PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:49 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Windows 2000 Performance Monitor
I've never bothered to run monitoring before, but I need to do so now so
that I can make more informed decisions. Does anyone have a good
config/setup
:49 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Windows 2000 Performance Monitor
I've never bothered to run monitoring before, but I need to do so now so
that I can make more informed decisions. Does anyone have a good
config/setup that they want to share which is most effective at tracking
usage primarily
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Windows 2000 Performance Monitor
Darin and Darrell,
Thanks to both of you for the pointers. Certainly that saved me some time.
I did manage to capture all of the process information by selecting all
Message -
From: "Matt" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Windows 2000 Performance Monitor
Darin and Darrell,
Thanks to both of you for the pointers. Certainly that saved me some time.
I did manage to c
At 05:18 PM 3/18/2004, you wrote:
Regarding your suggestion about a RAMDISK, Pete is actually working on a
persistent instance of Sniffer with all sorts of fancy words to describe
how it works :) My
Matt,
I'm pretty happy with the beta - so far no glitches or gotchas on my test
server nor
Pete,
I've definitely been reading up on the other list and all looks great so
far. I can't leave my server logged into, so I'm going to sit back for
a little bit longer until you get the service stub thing going
(recommendations, et. al)
It also appears that defeating Sniffer with a weight
I've never bothered to run monitoring before, but I need to do so now so
that I can make more informed decisions. Does anyone have a good
config/setup that they want to share which is most effective at tracking
usage primarily related to an IMail/Declude/Sniffer setup? Should I be
storing
Matt,
I monitor a bunch of counters (memory, cpu, process, disk, network, etc) on
our servers. I roll the perf logs on a daily basis. The hard thing in
tracking this stuff is that when you add process counters there is no way to
track all of the individual processes for
