RE: SPAM-WARN:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned

2006-10-23 Thread Michael Thomas - Mathbox
Matt, Justa minor point, it doesn't affect your logic. Now according to Michael's tests, the CR-only pattern leads to parsing issues in Declude Virus where it can't even find the attachment to scan it. Actually, it was the "No Cr" (I.E. LF only) test that passed completely undetected. By

[Declude.JunkMail] Different issue - Process flow question

2006-10-23 Thread Michael Thomas - Mathbox
Hi All, 1. Is it not true that when properly installed and running, that Declude handles EVERY message that passes through the mail server? 2. There is only one GLOBAL.CFG. 3. Every message processed should attempt to run every external test. (That's why many external tests accept the current

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Different issue - Process flow question

2006-10-23 Thread John T \(Lists\)
1. Is it not true that when properly installed and running, that Declude handles EVERY message that passes through the mail server? Every message that (in the case of Imail) SMTPD32 service hands it. 2. There is only one GLOBAL.CFG. Correct. 3. Every message processed should attempt to run

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned

2006-10-23 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi Matt: Now according to Michael's tests, the CR-only pattern leads to parsing issues in Declude Virus where it can't even find the attachment to scan it The point I'm trying to make is, that the attachment not discovered problem may not at all be a problem with incorrect linefeeds IN the

Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned

2006-10-23 Thread Darin Cox
David Barker, Can you tell us the status of this old case? What progress has been made on this seemingly critical issue? Darin. - Original Message - From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:09 AM Subject: RE:

RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned

2006-10-23 Thread David Barker
Darin, Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line terminator issue. As there are several other things he is working on I do not have a definitive release date for this, I am looking at moving around some

Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned

2006-10-23 Thread Darin Cox
Thanks, David. We appreciate your input. Is it feasible to post a list of known issues and/or issues being worked? I realize that's a lot of disclosure, and would probably increase call volume significantly, but I also know that would make me feel much more comfortable of someday being able to

RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned

2006-10-23 Thread David Barker
I will see what I can do to bring together a list of known issues. Just give me some time (days) and I will get it posted. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:19 AM To:

Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned

2006-10-23 Thread Darin Cox
Thanks, David. We appreciate your efforts. Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:26 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail q files magically dissapearing

2006-10-23 Thread Craig Edmonds
On one of my imail servers, my spool folder is slowly filling up with D files. I am using fpreview to view the files in the spool and there are currently 180 or so emails. when i try to "return to queue" I get an error saying that the q file could not be found, whch isa bit strange

Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned

2006-10-23 Thread Matt
David, Thanks to both you and the other Dave for taking another look at this. Matt David Barker wrote: Darin, Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line terminator issue. As there are several other

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail q files magically dissapearing

2006-10-23 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
I've noticed the same thing in all versions of Ipswitch IMail Server; the cause was broken connections, 99% of which were spam. Only in the absolute latest, v9.10 from Sep-06-2006, have I noticed that IMail cleans up after itself. There is an item about this in the latest release notes.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: imail q files magically dissapearing

2006-10-23 Thread Craig Edmonds
on further inspection, the files where the q spool files have dissapeared all have the ERR 02 Virus scan in the log file.I am running ClamWIN. Is this an clamwin error? 20622910:23 23:59 SMTPD(3b24000400828f94) [65.17.213.163] connect 80.33.86.200 port 1291320623010:23 23:59