[Declude.JunkMail] PERCENT test confusion

2005-04-20 Thread Will
I'm trying to understand why my mail server is sending so many messages to the quarantine folders instead of just marking the headers. In fact, the vast majority of my SPAM is going to the spool/spam folder since updating all the declude rules. The only test I have set to HOLD is the PERCENT

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PERCENT test confusion

2005-04-20 Thread David Barker
, April 20, 2005 9:22 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] PERCENT test confusion I'm trying to understand why my mail server is sending so many messages to the quarantine folders instead of just marking the headers. In fact, the vast majority of my SPAM is going

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PERCENT test confusion

2005-04-20 Thread Will
, 2005 8:29 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PERCENT test confusion Will, Just to make sure, your Imail is passing on mail to another server and therefore acting as a gateway that is why you are using OUTBOUND actions correct? David B www.declude.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PERCENT test

2003-01-27 Thread Markus Gufler
Ok, thank you Sanford and Terry for the information. How can I test relaying trough my servers using the %piggyback address? [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be the correct format. This will not work. What can Scott mean by writing IMail does normally check for this, but there is a report of it not

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PERCENT test

2003-01-27 Thread Smart Business Lists
Markus, Monday, January 27, 2003 you wrote: MG How can I test relaying trough my servers using the %piggyback address? MG [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be the correct format. MG This will not work. You have 2 mail servers, example.com, which is an IMAIL server, and example.net. Example.net

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PERCENT test

2003-01-27 Thread Markus Gufler
the messages a percent hack can use our server to relay. Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smart Business Lists Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:12 PM To: Markus Gufler Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PERCENT test Markus

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PERCENT test

2003-01-27 Thread Smart Business Lists
Monday, January 27, 2003 you wrote: MG If I understand right a problem can ocur if one of our clients MG mailservers (most of them exchange servers) become a open relay because MG the admin has changed something. If this server has set our Imail-Server MG as smarthost and uses SMTP-Auth to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PERCENT test

2003-01-27 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Markus, the crux of the issue for you is whether or not you allow relaying for your client servers. If you do, then the percent hack is a legitimate method for their server to request the relay from your server. The IMail security regarding the percent hack is not to *prevent* the percent hack,

[Declude.JunkMail] PERCENT test

2003-01-26 Thread Markus Gufler
Hi Scott, I've seen that in the last 16 days only 26 messages has triggered the PERCENT test on our server. All of them triggered also the REVDNS test. (because the % make's impossible to resolve the domain?) From this 26 there was only 6 that triggered another test (SPAMCHK) From this 6

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PERCENT test

2003-01-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
The question: Why PERCENT should be a sign for spam that recieve 50% of the hold action in your default config file? Have I missed something? It would be very rare that a sender HAS to use source-routing such as the % method, so the assumption is that anyone doing so is either

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PERCENT test

2003-01-26 Thread Smart Business Lists
Markus, Sunday, January 26, 2003 you wrote: MG Why PERCENT should be a sign for spam that recieve 50% of MG the hold action in your default config file? MG Have I missed something? The PERCENT test was never to catch spam as I recall. IMAIL, and other mail servers for that matter, can be