RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop, OSSRC, and OSSOFT Tests

2002-11-13 Thread Ron Harris
To: Ron Harris Subject:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop, OSSRC, and OSSOFT Tests Ron, Tuesday, November 12, 2002 you wrote: RH I currently Hold a lot of e-mail failing a lot of the open relay tests. The only two tests I hold directly are ORDB and SNIFFER. ORDB is about 99% for me

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop, OSSRC, and OSSOFT Tests

2002-11-12 Thread John Tolmachoff
I currently give a weight of 16 to SpamCop, forcing the message to either fail 2 minor tests or one other major test. (Subject modification 15-19, hold at 20.) Here is what Declude has to say about OSSRC: Osirusoft's Confirmed Spam Source list. These are sites that continually spam and have been

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop, OSSRC, and OSSOFT Tests

2002-11-12 Thread Smart Business Lists
Ron, Tuesday, November 12, 2002 you wrote: RH I currently Hold a lot of e-mail failing a lot of the open relay tests. The only two tests I hold directly are ORDB and SNIFFER. ORDB is about 99% for me and SNIFFER is less but still very high. Mainly SNIFFER fails on lists and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop, OSSRC, and OSSOFT Tests

2002-11-12 Thread John Tolmachoff
I have given this test a weight of 2. My thinking is that although they are known to produce SPAM, they have not been shown very in-effective in Scott's monthly log. Darn keyboard virus. Let me try that again. ...they have not been shown to be very effective in... John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT