Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test order and whitelist

2003-06-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
I found archived messages about the order in which tests are run, but nothing which directly applies to something I noticed in our logs. Whitelisting works, but many messages are getting tests run on them before the whitelist. Seems like a waste of CPU. Is there a way to make Declude skip all

[Declude.JunkMail] Test order and whitelist

2003-06-26 Thread Keith Purtell
I found archived messages about the order in which tests are run, but nothing which directly applies to something I noticed in our logs. Whitelisting works, but many messages are getting tests run on them before the whitelist. Seems like a waste of CPU. Is there a way to make Declude skip all

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test order and whitelist

2003-06-26 Thread Mark Brody
] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test order and whitelist I found archived messages about the order in which tests are run, but nothing which directly applies to something I noticed in our logs. Whitelisting works

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test order and whitelist

2003-06-26 Thread Jerod Bennett
: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test order and whitelist You know, this brings up another point. We use a weighting method and consider all 20 weights to be spam. Once that weight is reached, it would make sense to stop testing to save proc time

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test order and whitelist

2003-06-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
You know, this brings up another point. We use a weighting method and consider all 20 weights to be spam. Once that weight is reached, it would make sense to stop testing to save proc time. Just food for thought. That's one we've given some thought to. The catch, though, is negative weights --