RE: [Declude.JunkMail] odd behavior

2005-02-25 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Ill repost here what I posted on the Imail list. The problem is within Imail, not Declude. Declude does not log a line using SMTPD, Imail does. The line showing the whitelisting is a Imail SMTPD line, end of story as far as Declude is concerned. John Tolmachoff

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] odd behavior

2005-02-25 Thread Darin Cox
Hi John, I think you missed a thread Doug and I exchanged. He explained that he combined the IMail and Declude logs below to show everything in regards to the message. The following two lines are from his Declude logs showing that the message was whitelisted by Declude: 02/22/2005

[Declude.JunkMail] Body filter adding extra 10 points

2005-02-25 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Hi, I am seeing very strange behaviour with one of my body filters. These are the only three entries with STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL: BODY2 CONTAINSSTRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL BODY20 CONTAINSSTRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL URGENT BODY20 CONTAINS

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] odd behavior

2005-02-25 Thread Dan Horne
So it looks like BOTH Imail (via trusted addresses) and Declude (via Autowhitelist) were whitelisting this message. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin CoxSent: Friday, February 25, 2005 9:32 AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Body filter adding extra 10 points

2005-02-25 Thread David Barker
Goran, 1. Do you have a copy of the actual email header ? 2. Is this Qbca31d68008ed51d the only test that failed ? David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 10:44 AM To:

[Declude.JunkMail] Errors in virus log

2005-02-25 Thread Jeff Frantz
Im using Declude v2.05 on Imail 8.15. I see the below error for each message in the virus log. 02/25/2005 11:05:26 Q4cb81c81018c9f59 Couldn't find console; starting... (2). 02/25/2005 11:05:26 Q4cb81c81018c9f59 Error starting deccon.exe: 2 02/25/2005 11:05:28 Q4cb81c81018c9f59

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Body filter adding extra 10 points

2005-02-25 Thread Heinrich Richter
Maybe the filtertest itself have an additional weight of 10? Then there should be a line like FILTER-NIGERIAN-SCAM filter c:\declude\nigerian.txt x 10 0 in your global.cfg Heinrich --- This E-mail was scanned for viruses by CAD-FEM GmbH

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Body filter adding extra 10 points

2005-02-25 Thread Goran Jovanovic
David, 4 e-mails with the same text failed. This is what came back to me as part of the SpamAttach.eml file. Do you need anything else? Subject:RE: Governance Working Group Call To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 16

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Errors in virus log

2005-02-25 Thread Ralph Krausse
In your global.cfg and/or virus.cfg, you have CONSOLE ON. Change that to # CONSOLE ON to comment it out. Also delete hijack.cfg if are not running hijack. Ralph From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Frantz Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Body filter adding extra 10 points

2005-02-25 Thread David Barker
Can you post the line in your global.cfg file FILTER-NIGERIAN-SCAM I am guessing you may have an extra 10 point being added there that should not be. Lets have a look. Thanks David www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Errors in virus log

2005-02-25 Thread David Barker
1. In the delcude folder if you are not running Hijackrename the file hijack.cfg to hijack.bak 2. Open your global.cfg comment out the line CONSOLE ON David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff FrantzSent: Friday, February 25, 2005 11:09

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Body filter adding extra 10 points

2005-02-25 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Nope sorry, FILTER-NIGERIAN-SCAMfilter C:\IMail\Declude\Filters\Kami\Filter_Nigerian.txt X 0 0 Goran Jovanovic The LAN Shoppe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heinrich Richter Sent:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Body filter adding extra 10 points

2005-02-25 Thread Scott Fisher
Can you post the entire filter? My copy of Kami's filter shows: BODY 12 CONTAINS STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL - Original Message - From: Goran Jovanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 9:44 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Body

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Errors in virus log

2005-02-25 Thread Jeff Frantz
Thanks! Deleting the hijack.cfg did it. -Jeff From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralph Krausse Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 11:20 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Errors in virus log In your global.cfg

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Body filter adding extra 10 points

2005-02-25 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Not sure if I am missing something John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 7:44 AM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] odd behavior

2005-02-25 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Yep, Dan is correct. I saw the first line about whitelist which was a Imail SMTPD line and stopped there. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne Sent:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Body filter adding extra 10 points

2005-02-25 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Disregard this post, hit the wrong button. Darn keyboard virus. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Body filter adding extra 10 points

2005-02-25 Thread Scott Fisher
Could it have been set to body contains 12.. on 2/16 and subsequently changed to body contains 2.. sometime after the email was processes? It's the only explanation that I can see... - Original Message - From: Goran Jovanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Body filter adding extra 10 points

2005-02-25 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Scott, Since I do the editing on the filter files and I do not remember doing this . I have been doing a bunch of work on COMBO filters but not on tweaking that filter. Now it is possible that I did tweak it and I do not remember doing it but ... I will ask around the office as well I sent

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Body filter adding extra 10 points

2005-02-25 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Goran and Scott... John probably hit the nail on the head. I was going to make the same comment, actually. Since you have the message, turn on HIGH or DEBUG level logging and send the message to yourself. I bet that there are other tests in that same filter file that are triggered, and that the

[Declude.JunkMail] Spammed on port 2525

2005-02-25 Thread Scott Fisher
I use port 2525 to bypass port 25 blocking for my employees. I was just checking my logs and I've been receiving spam on port 2525 Can anyone share the necessary Cisco IOS commands to let the Cisco router do port translation? P.S. IOS isn't my primary language...

