[Declude.JunkMail] Filter Rule Mistake

2003-07-09 Thread Rob Salmond
I've got a custom filter that isn't generating any error messages, but fails to catch the spam I want it to. Perhaps someone could point out the problem? From my Global.CFG: SPAMFILTER filter D:\IMail\Declude\spamfilter.txt x 0 0 From spamfilter.txt: MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS $stderr$ MAILFROM 0

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Rule Mistake

2003-07-09 Thread R. Scott Perry
I've got a custom filter that isn't generating any error messages, but fails to catch the spam I want it to. Perhaps someone could point out the problem? From spamfilter.txt: MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS $stderr$ MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS $bounce$ MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS $odc.ca$@ The problem is the $ in there --

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Rule Mistake

2003-07-09 Thread Rob Salmond
I understood the $'s to behave as wildcards. Removing them will work for the stderr, and bounce rules but if I leave odc.ca in there without a wildcard and an @ it will drop all internal mail. Is there another way I can fix this? Also, what can I do to ensure the proper config files are used?

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Rule Mistake

2003-07-09 Thread Smart Business Lists
Rob, Wednesday, July 9, 2003 you wrote: RS I understood the $'s to behave as wildcards. Just as a matter of interest where did you get the idea that $ was a wildcard character? Terry Fritts --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Rule Mistake

2003-07-09 Thread R. Scott Perry
I understood the $'s to behave as wildcards. Removing them will work for the stderr, and bounce rules but if I leave odc.ca in there without a wildcard and an @ it will drop all internal mail. Is there another way I can fix this? Declude JunkMail doesn't include wildcards. For the odc.ca rule,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] argh! change!

2003-07-09 Thread paul
That's the HOLD action. Although you can use it, the HOLD action will prevent the E-mail from being delivered. So if you use the HOLD action, the recipient will not receive the E-mail. Right, I understand that option, which is why I'd prefer to be able to COPY the lower weighted mails to be

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] argh! change!

2003-07-09 Thread R. Scott Perry
That's the HOLD action. Although you can use it, the HOLD action will prevent the E-mail from being delivered. So if you use the HOLD action, the recipient will not receive the E-mail. Right, I understand that option, which is why I'd prefer to be able to COPY the lower weighted mails to be

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] argh! change!

2003-07-09 Thread paul
It sounds like you're looking for an action that acts like the HOLD action (by copying the Q*.SMD and D*.SMD files to a specific directory), but also delivers the E-mail. Unfortunately, there isn't anything like that in Declude JunkMail. Right, that's what I was looking for. It makes sense

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Rule Mistake

2003-07-09 Thread Rob Salmond
Just as a matter of interest where did you get the idea that $ was a wildcard character? The way its written in the manual it just looked like it would be a wildcard. You can't have a $ sign in a valid domain name or an email address so I just assumed thats what it was. On closer

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] argh! change!

2003-07-09 Thread David Stavert
I just started seeing junkmail that is addressed to an everyone@ the mailserver domain name. It looks like the real message was sent to an email address at a domain hosted on that mailserver and the everyone@ was added. Is this a new technique? Thanks David Stavert --- [This E-mail was scanned

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Rule Mistake

2003-07-09 Thread R. Scott Perry
Just as a matter of interest where did you get the idea that $ was a wildcard character? The way its written in the manual it just looked like it would be a wildcard. You can't have a $ sign in a valid domain name or an email address so I just assumed thats what it was. Thanks for

[Declude.JunkMail] Novice question, weight gain

2003-07-09 Thread Mike Kruidhof
Scott, How can I add a weight to this email message? -- Received: from airip2.emailvalues.com [65.60.9.93] by mx2.cooking.com (SMTPD32-7.07) id AC6A688008A; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 12:32:58 -0700 From: Weight Loss [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] argh! change!

