New try, since it looks like we actually want to keep the xserver-xorg
metapackage.
Cyril Brulebois (07/02/2011):
> currently, xorg.git/debian/TODO says:
> | * Xwrapper.config should really move away from x11-common, now that we
> | only have one X server to deal with
>
> I'm not sure I want t
Le 07/02/2011 09:53, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Brice Goglin (07/02/2011):
>
>> xorg depends on many more packages than xserver-xorg does. My
>> understanding is: When you want the minimal stuff, you install
>> xserver-xorg. When you want almost everything to get a "normal" X
>> running, you i
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 09:43:00 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 07/02/2011 09:33, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> > xserver-xorg only serves a few purposes AFAICT:
> > - dependencies on the server + drivers + tools, which can easily be
> >moved to the xorg metapackage (we already have xorg → xse
Brice Goglin (07/02/2011):
> xorg depends on many more packages than xserver-xorg does. My
> understanding is: When you want the minimal stuff, you install
> xserver-xorg. When you want almost everything to get a "normal" X
> running, you install xorg. But I didn't check if there was still a
> poi
Le 07/02/2011 09:33, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> xserver-xorg only serves a few purposes AFAICT:
> - dependencies on the server + drivers + tools, which can easily be
>moved to the xorg metapackage (we already have xorg → xserver-xorg
>→ stuff, it's just about replacing that with xorg → st
Hi,
currently, xorg.git/debian/TODO says:
| * Xwrapper.config should really move away from x11-common, now that we
| only have one X server to deal with
I'm not sure I want to be the one moving this to another package,
seems like it could break easily. But see below.
| * Merge xserver-xorg and
6 matches
Mail list logo