[Declude.JunkMail] casino spam

2005-02-25 Thread Kyle Fisher
Has anyone noticed in the past week an increase in casino, or party poker, etc.. spam? Kyle

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] casino spam

2005-02-25 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
I've seen several kinds of spam increase in the last day. - Original Message - From: Kyle Fisher To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 4:40 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] casino spam Has anyone noticed in the past week an increase in casino, or party

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] casino spam

2005-02-25 Thread David Barker
Kyle, When willyou stop signing up for those gambling sites, you know you can't win? :) No reported increase on our side. David B www.declude.com - Original Message - From: Kyle Fisher To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 5:40 PM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] casino spam

2005-02-25 Thread Kyle Fisher
Whats funny is I did sign up for an account a couple of weeks ago and I still havent won. I did it for the free set of poker chips. Thats what I figured. Its strange everything will be going fine for a few weeks then for some reason we get a small flood of something. Like casino.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] casino spam

2005-02-25 Thread David Barker
Which can under certain circumstances be correct. If you had signed up with the websitethen declude is correct in identifying them as legitimate email. It is possible we could set up some additional filters to help with a specific type of Spam. David B www.declude.com - Original

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] casino spam

2005-02-25 Thread Paul Navarre
Ive actually noticed an increase specifically in gambling site spam myself. Paul Navarre Has anyone noticed in the past week an increase in casino, or party poker, etc.. spam? Kyle

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] casino spam

2005-02-25 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, February 25, 2005, 5:50:45 PM, Glenn wrote: GW I've seen several kinds of spam increase in the last day. We're seeing a new porn campaign, a new kiddie porn campaign, a ramp-up of the current M$ software rip-off (media-theft) spam. We've seen a bit of a pick-up in the casino stuff

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] casino spam

2005-02-25 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, February 25, 2005, 6:11:58 PM, David wrote: DB Which can under certain circumstances be correct. If you had DB signed up with the website then declude is correct in identifying DB them as legitimate email. It is possible we could set up some DB additional filters to help with a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammed on port 2525

2005-02-25 Thread Matt
Here's what I am using for a mail server located at 192.168.1.1 for this example. IMail is configured to listen on port 587, but to the outside world it appears as both port 25 and 587. Even though one would think that you didn't have to NAT 587 to 587, in this case you do because of the other

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] casino spam

2005-02-25 Thread Matt
You can solve this problem by simply blacklisting British Columbia. Seriously though, it's strange how much of this stuff comes from there. In the penny stock world, this province also gained quite the reputation for fraud in the past. I won't mention the strip clubs. Andrew might be able to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammed on port 2525

2005-02-25 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
See my thoughts on the Imail forum on 587. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 4:50 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammed on port 2525

2005-02-25 Thread Matt
SMTP AUTH on port 587 isn't required by the RFC...it just simply makes a whole ton of sense in most setups. Considering that this is a standard port, and it will most likely find its way through broadband provider's blocks since it is reserved for this use and likely to be restricted to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] casino spam

2005-02-25 Thread Scott Fisher
I added this to my ipfile today: 66.154.124.0/2966.154.124.0/29gamingpen.comadded 02-25-05 gamingpen, playerjuice and gamestrek all .com. Also in kind of a spammy neighborhood with several SBL entries near: 66.154.111.0/2466.154.111.0/24agooba.comadded

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] casino spam

2005-02-25 Thread Matt
If you do a lookup on ARIN, you will find that this netblock is delegated by BChosting, which is a subdivision of AssertiveNetworks. All of their IP space is treated as suspect by our system. You might also note their address...Vancouver, British Columbia...

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammed on port 2525

2005-02-25 Thread Scott Fisher
I'll forward to my network person. He talks Cisco much better than I. - Original Message - From: Matt To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 6:49 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammed on port 2525 Here's what I am using for a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammed on port 2525

2005-02-25 Thread Scott Fisher
I'd picked 2525 before I really knew about 25. What really irks me is that Imail has made no provisions to accomodate a port 587. It can't be two hard to accomodate another SMTP port... most of the code is that same as the port 25 code... This has been an issue for over a year and no word

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] casino spam

2005-02-25 Thread Scott Fisher
gambling, strip clubs, isBC the Nevada of Canada? - Original Message - From: Matt To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 8:35 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] casino spam If you do a lookup on ARIN, you will find that this

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] casino spam

2005-02-25 Thread Kyle Fisher
So its not just me getting it. I thought maybe it was pay back for not betting enough when I play. Gamestrek is the biggest one I am seeing. Thanks for the info didnt know about British Columbia. Scott is the MAILFROM-IP.txt filter ok to use since you did all the work? If it is do

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] casino spam

2005-02-25 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Kyle, On a side note gamestrek . com has been getting caughton SURBL multi for most of the day today. Doing URI lookup's in the URI RBL'shasbeenvery effectivefor us incatching a lot of the new spam campaigns. Darrell ---Check out