So I'm neither able to disable only outgoing warnings.
Have you tried my suggestion? :)
No.
We've had the same problem with 5 other clients sending messages to
users on the ISP inode.at
Adding per domain configigurations to this 5 domains will not prevent
that other clients (domains) will
There is a ISP from Austria using the Exim Internet Mailer.
(www.exim.org)
In the last months there was a lot of messages send from our system to
this provider where Exim returned an error message like:
=
This message was created
Because since we use SPAMCHK there was also some bounced messages from
Exim indicating the casue of the error
forced faulure: SPAMCHK ...
I'm sure Exim bounce our messages because there are the X-RBL-Warning:
lines in the header.
Talk about a poor man's spam filter -- relying on the
In this case, since they don't seem to care *which* spam
tests fail (the
fact that you use an X-RBL-Warning: header rather than
blocking the E-mail
typically indicates that the test doesn't justify blocking
the E-mail), I
would recommend using a trick to allow you to keep the
I can't follow:
The default- and per Domain configuration is used to process incoming
mail for this specific domain.
But the Exim Mail server bounce our messages with the outgoing
X-RBL-Warnings from declude.
As I know only the pro version handle the outgoing actions set in the
global.cfg
So
, January 27, 2003 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: Exim error message (X-RBL-Warning..)
In this case, since they don't seem to care *which* spam
tests fail (the
fact that you use an X-RBL-Warning: header rather than
blocking the E-mail
typically indicates