2003-07-09 Thread Karen D. Oland
Could he not copy the messages to a special user, then use the command line to move all the *.SMD to the SPAM directory from that user's mailbox? Set up a batch file and schedule the task to move them every few minutes? -Original Message- From: R. Scott Perry It sounds like you're

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Novice question, weight gain

2003-07-09 Thread R. Scott Perry
How can I add a weight to this email message? -- Received: from airip2.emailvalues.com [65.60.9.93] by mx2.cooking.com (SMTPD32-7.07) id AC6A688008A; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 12:32:58 -0700 The REVDNS hostname is

[Declude.JunkMail] Bizarre DJM Pro Situation

2003-07-09 Thread Dan Geiser
Hello, All, We are using DJM Pro. I'm having an issue with a message that I don't think should have been delivered. Here are the headers... - Received: from out017.tpcper.com [69.24.239.37] by pagerover.com (SMTPD32-6.06) id A4323AA80134; Sun, 06 Jul 2003 15:10:42 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bizarre DJM Pro Situation

2003-07-09 Thread R. Scott Perry
We are using DJM Pro. I'm having an issue with a message that I don't think should have been delivered. X-Spam-Tests-Failed: OSSRC, EASYNET-DNSBL, IPNOTINMX, WEIGHT05, WEIGHT07, WEIGHTRANGE05-59, WEIGHTRANGE07-59 [8] For the life of me I cannot figure out why this was delivered to the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Novice question, weight gain

2003-07-09 Thread Mike Kruidhof
Scott, I understand your point but would it be possible to do a DNS lookup on the RDNS hostname. The IP address that is returned should match the IP address that they used. In your case it would match, but in this case 93.9.60.65.in-addr.arpa does not even have an record. I am looking for a

h:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Novice question, weight gain

2003-07-09 Thread Nathan Fouarge
Please remember to restart the services too... :) Glad I could help. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Kruidhof Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Scott, I understand your point but would it be

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Rule Mistake

2003-07-09 Thread Rob Salmond
Perhaps blocking on odc.ca. would be the best option here (including the . at the end)? Hey! Good idea. Dropping that in right now. Thanks ;) Rob Salmond Ontario Die Company (519)-576-8950 ext. 132 --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] ---

[Declude.JunkMail] REDIRECT configuration

2003-07-09 Thread Russ Uhte (Lists)
Finally getting around to updating my Declude Junkmail config. I would like to use the REDIRECT command, but want to make sure I'm using it correctly before throwing myself to the wolves! :) 1. Using the REDIRECT command, I don't need the domain folders. For example: I'm a mail gateway for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] X-Declude-Sender Missing from Header

2003-07-09 Thread R. Scott Perry
We are seeing several spam emails delivered to our clients which are apparently able to bypass JMPro filters as there is no X-Declude-Sender line in the header. Can anyone explain why it is missing (see sample header below)? X-RBL-Warning: EASYNET-DNSBL: Blacklisted by easynet.nl DNSBL -

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Rule Mistake

2003-07-09 Thread Rob Salmond
Perhaps blocking on odc.ca. would be the best option here (including the . at the end)? Hey! Good idea. Dropping that in right now. Thanks ;) Rob Salmond Ontario Die Company (519)-576-8950 ext. 132 --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] REDIRECT configuration

2003-07-09 Thread Russ Uhte (Lists)
2. In the archives, ( This message specifically http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09131.html) it says to put the configuration in the global.cfg file. However, if I'm reading the manual correctly, it says to put the configuration in $default$.junkmail. It should actually be

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] REDIRECT configuration

2003-07-09 Thread R. Scott Perry
2. In the archives, ( This message specifically http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09131.html) it says to put the configuration in the global.cfg file. However, if I'm reading the manual correctly, it says to put the configuration in $default$.junkmail. It should actually be

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] REDIRECT configuration

2003-07-09 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Scott I had this problem with a domain that was not on my server and wanted to use REDIRECT to point ot another junkmail file. But it always used the outbound settings in the global.cfg. You said when I had the issue you were going to have this fixed in a future beta release. Has it been

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] REDIRECT configuration

2003-07-09 Thread R. Scott Perry
I had this problem with a domain that was not on my server and wanted to use REDIRECT to point ot another junkmail file. But it always used the outbound settings in the global.cfg. You said when I had the issue you were going to have this fixed in a future beta release. Has it been fixed The

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] REDIRECT configuration

2003-07-09 Thread Russ Uhte (Lists)
At 02:39 PM 7/9/2003, you wrote: I had this problem with a domain that was not on my server and wanted to use REDIRECT to point ot another junkmail file. But it always used the outbound settings in the global.cfg. You said when I had the issue you were going to have this fixed in a future beta

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bizarre DJM Pro Situation

2003-07-09 Thread Dan Patnode
.tpcper is Topica. They come out with new spamming domains continuously while keeping their IPs fixed. Blocking their IPs however, also blocks all the newsletters they publish. I've been testing their removal system for the last 2 months, if you enter the recipients email address here with

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bizarre DJM Pro Situation

2003-07-09 Thread Sheldon Koehler
I had a very interesting and nice talk with the CEO of Topica at ISPCon in April. She was very proactive on the double opt-in service and to get their higher level of service, you must be double opt-in only! I encouraged her to set a deadline for everyone on their servers to be double opt-in and

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] REDIRECT configuration

2003-07-09 Thread Dan Patnode
The asumption is that multiple folders are needed, you are running multiple domains through the same gateway. I've been using REDIRECT for over a year and there are advantages to customization, being able to REDIRECt with some and SUBJECT with others, or different versions of each.

