I'm not sure of my terminology here.
The MAILFROM tests the e-mail address referred to as the Declude Mailfrom.
There is also a displayed mailfrom that is displayed in the e-mail client and can be
quite misleading.
It would be interesting to have a variable to check the displayed mailfrom.
I
My idea is to punish those people that have a reverse dns timeout.
To help counter a case where I have a DNS problem, I'll only perform this when a major
RBL test fails.
Why? Under normal conditions the reverse dns shouldn't timeout, and that timeout
negates the spamdomains tests.
Opinions? Is
I've been playing with the WHITELIST in a filter option, mostly to
create a filter for whitelisting mailing lists people subscribe to. Ever
since my Whitelist had to move out of Gloabl.cfg due to size
(whitelisted employee home email addresses...) I've been looking at
moving the few whitelist
WHITELIST will whitelist the mail and bypass all junkmail processing.
To bypass the specific filter use an END
SUBJECT END CONTAINS [Declude.JunkMail]
Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/01/04 09:51AM
I've been playing with the WHITELIST in a filter
I noticed after I upgraded to Declude 1.79, Delog 1.08b is no longer able to
calculate the number of failed messages from the declude log files. It
returns that 0 failed. Apparently the log files for declude have changed
with this new version. Does anybody know if there is a newer version of
Delog
WHITELIST will whitelist the mail and bypass all junkmail processing.
To bypass the specific filter use an END
SUBJECT END CONTAINS [Declude.JunkMail]
That's what I thought, thanks for confirming it. :)
Jeff
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Sorry to be a bother but I need to find someone who has successfully
harvested the passwords from Post.office so we can migrate to a newer
MTA.
Currently we are running Declude and Imail on another server in front of
our real MTA.
Thanks,
Doug McKee
---
[South Texas Internet scanned this
Hi,
Does anybody know if there is a newer version of Delog or another program
that can analyze the declude log files?
I use DLAnalyzer (www.DLAnalyzer.com) with great success.
Here a few snippets from reports that I schedule daily:
Last Action Report Using Action: DELETE, HOLD,
Scott,
I've noticed the logging problem as well and I do have LOGLEVEL MID
in my global.cfg.
That doesn't resolve the issue.
Aaron
On Jun 1, 2004, at 9:01 AM, R. Scott Perry wrote:
I noticed after I upgraded to Declude 1.79, Delog 1.08b is no longer
able to
calculate the number of failed
I've noticed the logging problem as well and I do have LOGLEVEL MID in
my global.cfg.
That doesn't resolve the issue.
Do you have the Msg failed lines in your log file? If not, then you
should go to LOGLEVEL HIGH.
-Scott
---
Declude
Scott,
Did the Msg Failed line under LOGLEVEL MID to report the
individual line numbers that it failed in a filter test get moved to
HIGH?
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 12:50 PM
Scott,
Thanks, we have been running along with MID since the beginning,
all along, upgrading the interim releases. We just this week needed to
know which line it failed on in one of our filter files. This is what
we get now in our log. I will up to HIGH this week. Thanks,
Thanks, we have been running along with MID since the beginning,
all along, upgrading the interim releases. We just this week needed to
know which line it failed on in one of our filter files. This is what
we get now in our log. I will up to HIGH this week. Thanks,
Qff4f4d2301429a89
Scott,
Changing to Loglevel High seems to have added the Msg Failed lines to
the log.
I run delog at the end of the day and see what the results are, but I'm
pretty sure it works now.
Thanks,
Aaron
On Jun 1, 2004, at 10:16 AM, R. Scott Perry wrote:
Did the Msg Failed line under
Title: Message
Hi,
Since
this doesn't appear to ever be offered as part of Declude, I took half an hour
and threw a few lines of code together.
If you
have a small subset of messages that you hold but for which you are worried
about occasional false positives being held, then you can use
Title: Message
Hi
Scott:
I set up two tests
(same test, different names) that cause an ALERT and a HOLD
action.
After testing a bit,
I get the feeling as if the ALERT is not working (see enclosed debug
log)
Is there some rule
of thumb or chart, which actions are mutually exclusive?
Title: Message
Hi
Scott:
I
think the the issue of "mutually exclusive" actions may not be obvious to a user
(after reading the manual).
I did
some more experimenting using the COPYTO action.
My
logic was - if I use a "copy" to another user, this reallyshouldn't effect
how the "primary"
My logic was - if I use a copy to another user, this really shouldn't
effect how the primary recipient's mail is acted on. From my tests it
seems as if DELETE/HOLD/BOUNCE basically are killer actions that cannot
be combined with ANY other action (other than LOG/IGNORE)?
I have the need to
I set up two tests (same test, different names) that cause an ALERT and a
HOLD action.
The problem here is that the ALERT action is designed specifically to
deliver the E-mail, and the HOLD action is designed specifically to block
it. Since both can't be used together, the HOLD action is used
Hi Scott:
The problem here is that the ALERT action is designed specifically to
deliver the E-mail, and the HOLD action is designed specifically to block
it.
I get it.
I guess my suggestion would be to make a distinction between:
- final message disposition: DELETE / HOLD / PASS
Let me throw in my two cents worth as well.
If you are thinking about changing the way you process actions I would
like to see the ability to do multiple actions per test.
NEWFILTER WARN,COPYTO [EMAIL PROTECTED],HOLD
Not sure how you would do this but for me this makes sense.
Want the WARN
But who wants 800MB to 1GB spam log files?
The server is so busy doing declude processes there isn't enough time to run
a log analyzer on the local machine.
It takes to long to transfer the log file to a different machine.
Robert
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL
But who wants 800MB to 1GB spam log files?
The server is so busy doing declude processes there isn't enough time to
run
a log analyzer on the local machine.
It takes to long to transfer the log file to a different machine.
Once a week, I zip the previous weeks logs, ftp them to my
23 matches
Mail list logo
