I am looking for recommendations on other blacklists that Declude users are
successfully using.
Right now I use.
Spamcop
list.dsbl.org (trusted)
AHBL
Spamhaus
CBL
UCEB
ORDB
SORBs
NJABL
BLITZEDALL
MailPolice
I looked at the Declude list and I am wondering about adding
spamsources.fabel.dk
, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Schick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude. JunkMail Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 12:35 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists Recommendations.
I am looking for recommendations on other blacklists that Declude
From: Chuck Schick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 12:55 PM
To: Declude. JunkMail Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists Recommendations.
I am looking for recommendations on other blacklists that Declude users are
successfully using.
Right now
: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists Recommendations.
Darrell:
Thanks for the recommendation. I have added MX Rate...Any particular one(s)
of the fiveten lists. I Think we used them in the past but had some false
positive issues.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
] On Behalf Of Gary
Steiner
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 12:15 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists Recommendations.
BLITZEDALL went offline in May (see http://opm.blitzed.org). Other than
that, all the ones you are using I am also using.
Other IP4R tests
Greetings,
I have been receiving many messages that are not being caught by
Junkmail and are not failing any tests. They are most certainly SPAM and are
more than a little obnoxious. I want to blacklist messages of this kind, but
want to be completely sure which is the best way. As an example,
I have been receiving many messages that are not being caught by
Junkmail and are not failing any tests. They are most certainly SPAM and are
more than a little obnoxious. I want to blacklist messages of this kind, but
want to be completely sure which is the best way. As an example, I have
We have the ability to develop a whitelist by domain now, how about the
ability to create a individual blacklist, say something like this in
each junkmail file...
WHITELISTFILE C:\maillists\cswanson\whitelist.txt
BLACKLISTFILE C:\maillists\cswanson\blacklist.txt
The catch here is while they
.
Brian Clover
-Original Message-
From: Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 12:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (4, ):[Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists
Scott and all,
We have the ability to develop a whitelist by domain now, how about the
ability to create
Scott and all,
We have the ability to develop a whitelist by domain now, how about the
ability to create a individual blacklist, say something like this in
each junkmail file...
WHITELISTFILE C:\maillists\cswanson\whitelist.txt
BLACKLISTFILE C:\maillists\cswanson\blacklist.txt
What prompted
Hi,
http://www.informationweek.com/story/IWK20021115S0018
After reading this article, I changed our setup to weight the blacklist
to 7 and delete email at weight20. This waters down the blacklist a bit
but removes the reliance...anyone else doing the same or similar?
regards,
http://www.informationweek.com/story/IWK20021115S0018
After reading this article, I changed our setup to weight the blacklist
to 7 and delete email at weight20.
Which blacklist? What was it set to before you read that article? Why did
you change it after reading that article?
SPAM,
Monday, November 18, 2002 you wrote:
S After reading this article, I changed our setup to weight the
S blacklist to 7 and delete email at weight20. This waters down the
S blacklist a bit but removes the reliance...anyone else doing the
S same or similar?
I think I understand what
18, 2002 4:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BLACKLISTS -
http://www.informationweek.com/story/IWK20021115S0018
After reading this article, I changed our setup to weight the blacklist
to 7 and delete email at weight20.
Which blacklist? What was it set to before you
Hi all,
How do I apply a blacklist against the Received: header -- not merely the Reply
To: header? I realize that this has been discussed ad nauseum, but in scanning
the archives and manual, I still don't have a clear understanding.
For example, our blacklist (from imagefxonline) contains the
Thank you for the clarifications, Scott.
To check the HELO/EHLO text (the
domain that appears in the Received: header), you can set up a HELO filter
(with Declude JunkMail Pro, using the latest release).
But a filter requires the four-column format HELO 10 CONTAINS spammer.com which
would
Thank you for the clarifications, Scott.
To check the HELO/EHLO text (the
domain that appears in the Received: header), you can set up a HELO filter
(with Declude JunkMail Pro, using the latest release).
But a filter requires the four-column format HELO 10 CONTAINS
spammer.com which
But a filter requires the four-column format HELO 10 CONTAINS
spammer.com which would require that we reformat any third-party
blacklists each and every time we refresh the list, right? Yuck!
Or is there a way to setup the HELO/EHLO filter against the
aforementioned two-column blacklist
Is it more efficient to have a single, large Blacklist file or multiple
small ones? Right now I have a single one but it is getting rather
large.
Thanks.
Hank
---
[This E-mail has been scanned for viruses.]
[MGT of America, Inc.]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
19 matches
Mail list logo
