But wich weight will have this test? The external test definition line
has 4 paramters:
-TestName
-external
-returnvalue
-filename
...but no xx 5 0 (for example)
You can just add the 5 0 at the end. For example:
MYTEST external 1 c:\IMail\Declude\myprog.exe 5 0
In this
Reply to: Roger Heath
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BLARSBL:DBSL on Thursday 8:49:08 AM
Should be DSBL... and it appears to be working here after turning
it on..
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
R
We are running Junkmail v1.53 and Imail v5.09 and I have been
noticing errors in my junkmail log file similar to the one below:
06/13/2002 01:30:47 Q2e06034 Msg failed WEIGHT10 (Weight of 17
reaches or exceeds the limit of 10.).
06/13/2002 01:30:47 Q2e06034 ERROR: Could not move spam to hold!
Reply to: Intelliware Administrator
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BLARSBL:DBSL on Thursday 9:38:20 AM
No, but I will try it. It seems to be working good. Scott had
this under subscription based services in his sample global file,
so I was a bit confused. Are there others? Does any one here
No, but I will try it. It seems to be working good. Scott had
this under subscription based services in his sample global file,
so I was a bit confused.
FYI, that section is for services that require a subscription *or* are not
commonly used. The only ones that require a subscription are
Title: Message
Hi
all..
Among all of us..
there is enough resources and know-how that should easily let us create a
database of unique entries in a kill-list.
We can gladly
provide a simple interface that everyone can upload their kill list - then run a
unique query on the list and output
Title: Message
But what about possible legal
ramifications on something like that?
I remember a discussion like this
before.
How would you keep someone from adding
an entry for malicious purposes?
Great idea but a hard sell.
But I would be interested.
John Tolmachoff
IT
Title: Message
If the
procedure is to have each admin download the list regularly, then the
responsibility for the validity of the list would be on the admin. This
would not be any different than me telling everyone that a particular address
(ie. [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is a
spamer. I think
I'm not sure if you mean BLARSBL or DSBL, but I have been using both, and
DSBL-MULTI as well, for several months without issue. In fact, they have
worked quite well for me, so I've given each of them a weight of 6, with my
hold weight being 10.
BLARSBL ip4rblock.blars.org *
Reply to: R. Scott Perry
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BLARSBL:DBSL on Thursday 10:18:20 AM
Thanks. I had to drop this almost as soon as I started it. It
seemed to work but then I began getting almost all mail trapped
with a weight 10 appearing from nowhere. Even the tests list did
not
Thanks, I will try these. Actually Scott has :
#DSBLALLip4runconfirmed.dsbl.org* 4 0
Maybe this was the source of the pbm?
That is correct. DSBL has 3 different databases:
[1] DSBL, which lists open relays that were reported from trusted sources,
[2]
Has anyone else had a problem with users receiving mail with
attachments, namely images? I have had quite a few users complain about
this, and have experienced it myself. Running Imail 7.10 -
2002.03.27.33 and Declude JM Pro 1.54 Beta.
Fritz
Frederick P. Squib, Jr.
Network Administrator
Has anyone else had a problem with users receiving mail with
attachments, namely images? I have had quite a few users complain about
this, and have experienced it myself.
Do you mean users that are receiving attachments they aren't expecting, or
not receiving attachments that they should be
Scott,
They are not receiving mail with images attached, to prove it, I sent
myself both a plain text message and a message with a small .gif file
attached to it from another server. The plain (no attachment) message
went through but the one with the .gif never made it.
Funny thing is I don't
They are not receiving mail with images attached, to prove it, I sent
myself both a plain text message and a message with a small .gif file
attached to it from another server. The plain (no attachment) message
went through but the one with the .gif never made it.
Funny thing is I don't see
What about a JavaScript test? There's something that should not be in
non-spam email. Or an ActiveX control detection. Both of these are big clues
that it is spam.
-Josh
--
Joshua Levitsky, MCSE, CISSP, EMTD
Desktop Systems Engineer
AOL Time Warner
- Original Message -
From: Mark
What about a JavaScript test? There's something that should not be in
non-spam email. Or an ActiveX control detection. Both of these are big clues
that it is spam.
This is something that we are considering testing for (along with base64
encoding of text or HTML segments, which is normally only
Use DSBALL at your own risk since entries are in fact unconfirmed and can
come from any source. The other two lists only accept entries from trusted
sources.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Roger Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:02 AM
To: Bill Landry
Use DSBALL at your own risk since entries are in fact unconfirmed and can
come from any source.
Just to clarify that: Unconfirmed means that it hasn't been proven that
the entries are open relays. However, any IP listed in DSBLALL either
comes from an open relay, or the person who submitted
Title: Message
Sounds good to me...
Maybe
the best bet would be a distributed iMail kill.lst or XML file that people
FTP'ed from a central site once a night/week.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Todd HoltSent: Thursday,
I just set up a ROUTETO and the routeto email address did not exist.
That should get handled just like any other bounce message -- the E-mail
should get bounced back to the sender.
I found a bounce message from postmaster with the following as the to address
PAMHEADERS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott: we are thinking also to not only search for tipical spam-content
but also for tipical non-spam-content and give them a negative weight as
you mentioned in a posting yesterday. But we are not sure if there are
any restrictions/rules that we should respect with the
Unfortunately this leads to a high false positive rate. (We tried it and
pulled it.)
_M
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
| Joshua Levitsky
| Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 2:11 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re:
Any idea why this email didn't get
tagged?
We have no whitelists and have Sniffer set for
subject, weight 10 set for subject and this message got through without a SPAM
in the subject.
Is it because the postmaster account is an alias?
The junkmail logs don't show anything other than all
Scott,
bobcalvert.com is a local domain. the postmaster@bobcalvert account is an
alias that forwards to our admin@astnetworks account. Both of these domains
have the Subject line for incoming and Sniffer is completely commented out
for outgoing. This is the first email I've seen go through
It was set up as
WEIGHT 10 ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, [EMAIL PROTECTED] did not exist so the email bounced. The
PAMHEADERS [EMAIL PROTECTED] was the address that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (my IMAIL Server) tried to send to let the sender
(me) know that the message could not be delivered to
26 matches
Mail list logo
