I just applied the hot fix and we will see
if it works. I wont know until about 8:30am CST when the email
load really hits. Just to let you all know that I setup 3
different DNS servers with 2003 and they all had the same memory leak. I setup
one NT4.0 and it worked fine. So in my case any
Can't see any significal increase. (see attached relative variation)
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 11:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 10-fold
Very telling graphic on the trends. What do you use to analyze your logs?
We're probably small enough that our statistics are much less representative
of the overall picture. It seems to be settling down a little bit. We're
now only at about double the normal load.
Darin.
- Original
A daily running vbscript parsing values from declude's delog.exe and
counting files in the spam virus hold folder. The script stores the
gathered values in a SQL-table. Then a MS Excel table connects trough an SQL
query to the database and creates the diagram.
Not very performant but it's doing
MG Unfortunately there is no justdoit.exe for this. Maybe when God will give me
MG some additional hors per day ;-)
I keep asking Him for this, but so far.
--
Best regards,
Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Hello Kyle,
Friday, November 19, 2004, 2:14:57 AM, you wrote:
KF I just applied the hot fix and we will seeif it works. I
KF wont know until about 8:30am CST when the emailload really
KF hits. Just to let you all know that I setup 3different DNS
KF servers with 2003 and they all had the
It certainly does the job.
I started a parser to grab all of the info months ago on tests failed,
whitelisting, and spam/virus counts, but just haven't had time to get back
to it yet to finish.
Maybe if we all pray for days to be extended to 28-30 hours we'll get an
answer grin. Take 2 hours
Found out what was going on. We changed the routing of abuse and postmaster
aliases a few months ago, and this was the first unfiltered domain being
routed to one of the new monitoring accounts that gets spam to those
addresses. All of the rest of the unfiltered domains either don't get any
spam
Hey, Goran,
That is what we ended up doing for this customer. They can't receive any
port 25 traffic from any IP addresses except ours now. I just had never
seen evidence of spammers caching IP addresses before.
I was thinking though that scanning ranges of IP addresses for responses on
port
Is anyone here running both Blackice and Declude? After running both for
about 20 minutes, all 4 processors on my server were pegged at 100%. Task
manager was filled with about 20-30 Declude.exe's, many instances of
Sniffer, many instances of SPAMCHK.exe, etc. A reboot of the server and the
Is anyone here running both Blackice and Declude? After running both for
about 20 minutes, all 4 processors on my server were pegged at 100%.
Which process(es) were using up the 100% CPU?
Specifically, if you click on the Processes tab in Task Manager, then click
on the CPU button, which
Declude.exe. 4 instances said 25% each, and the rest of the many Declude
processes were at 0.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Oh, yeah, and blackice was way down the list showing 0%.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice
Is anyone here running both
Thanks for the tip, but I never took it off of Trusted. Still, I will test
that and see.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason @ AreaTech
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Last few weeks I've finally taken some time to read the manual and tweak
Declude. So far I'm seeing great results - but have one problem which I
can't seem to resolve.
Right now spam to an Imail alias gets through. For example I've got an
alias setup for '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' which directs mail
All,
I know this is late to this thread and a little OT of this thread -
don't mean to hijack it.
I'd be interested in knowing what kind of % you're getting on
false-positives and holding.
My averages are like this... over the last year:
11.89% false-positives(FPs) (on NON-auto
They will save an entire department
SINGAPORE (AP) -- Forget trying to flood Bill Gates' e-mail inbox with junk.
The Microsoft Corp. chairman receives 4 million e-mails a day, but
practically an entire department at the company he founded is dedicated to
ensuring that nothing unwanted gets
17 matches
Mail list logo
