You know, this brings up another point. We use a weighting method and consider all >20 weights to be spam. Once that weight is reached, it would make sense to stop testing to save proc time. Just food for thought.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test order and whitelist >I found archived messages about the order in which tests are run, but >nothing which directly applies >to something I noticed in our logs. Whitelisting works, but many messages >are getting tests run on >them before the whitelist. Seems like a waste of CPU. Is there a way to >make Declude skip all tests >on a whitelisted address? Here are edited sample log entries ... What you want is the "PREWHITELIST ON" option of the latst beta version. That will automatically bypass scanning of E-mail that gets whitelisted for certain reasons (not all, though). -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers. Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection. Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
