[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth

2003-09-18 Thread Kami Razvan
Title: Message Scott: Hope all is well. The global.cfg has: AUTOWHITELIST ONPREWHITELIST ONWHITELIST AUTH I thought with Whitelist auth the users that authenticate will have their emails whitelisted. In this case one user's email to another user (within the same organization) has been

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bad header question

2003-09-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
Josh is right. Declude doesn't like seeing IP addresses in Message ID headers. Just to clarify, there were two problems with this E-mail: [1] The Message-ID: header wasn't present when the E-mail was sent (it was added by IMail after the E-mail was received). This caused the E-mail to fail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth

2003-09-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
The global.cfg has: AUTOWHITELIST ON PREWHITELIST ON WHITELIST AUTH I thought with Whitelist auth the users that authenticate will have their emails whitelisted. That is correct. Are you using IMail v8 and the latest interim release of Declude? In this case one user's email to another

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth

2003-09-18 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi; I am using: X-Note: This E-mail was scanned filtered by Declude [1.75i6] for SPAM virus. Is that the last release? I will download again to make sure. They are going through Outlook and they have to do SMTP authorization- otherwise they won't be able to send. I will double check..

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bad header question

2003-09-18 Thread Matthew Bramble
Thanks a bunch for the clarification. It's just unfortunate that programs that make the mistake of using an IP as a hostname and not including a message ID end up failing so many important tests. I recently been seeing about 2 different senders each week that will FP for this reason (but no

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bad header question

2003-09-18 Thread Frederick Samarelli
Matt, Do you have an updated version of your tests. Thanks. Fred - Original Message - From: Matthew Bramble [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 9:27 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bad header question Thanks a bunch for the clarification.

[Declude.JunkMail] Internal Mail

2003-09-18 Thread Darryl Koster
The hosting business I run deals mainly with business and I have no dial up or dsl customers that use my services. Saying this it means we get a lot of internal mail going between clients. Is there a way to ensure that e-mails sent from an address (say statustechnologies to statustechnologies)

[Declude.JunkMail] Foreign language Spam Mail

2003-09-18 Thread James Robb
Hi Who has had any luck in trapping spam written in a foreign language. I seem to be getting what appears to be spam from what appear to be written in Russian and I have no clue has to how to stop the messages. This is the latest that I have received. , , . 2000 . 00 . :

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Internal Mail

2003-09-18 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
My program MATCH might help. It looks at the To address and the From address, and they are both listed in the respective text files, it returns a fail which you could then weight at say -100. John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com -Original

[Declude.JunkMail] private list

2003-09-18 Thread Keith Anderson
Matthew, A few of us on the Declude list have been discussing offline a way to exchange anti-spam tricks and blacklists without risk of spammers listening in. A few also have some spam detection ideas that they would like to discuss. So far those interested are the following: Colbeck,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth

2003-09-18 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Local to local does not require authentication. If you look at the logs or the Q file, I bet Imail treats it as such and either does not add the authentication line to the Q file. John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com -Original Message-

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] private list

2003-09-18 Thread Keith Anderson
Well, I guess since I accidentally and stupidly sent this to the whole Declude group, I would extend the invitation to anyone in this group. Please contact me privately off this list. (Unlike I just did.) This is a group that's not intended to exclude anyone except spammers, so don't feel left

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] private list

2003-09-18 Thread Mark [Support]
Thursday, September 18, 2003, 11:52:51 AM, you wrote: KA Colbeck, Andrew KA John Tolmachoff KA Markus Gufler KA Kami Razvan KA Are you interested in joining the group? If so, I'll add your email to the KA initial discussion group, and once we form the private list, we can start KA

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNAMIC - 09/17/2003 - A new filter to detect IP'd reverse DNS entries IP'd reverse DNS entries

2003-09-18 Thread Charles Frolick
You might want to add underscores, I use underscores as my seperator, and I doubt I am the only ISP to do so. Also, why did you start the list at 30? I know that it I very unlikely for a residential IP to be all numbers under 30, but why 30? And finally, what about those that pad with zero's?

