[Declude.JunkMail] Virus?

2006-04-06 Thread Richard Farris
I just received about 10 of these at 7:30 this morning...any ideas what is going on.. Richard FarrisEthixs Online1.270.247. Office1.800.548.3877 Tech Support"Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet" ---BeginMessage--- Hello friend ! You have just received a postcard from someone who cares

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Virus?

2006-04-06 Thread John T \(Lists\)
I would consider that a virus, although the payload is not in the e-mail but on a web site. John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Farris Sent: Thursday, April 06,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.1 and 4.1 Release Notes

2006-04-06 Thread John Doyle
Love the link in the release notes to the examples in the KB. It makes it easy to evaluate and if desired adopt. Thanks! John Declude 3.1 and 4.1 Release Notes http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122 available. David B www.declude.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing

[Declude.JunkMail] changing decludeproc from 4.09.4 to 4.1

2006-04-06 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I have always done the updates by stopping the decludeproc service, putting the new decludeproc into place and then starting it. When I did this to move to 4.1 the end result was that decludeproc was started but nothing was being processed. When I reversed the steps and put 4.09.4 back

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Virus?

2006-04-06 Thread Goran Jovanovic
I had to manually release your message from the virus queue because it got tagged as Virus: Html.Phishing.Card.Sanesecurity.06022100 Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Farris Sent: Thursday,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] changing decludeproc from 4.09.4 to 4.1

2006-04-06 Thread David Barker
1. Harry please contact support at declude regarding your issue of upgrading. 2. The GUI is independent of the install you do not need the full update. David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry VanderzandSent: Thursday, April 06, 2006

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.1 and 4.1 Release Notes

2006-04-06 Thread David Barker
Thanks John. I will continue to do this in the future. Also just FYI we are currently re-writing the Declude manuals. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Doyle Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:51 AM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.1 and 4.1 Release Notes

2006-04-06 Thread John T \(Lists\)
http://support.declude.com/Customer/KBArticle.aspx?articleid=55 Also, if some one has e-mail forwarded from another system, it will fail this test. John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.1 and 4.1 Release Notes

2006-04-06 Thread John T \(Lists\)
http://support.declude.com/Customer/KBArticle.aspx?articleid=54 Question, if a message is 1 MB and there are 3 tests as in the example, does that message get a negative weight of 3 or 6? To actually score a message of 1 MB the third column would actually be 1024, correct? Is this checking the

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.1 and 4.1 Release Notes

2006-04-06 Thread David Barker
Declude 3.1 and 4.1 Release Notes http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122 available. David B www.declude.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.1 and 4.1 Release Notes

2006-04-06 Thread David Barker
1. As each test is independent it will receive a -6 (-1+-2+-3) 2. Technically yes 1024 KB = 1 MB 3. Checks the size of the D file in Imail or .eml file in SmarterMail David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] changing decludeproc from 4.09.4 to 4.1

2006-04-06 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I am waiting for their response. How does one get the GUI? Maybe I am being obtuse here but I am not getting it. Your answer is the same that support gave me. I download decludeproc4.1 and install it.where does the dui come from if I do not need the full install? Harry Vanderzand inTown

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] changing decludeproc from 4.09.4 to 4.1

2006-04-06 Thread David Barker
All downloads are available from the Declude My Account home page www.declude.com/login.asp the GUI download is titled Declude Graphical User Interface. And yes the answer is the same as support gave you because I was the person who answered you I could not figure out why you were posting the same

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] changing decludeproc from 4.09.4 to 4.1

2006-04-06 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Thank you Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet Computer Services 519-741-1222 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:19 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]

[Declude.JunkMail] msgsize enhancement suggestion

2006-04-06 Thread Scott Fisher
I like seeing the msgsize addition to Junkmail. I've used a size test for years and look forward to potentially removing an external test. I would like to see the bottom end handled too. A msgsize test that would detectwhere the message is just a couple of bytes would help combat empty

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Virus?

2006-04-06 Thread Richard Farris
Which virus scanner do you use? Richard FarrisEthixs Online1.270.247. Office1.800.548.3877 Tech Support"Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet" - Original Message - From: Goran Jovanovic To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 10:47 AM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Virus?

2006-04-06 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Richard, you might want to check this thread from the archives. Goran can clarify, but I'm pretty sure that this is the source of the "Sane Security" detection string. For what it's worth, Message Sniffer catches the email message body you supplied with the MALWARE category. The hosting

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Virus?

2006-04-06 Thread Matt
Title: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Banks (and Ebay) Phising Filters I see this guy regularly. It's kind of like phishing. He moves around from site to site sending out gif.exe's, pretending they are greeting cards. I don't see much volume, though it is steady and has been for months. Matt

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Virus?

2006-04-06 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Richard, I implemented CLAM AV with the Sane Security phishing filters. This is from the thread that Andrew included. I run F-Prot then McAfee then CLAM AV with the ExitOnFirstDetect (or whatever that directive is). Clam is the scanner that catches pretty much all phishing attempts. The

[Declude.JunkMail] problem with DNSstuff.com web site

2006-04-06 Thread Imail Admin
Hi All, I've been trying to access www.dnsstuff.com and www.dnsreport.com from my desktop system. I keep getting this reply: Sorry, you have triggered our rate limiting system. If you are reading this in a web browser, we apologize -- we want you to use the site as much as you like. What we do

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] problem with DNSstuff.com web site

2006-04-06 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Ben, based on the info here: http://banned.dnsstuff.com/pages/abuse.htm You might try going to their backup site at: http://www.dnsstuff.com:8080/ As for contacting somebody there, join the forums and make a posting. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Virus?

2006-04-06 Thread John Doyle
Goran Can you give me some information on installing the sane security phishing filters with CLAM. I found and went to the sane web site, and can see how to download, But Im not sure how clamwin is set up to use the file. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks John

[Declude.JunkMail] Semi-OT: Stupid DNS question...

2006-04-06 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi, All- I am missing something about Windows DNS servers/resolvers... I'm using W2K and W2003 servers with the respective MS DNS servers on my mail servers. I have installed DNS servers in cache-only mode. The root hints appear to be correct. Recursion is enabled and no forwarders are

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Semi-OT: Stupid DNS question...

2006-04-06 Thread Andy Schmidt
Dave, How do you test? The resolver is different from the server! If you are trying Ping, Tracert or other - then they use the resolver and the resolver goes by the network settings. You said you removed the ISP's DNS servers - what did you replace them with? What happens if you do an NSLOOKUP

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Semi-OT: Stupid DNS question...

2006-04-06 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Specifying your ISP's DNS servers in your network setup won't be an issue, Dave. If the root hints are even close to being correct, your DNS server configuration should be fine. To test whether your DNS server is doing the job, issue a single command line query that you know is going to test

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Semi-OT: Stupid DNS question...

2006-04-06 Thread Sanford Whiteman
When I remove the ISP's resolvers from the network setup on the machines, the DNS servers don't resolve anything. Adding to the other responses: if you aren't specifying any resolvers in the NICs' TCP/IP configs, then applications that don't specify their own resolvers will not

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] problem with DNSstuff.com web site

2006-04-06 Thread IMail Admin
I read the abuse link before, but it is unhelpful, and I couldn't get the 8080 link to work either. That's why I posted here; doesn't Declude own that site? Ben - Original Message - From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, April 06,