[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How good does it get?
Glenn:
What we do is simply a negative weight for newsletters. We review the
weights of 20-60 and delete on 60.
Newsletters typica
inal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How good does it get?
Glenn:
What we do is simply a negative weight for newsletters. We review the
wei
we simply
whitelist their REVDNS.
Regards,
Kami
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn \
WCNetSent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 4:53 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How good
does it get?
Running JunkMail since May 2002. I've done a
Z.
- Original Message -
From:
T.
Bradley Dean
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:07
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] How good does
it get?
I just installed the demo (Tuesday I believe) and I have it set
to warnonly. My plan is to move ev
D]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] How good does it get?
I just installed the demo (Tuesday I believe) and I have it set to warn
only. My plan is to move everything with a weight of 20 or above to a
'spam'
folder in each us
I just installed the demo (Tuesday I believe) and I have it set to warn
only. My plan is to move everything with a weight of 20 or above to a 'spam'
folder in each users webmail. I may be able to do 15, so far the highest
legitimate mail we've seen was 14.
Looking at what's coming in, I'm getting