[Declude.JunkMail] Some good info on the Verislime coup

2003-09-18 Thread Sheldon Koehler
http://homepages.tesco.net./~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/verisign-internet-coup.html Sheldon Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com Ten Forward Communications 360-457-9023 Nationwide access, neighborhood support! Whenever you find yourself on the side of the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Foreign language Spam Mail

2003-09-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
Could you send the full headers of one of the E-mails? The actual foreign language content isn't as important as what appears in the headers. Here's a whole message. This one should be caught by the NONENGLISH test, due to all the high-bit characters in the subject.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Foreign language Spam Mail

2003-09-18 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Who has had any luck in trapping spam written in a foreign language. I seem to be getting what appears to be spam from what appear to be written in Russian and I have no clue has to how to stop the messages. Could you send the full headers of one of the E-mails? The actual foreign language

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Some good info on the Verislime coup

2003-09-18 Thread Todd Holt
Just another example of what happens when basic infrastructure is privatized! I'm not a bleeding heart liberal proponent of government controlling everything, but I do believe that certain infrastructure components need to be controlled by a disinterested third party (or less interested) that can

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Foreign language Spam Mail

2003-09-18 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
And here's a nasty Babelfish translation: Is for sure for you necessary angliiskiy language in the work or in the contact on leisure. It occurs, to learn foreign language is possible very easily and it is rapid! For this it suffices to only use our special procedure! You ring, contact telephone

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Some good info on the Verislime coup

2003-09-18 Thread Keith Anderson
I don't know anyone that doesn't think Verisign's move is an extremely bad one for everyone except them. I'm not sure whether to complain or to buy Verisign stock. Tell me the lawyers won't have a field day with that. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [IMail Forum] thank you, thank you, Verisign!! and BIND9 Veri sign-rape patch

2003-09-18 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:53 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] thank you, thank you, Verisign!! and BIND9 Veri sign-rape patch If you are using Declude JunkMail, you can either add similar tests

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [IMail Forum] thank you, thank you, Verisign!! and BIND9 Veri sign-rape patch Verisign!! and BIND9 Veri sign-rape patch

2003-09-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, I saw this posted to the IMail list, but have not seen anything announced on the JunkMail list about this interim release. I have downloaded v1.75i7, does this interim release mean I can remove all of the following entries from my global.cfg file: No. It only applies to the .com/.net

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [IMail Forum] thank you, thank you, Verisign!! and BIND9 Veri sign-rape patch Verisign!! and BIND9 Veri sign-rape patch

2003-09-18 Thread Keith Johnson
Scott, If I add the new interim release, what does JM Pro do to an email it finds with this trigger? Do I need to add anything to the global.cfg file? Thanks for the aid. Keith -Original Message- From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [IMail Forum] thank you, thank you, Verisign!!

2003-09-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
If I add the new interim release, what does JM Pro do to an email it finds with this trigger? Do I need to add anything to the global.cfg file? Thanks for the aid. You don't need to do anything -- it just fixes the MAILFROM and HELOBOGUS tests so that a non-existent .com/.net address

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Foreign language Spam Mail

2003-09-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
Here are the headers from this specific e-mail that I wrote about. Subject: Êðàñíàÿ è ÷åðíàÿ èêðà... The NONENGLISH test should catch this one. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers. Declude Virus:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Foreign language Spam Mail

2003-09-18 Thread James Robb
Scott Here are the headers from this specific e-mail that I wrote about. Received: from p3EE1C646.dip.t-dialin.net [62.225.198.70] by northmail.northsails.com (SMTPD32-7.15) id AD0521F00B4; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:19:33 -0400 Received: from hdetud1.tudelft.nl [181.149.98.38] by

[Declude.JunkMail] Interim release to detect wildcard DNS entries (aka VERISCAM)

2003-09-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
We have just come out with an interim release (v1.75i8) that will detect the wildcard A records from all TLDs that use them. This works automatically with the MAILFROM and HELOBOGUS tests, without any configuration changes needed. However, the latest interim release includes an experimental

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim release to detect wildcard DNS entries (aka VERISCAM)

2003-09-18 Thread Todd Holt
Where can I download the interim release? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:42 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim release to detect wildcard DNS entries (aka VERISCAM)

2003-09-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
Where can I download the interim release? You can download it from http://www.declude.com/release/175i/declude.exe . -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers. Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is

[Declude.JunkMail] latest SpamDomains list?

2003-09-18 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
I haven't made use of the SpamDomains test yet, am working on that now. I found a sd.txt file from Bill B. dated 5/30/2003. Does anybody have a newer list to share? Glenn Z.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNAMIC - 09/17/2003 - A new filter to detect IP'd reverse DNS entries IP'd reverse DNS entries IP'd reverse DNS entries IP'd reverse DNS entries

2003-09-18 Thread Matthew Bramble
Charles, Thanks for the tip. I'll probably search some of my spam files for hits before adding this just to make sure it doesn't interfere with anything and in order to see how common it is. I don't think adding extra lines to something that only searches reverse DNS is that demanding on

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim release to detect wildcard DNS entries (aka VERISCAM)

2003-09-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
Thanks a bunch for both new features. Are you planning on doing anything in the future with the IP's that you are collecting, i.e. new functionality like creating a blacklist? Or is this just being done to facilitate that test? We haven't decided for certain what we are going to do, but if