I came up with the idea before I ever heard mention of it anywhere
else, and long before 8/2005.
Is that the debate now? I gave you credit for innovating it vs. _your
own bizarre claim_ that someone you explicitly fed the idea to could
claim it as IP! If you want full, original credit for
Matt,
Thank you for the suggestions, I will try
these settings and keep an eye on it. I had turned winsockcleanup on due
to an issue where I was no longer able to perform dns queries until the decludeproc
was restarted. Ive turned it off again per your suggestion, which
I hope is now
Hi All,
This is definitely an off topic question.
I have a client that wants to monitor what
their outsourced developers are doing. The development is taking place in IIS,
.Net Application Server and SQL 2000. They want to know generally speaking what
they are doing. Are the
Will
Check
your memory useage in Task Manager and be sure you don't have memory creep. I
had winsockcleanup on for an issue I had. Once resolved I turned it off. It seem
to not allow new messages into the procdirectory untill it empties to
allow for the cleanup. So, if you watch cpu usage
Yep, yep, yep, and yep.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Goran Jovanovic
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 3:39 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Monitoring/Auditing a Windows
Server
Darin,
My understanding of the
source code development is
Yeah, the auditing needs some supervision, you can
use a script to read the file every 6 hours or so.
Basically move the current file, create a new one,
and rename the old in a date-time.txt format. Then parse it for what youre
looking for and spit out some basic custom XHTML page (or
Lets start at the high-level:
What question are you trying to
answer?
e.g:
Are the developers
spending enough time doing the work they should be doing?
Are the developers doing
things they should not be doing?
Are the developers competent
and performing their job properly?
good perspective
Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet Computer Services 519-741-1222
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert E.
SpivackSent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 7:01 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:
