http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/detail.php?domain=lakesnet.net&submitted=1
070148902&table=dsn
This is why, although I was able to send to your postmaster account with a
null sender from the command line.
- Tony
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Be
The per-domain folders need to be the official host name as in IMail, so if
your setup is like this in Imail:
Official host name: mail.domain1.com, alias: domain1.com
Official host name: mail.domain2.com, alias: domain2.com
... then your folders for declude need to be:
mail.domain1.com
mail.domai
http://www.info-zip.org/Zip.html
I think this is more what your looking for:
- Creates .zip files instead of .gz files like gzip
- is free. :-)
- Tony
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of ISPhuset Nordic
>AS
>Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004
Hey and I just got an email on a real cool piece of software that will let
me find out anything on anyone. We can use their own tools against them!!!
:-)>
- Tony
>I received the following message this AM. I think we should start a hitmen
>for hire group to track these morons down. What do you
you da man, thank you sir!!!
Must have had too much egg nog - tis the season as they say. :-)
- Tony
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
>Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:53 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Declude
touch-Note: Spoolfile:[Db60a14c.SMD]
X-Intouch-Note: SPAM tests failed:[None]
Blah Blah Blah - rest of body of message deleted to protect the innocent
Sincerely,
Tony Gray
Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Intouch Communications, Inc.
1027 Church Street
>relays.osiriusoft.com is not a regular DNS query. They are scanned for each
>email to see whether the source email exists in the DNS.
(Scott/Len/Sanford - bail me out here if I'm not understanding this right)
:-)
Declude does a seperate DNS lookup "for each IP4r test for each email" it is
set t
> My only option to minimize hits on an external server will be direct
>resolution which slows down some other sites, or being able to become a
>secondary for relays.osirusoft.com.
Your own server should NOT be noticably slower unless it is not configured
correctly. Without a forwarder to use,
>However, as a school I would simply enforce the spam control and too bad
>some legitimate mail gets caught. I will have a look at those mails once or
>twice a week and forward them if they seem legit. For THAT I would like a
>simple to use tool, either a small web interface or a gui tool to quickl
>That's already there -- the configuration files are plain text files, and
>can be accessed with ASP, PHP, proprietary interface, etc. :)
>
>I'm not sure if the advantages of an API (not having to deal with the text
>files directly) would outweigh the disadvantages (less flexibility).
>
John,
I ran into the same problem awhile ago - I found and use "Bulk Rename
Utility" - freeware from a guy named Jim Willsher.
When double checking the link before sending it - it appears that his
homepage is gone too. It IS freeware, I suppose I could send you the
installer. :-)
- Tony
>---
>My guess is that most spammers make no money (or
>just enough so that they can make some spare change when they can't work
>overtime at McDonalds). But the suckers are told that they'll make $50K
>("If you don't believe me, look at your inbox -- do you think there would
>be all those spams there
One
word: MONEY.
For
every 1000 or so mailboxes they tar up, one poor unsuspecting sap sends them
money for whatever they're peddling. If you could, essentially for free,
blast out 100,000,000 emails knowing that 0.1% of them would send you $10 bucks
- do the math... I think that's $100
>
>Now I am confused. (Not the first, won't be the last.) Why would you assign
>a negative weight? It seems like this test is to see if the mail came from
>other that a domain registered mail server, and if so, it would be an
>indication of possible SPAM, there by saying we should have it add
>weig
>
>Now I am confused. (Not the first, won't be the last.) Why would you assign
>a negative weight? It seems like this test is to see if the mail came from
>other that a domain registered mail server, and if so, it would be an
>indication of possible SPAM, there by saying we should have it add
>weig
To specify more than one DNS server in Junkmail:
- does it work properly?
- which would be the proper format:
DNS 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.8
...or
DNS 1.2.3.4
DNS 5.6.7.8
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Tony Gray
Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Intouch
X-Note - Total spam weight of this E-mail is 5.
X-RBl-Warning: Your mail server [209.69.7.9] is missing a reverse DNS entry.
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [209.69.7.9]
X-Declude-Spoolname: D8395ae98022e920e.SMD
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude (www.declude.com)
X-NRecip
I just
received one of these today too.
I
responded asking for the confirmation letters of those who apparently 'opted
in'. I have not received any list yet. Surprise,
surprise.
-
Tony
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
### My submission to the suggestion box :-) ###
I just recently heard about how AOL users can blacklist all but specified
recipients. I happened to learn about it by sending an email to my uncle
(who uses it and forgot to add me to the list - at least he says he forgot)
I (and a small sampling o
19 matches
Mail list logo
