Hello,
I have used this program for a while, but it still marks some legitimate
mail as spam. Does anyone have a sample cfg file that blocks a good amount
but doesn't mark legit mail spam I could look at? Do most people just have
it mark it spam or have it automatically delete it?
Thanks,
Since my logs show that ORBZ hasn't responded to my server since 2:19pm on
3/19, I was wondering what alternate services that are commented out of the
global.cfg file are highly recommended or used? I would prefer to hear about
ones that work well while my boss would prefer to hear about free or
Since my logs show that ORBZ hasn't responded to my server since 2:19pm on
3/19, I was wondering what alternate services that are commented out of the
global.cfg file are highly recommended or used? I would prefer to hear about
ones that work well while my boss would prefer to hear about free or
on 3/21/02 9:28 AM, R. Scott Perry wrote:
Since my logs show that ORBZ hasn't responded to my server since 2:19pm on
3/19, I was wondering what alternate services that are commented out of the
global.cfg file are highly recommended or used? I would prefer to hear about
ones that work well
Sorry if this is off-topic, the more direct mailing list is closed to
non-subscribers.
My setup:
Twin 1G proc.
1G RAM
20x5G 10K RPM SCSI RAID 5 for OS + programs + mailboxes (Separate Adaptec
Controller) (C: D:)
20G 10K RPM Mirrored SCSI Set for spool + logging (Separate Adaptec
Controller)
So who's right and who's wrong here?
ORBZ for not changing the test or Lotus for not fixing a bug in their software?
In either case we loose another decent blacklist not because of some junk
mailer fighting for the right to send junk but a software issue in one program.
This would seem be a
I had a similar sort of morning, got the sniffer demo, and I've been
watching the mailserver slowly die. My declude log for today has a lot of
external program didn't respond in an hour so skip it messages, so I
commented sniffer back out of my global.cfg. Took a while, but all the gunk
in the
I could also use one like that. Still getting a lot of spam in. and
don't want to delete good emails if possible. Please let me know if
anyone has one
Thanks
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Mitchell
Sent: Thursday, March 21,
I have used the release (non-demo) version of sniffer.exe
for a week and it has worked fine. Our server processes between
50 and 100 thousand msgs/day and have not seen any slowdowns
or process lockups.
The SNF definitions are constantly evolving based on what people
report as Spam or false
The NJABL tests look promising. Anyone tried them yet?
--Matt Robertson--
MSB Designs, Inc.
http://mysecretbase.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Helpdesk
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Here's the relative chunk from mine. Basically my noabuse and
nopostmaster tests have bneen reduced to 4 from 5. Then badheaders was
reduced to 4 from 8 (any ColdFusion-generated email will fail this one
unless specially handled, and few CF programmers are aware of the
problem). Then the
Matt sorry I am new to declude is there someone that uses it that I can call
to help me get mine right.
John
- Original Message -
From: Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:02 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] sample global cfg
on 3/21/02 12:45 PM, Matt Robertson wrote:
The NJABL tests look promising. Anyone tried them yet?
Matt,
I just started testing them about 90 minutes ago and so far they look very
good.
Greg
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail
I'm not sure what you mean by get it right, but I can tell you this: If
you just look at your global.cfg and replace the block you have with the
one I posted you're done (although my lawyer says I have to remind you
that these are good settings for *me* and not guaranteed in any way).
This
I've responded to this off list.
If anyone else experiences anything similar please let me know.
Thanks!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_M
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Scott Phelps
| Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:09 PM
| To: [EMAIL
The only difference between the live Message Sniffer and the demo is the
message counting logic - which amounts to about 5 lines of code. If it
works at all, it should continue to work - just like the production
version.
I have sent new code to Scott John to test with,... Hopefully we will
get
I humbly take that back.
Upon reviewing the file dates, I discovered that the posted demo version
had missed an bug fix from a few weeks ago. The bug would allow
evaluation matrix to run out of range in cases where the first character
in a scanned message was null or 127.
I have updated the
Here's some more information behind the big mystery.
http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,51218,00.html
The small city of Battle Creek, Michigan, wants to lock up an anti-spam
activist who it believes crashed its mail server.
Never mind that the town government was using a buggy version
It would be nice to add weight for too many recipients. (The amateur spammer
test)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Kate Berris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 2:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Everyone sign that (click the bottom link). I did, and I feel much better.
NO!!!
