RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AMEX fails routing test

2005-02-12 Thread Marc Catuogno
: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AMEX fails routing test YOU may want to chang your config to use weightrange instean of weight. It will difinitivly choose the actio that will happen and avoid confusion. Why was this message held anyway. Based on the failed tests I would not hold this message on our server

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AMEX fails routing test

2005-02-12 Thread Dave Doherty
@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AMEX fails routing test YOU may want to chang your config to use weightrange instean of weight. It will difinitivly choose the actio that will happen and avoid confusion. Why was this message held anyway. Based on the failed tests I would not hold

[Declude.JunkMail] AMEX fails routing test

2005-02-10 Thread Marc Catuogno
X-RBL-Warning: ROUTING: This E-mail was routed in a poor manner consistent with spam [210f]. X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.32.34.73] X-Declude-Spoolname: D465d077100c4763a.SMD X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for spam. X-Spam-Tests-Failed:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AMEX fails routing test

2005-02-10 Thread Dave Doherty
, February 10, 2005 7:09 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] AMEX fails routing test X-RBL-Warning: ROUTING: This E-mail was routed in a poor manner consistent with spam [210f]. X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.32.34.73] X-Declude-Spoolname: D465d077100c4763a.SMD X-Note: This E-mail was scanned

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AMEX fails routing test

2005-02-10 Thread Kevin Bilbee
: Thursday, February 10, 2005 4:09 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] AMEX fails routing test X-RBL-Warning: ROUTING: This E-mail was routed in a poor manner consistent with spam [210f]. X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.32.34.73] X-Declude-Spoolname