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Spam News

2003-07-09 Thread Dan Patnode
Thought these might be of interest: New site spoofs PayPal to get billing information http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/2003/07/09/paypal/ Congress fights over spam opt-in rules http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/2003/07/09/spam/ --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by

[Declude.JunkMail] Harvesting Attempt

2003-07-09 Thread Rifat Levis
The harvesting attempt is increasing every day. In 1 hour period , i can see minimum 20 different ip address trying to harvest user database. Many connection is made from the same user via proxy but it is really annoying for mail servers to deal with many ip address and to waste processor time

[Declude.JunkMail] Spam Attack

2003-07-09 Thread Jeff Kratka
Just to let everyone know so others don't get hit with it, I just had a Spam attack/Bomb from one particular location. As soon as I found out I blocked everything possible and things are working. It was so bad that it killed the server. It came from: [217.16.118.12] MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Attack

2003-07-09 Thread Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Kratka Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 5:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Attack Just to let everyone know so others don't get hit with it, I just had a Spam

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] X-Declude-Sender Missing from Header

2003-07-09 Thread JR Tatum
Scott, We use the default XSENDER ON option in the Global.cfg file. The weird thing is that 98% of our email headers do have the X-DECLUDE-SENDER line listed properly. Thank You, JR Tatum, President Performance Dimensions, Inc. (336) 774-1849 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.triadnetwork.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] REDIRECT configuration

2003-07-09 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Scott If the domain is remote the redirect does not work because it is considered outgoing so the rules in the global.cfg are used. But when there is a domain level junkmail file specified for the remote domain declude processes the remote domain using the default.junkmail file for that domain.

[Declude.JunkMail] Archives

2003-07-09 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Is may missing from the archives I am looking for a thread from May and I can not seem to find it. I have some of the messages saved locally but I am missing a few. I even search on the word header and nothing in May. Try searching Logging Nothing in April or May. I find this hard to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] REDIRECT configuration

2003-07-09 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Scott, I found your email to me about this issue. Take a look what you wrote -Original Message- From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 5:16 AM To: Kevin Bilbee Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Logging request That is correct but the only

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Archives

2003-07-09 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
They had a big outage during that time. John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 5:57 PM

[Declude.JunkMail] Some Help needed on a couple of things

2003-07-09 Thread Glenn Brooks
I finally have had the chance to upgrade to 1.65 and need a little help on a couple of things I have in my global.cfg file a couple of tests: BLACKLISTIP ipfile E:\IMail\Declude\ipblacklist.txt x 20 0 BLACKLISTDOMAIN filter E:\IMail\Declude\domainblacklist.txt x 20 0 one is an ip address test

[Declude.JunkMail] Some Help needed on a couple of things 2

2003-07-09 Thread Glenn Brooks
I just checked the log files again and I am seeing this: 07/09/2003 20:26:04 Qc0a12c1600c8a399 Msg failed BLACKLISTIP ( This is a spam IP address). Action=DELETE. 07/09/2003 20:26:04 Qc0a12c1600c8a399 Msg failed BLACKLISTDOMAIN (Message failed BLACKLISTDOMAIN test (79)). Action=DELETE. So it

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Attack

2003-07-09 Thread Jeff Kratka
I first thought that but there are different messages, just bad jokes each message. There were also some viruses atteched which were caught. Jeff -- Original Message -- From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 9 Jul

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Attack

2003-07-09 Thread Adrian Hauri
These IP addresses are blacklisted as an open relay in ORDB etc. Check http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=217.16.118.12 Cheers Adrian - - Original Message - From: Jeff Kratka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,

[Declude.JunkMail] Spoolviewer.exe - bug?

2003-07-09 Thread Tom Baker | Netsmith Inc
Scott: Does spoolviewer.exe look at the registry to determine the actual spool location? We just moved our spool to a different physical volume to improve performance... D:\imail\spool - e:\imail\spool everything else remained on D except the spool. Everything is functioning great (doubled our