RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - SMTP Gateway

2005-12-29 Thread Kaj Søndergaard Laursen
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am hoping that if we can generate some interest from the Declude community, we might see some interest by Barry in providing direct Declude support for our gateway. This would make Declude 100% mail server neutral, and it could be

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] proc directory orphans

2005-12-29 Thread Bill Green dfn Systems
John, As I got a chance to look more thoroughly, I found that I misspoke. The files in question are in the Work directory inside the Proc Directory. On 12-28-05 you wrote: Are there any related D files left over? Could these be confirmation list messages that has to do with the Declude

[Declude.JunkMail] So - what happened with the Downgrade

2005-12-29 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi, After all this turmail last weekend, where several users suffered a "downgrade" from Pro which strangely coincided with the unavailability of a certain host name at Declude - and which equally strangely seemed to fix itself after Declude fixed that problem on Monday -- I'm wondering

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - SMTP Gateway

2005-12-29 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Rather than list everything it does here, I put together a little info page at. . . I fail to see this post as anything but spam. In the archives, you'll see that I've defended the right of posters to market commercial Declude plug-ins or wrappers on this last in the past. I still

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude Release 3.0.5.23

2005-12-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Message Declude Release 3.0.5.23 There has been an intermittent bug in Declude that reported certain features in the Pro version were not available. There is no function within Declude to downgrade functionality other than by changing the key in the configuration file which is

[Declude.JunkMail] declude.cfg cleaning

2005-12-29 Thread Scott Fisher
Just cleaning up my declude.cfg file. Are the PROCESSES and THREADS options still valid for 3.05.x?

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - SMTP Gateway

2005-12-29 Thread Brian
Hi Sandy, I apologize if this post offended you. I had no intention of posting anything that might be remotely construed as commercial spam. I used Declude for quite awhile, and still use Declude AV. I have monitored this list for years, not to upsell anything to anyone, but because it is

[Declude.JunkMail] Domain Config files

2005-12-29 Thread george
Running Declude 3.0.5.23 IMail 8.22 I have a number of gateway domains and have set up per-domain configuration files ($default$.junkmail) in appropriate subdirectories. This setup works as expected. I also serve as an outbound gateway for some of these domains. All of this outbound

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude.cfg cleaning

2005-12-29 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The "PROCESSES" is no longer used under 3.x, but the THREADS is the 3.x replacement for PROCESSES. Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] proc directory orphans

2005-12-29 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Uh, that is kind of time critical. Is e-mail moving and being processed? Again, are they just Q with no D? Is the Decludeproc server running? John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Green dfn

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] proc directory orphans

2005-12-29 Thread dfn Systems
Yes, I'm moving about 25,000/day. It's just these few per day that seem to get left. Just Q files. No matching D files anywhere. Decludeproc is definitely running. I can observe the action happening in the Work directory. I moved all the files over 2 days old into a holding folder. They were all

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] proc directory orphans

2005-12-29 Thread Rick Hogue
I have the same situation on my install with the same 8.21 and 3.05 installs. I get 6 to 8 Q files in the work directory and once every few days I will get a D file in the proc directory all by itself. All mail seems to be processing, and what I have seen on the D files is that they are spam (you