-
From: Chris Kuske [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IP Blacklist
A shameless plug, but here goes since we have quite a few Declude users
now that we're on the default IP4r test list...
Check out
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Farris
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 7:57 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: CBL:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IP Blacklist
Anyone have a testimony
Anyone see any reason why 30 points wasn't assessed from the IP Black
list? Running Junkmail Pro 2.0.6.16
Received: from SMTP32-FWD by inetconcepts.net
(SMTP32) id AC77C106B02A4EC42; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 04:23:18 -0500
Received: from peace.happysupport.com [70.84.49.210] by inetconcepts.net with
Just guessing that there might not be a line break in your IPFILE after
that line.
Matt
Don Brown wrote:
Anyone see any reason why 30 points wasn't assessed from the IP Black
list? Running Junkmail Pro 2.0.6.16
Received: from SMTP32-FWD by inetconcepts.net
(SMTP32) id AC77C106B02A4EC42;
No. There is a line break. Any other ideas?
Wednesday, August 10, 2005, 9:14:04 AM, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
M Just guessing that there might not be a line break in your IPFILE after
M that line.
M Matt
M Don Brown wrote:
Anyone see any reason why 30 points wasn't assessed from the
Don,
Maybe try looking in the log to see if there are any errors. Check
your global.cfg for multiple test entries named BLACKIP. Unless
something has changed, I don't believe the following lines are
appropriate for an ipfile:
SKIPIFWEIGHT 30
MAXWEIGHT 30
STOPATFIRSTHIT
Maybe
Wednesday, August 10, 2005, 9:58:05 AM, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
M
M Don,
M
M Maybe try looking in the log to see if there are any errors.
No errors.
M Check your global.cfg for multiple test entries named BLACKIP.
Only one.
M Unless something has changed, I don't believe the
Is there a good IP Blacklist that can be downloaded
everyday that is constantly updated..thanxs..I noticed that all the spam I got
today was from the same block 216.41.254.0/24
Richard FarrisEthixs
Online1.270.247. Office1.800.548.3877 Tech Support"Crossroads to
a Cleaner Internet"
on 8/9/05 10:28 AM, Richard Farris wrote:
Is there a good IP Blacklist that can be downloaded everyday that is
constantly updated..thanxs..I noticed that all the spam I got today was from
the same block 216.41.254.0/24
SBL is a good list to use.
Info on 216.41.254.0/24 -
A shameless plug, but here goes since we have quite a few Declude users
now that we're on the default IP4r test list...
Check out MXRate, at http://www.mxrate.com
We have a public DNS test that outperforms SBL/Spamcop on a consistent
basis, and can also offer our list for subscription with
What's the difference between:
pub.mxrate.net
and
pub.senderdb.net
Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 11:37:21 AM, Chris Kuske [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CK A shameless plug, but here goes since we have quite a few Declude users
CK now that we're on the default IP4r test list...
CK Check out
SenderDB was the old name. They changed last year sometime to mxrate.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chris Kuske [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IP Blacklist
Yep, we renamed SenderDB to MXRate as it is more descriptive of what the
program does.
Chris
Don Brown wrote:
What's the difference between:
pub.mxrate.net
and
pub.senderdb.net
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to
Plus SenderBase threatened to sue us :-(
Chris Kuske wrote:
Yep, we renamed SenderDB to MXRate as it is more descriptive of what
the program does.
Chris
Don Brown wrote:
What's the difference between:
pub.mxrate.net
and
pub.senderdb.net
---
This E-mail came from the
Hello,
I have a question. I have a test that when a spam message comes
through the filters and not caught, I add the whole /24 IP address range to
a file so that if a message arrives from the IP range again, it's
automatically set to a weight that gets the message forwarded to an e-mail
Anyway, I would like to add the IP addresses of hotmail, etc. so
that if a message comes through from the hotmail servers, I don't
inadvertently block it.
Can I just add a '#' before the IP address to 'rem' it out and
Declude won't block it?
That will work fine -- in that case,
Greetings All,
Is it possible to put a subnet in the ip-blacklist
so i can cover a range of ip's instead of each ip
on the subnet... this would make an extreamly huge file
and not telling how much cpu time to scan the file
each time a piece of mail came through.
Tks,
Mike :)
---
[This E-mail
Is it possible to put a subnet in the ip-blacklist
so i can cover a range of ip's instead of each ip
on the subnet... this would make an extreamly huge file
and not telling how much cpu time to scan the file
each time a piece of mail came through.
v1.46 allows for CIDR ranges to be indicated in
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IP Blacklist
Is the IP Blacklist intended to be one ip per line or can we specify a
range or a C block, for intance?
It currently works by looking for a partial match. That means that if you
were to enter 192.168.212., it would blacklist
Is the IP Blacklist intended to be one ip per line or can we specify a
range or a C block, for intance?
Thanks,
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55 (972) 788-2364 Fax: (972)
Is the IP Blacklist intended to be one ip per line or can we specify a
range or a C block, for intance?
It currently works by looking for a partial match. That means that if you
were to enter 192.168.212., it would blacklist the entire Class C range
of 192.168.212.0 through 192.168.212.255.
21 matches
Mail list logo
