Hello,
you can try one from here
http://directory.google.com/Top/Computers/Software/Groupware/Microsoft_Excha
nge/Utilities/POP3_and_Internet_Gateways_to_Exchange/
or from here
http://www.msexchange.org/software/software.asp?cat=POP3downloaders
We did test all of them, and as written a mail
Where can I find some docs/hints/tips/etc on using the SpamHider function of
Declude Junkmail??
It requires downloading a file from
http://www.declude.com/release/147/spamattach.eml , that goes in your
\IMail\Delude\ directory (which can be modified to suit your needs), and
then using ATTACH
I've just included the reverse DNS test WARN in the $default$.JunkMail file
later I received an email from a software vendor that had the X header
warning:
X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a mail server 207.33.16.83
with no reverse DNS entry.
When I checked 207.33.16.83 using
Scott,
This is also marked as failing REVDNS check 194.82.139.3 but it has a PTR
record
194.82.139.3 PTR record: mail.stokecoll.ac.uk. [TTL = 270984 seconds]
Our primary DNS is 213.210.8.110
Thanks
David
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I had a similar problem and had to specify the DNS server used by
Junkmail rather than having Junkmail use the one that iMail used.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R.
Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 8:15 AM
To:
Our primary DNS is 213.210.8.110
That's the problem. You DNS server is saying that nothing exists (reverse
DNS lookups, MX record lookups, etc.). That's a serious problem that needs
to be fixed.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
FWIW,
If that server is W2k and DNS was configured without an active Internet
connection, then DNS will not download the root servers and nothing will
work.
You might want to try un-installing the W2k DNS service and
re-installing with an active Internet Connection.
-Original Message-
We're not running win2k DNS, we're using Simply DNS. I am puzzled by this as
this DNS server is hosting 300-400 domains without any apparent problems. If
you run a DNS report agaisnt any of the hosted domains it responds
correctly.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Smith [mailto:[EMAIL
Instead of going through all of that, you can just delete the root zone
indicated with a . and Win2K will start using the root servers as it
already has them configured.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Smith
Sent: Friday, May 17,
We're not running win2k DNS, we're using Simply DNS. I am puzzled by this as
this DNS server is hosting 300-400 domains without any apparent problems. If
you run a DNS report agaisnt any of the hosted domains it responds
correctly.
The key is realizing that (like an SMTP server), DNS goes two
I does appear that that DNS isn't responding corectly, the other two are -
so thanks for the detective work. Now to find out why...
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 May 2002 14:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reverse
Anyone know the IPs for Bellsouth.com's outbound mail servers. I have a
customer that claims they are getting bounces on return mail - I want to be
sure that I have not accidentally blocked their IP.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
303-421-5140
www.warp8.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses
JunkMail-Pro on IMail 6.04 on WinNT...
I have a user, [EMAIL PROTECTED], which has an alias, SomeAlias. I also
have my per-user config set up and verified to be working properly.
If I send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the domain's
$default$.JunkMail is used instead of the SomeUser.JunkMail
Thanks to everyone. I had to reinstall the DNS server to get it working
again, no amount of config changes/restarting would work.
-Original Message-
From: Smart Business Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 May 2002 15:22
To: David Lewis-Waller
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail]
I have been looking
at the documentation for whitelisting with Declude JunkMail and see that you can
whitelist a "from address" but don't see a reference to whitelisting a "to
address". If I have several hundred customers in an e-mail domain (say
example.com) hosted by my IMail server, and
I have a user, [EMAIL PROTECTED], which has an alias, SomeAlias. I
also have my per-user config set up and verified to be working properly.
If I send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the domain's
$default$.JunkMail is used instead of the SomeUser.JunkMail
I also tried creating a
We do run JunkMail Pro, with version 1.53, so that's great! Does is matter
where we place the whitelist section in the global.cfg file, or can we just
list them all at the bottom of the file?
They can go anywhere in the file.
Why is there currently a hard limit of 200 whitelist entries? I
I could use more WHITELIST space. I have many users who get email from AOL, YAHOO and
MSN users. I do not want to WHITELIST the
entire domain because of the spam problems from these domains but I do want to
WHITELIST specific users so the 200 limit gets used
up quickly.
Thanks,
Greg Foulks,
Is there a limit on local blacklist entries?
I'm getting several spams per day that don't fail any tests. We haven't
gone "live" with Junk-Mail to our users yet, but when we do, there may be
requests to block specific addresses or domains. Don't know yet if we'll
offer that to the users,
Is there a limit on local blacklist entries?
No. Just for the whitelists (which should be changed in an upcoming release).
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
You can just create a \IMail\Declude\domain.com\SomeAlias.JunkMail file,
and Declude will use that.
