RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0

2005-12-21 Thread Robert E. Spivack
The community support for SmarterMail is much smaller (or at least quieter). We are running one SM server for a client and Ive posted several questions on the SM support forums and have not received any responses at all. Similar posts to Imail or Declude discussion lists have always

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0

2005-12-21 Thread Markus Gufler
web-based forum: I have to go there each day and spend some minutes to find out what's going on. My 24 hours each day are short enough that I will do that one, two or some more days but then I will left the forum until I havea new problem. And for shure not to see if someone maybe has a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0

2005-12-21 Thread Michael Graveen
I've also posted question to their forum with little or no response (I didn't think the questions were that obscure). There definitely seems to be more experts in the IMail camp, or at least experts that are willing to share. As with new versions of IMail, I'll take the wait and see attitude

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0

2005-12-21 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango
what questions do you have regarding smartermail? or what is your username in the forum to look for them. I try to be actively involved in the forum -that is my way to learn about smartermail- and I will be glad to try to help. regards -Luis Arango From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0

2005-12-21 Thread Dave Beckstrom
Guys, Why dont all of us who own smartermail send an email to smartertools asking them to launch a smartertools discussion list? It will take more than one person requesting it for them to set it up. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0

2005-12-21 Thread Chris Anton
Maybe you could get IPSwitch to set one up. LOL! -Chris -- Original Message -- From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:02:14 -0600 Guys, Why don't all of us who own smartermail send an

[Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail and Declude

2005-12-21 Thread Dave Beckstrom
We have one problem with the smartermail and declude combination and I'm wondering if perhaps the folks at Declude could work with smartertools to resolve it. We have Declude set up to NOT add any headers to outbound email. On inbound email (email sent to us) we add headers such as actual

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0

2005-12-21 Thread Jeff Robertson
Evans Martin set up an unofficial SmarterMail discussion list a few weeks ago. Original message below Hey guys! I got really tired of having to log into a web based forum to see what is going on with SmarterMail so I created a list that I hope we can turn into something similar to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0

2005-12-21 Thread Barry Simpson
FYI, SmarterMail is aware of this discussion thread and I know that they would want to be aware of any issues with technical support. Barry From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 12:02 PM To:

[Declude.JunkMail] Test idea

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Is there any way, and if not is some one willing to come up with a way, of counting the number of characters in the body and if less than say 10 the penalize x and if less than say 25 then penalize y? John T eServices For You --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA

[Declude.JunkMail] BCC in header

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Since a BCC line from a legit client will never appear in the header, it makes sense then that we can filter on BCC: in the header and penalize a good amount, correct? John T eServices For You --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BCC in header

2005-12-21 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
I've definitely seen a BCC: header entry on legitimate mail, which is then blank. I think the big idea is that the sender MTA thought it was a good idea to let the receiver know that a BCC was used. Sorry, I can't remember the software or domain involved. I'd suggest at least creating a new

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BCC in header

2005-12-21 Thread Dave Doherty
Seems like a good idea to me if you seeing many messages with BCCs in the headers. I can't recall ever seeing one on the messages I've inspected. -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. - Original Message - From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BCC in header

2005-12-21 Thread Dave Doherty
Good idea. -d - Original Message - From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 1:35 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BCC in header I've definitely seen a BCC: header entry on legitimate mail, which is then blank. I

[Declude.JunkMail] FW: Update: SmarterStats 3.1.2181 Released

2005-12-21 Thread Dave Beckstrom
-Original Message- Subject: Update: SmarterStats 3.1.2181 Released This email is to inform you that a new version of SmarterStats has been released. Version: 3.1.2181 Released: December 21, 2005 RELEASE NOTES ADDED: Several more spider/bot definitions were added ADDED: More

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BCC in header

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Party pooper. ;) Actually, I would have never thought of a reason for it to be in the header, since by nature it is not supposed to be known. I have seen it in spam though. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0

2005-12-21 Thread Gary Steiner
I feel the same way. I've answered several questions in their forums and tried to promote discussion where I was able.As for my own questions, I've always received answers, both from their support and from other users.I guess it depends on the nature of the forum and also a little bit of luck.

[Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread Goran Jovanovic
I have had decludeproc 3.0.5.22 abend on me twice today. Is there anything I should be doing to capture information about this? I have automatic restart enabled so it starts again but I am not super happy with it abending. Any hints on what (if anything) I can/should be doing?

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Is abend some kind of French word? ;) John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 1:13 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread Markus Gufler
"abend" in German means "evening". good Abend! :-) Markus From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists)Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 10:23 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend Is

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BCC in header

2005-12-21 Thread Matt
Or if you use an E-mail client that doesn't encode your mail stores, you can just open it up in a text reader and search for the occurrences. I did a cursory search and found that Hotmail can display this behavior, as well as MS SMTP (using something like CDO). It is also possible that other

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread Dave Beckstrom
Abend is a common term used in the world of mainframes. Its the same as aborted or crashed. I first heard it in 1981 and used it many, many times over the years. I dont know where the term originated from. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread Goran Jovanovic
It is an IBM mainframe term from long ago. ABnormal END Of course this is all very interesting but it does not answer my original questions L Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent:

