modified: NEWS.xhtml
===
--- NEWS.xhtml 2004-07-08 20:16:59 UTC (rev 1601)
+++
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Author: fabbione
Date: 2004-07-08 15:23:26 -0500 (Thu, 08 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 1603
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Merge r1597 from branch/4.3.0/sid
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/changelog
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#245246: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Author: fabbione
Date: 2004-07-08 15:26:47 -0500 (Thu, 08 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 1604
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Start -7 development.
Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
===
---
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254973: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#255963: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:02:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#256099: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 255453 xlibs
Bug#255453: Back-slash and vertical-bar keys broken under X
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xfree86' to `xlibs'.
retitle 255453 xlibs: backslash and vertical-bar keys broken for
xfree86/pc104/br/abnt2
Bug#255453:
reassign 255453 xlibs
retitle 255453 xlibs: backslash and vertical-bar keys broken for
xfree86/pc104/br/abnt2
tag 255452 + upstream
thanks
Just FYI, keymap bugs are practically always bugs in xlibs, not
xserver-xfree86.
This bug may have been fixed in upstream CVS; I'll check for a fix there.
There are several problems...
1. I'm not getting dri enabeled or dri disabled.
2. These missing symbols.
3. A general not working of mach64 DRI on sparc.
I have a Mesa tree that builds in linux, previously there was some solaris
only ASM. The DRI tree still has this build problem, so I must use
Sam Halliday wrote:
i just noticed bug #201737... before anyone goes and tries to combine this bug
with that one... THEY ARE NOT THE SAME.
actually, they are the same bug... but i didn't notice previously as people seem
prepared to use a half-complete keyboard map. the attached file i sent has
xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-6.dsc
xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-6.diff.gz
lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb
libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
tags 255453 + moreinfo
Bug#255453: xlibs: backslash and vertical-bar keys broken for
xfree86/pc104/br/abnt2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 255467 xlibs
Bug#255467: FocusOut event instead KeyRelease
Bug reassigned from package `xfree86-common' to `xlibs'.
severity 255467 serious
Bug#255467: FocusOut event instead KeyRelease
Severity set to `serious'.
close 255467
Bug#255467:
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
x-window-system-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb: package says priority is extra,
override says optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is
Accepted:
lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb
reassign 255689 discover-data
retitle 255689 discover-data: uses 'apm' XFree86 4.x driver for ATI
Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility U1
thanks
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 02:01:57PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
clone 255439 -1
retitle -1 Wrong driver chosen for ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility
reassign 255467 xlibs
severity 255467 serious
close 255467
merge 255467 254973
thanks
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:50:04AM +0300, Mait Vares wrote:
Package: xfree86-common
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 has annoying bug,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:22:54AM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
Summary: Back slash and vertical bar keys broken under X.
System: Debian GNU/Linux sarge 2.4.25-1-k7
libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12
Details:
This is how the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 255689 discover-data
Bug#255689: Wrong driver chosen for ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility U1
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xfree86' to `discover-data'.
retitle 255689 discover-data: uses 'apm' XFree86 4.x driver for ATI
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
retitle 255701 xlibs-data: add ISO 10646-1 character set support to
ja_JP.UTF-8 XLC_LOCALE data
Bug#255701: xlibs-data: fonts can't be display under ja_JP.UTF-8
Changed Bug title.
Author: branden
Date: 2004-07-08 16:25:59 -0500 (Thu, 08 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 1605
Modified:
trunk/debian/TODO
Log:
Add items.
Fabio, please move these to a future milestone if you disagree.
Modified: trunk/debian/TODO
===
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 255744 xserver-xfree86: [mouse] X server can fail to start if psmouse
module managed by hotplug
Bug#255744: xserver-xfree86: X fails to load if psmouse module managed by
hotplug
Changed Bug title.
tag 255744 + help upstream
Bug#255744:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 11:50:17PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
i have a couple of ttf fonts that i installed in one directory on
my system. now after installing additional debian ttf-packages,
i would like to have *one* clean solution for all fonts. is there
a script that copies the fonts
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 07:41:41AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
This project was christened XWin.org. freedesktop.org has existed since
the late 1990s, basically as just Havoc with a bunch of standards (e.g.
