[Declude.JunkMail] Messages for list showing up in spam account

2004-05-07 Thread Jeff Maze
Was just wondering why these messages, that should be delivered to our maillist account, is being delivered to our spam account. Received: from declude.com [24.107.232.14] by mail.crescentdigital.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A5834E600F4; Fri, 07 May 2004 07:39:47 -0400 Received: from

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Messages for list showing up in spam account

2004-05-07 Thread R. Scott Perry
Was just wondering why these messages, that should be delivered to our maillist account, is being delivered to our spam account. It's hard to say without more information, but what I can say is that: X-Spam-Tests-Failed: ROUTING [-6] The E-mail only failed the ROUTING test, and scored less than

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Messages for list showing up in spam account

2004-05-07 Thread Markus Gufler
Looks like there are WARN actions for the follwoing 4 tests in your configuration X-RBL-Warning: FIVETENSRC: 52.47.50.82.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com. X-RBL-Warning: IPWHOIS: $ has inaccurate or missing WHOIS data at the RIR X-RBL-Warning: SPAMCHK: Message failed SPAMCHK: -6. X-RBL-Warning:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Messages for list showing up in spam account

2004-05-07 Thread Jeff Maze
After doing a little digging, I figured it out.. Something with the way I have Declude configured.. DOH! Sorry about that.. Thanks for the response.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 9:17 AM To:

[Declude.JunkMail] Domain forwarding

2004-05-07 Thread Bud Durland
We may be setting up a separate mail server for a new venture by our company. I'd like to use our current iMail/Declude server as a gateway to the new server. We are using DecludeJM Standard. Setting up iMail to store-and-forward the mail for the new server is easy enough. I just want to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Domain forwarding

2004-05-07 Thread R. Scott Perry
Setting up iMail to store-and-forward the mail for the new server is easy enough. I just want to make sure I have my ducks in a row on the Declude side. The on-line manual sez that Declude will treat the mail for the forwarded domain as outgoing, and claims that the standard and pro

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Domain forwarding

2004-05-07 Thread Bud Durland
R. Scott Perry wrote: Setting up iMail to store-and-forward the mail for the new server is easy enough. I just want to make sure I have my ducks in a row on the Declude side. The on-line manual sez that Declude will treat the mail for the forwarded domain as outgoing, and claims that the

[Declude.JunkMail] Feature Request

2004-05-07 Thread Scott Fisher
I know this has been requested before, but if more people request it, won't it get higher on the list... The TESTSFAILED filter type just begs for the NOTCONTAINS parameter. Scott Fisher Director of IT Farm Progress Companies --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

[Declude.JunkMail] SPF logs

2004-05-07 Thread serge
Maybe this was discussed before, but i have spf.log and spf.none growing in c:\ what to do about these ? why aren't they included in the regular declude logs ? Also, my clients sending email thru my server are falling spf ? should i add all my internal addresses to my spf dns records ?

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF logs

2004-05-07 Thread R. Scott Perry
Maybe this was discussed before, but i have spf.log and spf.none growing in c:\ what to do about these ? why aren't they included in the regular declude logs ? Because they are not appropriate for the regular Declude logs. The SPF logging was added when the SPF support was first added, and

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF logs

2004-05-07 Thread Darin Cox
Ouch, that's not good. Don't like logs that I don't know about and could later cause disk space issues...especially logging to the system drive. Thanks for bringing this up, Serge. Scott, can this be disabled? Or at least moved? Darin. - Original Message - From: serge [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature Request

2004-05-07 Thread R. Scott Perry
I know this has been requested before, but if more people request it, won't it get higher on the list... The TESTSFAILED filter type just begs for the NOTCONTAINS parameter. The next release will include NOTCONTAINS. :) -Scott --- Declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature Request

2004-05-07 Thread Matt
Your 8 minutes is almost up :) Thanks, Matt R. Scott Perry wrote: I know this has been requested before, but if more people request it, won't it get higher on the list... The TESTSFAILED filter type just begs for the NOTCONTAINS parameter. The next release will include NOTCONTAINS. :)

[Declude.JunkMail] Secondary DNS, MS, TXT

2004-05-07 Thread serge
Any reason why an MS W2K DNS configured as secondary, is not transfering TXT records (SPF) from the primary MS W2K DNS ???

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: disabling NDR's/badmail dir with Microsoft SMTP

2004-05-07 Thread decjunkmail
Hi, I'm setting up Microsoft SMTP mail server as an outbound gateway/offload and I've noticed that failed NDR's ultimately pile up in a badmail directory. Is there a regkey setting to configure MS SMTP to simply bit-bucket those instead of creating a growing folder that must be cleaned out