Hi,
Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me
to better manage my backup mailserver -
The only way to do that would be if you are also running Declude Virus,
you
could use the AVAFTERJM ON option to force Declude Virus to run after
Declude JunkMail, which also
Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me
to better manage my backup mailserver -
The only way to do that would be if you are also running Declude Virus, you
could use the AVAFTERJM ON option to force Declude Virus to run after
Declude JunkMail, which also forces
Hi,
Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me
to better manage my backup mailserver -
The only way to do that would be if you are also running Declude
Virus, you
could use the AVAFTERJM ON option to force Declude Virus to run
after
Declude JunkMail,
Eventhough the poster was talking about HiJack, I forgot to mention I was
asking about JunkMail. When using this option will a message held by
Junkmail and returned to the queue ever be scannen for virusses? I remember
reading JM would move it to the hold before VIR could scan it for virusses.
Hi,
i use a combo-filter DOMAINFAELSCHER, there are only 3 lines in this filter:
TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SERVEROK
TESTSFAILED END NOTCONTAINS DIREKTANUNS
TESTSFAILED 5 CONTAINS SPAMDOMAINS
(the tests SERVEROK, DIREKTANUNS and SPAMDOMAINS are called in this order in the
global.cfg)
my
i use a combo-filter DOMAINFAELSCHER, there are only 3 lines in this filter:
TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS SERVEROK
TESTSFAILED END NOTCONTAINS DIREKTANUNS
TESTSFAILED 5 CONTAINS SPAMDOMAINS
Are you running the latest interim release (which is required for
NOTCONTAINS to work)?
hi scott,
i downloaded the interim version this morning. but i will go to the server and
check the version.
mfg
i.a.
gez. markus guhl
***
lds nrw
dez. 235
tel.: 0211 9449 2578
fax.: 0211 9449 8344
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
hi scott,
looks like there was a misunderstanding with my systemadmin. he puts the
declude.exe of the interimversion (1.79i8) to the wrong directory
(..\imail\declude). i moved it to ..\imail
i will write again if the problem shows up again.
mfg
i.a.
gez. markus guhl
Hello,
*nix is not my world.
On my testserver I installed Cygwin, installed everything from the
cygwin.txt, but I'm still getting this error:
--
$ perl Makefile.PL
What email address or URL should be used in the suspected-spam report
text for users who want more
I have seen from the list archives that when an account is forwarded to
another, the second account receives all spams, instead of them being
placed in the spam mailbox. Is there a work around for this? We have users
who, when on vacation, will forward their mails to another user. The second
I have seen from the list archives that when an account is forwarded to
another, the second account receives all spams, instead of them being
placed in the spam mailbox.
Correct -- that is by design. The forwarded E-mail may go to another
server that does not support mailboxes.
Is there a
Would marking the subject still allow the Imail rules to process on the
receiving end?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 1:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Forwarding
Declude is blocking all messages that have attachments
except .txt attachments. We have turned off Declude and we can now send
messages with attachments. Any idea why Declude would be blocking all messages
with attachments?
Thank you,
Joshua
Sunline Team
(941)206-7870
Would marking the subject still allow the Imail rules to process on the
receiving end?
Marking the subject would still allow the E-mail to be forwarded (since it
reaches the recipient), and the marked subject would be intact so that the
new (forwarded to) recipient would be able to detect that
Declude is blocking all messages that have attachments except .txt
attachments. We have turned off Declude and we can now send messages with
attachments. Any idea why Declude would be blocking all messages with
attachments?
By Declude do you mean Declude JunkMail (the subject of this list,
I'm sorry, I am referring to Declude Junkmail. We have narrowed it down to
the gibberish test.
06/21/2004 14:41:40.187 Q2bdf0f647117 Test #79 [GIBBERISH weight=330]
triggered; action = 5 [Message failed GIBBERISH test (415)]
The gibberish test is assigning the message a very large weight.
Are you using the newest GIBBERISH file?
Try putting the log into Debug for a message, wait for a message to get
caught, then turn back and review or send that log snippet.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I added WHITELIST TO in my Global.cfg but it seems to have backfired on me.
I have a couple of users that want all emails to come to them unfiltered. I
added them in the Global.cfg as mentioned.
However we just had a message that was bcc'd to several others and it got
through to all
I am using the version of Gibberish below.
Version: 2.1.0
#
# Last Modified: 12/30/2003
Attached is the log entry for one of the blocked emails.
I'm noticing a lot of entries with:
06/21/2004 14:41:25 Q2bd100b901ba374e WARNING: Unknown filter type
SKIPIFWEIGHT.
06/21/2004
I added WHITELIST TO in my Global.cfg but it seems to have backfired on me.
I have a couple of users that want all emails to come to them unfiltered. I
added them in the Global.cfg as mentioned.
However we just had a message that was bcc'd to several others and it got
through to all because one
I got nailed by that to i use BYPASSWHITELIST bypasswhitelist 30 4 0 0
first number is the weight and the second number is the number of
recipients, leave the other numbers 0
so if the message reached a weight of 30 and had four or more recipients the
whitelist would be bypassed.
Rick
ATTACHED
Thank you,
Joshua
Sunline Team
(941)206-7870
(888)512-6100
http://www.sunline.net/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 3:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
You need to run a newer version of Declude. The one you are using 1.75 does
not include the MAXWEIGHT feature. I believe that was introduced in 1.77x
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
John is correct here. Please take care to read the comments at the top
of each of the custom filters that are shared on both the main site and
the beta filters directory. If you make a mistake as simple as using
the wrong version of Declude, they can create a ton of false positives
and this
24 matches
Mail list logo
