(or whatever term) licensee, will have to pay for each term.
In either case, you will need to acquire a service agreement to obtain more
current versions that what you originally pre-paid for.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original
customers - but it should NOT be active for ALL your customers by default!
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type
Hi,
I'm trying to set up a server from scratch and thus
downloaded and ran:
Declude_IM_N310.exe
and chose the option to let it do its install (rather than
the option for "experienced" admins).
PS - that screen has a typo!
The setupcreated a
C:\Program Files\Declude
folder that
Hi Dave,
thanks.
Next question:
I noticed that your Virus.CFGis missing two options
from Version 2:
AUTOFORGEON
BANEZIPEXTSON
If I recall correctly, the idea was
that:
BANZIPEXTS OFF#
BANEXTEZIP
BANEZIPEXTS ON
would PERMIT banned extensions inside zipped files (where
they could be
Dave -
That's what I call catch 22:
D:\IMaildecludeproc -diag
Invalid
command line parameter:
-install Install
Declude-diag Print
diagnostics
Hm -
so let's see, after "-install",I used "-diag" to figure out what's wrong.
But, "-diag" isinvalid. The ony valid parameters are... "-install"
#AUTOREVIEW ON
I was first trying to get the virus portion to work. So I ONLY had the code
in VIRUS.CFG as per your sample file:
# This Code is only required for IMail
CODE I924x----4887
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414
Install Declude
-diagPrint diagnostics
is not factual?
It should read:
Invalid command line parameter. Valid options are:
-v displays the version and build
-i installs the decludeproc service
-u uninstalls the decludeproc service
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934
Hi,
I think Dave said, it would be in \Imail\Declude\Resources ?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Wednesday
Hi Dave,
Sorry everyone -- my mistake. Yes, I was trying 3.1 - not realizing that I
had access to 4.x.
I'll start over.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi John,
I assume you tried sending FROM a different domain name - just in case they
have blacklisted the domain name, but not the IP (however unlikely that
might sound.)
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From
Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Beckstrom
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 03:16 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT
Title: WAY OT: command line for killing a win2k process
C:\ taskkill /?
TASKKILL [/S
system [/U username [/P
[password { [/FI filter]
[/PID processid | /IM imagename] } [/F] [/T]
Description: This command line tool can be used to
end one or more processes. Processes can be killed by
Title: Message
Hi,
see the /Sswitch, it allows you to set a remote
system to connect to.
So you couldrun this on your Win XP workstation, per
example.
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harry,
how does ASPMail submit the messages? To "localhost" (like
the IIS SMTP service of that web server) - or does it specify your Imail Server
directly?
If it goes through the IIS SMTP service first, then you'll
be able to see log information in the IIS log that might
help.
If he
Hi:
this line tells you that this mail truly should have never
been accepted by Imail:
06:13 13:00
SMTPD(ef2801f16207) [216.16.233.16] HELO
HELO must be
followed with the host name of the sender. Having no (or at least no
recognizable)host name is causing you the
problem.
I'm
Title: Message
Are
the BIOS versions the same? Maybe it was fixed in a newer BIOS update. I
remember updating older servers of various brands and recall that the readme's
for BIOS' often talked about fixes to power management
support.
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
Title: Message
If IIS
finds a virtual folder that matches the user name, then it switches to it as the
root.
Maybe
this carries over for the "default" user profile?
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-From:
in system policies - just don't
remember if they were domain/group or user policies.
Essentially, it's a setting the the current user hive of the registry. You
could edit the shell settings directly - but better to use a tool that
knows which items need to go together.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone
Hi John,
It's implicitely defined by using it in the FOR command:
FOR /R %%f in (ex*.log)
Whatever variable you use in the FOR is defined as the variable to hold
the directory items.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
Compress2DayOldLogs.cmd file:
C:
CD C:\WINNT\system32\LogFiles\
FOR /R %%f in (ex*.log) do C:\Program Files\WinZip\WZzip.exe -m -ex -Td01
%%~dpnf.zip %%f
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Thanks Andrew (and all other contributors to this thread). I responded to
most off-list - I appreciate everyone's suggestions.
I will take a look at Urchin as well - I think I've seen it used in a few
places.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934
and then use the server command to
specify your DNS server. Then try to query for domain names.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty
Sent
') reporting
B) uses a database structure that does not limit volume (e.g., a JET
database won't do).
What is everyone else out there using?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
versions in some
respects... But their accumulators are too small for active sites.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert E. Spivack
Sent: Tuesday
I thought the meta element is only valid in the head element, thus
should never be executed, even if it appears in the HTML body?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
addresses (such
as the Declude list)
E) If none of these suggestions apply, you should examine whether your
priority is posting to the list or the read/receive requests and then decide
for one OR the other.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
it?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Edmonds
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 08:41 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail
for messages
attachments).
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy D. Hilton
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 03:54 PM
Any group discounts for Declude customers? G
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 03:36 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Funny RDNS
We still have one customer with a dual
Declude Video Suite ?
(to keep the naming consistent)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 04:02 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Funny RDNS
snip He has
his
Yeah, I agree, Security Suite is the best so far.
Definitely no 4 in there. For now, it's still Version 3 - just repackaged
differently.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
Hi Kevin,
I understand what you're saying- you believe Declude
4.0 is really just a"Declude 3.x Suite" vs. the Declude 3.x "legacy
products".New customers can only purchase the Suite, while old customers
will continue to upgrade their individual products. The code base is the
same.
In
Have you determined whether you can just use one of your other C-Class
networks to set up a simply IIS SMTP server as a smart host and then relay
your outbound mail through that IP address?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original
You actually CAN - but only if you are using IIS for your outbound gateway.
With IIS you can set up routing options for different destination domains.
Configuring per domain IP/port numbers and other output routing options is
something I've always missed in Imail.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Hi,
After all this
turmail last weekend, where several users suffered a "downgrade" from Pro which
strangely coincided with the unavailability of a certain host name at Declude -
and which equally strangely seemed to fix itself after Declude fixed that
problem on Monday -- I'm wondering
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 10:49 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re
Hi David:
Thanks for acknowledging the hardware
problem.
However, I don't think anyone here really would be too
upset about hardware problems on your end - if it didn't uncover what appears to
be a HUGE software problem? It's the DecludeSOFTWARE that
deactivates/downgrades itself, if we
Right - that's why paying licensees object to any technique that could
result in their license being automatically revoked without any in-person
oversight -- no matter how unlikely the scenario might appear.
(I actually support license VALIDATIONS so that software vendors can get
paid by their
It's okay - we just like to show who's closest to
retirement age by touting the ratio of mechanical/electrical/electronic
componentsfound in the first batch data processing device we ever used
professionally G
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
On that note... To any youngsters who think that single Bits don't have any
physical incarnation.
Here's what 1 bit really looks like G:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b1/Core2.jpg
(Hint: It's one of those black rings.
Hm... Thinking about it, I guess I'm looking at 64-bit
Title: Message
Ha -
long before Gates started college, therewas a company called International
Business Machines. And you had to program sorter/merger machinesto get
your punch cards in the proper order for the revolutionarybrand-new /370s
- because disk sorting was not yet available, even
clients will be redirected to the new logon screen!?
That's how I normally handle changes in third party web applications.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
As reported twice
before (e.g. most recently yesterday), there is a bug in the "BadRouting"
test. The "Countries" test correctly reports "GERMANY-destination".
But the BadRouting test
fails.
I had posted
sample SMTP headers yesterday.
T-Online is
one of the world's large Internet
Title: Message
Bothidentifiable
IPaddresses are in Germany.
The only record inbetween was a
forwarding entry and should have been ignored!?
-Original Message-
Received: from mailout09.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.84] by
hm-software.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.15) id
as they happen? Other than limiting the total cpu
use dedicated to Declude (e.g., queuing messages if there is a spike in
volume), what's the point?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
can't see how the same outcome suddenly should require x times the CPU
resources, no matter how inefficient the process settings are? What is
spending all this other CPU time on? Looping, looking for directory content?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201
parameters
without answering the underlying question of why this extra CPU time is
needed?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik
Sent: Tuesday, October
no other messages are pending.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 04:14 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Uh - well THAT is good information.
So it is your sense that now they are ready to take on customers with
dual-processor Dells without Declude falling asleep?
That means I can finally upgrade (thanks to your persistence).
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax
server is, that one in 13 service starts,
it will take a second DNS lookup before the root servers are known.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck
Can the beta testers with dual-CPU machines confirm that the latest Beta
Built is now running without creating the previously reported backlog
problems?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Darrell - thanks for reporting back.
Okay, so my dual-processor system is still not compatible with the beta.
(I did not beta-test, since I don't have a single-processor machine.)
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original
just a theory.)
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tyran Ormond
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 09:59 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re
that never send any email.
Ideally, in addition, set up SMTP AUTH for your clients so that you can use
SPFFAIL for incoming mail and, if you choose, ignore SPFPASS for now.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
---
This E-mail came from
100%.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 8:48 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF - Missing the Point
still unacceptable
Title: OT - Removal from SPEWS
Hi,
one approach could be - "why bother".SPEWS is useful
as a reference - but can't be used to block email.I would think that none
of the relevant ISPs and most smaller will care of you're listed there or not as
the blacklist has a way too high false positive
Heimir,
I understand everyone's level of frustration - I think THAT is actually a
constructive suggestion. We can't do anything about how long this take, but
at least people would feel treated fairly. I think your email deserves
serious consideration.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201
Hi,
It's the IRC virus.
Seems that you don't have MS05-039 missing:
http://www.internetsecurity.fi/v-descs/ircbot_es.shtml
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
looks as if this
email went DE - DE - US.
Should nothave
failedSpamrouting?
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177] by
hm-software.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.15) id AFF1667600F4; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:07:45
-0400
Received: from p548A9978.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
Title: Message
the
spamrouting test will only tag things when they switch continents back and
forth
Correct, that's why I'm asking - it doesn't apply
here.
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL
Title: Message
Amazing.
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of MattSent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 02:23
AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject:
Hi,
sorry, I lost the original email. Somehow I
thought it saw a "BDAT" instead of "DATA" in the log - but I could be
mistaken. (Curious to see it
again.)
In any case, take a look at this:
http://freesoft.org/CIE/RFC/821/20.htm
This seems to imply, that the sender does not have to "look
Hi Matt:
I agree thatthe IIS logis omitting information
that we would like to see (e.g., it doesn't log the BDAT parameters for inbound
message- only for outgoing - and it doesn't log the mulit-line response to
anEHLO) - but I'd be surprised if the log "replaced" command values, e.g.,
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 04:32 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Anybody
Well, if the DNS is pointing to the right IP and if access
via the IP works- then the problem is with web server configuration and
its association of FQDN to the IP.
I assume IIS?
Is the IP address a "shared" IP
for several web sites?
If yes, didyou remember to add the "host header" name
Yes - kudos to CpHz for what they added and for the manner it which it is
being made available!
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NIck Hayer
Sent
me to group it with other tests of
the same class to avoid double-counting.
Example - I have a group of content based tests. But I have another group
of sending server based tests.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message
Hi:
You have WHITELIST AUTH defined - but also defined that
white lists should be BYPASSED, if a mail has a weight =12 and 4
recipients. Your message has a weight of 20 and 4 recipients, thus is bypassed
the white list.
(Now - personally - I feel that "SMTP AUTH" should not be
treated
Hi,
This one has a version for OE and Outlook:
http://www.daesoft.com/SpamSourceOE/index.htm
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
Sent
Uh, I understood it to be
that some "recipients" were on AOL - not the sender!
It's also not AOLs fault,
if some AOL customers have blocked the receipt because they are too lazy to
unsubscribe.
And, AOL does have means
to allow certain senders to be "white-listed".
I think it's more a
Wow ...
this is the FIRST time in very many years that I actually
am pleased what they added.
Does anyone know if the "SPF connection filtering" truly is
DURING the SMTP conversation? If so, will it by bypassed if SMTP AUTH is
used?That alone would receive my message load by about
5%.
Hi,
There is a knowledge base entry about a new ODBC DLL.
If you keep your user base in SQL, make sure that you get the latest
DLL.
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William
If he defines SPF records for his customers' domains where
he lists the authorized mail servers - then any mail that he receives supposedly
from his customer will be flagged/deleted if it does NOT originate from one of
the authorized mail servers.
there are the
1,000,000,000,000 hosts
Title: Message
Hi
Matt:
While
I was beta testing 2.0.6, I was also suffering from some distributed dictionary
attacks - and I was scrutinizing the log files much more closely (to look for
possible beta errors).
I
don't know WHICH of these three factors were critical (2.x vs. load vs.
Title: Message
Darin,
what's
the problem? As long as Challenge/Response messages originate from
"" (the null sender) it wouldn't matter if two majorISPs do
it.