[Declude.JunkMail] Upcoming work load

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Any one else ramping up for a heavy work load? Starting tonight and going full force on Friday afternoon, I have major projects for Friday, Saturday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday. Monday the 2nd is reserved for work on my servers. ;) Replace 1 SQL server Replace 1

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread george
Derived from 'ABnormal ENDing' George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 4:36 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0

2005-12-21 Thread Matt
Barry, That's good to know, but I don't think it takes a genius to figure out what is at issue here. The difference is "push" vs. "pull".  If you expect customers to help out in providing community support, you shouldn't expect as much success doing a message board because that requires

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread gbirdsall
I always thought it was Absent By Enforced Net Deprivation - usually when someone hadn't posted in a while 'cause their modem died or their parents grounded them. It's been a long time since I heard that though. - greg Abend is a common term used in the world of mainframes. It's the same

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread Don Brown
abend = crash. I remember when RAM was called core, too. Wednesday, December 21, 2005, 3:29:49 PM, Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MG MG MG abend in German means evening. MG MG   MG MG good Abend!  :-) MG MG Markus MG MG   MG MG   MG MG MG MG From: [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread Nick Hayer
John T (Lists) wrote: Is abend some kind of French word? AbnormalEnding. - circa 1985 - coined with the introduction of Microsoft products. -Nicko ;) John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Upcoming work load

2005-12-21 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hey John, And if your married - add in Get Divorced with that schedule. Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread Goran Jovanovic
And here I thought that everyone knew that termoh well I am dating myself Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 4:49 PM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread Dave Beckstrom
I used to read CORE dumps and debug the operating system. I even wrote code for the operating system (I was a systems programmer) I don't think you're a real programmer if you don't read binary and assembly language!!! LOL!!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread Darin Cox
I thought that went further back than that. I remember hearing it a lot from mainframe types prior to Windows 1.1early 80's... Darin. - Original Message - From: Nick Hayer To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 4:51 PM Subject: Re:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread Robert E. Spivack
I guess not everyone has had the pleasure of waiting in line for hours for a printout (batch processing mainframes) to find just a few terse lines with ABEND error xx and no other clue as to why the job failed. That's why ABEND sticks in one's mind for many many years if you've had to deal

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Upcoming work load

2005-12-21 Thread Darin Cox
Glad to see that you at leastare takingChristmas offto rest. Best of luck to you on your installs and upgrades. Darin. - Original Message - From: John T (Lists) To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 4:44 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Upcoming work

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0

2005-12-21 Thread Robert E. Spivack
A couple of things: How to remove the mark as spam menu items in webmail since they are meaningless when using an external spam blocking preprocessor.  The suggestion I got from support that in an unsupported manner I could edit the aspx files, seemed partly reasonable until I poked

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread Dave Beckstrom
Dave, do you have the same compulsion I do, that when you see a binary string in a movie or tv, you *have* to convert it to hex, octal or decimal to figure out if there's a joke there for you? Andrew 8) Andrew, No, I guess you must have it worse then I do! *chuckleBut I do laugh at

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread Matt
I stick to playing records backwards so I can get direction from the devil :) Matt Colbeck, Andrew wrote: Dave, do you have the same compulsion I do, that when you see a binary string in a movie or tv, you *have* to convert it to hex, octal or decimal to figure out if there's a joke

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread Sanford Whiteman
AbnormalEnding. - circa 1985 - coined with the introduction of Microsoft products. Unlikely -- in the post-mainframe world as I experienced it, ABENDs were to Novell NetWare as BSODs were to Microsoft products. Always had to shift terminology when dealing with Windows people (back

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0

2005-12-21 Thread Evans Martin
I have started hosting a community supported SmarterMail list if anyone is interested in joining it. Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subscribe SmarterMail in the BODY of the message to subscribe. I hate using their online forum because it doesnt flow as well as a list does. The

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Gees, I did not realize the path this would take. Yikes. BACK TO YOUR ORIGINAL QUESITONS! Check the C:\ root for any declude files that may be there. Are there any files in the error or repair directories? (spool\proc\error or spool\proc\repair) If so, compile all the log lines

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
What Sandy said. In my experience, the infrastructure software never failed, the only ABENDs were from applications that our own programmers wrote. And yes, ABEND is still in my vocabulary. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Upcoming work load

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
It is a Sunday like all the rest, reserved in advanced by an authority far higher than me. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 2:12 PM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Upcoming work load

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Nah, she likes the pay check too much. What little there is after all the necessities. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 1:53 PM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread John T \(Lists\)
While I would like to think that makes me feel younger, I am actually still a green horn of sorts in networking having only been in the field now for just 5 years. But I do remember playing with a Tandy 1000 and MS DOS 3.11 and later MS DOS 5.0 and DOSSHELL, although I was never able to figure out

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread Andy Schmidt
Title: Message Ha - long before Gates started college, therewas a company called International Business Machines. And you had to program sorter/merger machinesto get your punch cards in the proper order for the revolutionarybrand-new /370s - because disk sorting was not yet available, even

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-21 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Title: Message What, you had a teletype instead of keypunch? Bah, kids today. When I was a boy, we had to walk uphill in the snow both ways just to submit our punchcards for overnight processing. And we liked it. Andrew 8) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On