welll... I ain't so sure that Declude tries to use an old aliases.txt file.
I just made the leap last week from IMail 8.13 to 2006.2 and updated Declude to
the lastest as well. For whatever reason, the address books did not convert
with the IMail upgrade. I had copied the entire mailbox
We're all seeing it... My log files have increased over 30% in recent times
as I'm sure yours have too. Through due diligence we stop an awful lot, but
much still gets by.
But we're being active after the fact. Is there anyone who has knowledge of
what virus and/or trojan is causing all of
Very frankly, I'm not in favor of a new name since the product will remain
the same.
As others have already recognized and evaluated, Version 4 should really be
called the Declude Suite.
All new sales will be of the Declude Suite which contains all the current
products while current users
I believe ipfile is specifically used to block single IPs and blocks of
IPs. The file it relates to should have a list of single IPs or IP/CIDR.
After the IP, the remainder of the line is only used for comments.
Otherwise you can also have a test (just as you state you've already got) in
I think the ALL_LIST.DAT file is some sort of compressed list and not
accessible via an editor... right???
Anyway, I found have a link where I got it some time back.
http://www.declude.com/release/178/all_list.dat
I haven't updated our server with it yet, so I have no idea how recent
We're about the same size and keeping IMail has been our choice.
You can buy the SA for less from dealers such as us or CDW or others .. 500
- Original Message -
From: David Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 10:36 AM
Subject:
Yep...The first one got me a couple ago.
Interesting too. It has no entry in Arin's database.
- Original Message -
From:
Richard
Farris
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 1:27
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam
attack
FYI,
I'm confused about the release of 2.0. I received 2 emails from Barry making
annoucements and then 2 emails immediately following which recalled the
announcements. (?)
Is 2.0 for IMail ready? ( I didn't do the beta either for the same reasons
as Andy and John T about the install stuff. In
An explanation of this file... it's purpose and how it gets there.. would be
very beneficial. Is supposed to be there, or is it part of the beta testing?
Will it re-create itself if deleted?
Most of us have automated routines which clear out our spool directories
since they grow quite rapidly
I.
~Joe
- Original Message -
From: J Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Current Default GLOBAL.CFG
Will Computer Horizons make the Global Config file available from the web
site
On another note... has anyone seen any sort of (cascading?) effect from the
SpamHeaders glitch?
I seem to have a fair amount of email winding up in our hold file that
failed both our weight tests and an IP hold test. They should have been
deleted based on the weight test, but are being held
Will Computer Horizons make the Global Config file available from the web
site?
Historically this file has had minor changes made to it and I don't always
keep up with the newsgroup as well as I would like to. [Believe it or not...
email is not the only task in my job descritpion... :)]
I'm
Yep a REAL annoying spammer. I'm putting the
Class Bs in hold as well as the first 2 or 3 letters of the domain names then
reviewing with Spam Review.
BTW.. didn't someone take over Spam Review? Any new
versions available?
Dam... we shoulda been in the registrar biz and
collected the
I've been trying to get to it for over an hour.
Just checked and I can get to Arin from DNSStuff but not via it's URL.
DNS problem somewhere in the pipeline??
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 11:36 AM
h. There's a prob somewhere...
Generated by www.DNSstuff.com
Country: UNITED STATES
Sorry, I could not connect to whois.arin.net (10051).
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 11:36 AM
Subject: Re:
I see a fair amount of junkmail which doesn't fail the Countries Test but
the country is shown as ARIN Unlisted or Unknown. Is there a way to show
these results as failing the test and subsequently add points for the
junkmail filter??
Thanks..
~Joe
www.EastARK.com
---
[This E-mail scanned for
Ben...
1. To get the Countries Test to work, add a line to your global.cfg
something like:
CTRY2filter c:\imail\declude\ctry2.txt x 5 0
this creates a filter test named CTRY2 with a link to a text file.
2. Create a text file (my example being ctry2.txt) which looks something
We're a small ISP and receive about 30,000 emails per day with 60 to 80%
being kicked out as either spam or viruses.
I upgraded about 6 months ago from a P2 running NT4 Workstation to a 2.4
Xeon (single processor on a dual processor motherboard) running Win2K with
only 256MB RAM.
I've never been
Is the Country/Countries Filter test supposed to work with the release
version, 1.75?
This filter isn't working for me so I wanna make sure I have the proper
version since I don't see any documentaion in the manual. Are there any
docs? even for a beta version?
I see a line such as:
I just upgraded to IMail 8.03 and turned on the daily report. Now I'd like
to know what it means. My report shows
Spam Content
LocalDeliver
RemoteDeliver
I'm assuming the delivery numbers are actual numbers after Declude has done
it's thing. Correct??
But where is the Spam Content
I'm seeing more and more of this all the time. Someone inquired about this
recently and maybe I missed any responses hanging head down in shame
The generic header reads...
Received from mydomain.com (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) by mail.mydomain.com.. etc
From: someone myemailaddy
To: myemailaddy
where
Ask and ye shall receive... whether you want it or not.. )
~Header~
Received: from attbi.com [24.131.138.246] by mail.hnb.com
(SMTPD32-7.03) id AE3F48EA013A; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:48:47 -0500
Received: from h00036d13b375.ne.client2.attbi.com
(h00036d13b375.ne.client2.attbi.com
Yep... I got one this PM. What do you think is the best way to block it??
~Joe
- Original Message -
From: Dan Patnode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:50 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Fraud Alert
Watch out for this one, the underlying code
Yep.. I saw one like that yesterday. I stuck it back in the queue for
delivery.
Wally World needs to get it together and fix what they changed.
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:31 PM
Subject:
Discussion being continued off-list unless anyone else is interested..
- Original Message -
From: Keith Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 2:10 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need Some Advise
When we first got Declude's JunkMail, we spent
When we first got Declude's JunkMail, we spent about 6 weeks using some test
accounts to determine our best parameters. We now dump all the email that
meets Spamcop and Weight22 categories. (I think we adjusted some weights to
get to that number but we found no false positives during the test
Personally speaking, if I were at home and seeing this, I'd just log in and
add a Domain Processing Rule to delete it. If I were at the server, I'd add
it to the kill.lst.
Someone's mailing list is basically screwed up. It originates from a place
called RapidSite.net which hosts web sites and
Admittedly, we're a small ISP and may not be representative of the entire
group, but I'm not convinced we would even use such a product.
Every so often I feel as though I'm a censor and I get an uneasy feeling.
If we allow individuals to control their own destiny with antispam
parameters,
hmmm... decisions... decsions...
1. Let the spammer know we're fighting back in which case they might try
other tactics? or change tactics? or ??
or
2. Let them think we're an easy target so they keep on doing what they're
doing except more of it and even invite their buddies to join in.
I think
I've also seen several legitimate emails that failed the BADHEADERS test.
After studying a test group for about 3 weeks, I came to the conclusion that
I could catch a lot of spam email but still allow 99+% of legitimate email
to go through by using a Weight test with a value of 22.
This still
30 matches
Mail list logo
