Scott,
Declude scans all emails and writes warnings into the headers based on the
global.cfg file.
Then it handles the email based on the *.junkmail file(s) in the
Declude/DomainName.com directory.
Two issues arise for us.
1. If we have a thousand domains on a server and only 50 are using
Good question, Paul, I was wondering the same thing.
Also, it appears that if you are running both Declude JunkMail and Virus,
that messages are filtered for spam first and are held if meeting the spam
tests. If my understanding is correct, that makes sense to me since it
saves on CPU cycles by
We have multiple web servers (as a hosting company).
1. Each web server runs it's own (Microsoft IIS) smtp server to relay mail
generated by web sites. This mail is usually feeding to their accounts on
the iMail server. Running everything through a central smtp relay server
would create a single
Wouldn't that also mean that we would need to turn off:
XINHEADER X-Spam-Tests-Failed: %TESTSFAILED%
as well, since people could also filter on this header? I have this
XINHEADER enabled right now, so I'm also wondering why about 1 out of 5 held
messages is missing the
Wouldn't that also mean that we would need to turn off:
XINHEADER X-Spam-Tests-Failed: %TESTSFAILED%
as well, since people could also filter on this header?
You might want to do that, yes. However, it can be difficult filtering on
that header (since the X-Spam-Tests-Failed:
We have multiple web servers (as a hosting company).
1. Each web server runs it's own (Microsoft IIS) smtp server to relay mail
generated by web sites. This mail is usually feeding to their accounts on
the iMail server. Running everything through a central smtp relay server
would create a
Wait, Does WHITELIST mean:
A. spam tests ARE NOT performed on the messages from that origin, or
B. tests are performed but messages go through regardless?
(We were trying to skip tests on our own messages from our own servers using
IPBYPASS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In this case, you can just use
I would prefer to JunkMail filter before virus scanning, so would you
consider setting up a special queue directory that we could move legitimate
e-mail messages that were held as spam so that Declude could periodically
parse the directory and virus scan any messages in there, and if clean move
I will be installing IMail 7.1 this weekend. The delivery rules allow for a
forward to a mailbox based on a filter. I am hoping that will make all this
work. The attach feature will keep the original message intact and allow a
domain manager to take the responsibility for retrieving and
I would prefer to JunkMail filter before virus scanning, so would you
consider setting up a special queue directory that we could move legitimate
e-mail messages that were held as spam so that Declude could periodically
parse the directory and virus scan any messages in there, and if clean move
Well, I guess it's nice to know that it will at least have a place in the
unlikely section of the database. It would seem to me that any large
IMail installation that is using Declude would want this because of the
potential huge CPU savings of not having to virus scan all junk mail, and
also
Well, I guess it's nice to know that it will at least have a place in the
unlikely section of the database. It would seem to me that any large
IMail installation that is using Declude would want this because of the
potential huge CPU savings of not having to virus scan all junk mail, and
also
What about this scenerio:
A huge company that you receive hundreds of e-mails a day from but with
a mail admin not on the ball suddenly finds itself listed in spam bases
that cause the e-mails sent to you to be stopped by JunkMail.
At the same time, a virus starts spreading by way of that
I rest my case, thanks for supporting my requested feature.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude scans all emails
What about this scenerio:
A huge
totaly agree with
i dont like the idea of having viruses sitting in a spam directory on m
server
all spam i seen so far do not include attachement, so i don't think virus
scanning of spam is a big cpu consumer
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
John, I'm sorry if I came off sounding insulting, I know you're just trying
to help. A little about our environment might be helpful. We currently
have two RedHat 7.2/Postfix 1.1.10 gateway servers running in our DMZ and
they are running equal MX records for load-sharing. They provide
16 matches
Mail list logo