It's a trick! Clicking on that link will crash their servers; they have
lots of empty jail spaces as people are leaving town, and they need to fill
them!
kidding, of course
-Scott
---
Everyone come back tomorrow and sign it again! And the next day, and the
next, ...
I think the town is going to learn VERY quickly that they aren't doing the
right thing. That wired article had links to the E-mail address for the
head system administrator, who is going to get a lot of mail
You're right... made me feel better..
Jeff
**
TymeWyse Internet
P.O.Box 84 - 583 N. Main St., Canyonville, OR 97417
tel/fax: (541) 839-6027 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
I told Kellogg's I wouldn't buy their cereal anymore:
http://www.kelloggs.com/contact/index.html
I called Kellogg's too, to complain: 1-800-962-1413
(8 AM to 8 PM ET Weekdays)
Battle Creek, a town of 54,000 best known as the headquarters of the
Kellogg's cereal company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
We use them as one of our tests, and we catch a fair amount of junkmail with
them. Here are the tests I use on our Postfix gateway:
bl.spamcop.net,
orbs.dorkslayers.com,
relays.ordb.org,
formmail.relays.monkeys.com,
proxies.relays.monkeys.com,
spews.relays.osirusoft.com,
I have used this program for a while, but it still marks some legitimate
mail as spam. Does anyone have a sample cfg file that blocks a
good amount but doesn't mark legit mail spam I could look at?
Do most people just have it mark it spam or have it automatically delete
it?
Sample CFG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ezbounce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hanmail
@uol.com.co uol
@gala.net gala
[EMAIL PROTECTED] france
networkpromotion.compromo
@kooldeals.net deals
[EMAIL PROTECTED] adult
mylottomail.com lotto
.em5000.net embounce
I followed suit and also sent a copy of my post on their guestbook to
him, as well as, the city commissioners over there. They probably don't
even understand what the hell is going on. Anyway, their e-mails can
all be found at
http://ci.battle-creek.mi.us/Government/High/Biographies.htm#Squires.
I am posting the following reply here to an active thread in the regular
IMail Discussion list (Scott I hope you don't mind), because for
whatever reason my posts there do not get distributed?? (I have finally
asked IPSwitch to investigate because I cannot post nor do I ever
receive original
I just posted an update to the Beta version of SpamReview (v1.0.27).
I had to remove the Spool features for now. I need more time to help keep
us all out of trouble.
I added an update feature that will allow you to select File/Check for
Program Updates and SpamReview will be updated from our
I am posting the following reply here to an active thread in the regular
IMail Discussion list (Scott I hope you don't mind),
Not a problem.
because for whatever reason my posts there do not get distributed??
FYI, this one did make it to the IMail Forum.
Ahh... my 2 cents anyway. I just feel
Ahh... my 2 cents anyway. I just feel no one has the right to send me
crap I did not ask for, especially PORN solicitations into my children's
e-mail box. Perhaps I am wrong legally as it relates to free rights and
e-mail solicitations, but the PORN solicitation alone is enough to keep
me
My favorite guest book entry is below. Unfortunately,
I was trying to eat at the time and almost pulled a
George Bush Pretzel!!
From: Alan Rawlsky
Thank you for making my job easier. It's getting
so no one wants my porn spam any more. But now with
ORBZ gone, I can use any open relay in the
I have weighted SPAMROUTING high relative to those below.
- Original Message -
From: Chad Killion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:14 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DSN:Good junkmail cfg file
Hello,
I need to implement JunkMail on my server
Another way to look at things would be to check out the court cases
where
Corporations have sued their employees for misuse of e-mail.
Do you know where there are any of these cases that I can review online?
If not, thanks anyway. I will try and free up some time to perform some
research and
Ahh... my 2 cents anyway. I just feel no one has the right to
send me
crap I did not ask for...
In one sense, isn't this what ORBZ was doing? Port Scanning
everyone,
and sending in unsolicited emails because they want to test other
people's
systems without them asking for permission to do so?
In one sense, isn't this what ORBZ was doing? Port Scanning everyone,
and sending in unsolicited emails because they want to test other
people's
systems without them asking for permission to do so?
ORBZ was not Port Scanning ORBZ was only after being notified of an
open relay seeing for
Another way to look at things would be to check out the court cases
where Corporations have sued their employees for misuse of e-mail.
Do you know where there are any of these cases that I can review online?
No, sorry. I just remember seeing this issue on the news.
As a business owner, I
37 matches
Mail list logo