.desktop, NETWM). In mid-2003, XWin and freedesktop made the decision to
essentially
retitle 255744 xserver-xfree86: [mouse] X server can fail to start if psmouse
module managed by hotplug
tag 255744 + help upstream
thanks
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 08:38:13PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
If the system is powered up and X is started by kdm, X will often fail
because of a missing core
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 02:25:08PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Thanks! I have reviewed the patch, and while compound text encoding is a
bit beyond me, I do appreciate the heads-up. :)
Thanks to you and all the DDs :)
I notice you are the author of this fix. Because of problems with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 255749 important
Bug#255749: xterm: Dies with segmentation fault
Severity set to `important'.
retitle 255749 xterm: SEGV in XawTreeForceLayout()
Bug#255749: xterm: Dies with segmentation fault
Changed Bug title.
tag 255749 + help upstream
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 256066 xvkbd
Bug#256066: xdm no longer recognizes xvkbd
Bug reassigned from package `xdm' to `xvkbd'.
retitle 256066 xvkbd: doesn't grok XFree86 4.3 XKB data
Bug#256066: xdm no longer recognizes xvkbd
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 256086 + moreinfo upstream
Bug#256086: Bold characters and font change with VT100*boldMode off
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, upstream
retitle 256086 xterm: bold characters and font change with VT100*boldMode off
Bug#256086: Bold
Author: branden
Revision: 1600
Property Name: svn:log
New Property Value:
Revert inadvertent, unrelated change to FAQ.xhtml made in r1599.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 01:23:22PM +0300, Alexandru Fomin wrote:
Hi Branden/Fabio,
in Faq.xhtml file, updated on Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:30:23
(XFree86 SVN commit: r1562 - in trunk/debian: . local), there
is a little typo; the url should be:
Your message dated Thu, 8 Jul 2004 16:36:16 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#255772: libxaw7: xterm dies with segfault
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
reassign 256066 xvkbd
retitle 256066 xvkbd: doesn't grok XFree86 4.3 XKB data
thanks
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:02:31PM -0500, Lance Simmons wrote:
Package: xdm
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal
In the past I used xvkbd, a virtual keyboard, to login in on a tablet
computer. (By
severity 255749 important
retitle 255749 xterm: SEGV in XawTreeForceLayout()
tag 255749 + help upstream
thanks
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 07:28:19PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
So the problem was in libxaw7. After downgrading libxaw7 from
4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 xterm works fine.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 08:57:30PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
I'm sending this message to maintainers of packages which are possibly
involved in the problem.
Please read http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252170
I know very little of X programming, so I have no idea which
tag 256086 + moreinfo upstream
retitle 256086 xterm: bold characters and font change with VT100*boldMode off
thanks
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 06:21:38PM -0500, dircha wrote:
[snip]
My trace shows me that colorAttrMode is initially off. Also colorBD
(which I assume you meant to set). Setting
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 256129 wishlist
Bug#256129: xlib: Xlib: Maximum number of clients reached
Severity set to `wishlist'.
reassign 256129 xfree86
Bug#256129: xlib: Xlib: Maximum number of clients reached
Bug reassigned from package `xlibs' to `xfree86'.
severity 256129 wishlist
reassign 256129 xfree86
retitle 256129 xfree86: xlibs reports Maximum number of clients reached
merge 233569 256129
thanks
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 05:30:40PM +1000, Lucas Barbuto wrote:
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal
File: xlib
Hi,
For
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
submitter 256299 Chip Coldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#256299: xdm: race condition in policy.c:Willing()
Changed Bug submitter from Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Chip
Coldwell
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
retitle 256317 xserver-xfree86: [debconf] chatter to stderr about DDC probe
(when calling get-edid)
Bug#256317: talks abou DDC, but does not tell how the DDC probe went
Changed Bug
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo