At 11:34 PM 3/21/2002, you wrote:
> > In one sense, isn't this what ORBZ was doing? Port Scanning everyone,
> > and sending in unsolicited emails because they want to test other
>people's
> > systems without them asking for permission to do so?
>
>ORBZ was not "Port Scanning" ORBZ was only after
>>Ahh... my 2 cents anyway. I just feel no one has the right to
send me
>>crap I did not ask for...
In one sense, isn't this what ORBZ was doing? Port Scanning
everyone,
and sending in unsolicited emails because they want to test other
people's
systems without them asking for permission to do so
I've tweaked our settings and are testing the following.
Anyone have any feedback either way on why any of this is too high,
too low, would let too much past, or would create too many false positives?
ORBZIN ip4rinputs.orbz.org 127.0.0.2 5 0
ORBZOUT
Please see below... Thanks!
At 04:05 PM 2/25/2002, you wrote:
>>>Well, the best way to handle this is for the admin at the remote mail
>>>server to add a reverse DNS entry (which the RFCs do require, even
>>>though many mail servers do not have a reverse DNS entry), and to get
>>>ACT to get
Hi Scott.
At 02:15 PM 2/25/2002, you wrote:
>>I have a customer who has not been able to send email through our system. He
>>was scoring a "17" on the spam scale. Here's the relevant detail from
>>the log:
>>
>>02/25/2002 13:23:37 Q811f28a BADHEADERS:8 REVDNS:4 SPAMHEADERS:5 . Total
>>w
false positives is legitimate mail
>from open relays - school district and government servers are the worst
>offenders.
>
>Comments please.
>
>Chuck Schick
>Warp 8, Inc.
>www.warp8.com
>303-421-5140
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Christopher U
I have a customer who has not been able to send email through our system. He
was scoring a "17" on the spam scale. Here's the relevant detail from the log:
02/25/2002 13:23:37 Q811f28a BADHEADERS:8 REVDNS:4 SPAMHEADERS:5 . Total
weight = 17
02/25/2002 13:23:37 Q811f28a Msg failed BADHEADERS (
Hello all. We just got the reverse DNS capabilities delegated to us by
our upline connection (Sprint). However, when I look in the DNS (MS DNS, NT4)
at the reverse DNS records (50.34.208.in-addr.arpa), there are no records.
I've tried manually entering one for our mail server (208.34.50.132) but
by Declude. Watch them for awhile and
>tweak them as needed.
>
>Tom
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher
>Ulrich
>Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 7:36 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [Declud
Hello. I'm a new user to declude's products, so sorry if I'm asking
things that were asked recently.
We're trying to build some good filters that will eliminate real junk
without blocking valid messages. I'm guessing this might cover
70-80% of the junk without blocking most valid messages. Doe
10 matches
Mail list logo