They
key is:
a)
have a weighting system in place so that only "questionable mail" is challenged
to cut down on overhead
b)
Title: Message
If I could I would bounce their C/R so it never get to us. I
tried it once and it got us in a loop with another ISP's C/R
Yes, that's Declude's fault as much as it
is an unacceptable C/R implementation. NEITHER should be sending notices
from anything but NULL. If at least
Title: Message
IMail won't
let Declude send as . That's the
problem.
Almost. The problem is that Declude stillCHOOSES to use
theImail1.exe command line application, even though it clearly is
unsuitable for the task.
Instead,they should allow us to configure which command
line
Title: Message
Hi
Matt:
I don't think that this would be trivial since there are several
functions that use this and now two different platforms
Now
may actually be the right time - they clearly HAD to "unbundle" their code from
Imail1.exe in order to support SmarterMail. If anything,
Title: Message
Hi
Frederick:
May be
you should also post the relevant lines from the Globa.cfg so that one can see
what lines you requested to be inserted.
Also,
which of these lines specifically are incorrect?
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201
Title: Message
Hi
Frederick:
I
don't know if this has been asked/suggested already and I don't have time to go
back to the RFCs to see if embedded spaces are permitted in the header name. But
have you ever tried eliminating that space:
XINHEADERX-Spam-Tests-Failed Weight:
Title: Message
Well -
NONE of those have an embedded space in the Header name!?
X-Note:
X-RBL-Warning:
vs.
X-Spam-Tests-Failed
Weight:
Have
you TRIED what I suggested?
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206
-Original
everse DNS:
%REVDNS% ([%REMOTEIP%])XINHEADERX-Note: Recipient(s):
%REALRECIPS%- Original Message -
From:
Andy Schmidt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 4:02
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Something new wi
...0.41%
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 01:12 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Hm -
I looked at http://www.declude.com/Version/Manuals/2.0.6.asp - but don't
find any DYNHELO?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL
Title: Message
Hi,
I
downloaded 2.06, ran the manual install - but ProcessCounter.exe is not
included!?
Refer
to:
http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206
I'm surprised the encodedURL is ranked to low?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 04:01 PM
:
Andy Schmidt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 4:00
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
ProcessCounter missing from manual install
Hi,
I
downloaded 2.06, ran the manual install - but ProcessCounter.exe
Probably meant not available (at the time).
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 05:09 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail
Title: Message
Hi,
remember the
discussion several weeks ago - how VA law has a chilling effect on spammers,
many of whom have cleaned up their mailing lists to remove aol
accounts?
"Jeremy Jaynes
was convicted in November for using false Internet addresses to send mass e-mail
ads
I tried that - CONTAINS would catch that variation anyway.
However, the real answer is to add IGNORE or WARN to the $Junkmail$
file. I've gone through this before - and I just couldn't remember what it
was...
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934
Title: Message
Hi,
I'm always seeking
to eliminate "double failures" for single facts to prevent false positives and
then "up" the weight for groups of tests that test the same
facts.
Several domains that
I used to have in SpamDomains (such as "Excite.com") are publishing
SPF.
I used
it was preventable by NOT
breaking with the standard.
So - if your system breaks the implied feature of BCC, then I think it
would be very good idea if you publish a big disclaimer, and in a prominent
location that your email users can't miss (e.g., don't put it in the
fine-print.)
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
talking
about!)
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 10:55 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Well - I guess my point is that this is a legal matter, there is an argument
that could be made - so one cannot simply dismiss this without proper
consultation. And THIS list is NOT the right one to get proper consultation
on legalities.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
whether IPNOTINMX suffers the same.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 05:30 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail
Hm... Good point!
Not set to anything - just subtracting weight right now...
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Friday, April 08
I'd like to speak out in favor of public betas. It would help CPHZ to weed
out poor design decisions ahead of time, by testing against a broad number
of configurations.
I think it's better these things are found before the software is released.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414
language word.
However, the word Resume is spelled with accents... I'm not sure if the Euro
currency symbol may even use that code table.
So - be ready for false positives.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Title: Message
Hi,
a) I have
mySMTP Gatewayscorrectly defined inIPBYPASS, so
thatDeclude can attempt to determine the ultimate sending IP address (for
EXTERNALemails).
b) However, the
IPBYPASS logic is flawed, in that it does not allow for the fact that email may
truly originate from the
G,
Declude is only following established industry practice (where target date
and release date must be at least 1 year apart) G
Best Regards
Andy
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 11:07 AM
Target release date for 2.0.6 - 28 March 04
I take
201 - 300 of 803 matches
Mail list logo
