Re: [Declude.JunkMail]

We use a software versioning and release methodology like Scott has outlined here...and while it does take a while to get new features to customers this way, it is necessary to ensure the reliability of our products. However, for Declude, the product is geared towards a rapidly changing landscape

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: National Do Not Call Registry

This link no longer works, but a quick google search for the filename yields these two slightly different WAVs. http://f4.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/cK39PtNOsYVIbxCrnPdbW_djeMcyYJ0pga_cTmTL7Y1y1DK eWX4b5zU9KZ_pgBbtv8d-1Va-sAtMLkA_/Sounds/errorbeeps1.wav http://bruessel.ws/ftp/pub/sed/errorbeeps1.wav

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MAILFROM - correct?

Hi Andy, I believe it should be straightened out now. Skanska is a customer of ours. Someone there forgot to renew their domain, so it expired Friday morning. They quickly re-registered, but the damage was done for a day. I believe that's what caused the MAILFROM and HELOBOGUS errors we were

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] client Question

I use the following line in my $default$.junkmail to change the subject for quick testing and demos to customers. Once they decide they like what they see it can be changed to delete or left for them to use email client rules. WEIGHT18 SUBJECT SPAM[%WEIGHT%-%TESTSFAILED%]: Darin. - Original

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per User - Alias Account

What if you created a mailbox instead of an alias on the first virtual domain that only forwarded and did not store? Would JunkMail process before Imail forwarded? Darin. - Original Message - From: Trent M. Davenport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.56 (beta) released

I thought the main benefit was that a weight of 25 would trigger both WEIGHT10 and WEIGHT20, but if weightrange was used we could avoid triggering the WEIGHT10 test. This simplifies the test handling, especially for those who take increasingly severe actions on higher weights...also for those

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] I was spammed by myself

Is there a feature list for the JunkMail beta? What are the reasons to use it over 1.53? Darin. - Original Message - From: Rick Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:27 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] I was spammed by myself The beta

Re: Is there a feature list for the JunkMail beta? Fw: [Declude.JunkMail] New filter test

Thanks, Rick. So to clarify, the difference between 1.53 and 1.55 are these additional filters? Sorry if you've answered this previously, I just joined the list. Darin. - Original Message - From: Rick Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:15 PM

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] I was spammed by myself

Thanks, Scott...didn't see that page... Darin. - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:38 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] I was spammed by myself Is there a feature list for the JunkMail beta?

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there a feature list for the JunkMail beta? Fw: [Declude.JunkMail] New filter test

Here are a couple of emails we received that were flagged with BADHEADERs but are valid subscriptions...anything appear out of order? Received: from mail.yourdictionary.com [206.14.214.45] by vwc.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there a feature list for the JunkMail beta? Fw: [Declude.JunkMail] New filter test

Interesting...thanks, Scott. Darin. - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:03 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there a feature list for the JunkMail beta? Fw: [Declude.JunkMail] New filter test Here are a