-Scott
Hi, Scott. Sorry, but that's not what I'm seeing. Here's the details.
user = [EMAIL PROTECTED],
alias = SomeAlias, which resolves to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At the
:NOT REGISTERED: No activation code.
Declude Hijack Status: NOT REGISTERED: No activation code.
End of diagnostics.
Here is the Imail log entry:
20020517 111322 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0040026A) [216.174.5.99] EHLO
ourdomain.net
20020517 111322 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0040026A
How risky is it to out-right delete messages that
fail the SPAMCOP or OSSRC tests? Those soundpretty accurate for
catching known spammers.
Are any of the many tests on the "DNS-based Spam
Databases" worth putting into effect to get more accuracy out of
Junk-Mail?
Glenn Z.
Hi, Scott. Sorry, but that's not what I'm seeing. Here's the details.
user = [EMAIL PROTECTED],
alias = SomeAlias, which resolves to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is SomeAlias [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]? If
it's [EMAIL PROTECTED], then you would need to use
I wouldn't
suggest it We also get legitimate email that fail the SPAMCOP and OSSRC
tests. Try holding the mail then decide if it should be deleted or
not.
Greg Foulks, MCP NewFound Technologies, Inc. http://www.nfti.com Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice:
614.318.5036 Fax: 614.318.5005
Glenn,
Very risky based on my admittedly small sample of a couple of thousand
messages per day.
Between 10 to 20% of our messages fail the SPAMCOP test and higher
then in the weight tests. OSSRC messages re about 1/3 of SPAMCOP.
We still have a small but significant 4% of failed messages that
LOL, I can't possibly hold and review mail for 220
hosted domains and 6300 of my own users! We're planning at this point to
go with the ATTACH action. Then it's THEIR choice to set up a filter to
delete all of it, or let it come in for review.
Glenn Z.
- Original Message -
Glenn,
I agree it is a potentially good solutions. But we experimented with
the attach action but and had significant problems although no time to
really pursue causes.
We tested with our main domain and several attachments actually locked
workstations running theBat!. Very surprising.
I have seen 10 at one time and 6 another. We have seen this problem for a
couple
of months now, although not often. What first brought it to my attention was
a monthly
billing email batch ending up in the wrong accounts. I spotted the $s and
tried to
figure it out, but other issues drew me away
Yeah, we had that problem at first but the message that locked up the
workstation was after that. I still intend to test this again at some
point.
What was surprising was that it locked using theBat!.
Terry Fritts
Friday, May 17, 2002 you wrote:
RSP FYI, the primary cause of problems with
Friday, May 17, 2002 you wrote:
H We delete messages that fail OSSRC on the fly.
Problem we've had with OSSRC is that so many people that run open
relays seem to be clueless sysadmins. In many cases their
organizations are our clients' clients. Fortunately we are small
enough and
Until I can convince them to upgrade,
is there a setting in Imail to disable realtime priority?
No. I've never even seen IMail using realtime priority (this is the first
time I've heard of IMail being able to reuse a filename with 1.46).
-Scott
---
[This E-mail
I have Imail 6.06 and have had a few of reports from customers claiming to
be getting someone else's email, however it is rare, and harder to track
since they almost always delete the email before letting us know. This makes
sense as to what may have happened, not saying it was, but it is
OK. Since we can't upgrade anytime soon and we can't have people receiveing
the wrong email, I have been instructed to shut down Declude.
It sucks because it does such a great job of catching spam.
Jay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Are they getting someon else's mail in your company or mail that looks like
it is for someone else at a different domain entirely? There was a whole
discussion at one point about a spam harvesting technique where a user gets
an email that looks normal enough, but it is not for them. They reply
In our case, our company and customer email is under the same domain. We
send a billing email once
a month. We found several of these in the spool with the SM$ extensions.
Imail log files stated the
emails were delivered. We had several customers call or email accounting to
complain they had
In addition to allowing more of them, allowing them to
be user specific (for Pro users) would be a huge plus.
That would give our users the ultimate level of control.
They could set very aggressive spam tests, but still be
assured of getting mail from certain addresses.
-Original
Title: Message
We hold spam for seven days.
Wehave a vbscript thatwe run at 11:59
pm everyday to automatically
- move day's spam to it's
own folder and delete 7-day old spams (same with virus)
- zipped the sysyymmdd.txt and
keep it for seven days
- keep seven days of declude
logs.
If
If I have 2 mail gateway servers that feed my internal IMail server and they
both have the same weight MX records and were addressed 123.123.123.1
123.123.123.2, would this be a legit use to IPBYPASS :
IPBYPASS 123.123.123.0/30
No, that isn't allowed.
or should it be configured
39 matches
Mail list logo
