[Declude.JunkMail] Footer per Domain?

Hello, I'm looking for a solution to add a footer on a per domain base. Could I create a filter that adds it for domain-a.com but not for domain-b.de? I must be on a per domain base, and it's different for each domain. Alex --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Footer per Domain?

Footer per Domain?You could use Sandy's external test that adds a footer. Wrapping it with a script of some sort to check the domain name before running the test sounds like it would meet your needs. You'd need to configure your script as the test in Declude, and could launch Sandy's exe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Automatic Whitelisting - IMail 2006.1

Next release scheduled for wed Jan 31 David Barker Director of Product Management Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent: Saturday,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Automatic Whitelisting - IMail 2006.1

Excellent! -d - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 8:41 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Automatic Whitelisting - IMail 2006.1 Next release scheduled for wed Jan 31 David Barker Director of

[Declude.JunkMail] Outlook SCL X-header

Does anyone know if there's a valid X-note header that can be placed in the message body that will cause Outlook to automatically route emails to the Junk-email folder? I wanted to use this approach rather than tagging the subject line and relying on users to build their own rules in Outlook. Thx

[Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Experiences

Well now that we have moved from IMail 8.15 to 8.22, we are now experiencing the problem where Declude needs to be restarted regularly to correct an apparent memory leak. I remember following threads about this problem and how the upgrade to IMail 2006.1 generally solved the problem. Since we

[Declude.JunkMail] Corrupt HELO causes fall-through of a spammy message?

One of my users received a spammy message which accumulated enough weight to reach our HOLD action. What I think happened is that the HELO, which has various high-bit characters which are illegal in a HELO caused bad parsing of that line in the header... The BADHEADERS and HELOBOGUS were both

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Experiences

We switched and going from 8.22 to SmarterMail was painless for our users. We actually got positive feedback from all except a few that would complain about paying taxes on winning the lottery. SmarterMail also does not have program aliases. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Experiences

I know that cost is a big thing with many, but if you really work it out, upgrades for both can be comparable if you buy your IMail SA from a supplier that doesn't mark it up that much. SmarterMail on a one-year upgrade cycle, and they have no upgrade protection, and they don't include

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Undocumented Directive 4.x

Is there a nice way to rotate this file without stopping decludeproc? Thanks John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 11:58 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Experiences

At 12:50 PM 1/29/2007, you wrote: Well now that we have moved from IMail 8.15 to 8.22, we are now experiencing the problem where Declude needs to be restarted regularly to correct an apparent memory leak. I remember following threads about this problem and how the upgrade to IMail 2006.1

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Experiences

Can you elaborate on lack SMTP Relay for specified IPs.? I thought you could whitelist IP addresses in SmarterMail. Or is this totally different? Mike, Let me state it another way. IMail will allow users to send without authentication, but only for a certain IP range. SmarterMail seems

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Experiences

Not true you can allow IP addresses to send unauthenticated. We do it. Security - SMPT Authentication Bypass Place your IP addressed in there and no auth needed. We are running 3.3.2439 Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Experiences

That is not correct. Here is the info from the help in version 3.x. Smartermail will do what you want, require those from non known ip addresses or ranges to have to authenticate and other not to have to. Blacklist / Whitelist From this page you can control which IP addresses are

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outlook SCL X-header

Does anyone know if there's a valid X-note header that can be placed in the message body that will cause Outlook to automatically route emails to the Junk-email folder? Assuming you are talking about Outlook *without* Exchange: AFAIK, there is no built-in header rule that is